Author Topic: The Democrats never-ending meltdown (Read 706 times)

MaterDominici · « **on:** November 02, 2018, 07:46:11 AM »

Tammy Bruce: The Democrats' never-ending meltdown

Just when you think you’ve seen the ultimate meltdown of the Democratic Party, there’s always more.
The hearing for Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh was an utter debacle for the Democrats. But it also provided an opportunity for reassessing their view of the world and attitude about the American people. They clearly chose not to do so and are now doubling down on hate.
The obviously new narrative from the Democratic Party and their enablers is the insane insistence that President Donald Trump is responsible for the horrible Pittsburgh ѕуηαgσgυє massacre and is a dangerous and horrific artifact of desperate people who seek to use every human crisis as a political opportunity.
Trump is a politician and has terrific people surrounding him. He has shown us for over two years now that he can handle the slings and arrows of the dying establishment machine. But the more troubling and sinister messaging has emerged against voters who chose freely in 2016 to not support the status quo.
In the aftermath of the ѕуηαgσgυє massacre, two people fanatically opposed to the president have gone on national television and compared the president and his voters, in one case, to the Islamic State terrorist group (also known as ISIS) and, in the other, claimed the president and his supporters of having “blood on their hands.”
On Monday at CNN, just two days after the ѕуηαgσgυє horror, GQ columnist Julia Ioffe made headlines. During a debate segment she said, “I think this president, one of the things that he really launched his presidential run on is talking about Islamic radicalization. And this president has radicalized so many more people than ISIS ever did.”
David Urban, a Trump supporter and another guest on the panel, confronted her on-air for the remark. After Jake Tapper declined to push back on the claim, Ms. Ioffe doubled-down on comparing supporters of the president to the blood-thirsty terrorists, “ISIS had like 10,000 members. I think the president has far more supporters who espouse an equally hateful ideology,” Ioffe retorted.
In the aftermath, outrage at the remark grew, and Ms. Ioffe apologized in the non-apology sort of way by explaining it was “hyperbole” fueled by the “emotional and painful time.”
Newsflash for Ioffe: That massacre was and is emotional and painful for all of us. This was not a poor choice of words, a mistake we all can make. This was an accusation, which she reinforced even after being confronted about it in real time.
Also within two days of the mass murder, Steve Schmidt, chairman of the John McCain 2008 campaign and hater of Mr. Trump, went on MSNBC to discuss the massacre, and instead used the horror to unleash a screed against those whom he despises. He declared the president and others “had blood on their hands.” Without any pushback from host Chris Hayes, he said Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway and “the vile president that she serves, abetted by Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh and Breitbart and NewBusters and Judicial Watch and all the rest of them, have blood on their hands. For the incitements that they have made that have triggered and radicalized these crazy people. It is deliberate …”
This frenzy to cast fellow Americans as dangerous terrorists because you disagree with them politically is beyond any normal or acceptable political discourse. It’s one thing to target the direct political opponent with rhetoric that is unseemly. But here we have the failing establishment, both Democrats and in some cases Republicans, choosing to malign the actual voters in the week leading up to an election.
Hillary Clinton’s declaration that the president’s supporters were “deplorable” and “not American” was the moment the losers in 2016 decided a scorched earth campaign punishing those who did not comply would be their new strategy.
It is now apparent Rep. Maxine Waters of California was not a rogue congresswoman calling for the harassment of Republicans; she was simply carrying forward the official Democratic torch.
What would possess the Democrats to think that attacking the American people would be their salvation? We may have received a clue as to their expectations when Clinton said that the instability would stop when they regained the House of Representatives.
In 2016, the American public saw through the attempts to gaslight them into believing things that aren’t true. One of those false assertions is how the Democratic Party cares about the American people and are champions on the issues we care about.
Their latest accusations, attitude and lack of any coherent position on policy for this country, proves not just the chaotic incompetence now destroying that side of the aisle, but makes clear their actual malevolence toward the citizen. After all, we are the ones who fired them, and we are the ones they are determined to punish.
When the midterm comes along the Democrats are going to find that we are not ISIS, or nαzιs, or racists, or terrorists. We are Americans. We are moms and dads, brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, husbands and wives, and best friends. We are voters and families who look to the future and want it to be the best it can be. Next week, we must trust and urge the American people to not reward those who condemn people for rejecting the status quo, and deciding to stand for freedom, fairness and a renewed American future.

Caraffa · « **Reply #1 on:** November 03, 2018, 07:44:44 AM »

And yet, at least where it matters, they're likely to win come Tuesday. Disaster is about to strike for Republicans & Trump if things don't change quickly.

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #2 on:** November 03, 2018, 08:25:57 AM »

Well, yes. The incuмbent party typically loses seats in the midterms - that's how it has been for a long time with two exceptions. Democrats will probably win the House, and Republicans the Senate. One chamber has all seats up for reelection and the other only has a handful.

I'm not informed enough to speak on any governor or AG races other than in my own state, but Minnesota is heading towards a Democrat governor and a Republican AG if the polls are an indicator.

Caraffa · « **Reply #3 on:** November 03, 2018, 11:10:56 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning on November 03, 2018, 08:25:57 AM

Well, yes. The incuмbent party typically loses seats in the midterms - that's how it has been for a long time with two exceptions. Democrats will probably win the House, and Republicans the Senate. One chamber has all seats up for reelection and the other only has a handful.

I'm not informed enough to speak on any governor or AG races other than in my own state, but Minnesota is heading towards a Democrat governor and a Republican AG if the polls are an indicator.

Not in this environment, it is no longer business as usual. They win, it's a black pill.

First, as mentioned in another thread, the reason why the out-party has often made gains is due to either war and/or recession, so this election should fit the "exception" pattern. Second, the Democrats aren't running on anything other than their own TDS and doubling down on what they ran on in 2016. Should they take the house, the 2016 election is essentially nullified; expect non-stop investigations of Trump as well as Kavanaugh. Third, it will normalize their behavior and attacks as they will see their actions as having worked. More Trump supporters and even generic GOPers will be assaulted. Lastly, it would an be undeniable sign that progressive managerialists and the globohomo corps are not only winning, they're on the verge of triumph.

When it comes to gubernatorial races, Republicans can not lose Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and especially Florida and think Trump is going to win in 2020. The general thought on Florida is that if DeSantis loses, Florida is likely lost. They've also made no headway in Pennsylvania (they don't have to win there as trying to beat an incuмbent is difficult) to tack on another bad sign for 2020 as well as redistricting come 2021.

Nishant Xavier · « **Reply #4 on:** November 03, 2018, 11:33:20 PM »

I believe Republicans will win big on Tuesday - especially in the Senate, and retain a comfortable overall majority in the Senate as well. Voter satisfaction with economic, foreign and immigration policy of the Trump administration is quite high, pro-life, social conservatives and those to whom supreme court and federal judges are important are all energized. Turnout is key. Prayer wins victory. Let us pray.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #5 on:** November 04, 2018, 04:34:51 AM »

.
Hillary's admiration for Margaret Sanger is common knowledge.
.

https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1676.html

.

http://www.visionandvalues.org/2011/04/on-margaret-sanger-the-soviets-and-democrats/

.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #6 on:** November 05, 2018, 02:42:21 AM »

.
I heard on the news this past evening a band teacher at a (high school?) has been forced to remove his/her "Make America Great Again" poster in the classroom after parents of students complained, the administration citing a violation of school policy not to bring politics into the curriculum.
.
So if it had been some libtard slogan, would there have been the same reaction?

Author Topic: The Democrats never-ending meltdown (Read 706 times)

MaterDominici

The Democrats never-ending meltdown

Caraffa

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown

JezusDeKoning

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown

Caraffa

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown

Nishant Xavier

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown

Neil Obstat

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown

Neil Obstat

Re: The Democrats never-ending meltdown