In America, around 1900, Catholic and Jєωιѕн immigrants, from Southern and Eastern Europe began flooding into a country, which had been almost exclusively the domain of Protestants from Northern Europe and a minority of protestantized blacks, from Africa.Of course you know, the immigrants from these regions you speak of were seen largely as "Papists" and an eminent threat to the South as well.
Not surprisingly, Americans were alarmed by this "Immigrant Invasion." In response, they re-formed The Ku Klux Klan to protest the invasion of their country by foreigners. These protests were largely directed against their own government, which had in fact betrayed them.
My paternal ancestors are catholic immigrants. They often said of this, that had a bunch of Protestants from Northern Europe invaded one of their Catholic countries, the resonse would have been largely the same! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
(http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f395/infiniti_i30_98/irfanview_german_edited.jpg)Germans have the coolest flag and colors of any nation hands down IMO.
Quote from: MarcelinoIn America, around 1900, Catholic and Jєωιѕн immigrants, from Southern and Eastern Europe began flooding into a country, which had been almost exclusively the domain of Protestants from Northern Europe and a minority of protestantized blacks, from Africa.Of course you know, the immigrants from these regions you speak of were seen largely as "Papists" and an eminent threat to the South as well.
Not surprisingly, Americans were alarmed by this "Immigrant Invasion." In response, they re-formed The Ku Klux Klan to protest the invasion of their country by foreigners. These protests were largely directed against their own government, which had in fact betrayed them.
My paternal ancestors are catholic immigrants. They often said of this, that had a bunch of Protestants from Northern Europe invaded one of their Catholic countries, the resonse would have been largely the same! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
Ironically in a strange twist in history I believe the Vatican actually backed the Confederacy's right to secede.
I believe if I'm correct that the Klan was a Southern Nativist movement started by Confederate veterans like Nathan Bedford Forrest as a means of protection and agression against the Northern Capetbaggers exploiting the recently defated and vulnerable South.
The Union and it's Yankee politicians and business leaders were raping Dixie big time if I was a Southerner in those times I might've joined the "Ghosts of the Confederacy" myself.
Quote from: alaricI believe if I'm correct that the Klan was a Southern Nativist movement started by Confederate veterans like Nathan Bedford Forrest as a means of protection and agression against the Northern Capetbaggers exploiting the recently defated and vulnerable South.
The Union and it's Yankee politicians and business leaders were raping Dixie big time if I was a Southerner in those times I might've joined the "Ghosts of the Confederacy" myself.
Reconstruction was a cruel thing to do to the South, since Southerners were fellow Americans and yes Reconstruction was about race.
Of course there is a native Southern distrust of Catholics that endures even to this day.
Not that I support the KKK but in recent times it seems the black agitators like to try and get the Klan riled up by mocking them. Anyway it's not like the South is any better than the North to me and I'll probably be looking for a "Yankee" girl to marry rather than a Southern one, nevermind the fact all of the 'shacking up' the white trash does these days.
The South is The Bible Belt! They have far more in common with Traditional Catholicism, than Northern Protestants. Although, more catholic immigrants settled in the north, but they weren't here in the 1860s! :roll-laugh2:
Northern Protestants alllied with Jews to defeat their common enemies: Catholics and The South.
Catholics and The South have common enemies and tend to be more conservatite/traditional, than northern protestants and jews.
Quote from: MarcelinoNorthern Protestants alllied with Jews to defeat their common enemies: Catholics and The South.
Catholics and The South have common enemies and tend to be more conservatite/traditional, than northern protestants and jews.
Southern Protestants support Israel and Jews.
So what if the South is more 'traditional' when it comes to values? If one ignores the immorality that Israel does against the Palestinians one has to question whether that is a person with morals.
If you take a drive through the South you'll see plenty of **** *****, the same as in the North.
No, but you made the comment in regards to The South, not The North and it is bologna.
As far as economics goes, that disgusting term is definitely a slander towards lower income whites, but especially Southern ones.
Your use of that term disgusts me; it is a term for our enemies to use, not our patriots.
Quote from: MarcelinoNo, but you made the comment in regards to The South, not The North and it is bologna.
As far as economics goes, that disgusting term is definitely a slander towards lower income whites, but especially Southern ones.
Your use of that term disgusts me; it is a term for our enemies to use, not our patriots.
Again working class does not equal white trash but those who 'shack up' do. And yes there is white trash in the North as well. Have you seen how men and women dress these days, both North and South? I don't understand this over-glorification of the South. Sure one should respect one's anscestors who fought for it but neither should one hold on to the ideal of the South being 'better' than the North, especially not these days. One should look at both regions having both their good and bad points.
No, you don't get it. The term is a racial slur.
Quote from: MarcelinoNo, you don't get it. The term is a racial slur.
Then it's a slur then. It's the same as calling a black a Negro or a Hispanic a mestizo however one finds in many whites these days some abhorrent behavior, just as with minorities.
Not even close.
Quote from: MarcelinoNot even close.
Uh yeah if one acts like 'white trash' one rightly deserves the name. The South went through the sɛҳuąƖ revolution and feminism just like the rest of the nation. I've lived my whole life here and being a convert to Catholicism I've been around my own Southern relatives, and trust me there is nothing praiseworthy to be said, with their fornication, adultery, divorce, feminism, praise of Israel, and among the 'baby boomer' Southern crowd they are just as liberal about race as a Northern liberal, oh and yes their love of economics, low taxes, and free trade.
Hell to them with my criticism of blacks, Jews, and women I'm the nαzι and fascist.
That being said I can also understand that the liberal counterculture was nothing to praise about either with it marching South to support civil rights for blacks.
Anyway back to the original point:
I do remember the way the old history was taught that the teachers would insist that 'Honest Abe' would have never allowed Reconstruction.
This thread wins the price for the most unusual title of any I have ever seen on this forum.
This thread wins the price for the most unusual title of any I have ever seen on this forum.
(http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/vv164/cbustamante47807/virgendeguadalupe.jpg)
Such images as the ones cited betray a tragic loss of both the sensus Catholicus and the true understanding of the grandeur of the Mother of God.
Quote from: Hobbledehoy
Such images as the ones cited betray a tragic loss of both the sensus Catholicus and the true understanding of the grandeur of the Mother of God.
Couldn't you have just added one more ignorant post so that we could have kept this thread going...?
I guess that includes you too sharp guy. :rolleyes:Quote from: SigismundThis thread wins the price for the most unusual title of any I have ever seen on this forum.
Just look at the contributors... makes sense now eh...?
(http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/vv164/cbustamante47807/virgendeguadalupe.jpg)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
(http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos22/chechin.jpg)Who is the represented of anyway? Al Queda or the Saudis?
These people seem quite proud too and tribalistic.
I think what Hobble said is more closer to the truth than you can handle, I don't believe no nations these days have the right to drape their flag around the BVM who is spiritually supposed to be Mother of us all. I understand Hispanics have this cultural and heritage thing going on with Guadelupe and long standing Catholicism but that is no longer the case these days, if anything, nations like Mexico and other Latin American ones have actually let the Lady down these days with mass defections from the Church and capitulating on issues like Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage.Quote from: Hobbledehoy
Such images as the ones cited betray a tragic loss of both the sensus Catholicus and the true understanding of the grandeur of the Mother of God.
Couldn't you have just added one more ignorant post so that we could have kept this thread going...?
Quote from: Marcelino(http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos22/chechin.jpg)Who is the represented of anyway? Al Queda or the Saudis?
These people seem quite proud too and tribalistic.
Anyway, I do give the more agressive Muslims credit for fighting against global Zionism and Western encroachment into their native lands.
The same can't be certainly said about Western "christians" these days.
Quote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
Quote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
I have never heard anyone of any race accuse people who are proud of their specific ethnic heritage of racism...
Quote from: alaricQuote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
I have never heard anyone of any race accuse people who are proud of their specific ethnic heritage of racism simply for that fact. I am proud of my Irish heritage, If I were to say I was proud of something bigger than that, I might say European. I think this is true, at least to some extent, because often white people in America know what their ethic heritage is with more precision than just European. Most American blacks don't. If they did, I think the dynamics here might be different.
Quote from: alaricQuote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
:applause:
Quote from: alaricQuote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
I have never heard anyone of any race accuse people who are proud of their specific ethnic heritage of racism simply for that fact. I am proud of my Irish heritage, If I were to say I was proud of something bigger than that, I might say European. I think this is true, at least to some extent, because often white people in America know what their ethic heritage is with more precision than just European. Most American blacks don't. If they did, I think the dynamics here might be different.
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: MarcelinoNot even close.
Uh yeah if one acts like 'white trash' one rightly deserves the name. The South went through the sɛҳuąƖ revolution and feminism just like the rest of the nation. I've lived my whole life here and being a convert to Catholicism I've been around my own Southern relatives, and trust me there is nothing praiseworthy to be said, with their fornication, adultery, divorce, feminism, praise of Israel, and among the 'baby boomer' Southern crowd they are just as liberal about race as a Northern liberal, oh and yes their love of economics, low taxes, and free trade.
Hell to them with my criticism of blacks, Jews, and women I'm the nαzι and fascist.
That being said I can also understand that the liberal counterculture was nothing to praise about either with it marching South to support civil rights for blacks.
Anyway back to the original point:
I do remember the way the old history was taught that the teachers would insist that 'Honest Abe' would have never allowed Reconstruction.
It sounds to me like you've got some resentments against your own people.
Bottom line, you live in a culture that is openly hostile towards your race and religion. You shouldn't help them.
(http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos22/chechin.jpg)
These people seem quite proud too and tribalistic.
Quote from: s2sreaQuote from: Hobbledehoy
Such images as the ones cited betray a tragic loss of both the sensus Catholicus and the true understanding of the grandeur of the Mother of God.
Couldn't you have just added one more ignorant post so that we could have kept this thread going...?
What's been posted that's ignorant?
It is my understanding that, The Ku Klux Klan was formed after the cινιℓ ωαr, in response to the policies of Radical Republicans, imposed on The South, during the era of post-war "reconstruction." Those policies were based on the idea, which at the time was quite radical, that blacks were completely equal with whites and that southern whites had committed great crimes against humanity, by their enslavement of blacks. Hence, southern whites owed a great debt to blacks, which should immediately be repaid with land, money, weapons, political control and a willingness on the part of southern whites to have their property seized, body beaten or raped and their life taken, if wanted, all in the cause of atoning for their sins against the blacks. I do not think I am exaggerating here.
President Lincoln, while a republican, was a moderate. Hence, he did not wish to punish the south, any further than he felt had been required to bring it into submission to The Union, which the cινιℓ ωαr had accomplished and General Lee had agreed to, when he surrendered. However, their were forces within Lincoln's party that did in fact want to punish the south. They were called the radical republicans and, unfortunately, they dominated reconstruction policies in the south.
In response to the terribly anti-southern-white policies of the radical republicans, during reconstruction, southern whites formed a secret political and military organization to protect whites during reconstruction. After the federal government quit pursuing radical policies in the south, it was, for the most part, disbanded.
! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
Todays "Minute Men" are in essence, yesteryear's Ku Klux Klan.
I believe if I'm correct that the Klan was a Southern Nativist movement started by Confederate veterans like Nathan Bedford Forrest as a means of protection and agression against the Northern Capetbaggers exploiting the recently defated and vulnerable South.
The Union and it's Yankee politicians and business leaders were raping Dixie big time if I was a Southerner in those times I might've joined the "Ghosts of the Confederacy" myself.
Quote from: Marcelino(http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f395/infiniti_i30_98/irfanview_german_edited.jpg)Germans have the coolest flag and colors of any nation hands down IMO.
Quote from: MarcelinoIn America, around 1900, Catholic and Jєωιѕн immigrants, from Southern and Eastern Europe began flooding into a country, which had been almost exclusively the domain of Protestants from Northern Europe and a minority of protestantized blacks, from Africa.Of course you know, the immigrants from these regions you speak of were seen largely as "Papists" and an eminent threat to the South as well.
Not surprisingly, Americans were alarmed by this "Immigrant Invasion." In response, they re-formed The Ku Klux Klan to protest the invasion of their country by foreigners. These protests were largely directed against their own government, which had in fact betrayed them.
My paternal ancestors are catholic immigrants. They often said of this, that had a bunch of Protestants from Northern Europe invaded one of their Catholic countries, the resonse would have been largely the same! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
Ironically in a strange twist in history I believe the Vatican actually backed the Confederacy's right to secede.
Quote from: alaricQuote from: MarcelinoIn America, around 1900, Catholic and Jєωιѕн immigrants, from Southern and Eastern Europe began flooding into a country, which had been almost exclusively the domain of Protestants from Northern Europe and a minority of protestantized blacks, from Africa.Of course you know, the immigrants from these regions you speak of were seen largely as "Papists" and an eminent threat to the South as well.
Not surprisingly, Americans were alarmed by this "Immigrant Invasion." In response, they re-formed The Ku Klux Klan to protest the invasion of their country by foreigners. These protests were largely directed against their own government, which had in fact betrayed them.
My paternal ancestors are catholic immigrants. They often said of this, that had a bunch of Protestants from Northern Europe invaded one of their Catholic countries, the resonse would have been largely the same! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
Ironically in a strange twist in history I believe the Vatican actually backed the Confederacy's right to secede.
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if The Vatican saw a threat in a completely unified America, dominated by a New England elite (not exactly, queen isabella, if you know what i mean)!
Of course, no one who was sane :jester: thought war was necessary to free black slaves or even that blacks were being terribly mistreated. It was the radical wing of the republican party that thought like that and it was those same kind of ideas that I think started the french revolution and its fallout, which of course, was extremely anti-papist!
And, there was all the folks who would suffer from a cινιℓ ωαr. It was the bloodiest war this country ever fought. In fact, the casualties of that war still exceed the american casualties in every other war America has ever fought.
Of course, everybody knew that industrialization was putting an end to state sponsored slavery. So, nobody needed to die in a cινιℓ ωαr, to put an end to slavery. It was already dying.
It's all about rank. They destroy the rank of the priesthood, the monarchy, then whites, natives, men, babies and of course, women. In the end, the only thing that gets any potent rank, in the modern era, is power. Hence the phrase, might makes right or as an ancient roman might have put it, caesar is truth.
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: alaricI believe if I'm correct that the Klan was a Southern Nativist movement started by Confederate veterans like Nathan Bedford Forrest as a means of protection and agression against the Northern Capetbaggers exploiting the recently defated and vulnerable South.
The Union and it's Yankee politicians and business leaders were raping Dixie big time if I was a Southerner in those times I might've joined the "Ghosts of the Confederacy" myself.
Reconstruction was a cruel thing to do to the South, since Southerners were fellow Americans and yes Reconstruction was about race.
Of course there is a native Southern distrust of Catholics that endures even to this day.
Not that I support the KKK but in recent times it seems the black agitators like to try and get the Klan riled up by mocking them. Anyway it's not like the South is any better than the North to me and I'll probably be looking for a "Yankee" girl to marry rather than a Southern one, nevermind the fact all of the 'shacking up' the white trash does these days.
The South is The Bible Belt! They have far more in common with Traditional Catholicism, than Northern Protestants. Although, more catholic immigrants settled in the north, but they weren't here in the 1860s! :roll-laugh2:
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: MarcelinoNorthern Protestants alllied with Jews to defeat their common enemies: Catholics and The South.
Catholics and The South have common enemies and tend to be more conservatite/traditional, than northern protestants and jews.
Southern Protestants support Israel and Jews.
So what if the South is more 'traditional' when it comes to values? If one ignores the immorality that Israel does against the Palestinians one has to question whether that is a person with morals.
If you take a drive through the South you'll see plenty of **** *****, the same as in the North.
No, but you made the comment in regards to The South, not The North and it is bologna.
As far as economics goes, that disgusting term is definitely a slander towards lower income whites, but especially Southern ones.
Your use of that term disgusts me; it is a term for our enemies to use, not our patriots.
This thread wins the price for the most unusual title of any I have ever seen on this forum.
Quote from: SigismundQuote from: alaricQuote from: Marcelino(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c7zyfigYdTQ/TnF3pR2socI/AAAAAAAATf0/wr_7SARjLS8/s1600/Black+Pride+Baltimore.jpg)Right but it seems when people of "color" engage in it, it's known as "pride" but when any ethnic whitey does the same it's labeled "racism".
Tribalism seems to be a universal trait.
Of course when it involves the Jews or Israel why it's known as their "right to exist".
Everyone else on the planet needs to assimilate or diversify.
I have never heard anyone of any race accuse people who are proud of their specific ethnic heritage of racism simply for that fact. I am proud of my Irish heritage, If I were to say I was proud of something bigger than that, I might say European. I think this is true, at least to some extent, because often white people in America know what their ethic heritage is with more precision than just European. Most American blacks don't. If they did, I think the dynamics here might be different.
had my Kilt one time at shop to get taken in, little black girl asked me about it, was verysweet, as was mother...no one accused me of bigotry......and yes, for some here this may be :shocked:, I spoke to them......
Quote from: SigismundThis thread wins the price for the most unusual title of any I have ever seen on this forum.
True, diverting in the "Civil" war aside, where is the part about sauce?????
Not likely smarter, why, did I say I was?
some here and this is by now a tiring issue, have constant "theyre coming to get us" response, but then you find out they live at the corner of white bread lane and Lily whiteville.....no non-whites and the fear of a black revolt is in the air....circa 1968.
Not smarter, just know there are more realistic issues to tackle then some small group of fanatics or occasional riot.....
Fear blacks? no, fear God's wrath, definately.....
Not likely smarter, why, did I say I was?
some here and this is by now a tiring issue, have constant "theyre coming to get us" response, but then you find out they live at the corner of white bread lane and Lily whiteville.....no non-whites and the fear of a black revolt is in the air....circa 1968.
Not smarter, just know there are more realistic issues to tackle then some small group of fanatics or occasional riot.....
Fear blacks? no, fear God's wrath, definately.....
Well, aren't you sooooooo much smarter than the rest of us! :sign-surrender:
One of the goals of the kkk is the removal of the citizenship of all the catholic people.
One of the goals of the kkk is the removal of the citizenship of all the catholic people.
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
it integrated many of the immigrants into American society
You mean it turned them into anti-European Americanists who abandoned their culture, defied their religious principles, and turned on their racial identity in order to become Anglo-Americans. Like JFK.
Quote from: pocheOne of the goals of the kkk is the removal of the citizenship of all the catholic people.
In America, around 1900, Catholic and Jєωιѕн immigrants, from Southern and Eastern Europe began flooding into a country, which had been almost exclusively the domain of Protestants from Northern Europe and a minority of protestantized blacks, from Africa.
Not surprisingly, Americans were alarmed by this "Immigrant Invasion." In response, they re-formed The Ku Klux Klan to protest the invasion of their country by foreigners. These protests were largely directed against their own government, which had in fact betrayed them.
My paternal ancestors are catholic immigrants. They often said of this, that had a bunch of Protestants from Northern Europe invaded one of their Catholic countries, the response would have been largely the same! So, they didn't take it as a personal insult.
Problem is, this land was NEVER meant for heretics.......it was meant to be convereted and settled by European Catholics....possibly, down the rd, for anglo and other nations Catholics as well, for a German Catholic would have flowed fine with Spainards......not wo much with Irish-americanists, hence the struggle in late 1800's.....
That melting pot thing was flawed at its start-that and the Prot/Cultics saw the New World as some pasture and new Jerusalem, rejecting Rome.....the vast empty wilderness to settle (ignoring Indians already here and the French/Spanish/Portugese, the rightful owners of the New World)
Before speaking of the supposed cruelty of the European Spaniards, you should remember that the Jew heavily infiltrated the New World, and they were the ones who dominated the slave trade.
Quote from: BellocThat melting pot thing was flawed at its start-that and the Prot/Cultics saw the New World as some pasture and new Jerusalem, rejecting Rome.....the vast empty wilderness to settle (ignoring Indians already here and the French/Spanish/Portugese, the rightful owners of the New World)
Of course I always put race above religion which is why I always feel more at home with a German Luteran than with the mestizo and Indian Catholics over the border.
Yes, it is clear that you do put race before the true religion. You also put your own poorly formed thoughts and conclusions derived from a meagre education before the teachings of the Sovereign Pontiffs, particularly Pius XI. Quote marked for the near future. Think of what you said before the next time you deny that you are an immature and pompous idolater.
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: BellocThat melting pot thing was flawed at its start-that and the Prot/Cultics saw the New World as some pasture and new Jerusalem, rejecting Rome.....the vast empty wilderness to settle (ignoring Indians already here and the French/Spanish/Portugese, the rightful owners of the New World)
The Indians were a bunch of cannibals anyway and did human sacrifice and obviously you don't know much about the cruelty of the Spanish with their greed, massacre of Indians, and slavery of blacks which continued after the Americans. Of course I always put race above religion which is why I always feel more at home with a German Luteran than with the mestizo and Indian Catholics over the border.
Before speaking of the supposed cruelty of the European Spaniards, you should remember that the Jew heavily infiltrated the New World, and they were the ones who dominated the slave trade.
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: BellocThat melting pot thing was flawed at its start-that and the Prot/Cultics saw the New World as some pasture and new Jerusalem, rejecting Rome.....the vast empty wilderness to settle (ignoring Indians already here and the French/Spanish/Portugese, the rightful owners of the New World)
The Indians were a bunch of cannibals anyway and did human sacrifice and obviously you don't know much about the cruelty of the Spanish with their greed, massacre of Indians, and slavery of blacks which continued after the Americans. Of course I always put race above religion which is why I always feel more at home with a German Luteran than with the mestizo and Indian Catholics over the border.
Before speaking of the supposed cruelty of the European Spaniards, you should remember that the Jew heavily infiltrated the New World, and they were the ones who dominated the slave trade.
Some indians were cannibals, some not......Spanish did nto masacre, but subdue and convert, the Prots on other hand, had a greedy, convert or die and wound up exterminating the indian......former Union generals called it the "final solution", sound familiar.....
YOUR comments, as usual, Trad20, are the ones thare are uneducated. Putting race above Fide is a sinful, unCatholic and condemned proposition.......so, go Luthern and piss off.....
Quote from: Traditional Guy 20Quote from: BellocThat melting pot thing was flawed at its start-that and the Prot/Cultics saw the New World as some pasture and new Jerusalem, rejecting Rome.....the vast empty wilderness to settle (ignoring Indians already here and the French/Spanish/Portugese, the rightful owners of the New World)
Of course I always put race above religion which is why I always feel more at home with a German Luteran than with the mestizo and Indian Catholics over the border.
Yes, it is clear that you do put race before the true religion. You also put your own poorly formed thoughts and conclusions derived from a meagre education before the teachings of the Sovereign Pontiffs, particularly Pius XI. Quote marked for the near future. Think of what you said before the next time you deny that you are an immature and pompous idolater.
gave ya thumbs down, anyway........like roscoe, you make no sense.......
They didn't care what the duke's religion was!
Sorry you feel such little affection for your religion, obviously, you are colored by riots, engineered by the NWO to accomplish exactly what you are saying, to divide.......what do I know, though, I only live in the south w/lots of blacks and hispanics...
But hey, make race your god instead of going aroudn the NWO and building up the faith.....a common ground...
Israel was not torn by religion, as Israel was a formal Jєωιѕн state, minorites allowed to live there.......not a comparison to freemasonic USA.
Open my eyes? yeah, sorry that criminal just degree and my time as a street cop and CSI, really living in those ivory towers......
What I propose is the faith and buidling and strengthening that, not joining the chorus fo fear mongering...
Feel free to move if you live in a war torn zone, beleive you me, I would move, right out of this country if I could......you can have it......
so, then, la Raza is supported by every hispanic? majority? do tell.....and yes, they are a threat, but like you and many others, because they place race and ethnicity above all else, so you and they and several other miscreants here at CI are JUST LIKE THEM!!!! you have become them, and soon, will resort to violence, at first, self defense, but with that attitude, soon, it will go beyond, like the IRA that eventually turned on itself and its supporters.....
your rant about Caholics killing others-and?? I hear that all the time from Prots about those "evil Catholics killing everyone"....and?
the nations is tearing apart and we are playing into hands of thsoe doing the tearing by buying into their crap and divides.......the answer is not a head in the sand, not is it to segregate and treat anyone not like us as the enemy....
very stupid ranting and it took you 4 posts
Play their game, but as noted, I would like to get out and happy for you to stay.....
QuoteThey didn't care what the duke's religion was!
No, they did hate him for being Catholic.
They were Serbs and One Muslim, maybe a Croat, I need to look it up.
Gavril Princeps the chief assassin was Judaic. Of the 6 assassins, 4 were Judaic.
If memory serves it is in A Heart for Europe by the Bogles.
When I read that, it was such a typical finding, I had no need to archive the exact source/page.
Wrong! His group was fighting for Serbian Nationalism. Serbians are Orthodox Christians. His personal belief was atheism, but so what, the cause was Serbian Nationalism and it was a broad based movement, just waiting for some event to set it off.
Quote from: MarcelinoWrong! His group was fighting for Serbian Nationalism. Serbians are Orthodox Christians. His personal belief was atheism, but so what, the cause was Serbian Nationalism and it was a broad based movement, just waiting for some event to set it off.
I seem awfully defensive, and it causes me to say stupid and false things.
I have a digital copy of the whole trial transcript, where it's stated quite clearly (by the assassins themselves) that they had a strong aversion to the Archduke for being Catholic.
First of all, they supported the idea of a unification of South Slavs. Not just Serbian Nationalism. Serbia was to be the "South Slav Piedmont"
Princip doesn't seem to have any Jєωιѕн blood, but his personal effects are kept in an old ѕуηαgσgυє building in Sarajevo. Strange.
The Day of The Race is celebrated today in Mexico.
It is the South and Central American version of Columbus Day. Started as an official holiday in Mexico around 1924.
The National Council of La Raza is funded by people like Bill and Melinda Gates, The Ford Foundation, Citigroup and Walmart :roll-laugh1: