I can be unspeakably rude, lewd, crude, and nasty, too!
You’re all rotten, no good, hypocritical, illegitimate, inbred retards with the minds of mollusks. Furthermore, you’re steeped in impurity, lovers of all that is foul, odious, despicable; a mob of malodorous mephitic polecats.
Why must some on CI inevitably descend into puerile character assassinators?
Why? Because they have no facts. They are therefore reduced to emotional outbursts, name-calling and bullying.
In order for civil discourse to take place, a distinction between fact and hearsay/opinion is required. Facts are supported by sources which include links to legitimate sources. This takes work which some (like Candace Owens) are willing to put in, while others (like Lad) are unable to unwilling to do.
His specialty is the Big Lie technique in which his unfounded and undocuмented opinions are pseudo-supported by emotional outbursts, name-calling, bullying and changing the subject. Also he lies when it's convenient as with his Big Lie that I supported Trump when he knows I never did and in fact have posted MTG and others in their criticisms against Trump.
He also knows well how many discussions we had over voting against the Kamela controllers who would have continued importing terrorists through their open border invasion. In his opinion, the Kamela controllers would have been a better choice. To be specific, he claimed that Catholics were duty bound to sit out the election (with the secondary effect that the Kamela controllers would once again control the auto-pen). I suppose in his mind, the invasion of our borders with drug lords, child-sex-trafficers and Somalian fraudsters would have been worth the moral superiority that would have come with that narrow-minded decision.