I watched 6 minutes of this crap and couldn’t take it anymore. Anyone to take this tripe seriously needs their head examined. Has anyone on here been to a wake and seen a dead body? Three Donald Trump doubles! Dude, you need to stop posting this crap!

It does seem that you and maybe only a couple others on this forum are the only ones saying “we landed on the moon because VIDEO man”

Many others here are questioning the ʝʊdɛօ media as well. This must be an age thing, there was one guy on here who admitted to being older but saw through some media fluff.

This goes for the real world as well there are many I have talked to who think this is a hoax, but just like the COVID scam there will always be those that don’t want to see the scam.

You’re right.

Candace is another “creation”.

She’s an indult TLM convert who has been wailing on the Jews since she broke with HIgH Wire news.

Her schitck sounds pretty good, but other Catholic analysts ( Will Tucker) have noticed that she is misdirecting her audience.

For example, she’s trying to distinguish for her conservative audience, the difference between “the good and the bad jews”.

This is bunk.
They are all essentially unified in their goal for the Revolution that puts them on top.

Owens is a horrible gatekeeper, probably making up 90% of the things she claims about Kirk.  She was shilling for Trump all throughout 2024, and then after he started appointing neo-cons, Jews, and Zionist puppets to his cabinet, she engaged in the pathetic histrionics of releasing an "emergency" warning to Trump that his cabinet was being INFILTRATED.   How she could say that garbage with a straight face is difficult to imagine.

After having shilled for Trump despite Trump and Vance making it clear that they both supported the genocide and were exhorting Israel to "finish the job", she later acted surprised and began posing as an αnтι-ѕємιтє, with the narrative of her backstory fabricated by Shapiro in having "expelled" her from Daily Wire for "Anti-Semitism".  Then she won some kind of fabricated "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award" to give her street cred and set her up for the gatekeeping operation ... despite the fact that others had been calling the Jews out for years and even decades.  Evidently she was AGAINST the genocide (later) despite having shilled for Trump all of 2024.  Instead of covering Epstein and Trump's ties to the Jews, as any REAL αnтι-ѕємιтє would have done, she spent months exposing the fact that hαɾɾιs had a White grandmother, and then later distracted from the Epstein scenario with her tabloid-like trash about Macron's concubine being a man, which everyone already knew to be the case, including most of France, and the exposure of which would have done ... absolutely nothing other than get clicks to her show and create a distraction from Trump's refusal to release the Epstein files.

While I'm not a fan of Fuentes, he gave a detailed account of how wicked and treacherous that woman is ... giving a play by play of how she set him up for that interview she invited him to just so she could try to tear him to pieces, something she had promised beforehand that she would not do.

Owens is a horrible gatekeeper, probably making up 90% of the things she claims about Kirk.  She was shilling for Trump all throughout 2024, and then after he started appointing neo-cons, Jews, and Zionist puppets to his cabinet, she engaged in the pathetic histrionics of releasing an "emergency" warning to Trump that his cabinet was being INFILTRATED.   How she could say that garbage with a straight face is difficult to imagine.

After having shilled for Trump despite Trump and Vance making it clear that they both supported the genocide and were exhorting Israel to "finish the job", she later acted surprised and began posing as an αnтι-ѕємιтє, with the narrative of her backstory fabricated by Shapiro in having "expelled" her from Daily Wire for "Anti-Semitism".  Then she won some kind of fabricated "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award" to give her street cred and set her up for the gatekeeping operation ... despite the fact that others had been calling the Jews out for years and even decades.  Evidently she was AGAINST the genocide (later) despite having shilled for Trump all of 2024.  Instead of covering Epstein and Trump's ties to the Jews, as any REAL αnтι-ѕємιтє would have done, she spent months exposing the fact that hαɾɾιs had a White grandmother, and then later distracted from the Epstein scenario with her tabloid-like trash about Macron's concubine being a man, which everyone already knew to be the case, including most of France, and the exposure of which would have done ... absolutely nothing other than get clicks to her show and create a distraction from Trump's refusal to release the Epstein files.

While I'm not a fan of Fuentes, he gave a detailed account of how wicked and treacherous that woman is ... giving a play by play of how she set him up for that interview she invited him to just so she could try to tear him to pieces, something she had promised beforehand that she would not do.

Who are you shilling for?

You don't even know Candace and yet - without any evidence or reason - state categorically that she is lying about almost everything she has said about her close and dearest friend Charlie Kirk.

You mock her for her realization about Israel implying it is all an act; that her dismissal from the Daily Wire was a set-up in agreement with Ben Shapiro. You dismiss her expose of the pedo ring associated with the Macrons as mere tabloid, and give credence to that infantile Fuentes who bleats "victimhood" at every little slight, real or imagined (sound familiar?).

It's hard to believe you can be that thick as to buy into all those backyard theorists, so I ask again, what's your game in all this. You declare, you accuse, you make wild statements, and yet rarely do you ever post evidence. Now, that is the manner of tabloid trash. 

Who are you?  You're obviously here on a mission and it doesn't seem to be a truly Catholic one.

Boru is a mainstream-media-muppet. At best, she's truly naive.  At worst, she's an infiltrator.

Boru is a mainstream-media-muppet. At best, she's truly naive.  At worst, she's an infiltrator.

No, I'm not actually naive at all. Who is your source? 

Who are you shilling for?

You don't even know Candace and yet - without any evidence or reason - state categorically that she is lying about almost everything she has said about her close and dearest friend Charlie Kirk.

You mock her for her realization about Israel implying it is all an act; that her dismissal from the Daily Wire was a set-up in agreement with Ben Shapiro. You dismiss her expose of the pedo ring associated with the Macrons as mere tabloid, and give credence to that infantile Fuentes who bleats "victimhood" at every little slight, real or imagined (sound familiar?).

It's hard to believe you can be that thick as to buy into all those backyard theorists, so I ask again, what's your game in all this. You declare, you accuse, you make wild statements, and yet rarely do you ever post evidence. Now, that is the manner of tabloid trash.

You don't have to know someone personally to know that they're lying.  There's plenty of evidence ... if you're willing to actually have an open mind and look for it.  Owens is a lying shill, and a gatekeeper for the Jews, and you're nothing but an empty-headed blowhard who do nothing but emote in favor of each pet theory you form an emotional attachment to.  You really need to just get off the internet and shut up, since you go from denying one Catholic doctrine and dogma to another and you're just bringing down God's rather on your head.

You can even see it on her nasty face.  You know, for all women claim to be personal, they're actually garbage in terms of being able to judge character, since their perception appear to be incapable of penetrated past whatever emotional front some woman puts up.  I can see in her fact that she's a deeply twisted individual, a nasty woman who'd be any husband's worst nightmare.

Yet another one who's one nasty individual, that's Erika Kirk ... as it's very easy to detect the wickedness in her countenance, her facial expression, and her speech.

So you keep saying, over and over and over again. Always the same mantra and to everyone who calls out your narrow-minded nonsense. Do really think that someone who was on the verge of converting, who went to Mass, said the rosary daily, and asked protestants to give more veneration to Our blessed Mother, is damned?  Are we not taught that God who is all love rewards generosity a hundred fold? My goodness, you lot do not even accept the Catholic Church yourselves. You do not accept the authority of the Pope. And yet you have the audacity to damn a man for doing the same - and for the very same reasons - the liberation theology being embraced by the most recent Popes. 

Charlie Kirk was an evangelical Protestant. He had a Evangelical pastor. TPUSA "faith" events are evangelical. Charlie Kirk never renounced his heretical Protestant errors and never publicly converted to the Catholic faith. Charlie Kirk said that prots and evangelicals "overcorrected" concerning "Mary". His words. In the video clip you love to reference, he didn't call her the Blessed Virgin, he didn't call her the Immaculate Conception. He called her "Mary". That is because the Protestant denial of those attributes of the Blessed Virgin are not an "overcorrection" for him...because he was a protestant. Charlie Kirk had sufficient grace and time to convert, and he had free will. Do not deny him his free will by insinuating that he died a Catholic. That was his decision to make, not yours