The Trump Impeachment: A Clash Between America’s Competing Elites? January 27, 2020/
16 Comments/in
Featured Articles /by
Kevin MacDonald
Is the Trump impeachment a Jєωιѕн coup? It’s a dangerous question even to ask. The Christian news outlet
TruNews was labeled an anti-Semitic conspiracy-theory website and banned by a
Jєωιѕн-dominated company—
YouTube—for saying so. [
2 Jєωιѕн Congress members want White House to shun news outlet that called Trump impeachment effort ‘Jєω Coup’, Jєωιѕн Telegraphic Agency, December 10, 2019] (Subsequently,
TruNews has been
deplatformed by PayPal for asserting that
Jeffrey Epstein was running a Mossad honeypot operation
designed to
blackmail leading
U.S. political figures).
But undeniably, Jєωs have taken very prominent, very public roles in impeachment. Most prominent are the two congressmen who conducted the House hearings:
Adam Schiff, Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and
Jerry Nadler, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. Both Schiff and Nadler were named as prosecutors in the Senate trial, with Schiff designated as lead prosecutor.
Both of the Democrats’ counsels at the House hearings were Jєωs:
Norm Eisen for the Judiciary Committee and
Daniel Goldman for the
Intelligence Committee. Several of the most prominent witnesses called by the Democrats were also Jєωs, including
Alexander Vindman and
Gordon Sondland.Strikingly, all three of the
legal scholars called by Nadler’s committee—
Noah Feldman of Harvard,
Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina, and
Pamela Karlan of Stanford University—were Jєωs, with a strong Jєωιѕн identity. [
The Tell: Three of the impeachment witness lawyers were Jєωιѕн, and it matters, By Ron Kampeas, Jєωιѕн Telegraphic Agency, December 6, 2019]
Gerhardt is a Fellow at the Katz Center for Advanced Jєωιѕн Studies, University of Pennsylvania and has given several lectures on Judaism the law (e.g.,
“Jєωιѕн Lives and the American Constitution: Selected Stories,” Bar Ilan University Law School). Karlan is a
self-described example of
“snarky, bisɛҳuąƖ, Jєωιѕн women,” and
Feldman is Director of the
Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jєωιѕн and Israeli Law at Harvard.
In effect, impeachment is a project of the numerically-dominant
Jєωιѕн Democrat-voting Left, with the Jєωιѕн counsels for the Democrats questioning Jєωιѕн witnesses in House committees headed by Jєωιѕн representatives, and covered with breathless enthusiasm by Jєωιѕн-owned media outlets like
MSNBC, CNN, and
The New York Times.The only surprise: that the Jєωιѕн role has been so public. In times past, Jєωs in
many walks of life used
WASP-sounding names to lessen
public perceptions of their Jєωιѕнness, and non-Jєωs were often
recruited to serve as
window dressing in what were in fact Jєωιѕн-dominated movements, most notably the
radical Left in
pre-1960s America.I believe this new blatant approach is a marker of Jєωιѕн power in 2020 America: Jєωs now feel confident enough that they can safely participate in such displays, knowing that their role will never be noted in public debate.
Indeed, it’s quite possible that the average white American watching the hearings genuinely sees the Jєωιѕн principals as nothing more than garden-variety white folks—they often seem to have
no “Jєωdar” at all.
This is no accident, since the
percentage of Americans who think “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jєωs,” in 2008 was 22%, compared to ~50% in 1964—despite Jєωιѕн dominance remaining obvious to anyone who bothers to seriously inquire. Being afraid to notice ethnic realities, or having been brainwashed into not noticing them, are major factors in the power of what has to be described as America’s new, Jєωιѕн-dominated, elite.
Donald Trump ran on a platform guaranteed to arouse the hatred of this elite. His immigration-related proposals and
comments (e.g., “
Paris is
no longer Paris,” “When
Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best”) and his advocacy of a non-interventionist foreign policy were red flags to an Establishment bent on massive immigration and endless wars in the Middle East to protect Israel. His victory was a hostile takeover of the Presidency, opposed by the entire spectrum of elite political opinion, from the far Left to the
neoconservative “Right,” and including
Conservatism, Inc. cheap-labor lobbyists like
Paul Ryan.Trump’s platform was populist to the core—it was essentially an end-run around elite opinion. And American Jєωιѕн intellectuals have long shown their hostility toward populism, as I noted
in Chapter 5 of my The Culture of Critique.
But the Trump phenomenon went beyond its rational content, It was an
implicitly White revolt, motivated by fears about what being a white minority in a majority black and brown America would mean for the future—
entirely reasonable concerns.
However, Trump’s implicit white appeal worked both ways—it inspired both support and also opposition, above all among Jєωs.
In interesting contrast to their fellow Americans of similar socioeconomic status, some 70–80 percent of U.S. Jєωs vote Democrat. But even so their visceral animosity toward Trump during the 2016 campaign was extraordinary (see my VDARE.com five-part series titled “
Jєωιѕн Fear and Loathing of Donald Trump”).
So it’s no surprise that Trump’s actual election was greeted with quite unprecedented anguish and frustration. The
Washington Post headlined
The Campaign to Impeach President Trump Has Begun the day of Trump’s inauguration. [By Matea Gold, January 17, 2017] (But in fact—incredibly—it dates back to
even before his nomination).
I believe the present political crisis should be seen as a struggle between our new, Jєωιѕн-dominated elite, stemming from the 1880–1920 First Great Wave of immigration, and the traditional white Christian majority of America, significantly derived from pre-Revolutionary colonial stock but augmented by subsequent white Christian immigration. This new elite, while influential prior to World War II, had increasing influence throughout the 1950s—typically seen as a rather placid decade of peace and prosperity, but in reality, a decade of intense
Kulturkampf roiling just below the surface but bursting out periodically, most spectacularly with the controversies surrounding Sen.
Joseph McCarthy.
The nascent elite
defeated Sen. McCarthy, despite subsequent
evidence that he was
. Of course, it is simply a fact that the individuals caught up in the McCarthy accusations were [url=https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/11/22/joe-mccarthy-and-the-Jєωs/]disproportionately Jєωιѕн. McCarthy’s crusade may be regarded as the last gasp of traditional America. So the possible resurrection of traditional America under a populist President Trump was seen by our new elite as a catastrophe.
The new elite really came to power in the
Counter-Culture Revolution of the
1960s, the decade that saw the
enactment of the
1965 Immigration Act, opening up immigration to all the peoples of the world, and the
Civil Rights Movement, which has now morphed into what amounts to
anti-white identity politics.
I was
on the Left during the 1960s. I’ve often said that if someone had asked me what America would look like in 50 years, I would have said it would be fairer, but I would not have envisioned the demographic transformation. Nor would I have anticipated the mushrooming of anti-white hate that has emerged in the
elite media and
academic world (see my
for a summary, pp. 446–448).
I have
docuмented that this new elite is fundamentally Jєωιѕн, in the sense Jєωs have constituted its indispensable core. It has promoted attitudes on immigration, multiculturalism, foreign policy affecting Israel, and non-white and gender-based identity politics that have now reached unchallengeable consensus among elites in the U.S. and throughout the West. But they were prevalent in the mainstream Jєωιѕн community since well prior to the 1960s, contrasting strongly with the rest pre-1960s America.
For example, the organized Jєωιѕн community has promoted the interests of Israel since 1948, overcoming
opposition of the former WASP foreign-policy Establishment that had dominated the U.S. State Department.
Even more importantly, the Jєωιѕн community has been
actively involved in opposing immigration restriction since the late nineteenth century and in promoting the ideology that America is a “Proposition nation’ open to all the world’s peoples.
As Professor Otis Graham commented on the Anti-Defamation League’s getting John F. Kennedy to put his name on a pro-immigration book in 1958 ghosted by one of its operatives:
The ADL, part of a Jєωιѕн coalition whose agenda included opening wider the American gates so that increasing U.S. ethnic heterogeneity would reduce the chances of a populist mass movement embracing anti-Semitism, had made a golden alliance. A Vast Social Experiment: The Immigration Act of 1965, NPG, October 30, 2005
Thus, despite the high-flown rhetoric, increasing immigration was really all about ethnic defense—by reducing the demographic, political, and cultural power of European-Americans (see also
Chapter 7 of my
Culture of Critique), as reflected in the attitudes of Jєωιѕн leaders going back to the 1920s.
Jєωιѕн organizations are now deeply involved in punishing people who dissent on immigration and other favored issues, as indicated by the example of TruNews [
Inside the War to Take Away Our Free Speech, by Eric Striker, Unz.com, January 21, 2020] This looks like a switch, but free speech is not at all a Jєωιѕн value,
quite absent from traditional Jєωιѕн communities. And in the contemporary world, Jєωιѕн organizations, such as the ADL, and organizations with prominent Jєωιѕн funding and staff, such as the
SPLC, have uniformly
supported “Hate Crime” legislation throughout the West. Jєωιѕн groups in Europe have long
advocated criminal penalties for “hate speech” and criticism of Israel, and they have succeeded in getting them enacted in the UK, Germany, France, and elsewhere.
In the U.S., these organizations have taken a lead role in getting dissidents de-platformed from social media and financial institutions, forming partnerships with
Facebook, Google, Twitter and Microsoft to combat “cyberhate,” including
pressuring You Tube to remove accounts associated with the Alt Right. They have also been prominently involved in doxing dissidents, often
resulting in loss of livelihood. Just recently, ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt
testified in Congress that the social media companies were not doing enough to combat “hate speech,” and asked that Congress step in to rectify the problem—a clear violation of the First Amendment.
Jєωιѕн lobbyists even persuaded President Trump (who contrary to their fears seems to have a policy of appeasement, for example by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital) to sign an executive order that effectively penalizes speech critical of Israel at universities. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education commented that
While the order is couched in language intended to paper over the readily evident threat to expressive rights, its ambiguous directive and fundamental reliance on the [International h0Ɩ0cαųst Remembrance Alliance] definition of anti-Semitism and its examples will cause institutions to investigate and censor protected speech on their campuses. … [C]olleges and universities will rush to punish student and faculty speakers in an attempt to avoid federal investigation and enforcement.
UPDATED: FIRE statement regarding executive order on campus anti-Semitism, December 10, 2019
Of course, university administrators are highly experienced in suppressing free speech even from mainstream conservatives, having acquiesced repeatedly to hecklers’ vetoes and physical harassment by campus leftists.
In fact, Trump’s EO includes language that might be construed as targeting an article such as this one, because it might be said to contain “stereotypical allegations about Jєωs as such or the power of Jєωs as a collective — such as, especially but not exclusively … Jєωs controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions” as
set forth in the IHRA definition.
As always, truth would not be a defense.
This new elite saw itself on the verge of complete victory in 2016. If Hillary had won, it would have been business as usual on all fronts, from foreign policy in the Middle East and toward Russia, to an immigration surge (as attempted during the Obama presidency), Amnesty for illegals, removing penalties for illegal entry and promoting multiculturalism, to knock out the white majority.
There would have been increased pressure for European-style legislation penalizing speech related to immigration and diversity, which would have been upheld by a Supreme Court refashioned with more justices like Elena Kagan, who has already
signaled willingness to rein in the First Amendment on speech related to diversity issues.
As Angelo Codevilla has written (without acknowledging the Jєωιѕн dimension):
Were any Democrat to win [in 2020], we can be certain that the demands on us [Deplorables] would escalate, and the government’s choke hold on education, speech, religion, medicine, law, and all manner of administration would tighten further.
A Deplorable Strategy Beyond 2020, American Greatness, December 2, 2019
To be sure, Trump’s election has not resulted in his promised policies being enacted. Middle Eastern wars continue, reflecting the priorities of major Jєωιѕн donors
Sheldon Adelson,
Bernard Marcus, and
Paul Singer who have collectively
contributed north of $250M to Trump re-election. On immigration, there
have been some
improvements at the
southern border and on
enforcement, but promises to end Birthright Citizenship via executive order (of course it will be litigated, but so what?) and lower legal immigration (which should have been attempted when the GOP had control of both houses of Congress) have not been fulfilled. The U.S. is still on schedule to have a white minority in the near future.
So, given Trump’s lack of success in effecting fundamental change, why Schiff et al. expending so much energy in an impeachment scenario that has, by all accounts, no chance of actually removing Trump?
Because they can’t help themselves. I suggest that that the “visceral animosity” that I noted above is motivated by the parallels between Trump’s white working-class base and working-class support for National Socialism in 1930s Germany. This phenomenon was traumatic for Jєωιѕн intellectuals, who at the time were deeply immersed in classical class-struggle Marxism. It was of critical importance in motivating the shift pioneered by Frankfurt School toward conceptualizing Jєωιѕн interests in terms of race—that the real problem Jєωs faced was white ethnocentrism, the latter solvable only by propaganda efforts aimed at vilifying white racial identity (which soon became mainstream in the
) and by importing non-whites in order to diminish white political power.
And, as always, this Jєωιѕн effort to nip Trump-style populism in the bud has been carried out with the great psychological intensity that is a general trait of Jєωιѕн activism. My observation is that among Jєωs there is a critical mass that is intensely committed to Jєωιѕн causes—a sort of 24/7, “pull out all the stops” commitment that produces instant, massive responses on Jєωιѕн issues. Jєωιѕн activism has a relentless, never-say-die quality. This intensity goes hand in hand with the “slippery slope” style of arguing: even the most trivial manifestation of anti-Jєωιѕн attitudes or behavior is seen as inevitably leading to mass murder of Jєωs if allowed to continue. (I discuss this at greater length [url=https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v3n2/TOQv3n2MacDonald.pdf]in Understanding Jєωιѕн Influence I: Background Traits For Jєωιѕн Activism, The Occidental Quarterly, Summer 2003,
pp 24-26.)
As Peter Novick
described this attitude in
There is no such thing as overreaction to an anti-Semitic incident, no such thing as exaggerating the omnipresent danger. Anyone who scoffed at the idea that there were dangerous portents in American society hadn’t learned ‘the lesson of the h0Ɩ0cαųst.’
In the case of impeachment, this psychological intensity is motivated by the fear that Trump could be reelected and be in a much better position to effect fundamental change. Indeed, Adam Schiff made exactly that point during his remarks during the Senate trial. [
Schiff Tells Senators They Must Not Allow Trump to Run for Re-Election , CNSNEWS, January 24, 2020]
So is this a Jєωιѕн coup? Of course, such a claim needs qualification. The Democratic Party may have “
tipped” demographically, but it still contains plenty of white gentiles. And there are Jєωs who are vigorously defending Trump, such as
Jay Sekulow, who is on Trump’s personal legal team, and
Stephen Miller, who remains a shining star in the administration’s efforts on immigration. Plus there are Jєωιѕн Trump donors noted above, although their driving interest in creating bipartisan support for Israel is typically combined with moving the GOP to the left on social issues, including immigration.
But yes, it is a Jєωιѕн coup. Indeed, the entire post-1965 regime should be regarded as a
Jєωιѕн coup motivated by fear and loathing of the people and culture of pre-1965 white America.
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmailPrintFriendlyShareShare this entry
16 replies
says:
January 27, 2020 at 9:36 pm
Very lucid and accurate analysis by Professor McDonald – as always.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 2:09 am
I had an aunt who testified in the proceedings against Alger Hiss. Years later, while attending public schools, I was taught about “the evils of McCarthyism,” and at one point asked my aunt if Senator McCarthy was delusional or correct in his beliefs. Her response was revealing: “I don’t know about other federal agencies,” she said, “but the State Department was loaded with Commies.”
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 2:48 am
As a mere transatlantic observer, I thought the enthusiasm shown by thoughtful US patriots for Trump somewhat excessive and premature. His personal flaws were obvious and have been uncorrected. Still, he stirred things up. An empty head and an impulsive character – who would jump in to fill the gap with ideas and actions? Step forward the Likud Lobby. And good old Alan “Jєωs Must Never Be Afraid to Use Their Well-Earned Power” Dershowitz (Gatestone Institute, March 27, 2019). Watch that space!
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 4:18 am
“…Stephen Miller, who remains a shining star in the administration’s efforts on immigration.”
Are you sure about that? Ann Coulter maintains that his role is actually the opposite.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 4:57 am
A perfect opportunity to apply CoC analysis. This article stood out above all others of the week and perhaps the year. How could anyone not notice the ethnic component of the ludicrous impeachment? I’m also glad this article appeared at VDARE before a fairly wide, immigration-patriot audience. Another good sign is that a Christian broadcast (TruNews) boldly went where few have gone. It’s time for Christians to catch on to what’s happening. Let’s hope the word is getting out.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 5:12 am
It’s a FAKE “clash between competing elites.”
It’s all Jєωs. Just as you listed many Jєωs on the Demo side, you can list just as many Jєωs on the Repub/Trump side, but you didn’t.
Jєω coup? LLLLOOOOONNNNNGGGG time ago.
A REAL impeachment proceeding would be on the real and obvious High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Blatant Violations of Oath of office, First Amendment, and Second Amendment. 100% guilty. Trump, all of Congress, the Supreme Court, and judges across the country who have upheld their crimes, are guilty.
Trump’s role, having been (s)elected president as a supposedly pro-White man, is to serve as punching bag. He’s an “evil White gun-promoting racist!”
Truth: He is evil. But he’s not White, he’s a crypto-Jєω. He has already eroded gun rights. And he certainly is a racist: a Jєω against all other races.
To conclude on the subject of the article, impeachment: It’s just the Repubs turn on the pedestal. For people who don’t have such short attention spans, we remember Clinton’s turn on that pedestal. We all know how that impeachment “clash” ruined his career, caused him to be prosecuted for decades of crimes (see “Clinton Body Count” videos, and other similar mountains of evidence), caused his money-machine fake charity to dry up, caused Jєω Jeffrey Epstein to kick him off his pedo plane and pedo island, and put him on the outs with corporate high-rollers and international leaders. NOT.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 5:33 am
Excellent and interesting piece. Trump is a mystery and his true allegiance is not clear at all. This is a key question. Is he a pragmatic narcisist, a below the radar real American or Jєωιѕн shill? For the life of me I cannot tell but I still have hope for the man as a true patriot if only because the alternative is too painful to contemplate. More research needs to be done on this front.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 6:35 am
As always, everything written by Kevin MacDonald is meticulously researched and spot-on. BUT considering Donald Trump’s shameful performance and outright treason of the hopes and ideals of millions of racially aware Americans that voted for him the impeachment is irrelevant. The Jєωs have an obedient puppet in the White House that so far had done absolutely everything they asked/told him to do. (like all previous American presidents). So, why should we care?
Prof MacDonald is more than generous when he describes Trump’s nefarious actions as “lack of success in effecting fundamental change”. There was never such an intention. He proved it from almost day one.
Kevin is right when he says “because they cannot help themselves”. That is true. There is never enough power for them.
The title of this article is very misleading. There has been no clash whatsoever because there are no competing elites. There is only one elite, the one that has been ruling the US since FDR. There was never such a thing as a WASP elite just a bunch of greedy Gentile/Aryan bastards without any racial awareness that led them to accept the Jєωs aa partners and equals. The only concern of America’s old ruling class was to make money (Vanderbilt, Morgan, Rockefeller, Getty, etc.) that is why they went along so well with the Jєωs. “If you want to know the end look at the beginning”.
The USA had it coming. Prof Revilo Oliver was right.
Reply
-
says:
January 28, 2020 at 7:45 am
Trump admin is way better than the Dems would have been–but of course, it’s been a long time coming and will not result in fundamental change. This is a good example of what Trump has managed to do: https://twitter.com/vdare/status/1222177871596310528
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 8:57 am
Angelicus: “The Jєωs have an obedient puppet in the White House that so far had done absolutely everything they asked/told him to do. ”
If you owned a restaurant in New York in 1930 and the mafia made you an offer you could not refuse about providing security for your business in exchange for a weekly fee, would you pay them? – and smile while you do so pretending you do not mind – or would you declare ‘I refuse to give in to this pressure’ and give them nothing?
If you reply that you would stick to your principles and pay them nothing, then how long would you be in business for?
How long do you think Trump would last if he resisted the blackmail & threats? And they would go after his family too.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 7:14 am
Love your article and your viewer commentary but I have yet to see any proposed recommendation to combat the evil menace of attacks by Jєωs on the white Christian race by you mr Sailor,mr. Joyce or the witty and intelligent audience of people who write their options on commentary to TOO! Wish there were a well funded organizational body to combat these Paracites!
Reply
-
says:
January 28, 2020 at 8:49 am
‘Jєωdar’
and 50% going to 22% as in the article
The vast majority of the people have very sophisticated and highly-developed radar to detect when it is they can and cannot say, and what opinions the current culture allows them to have, and most are happy to go along with this arrangement. The reason it does not cause any unease is simply that most people are not wired to be bothered about truth, justice, logic etc, (whilst at the same time claiming that these are their guides).
Over the millennia, the tribes that accepted all the opinions they were given are the ones that won the battles and land, not the tribe in which all matters are discussed at length by the people before deciding on what is justice and truth.
Today our allowed opinions are provided for us by the mainstream media, more than by the leaders/politicians, but the same principle applies, and besides, today the two of them are in unison over immigration & political correctness, apart from Trump.
So for the vast majority, there is no attempt to get to the bottom of any issue, such as ‘do the Jєωs influence US politics’?
Evidence for this is provided by the way the people are able to accept all the following 1-3 below at the same time even though the application of logic tells us this is impossible. Contradictions are simply ignored. In an alternative world, one were where contradictions are not accepted with ease, and where truth and justice do matter, then very quickly an intense indignation, to say the least, would arise over the Jєωιѕн influence.
Accepted contradictory statements:
1) Aipac make on secret of the fact that they influence US politics. They say so themselves when they appeal to donors.
2) We are not allowed to say the Jєωs influence US elections, and most of us ‘believe this’is the case, but only in the sense that no thoughts are ever directed to the task of pondering on this assertion, so we ‘virtually believe this’ which is not quite the same as full belief, but going into this state of mind saves having any troubling thoughts, such as ‘this is not right’.
When the chieftan says ‘the other tribe stole our land so we need to go to war’ the people respond with ‘they certainly did!’, and the person who says ‘did they?’ finds himself turned on by the group, in the way K MacDonald’s work colleagues in academia turned on him. Only a small proportion of us can withstand this group pressure. However it is worth noting that several listened to the chief, knew it was false, and said noting. These are represented by the donkey in ‘Animal Farm’ – they know very well the Jєωs influence US politics but say nothing.
3) Russia possibly does influence US elections, albeit not via having representation in Congress and not by dontating millions of pounds to openly Russian pressure groups in the US
Clearly All the majority are interested in is ‘what am I supposed to think’ .
However, what we can also conclude is that if the media/culture was no longer controlled by the Left and the Jєωs, then suddenly the same majority would quickly change their minds when the message was changed. If this happens, the people would be swimming in the direction of self-interest, not against it as they do at present, so the journey would be much easier and swifter, and we could get a lot done to put right some wrongs.
Mainstram media accepted view on Jєωιѕн influence:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/opinion/aipac-2019.html
But this Sunday, when 18,000 members and supporters are expected to descend on Washington for the annual Aipac Policy Conference, a new wave of anti-Israel critics, including several new members of Congress, have resurrected the anti-Semitic canard that American Jєωs have too much power. And they’re blaming Aipac again.
Another relevant point is that the Jєωs are second dog in controlling the media, and the Left are top dog. This is demonstrated by the way the MSM do not take Israel’s side in the land conflict with the Palestinians. The Jєωs do not have enough influence to achieve this.
The US Christians support Israel as they see a *civilised* nation (Israel) besieged by a backward one (crazy muslims obsessed by the Crusades who love war & conflict & terrorism) and the Christian Right will naturally favour the civilised when it is civilised versus the backward/hostile. But the Christian Right do not influence the msm.
The Left, however, when they observe conflict between the civilised and the backward in Israel/Palestine, they naturally side with the backward. It is in their nature to do this. And we see that in the MSM the left wins.
This is why the ‘Alt-Right’ make a bad move when they support the Palestinian cause – they are alienating the average white person (religious or not) from their cause by siding with the uncivilised, which discredits them in the eyes of the average right wing person.
Neither could the Jєωs save Weinstein – and we have to acknowledge that he was in a position of great influence and therefore very valuable to them.
We falsely assume they have more power than they do as they have so much power when it comes to using the weapon of ‘antisemitism’ and getting us all to bow to the h0Ɩ0cαųst Industry – but this power is merely granted to them by the Left, which is happy to go along and fully support these themes as they suit the left in their aim of demonising the Right, and all white people.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 9:09 am
Having come of age during the turbulent sixties, I witnessed for myself the underhanded dealings used to push “civil-rights” on us law-abiding whites.
It was the JєωS…It’s ALWAYS the JєωS. Almost every “civil-rights worker” was a left-wing Jєω.
During the first so-called “civil-rights” movement, we used to have a saying: “Behind every Negro, there is a Jєω”. It was no secret that Jєωs were behind the “civil-rights” movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
From personal experiences, blacks were not the “non-violent” types who only wanted “equality”, but were always violent racists who demanded that “whitey” acquiesce to their “wants and needs”, quite often taking by force (stealing) what they felt should have been theirs.
Growing up in 1950s Detroit (which was still a livable city), us whites had to be wary of blacks. Black criminality was quite often ignored by “the powers that be”, the “excuses” being the “racism” and “discrimination” that blacks lived under. This was all orchestrated by the Jєω civil-rights “experts” attempting to impose a massive guilt trip on us whites. Of course,our protests against integration were drowned out by the Jєωs and the mainstream media of the time, which demonized us whites, even back then. Us whites retreated into our shells, being careful not to offend the Jєωs and their “pets”–blacks, but in the backs of our minds, we knew, even then that the whole “civil-rights” movement was a major factor in the destruction of our society.
Civil-rights policies initiated in the 1970s didn’t help, either. The imposition of “affirmative action”, forced busing of school students, and the outlawing of aptitude tests for employment assured that substandard, unqualified blacks would be pushed into the workforce. Of course, large corporations and the federal government could easily absorb the incompetence by hiring qualified whites to mentor unqualified blacks, but what about small businesses?
Even some liberal whites are seeing that this whole “civil-rights” deal is a massive scam perpetrated on us whites.
Reply
says:
January 28, 2020 at 11:24 am
Sir,
even from so far afar as Milan, it was impossible not to recognise names and faces, and ask: – Why so many Jєωs against Trump ? Even though he affirmed Jerusalem as the holy capital of their “holy” country, they’re trying to ruin him. So, why ?-.
And of course you’re right: they can’t help themselves.
As a side note: I was reading an article and its comments on Breitbart, and a reader quoted you extensively from CoC. He received many “like”. On Breitbart.
Reply
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
Learn how your comment data is processed.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/01/27/the-trump-impeachment-a-clash-between-americas-competing-elites/
Topic: The Trump Impeachment: Clash Between America's Competing Elites? (Read 140 times)