I thought with all the newly released docuмents by The Trump Administration, it had become clearer that The CIA had killed him.  

I thought with all the newly released docuмents by The Trump Administration, it had become clearer that The CIA had killed him.  

No doubt.  It's neat how they release this stuff, presumably after the guilty parties are dead.  Apparently, during The Clinton Administration lots of docuмents were released that had poured out of the former Soviet Union.  Among these were the Venona docuмents which were said to vindicate Senator McCarthy for claiming that he had a list of Communist in our own State Dept, many of whom were on the "payroll of the soviet union."  It seems that everyone he named was guilty.  

No doubt.  It's neat how they release this stuff, presumably after the guilty parties are dead.  Apparently, during The Clinton Administration lots of docuмents were released that had poured out of the former Soviet Union.  Among these were the Venona docuмents which were said to vindicate Senator McCarthy for claiming that he had a list of Communist in our own State Dept, many of whom were on the "payroll of the soviet union."  It seems that everyone he named was guilty.  

I missed your response above to my post, so I'll respond to it now.

I think you're right that the founders did not neglect to take in to account sinful nature, but not from a religious view of it, but from a secular notion, since even humanists can see that people can sin. I think that they didn't take into account is man's inherent sinful nature, due to original sin. If they had, then they would see that "all men being free" would eventually lead to big problems, especially with religious liberty. It's my opinion that they thought that if men could just be free, then they would generally chose the right thing. But that's not what happened. I'm probably not explaining it very well.

Yes, we do have unbridled capitalism to the point of the servile state, since so many of us work for other people - often corporations. We are "wage earners" and that's the problem. We help to make wealth for others at the top. No, I'm not a socialist or Marxist or libertarian or anything like that. According to Belloc, the servile state exists when most of us do not own the means of production for our own benefit, or wealth. Not that we have to be wealthy at all, only that we should have control over our work life, which we don't really have now.

In a wage-earner society, the masses of people are more easily controlled, because we are dependent on our employers, and the political system tends to benefit the employers.

The labor unions are tolerated, because even though the unions give workers more money and benefits, the unions prop up the whole servile state in that they aren't adverse to the corporations employing masses of people, as long as the corporations pay a fair wage and benefits.

Disillusioned? Yes. How could we kids who were raised to believe that we were the 'good-guys'; to  be patriotic, enlist to serve our country, trust our various officials who had our best interests at heart, et al ... not be disillusioned? We were told that if we worked hard and played by the rules we would come out 'on top'. We're on top of something alright, but I can't see what it is through all the flies.