Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Traditional Catholic Teaching & Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court  (Read 2208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cera

Re: Traditional Catholic Teaching & Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2020, 01:19:03 PM »
Quote from: SeanJohnson on September 27, 2020, 12:13:57 PM
It’s a shame that Trump never considered for even a moment the possibility of appointing a man.

This reveals a certain weakness and lack of courage:

He feels himself bound by feminist pressure to appoint a woman.

I could only imagine a hiring manager in any other context declaring that only men will be considered for an opening.
That's one way of looking at it. On the other hand, it could be that Trump is playing the other side into once again exposing their stupidity and hatefulness.
I seriously doubt that any feminists will be happy with a brilliant pro-life Catholic mother of 7 children.
Logged

Offline Cera

Re: Traditional Catholic Teaching & Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2020, 01:22:08 PM »
Logged

Offline Incredulous

Re: Traditional Catholic Teaching & Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2020, 02:20:21 PM »
Quote from: josefamenendez on September 25, 2020, 02:43:00 PM


She is apparently a Charismatic NO Catholic and belongs to a charismatic group, "People of Praise". Yikes.




                                         People of Praise

                                   Reminiscent of MC Hammer's old song "Pray"




                                         
Logged

Offline ByzCat3000

Re: Traditional Catholic Teaching & Amy Barrett on the Supreme Court
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2020, 01:05:14 PM »
Quote from: Clemens Maria on September 24, 2020, 09:33:26 AM
Maybe BC3000 is referring to the larger social context in our country and the world?  He would be right that to start objecting to her on the basis of her being female would be political death.  It is what it is.
Essentially, yes.  I agree with Ladislaus that in a Catholic society, an anti abortion male would be chosen, period.  But I'm not going to object to Barrett given the sort of society we live in,  Nor am I going to hold Trump, a liberal leaning Presbyterian, to Catholic principles.

The only thing I could think of is that a female justice even violates natural law, but Im not certain of this, and even if so, there are bigger fish to fry, so to speak.

So I agree idealistically but I realize the game that's being played.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
« previous next »