Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Fitzinfo on July 17, 2019, 03:34:03 PM
-
Shill Steve Pieczenik blames West for Epstein sex ring (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/16/redwasher-steve-pieczenik-blames-west-for-epstein-sex-ring/)
-
Trump is saying he kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago after Epstein approached the young daughter (the now-famous Virginia Roberts) of an employee. He now claims he has had nothing to do with Epstein since.
True?
-
If he distanced himself from Epstein it was likely only for self preservation. I suspect that Trump is dirty.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/video-emerges-showing-trump-partying-with-pedo-blackmailer-epstein-at-mar-a-lago/ (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/video-emerges-showing-trump-partying-with-pedo-blackmailer-epstein-at-mar-a-lago/)
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/ (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/)
-
If he distanced himself from Epstein it was likely only for self preservation. I suspect that Trump is dirty.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/video-emerges-showing-trump-partying-with-pedo-blackmailer-epstein-at-mar-a-lago/ (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/video-emerges-showing-trump-partying-with-pedo-blackmailer-epstein-at-mar-a-lago/)
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/ (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/)
We are all sinners in need of repentance .... let him who is without sin cast the first stone.
The angels in heaven rejoice over one sinner who repents.
How do we know that Trump has not repented?
What other choice do we have in a leader?
Consider Lindsey Graham. He was a weakling until McCain died and he was freed from blackmail.
Now he is a strong voice in the Senate.
We must pray that others will be set free, repent, and become strong.
Sean Hannity also comes to mind. Perhaps through his show, others will come to the Truth, which is Christ.
-
We are all sinners in need of repentance .... let him who is without sin cast the first stone.
The angels in heaven rejoice over one sinner who repents.
How do we know that Trump has not repented?
Well, technically, he can't repent since he's not a Catholic. But, apart from that, from a natural perspective, I hope he has repented. But, depending on what the crimes were, even if someone has repented, he should still face the consequences.
-
Shill Steve Pieczenik blames West for Epstein sex ring (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/07/16/redwasher-steve-pieczenik-blames-west-for-epstein-sex-ring/)
Is that your website?
One your articles appears to be anti-Catholic. It's about Fatima, and you write that the Fatima prophecies are anti-Catholic, and that the timing of Fatima is very suspicious - the same year of Lenin's anti-Christ October Revolution.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/01/22/fatima-and-the-soviet-merger-of-orthodoxy-with-catholicism/
-
Is that your website?
One your articles appears to be anti-Catholic. It's about Fatima, and you write that the Fatima prophecies are anti-Catholic, and that the timing of Fatima is very suspicious - the same year of Lenin's anti-Christ October Revolution.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/01/22/fatima-and-the-soviet-merger-of-orthodoxy-with-catholicism/
Rejecting Fatima makes one anti-Catholic? I'd like to see a Holy Synod agree with you on that.
-
Rejecting Fatima makes one anti-Catholic? I'd like to see a Holy Synod agree with you on that.
You are not Roman Catholic, right? That might be a reason for rejecting Fatima.
It's an approved apparition of Our Lady, in the Roman Catholic Church.
-
Is that your website?
One your articles appears to be anti-Catholic. It's about Fatima, and you write that the Fatima prophecies are anti-Catholic, and that the timing of Fatima is very suspicious - the same year of Lenin's anti-Christ October Revolution.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/01/22/fatima-and-the-soviet-merger-of-orthodoxy-with-catholicism/
Meg, if you read the comments in the link you gave you will find some dead giveaways, like
Regardless, this obsession with Mary’s heart is not a teaching found in the writings of the Church Fathers. Therefore, it is NOT according to tradition, much less according to the Bible. This sacred heart stuff is, however, found in the writings of a heretic.
Regarding the miracle of the sun, Fitzpatrick writes:
Aerial phenomena is not a miracle. The Bible warns of “lying signs and wonders”, and of angels of light who preach a different gospel. Fatima did preach a different gospel, consecration to Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. No where in the Holy Scriptures does it speak of a Marian-based gospel, much less devotion to a single body part—even Mary’s.
The supposed Vatican supression of the secrets is a distraction. It’s irrelevant because the apparition is invalid to begin with.
Bottom line: no miracle occurred, no Gospel of Jesus Christ preached.
It’s a false, Satanic apparition.
A Catholic might say, I have my doubts about Fatima. But to call Fatima satanic is something else. Satanic?
-
Meg, if you read the comments in the link you gave you will find some dead giveaways, like
Regarding the miracle of the sun, Fitzpatrick writes:
A Catholic might say, I have my doubts about Fatima. But to call Fatima satanic is something else. Satanic?
Nice cherry picking. But you will see in the following article that I am a defender of Catholics, not to mention the many excellent Catholic-defending contributions of Jude Duffy at my blog.
Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/)
-
Nice cherry picking. But you will see in the following article that I am a defender of Catholics, not to mention the many excellent Catholic-defending contributions of Jude Duffy at my blog.
Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/)
I have no desire to read your article on Jesuits. My aim is to point out that you obviously despise the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and dismiss the miracle of the sun as a manifestation of the demonic.
Actually I am subscribed to your email and find it very interesting and original. That doesn't mean I accept your twisted thinking on this particular issue.
Thanks anyway.
-
Meg, if you read the comments in the link you gave you will find some dead giveaways, like
Regarding the miracle of the sun, Fitzpatrick writes:
A Catholic might say, I have my doubts about Fatima. But to call Fatima satanic is something else. Satanic?
He appears to base his strange views on is own interpretation of Scripture, from the book of "The Apocalypse of St. John the Apostle," which he terms as "Revelations," as the Protestants also term that part of Sacred Scripture.
I mistakenly thought he was anti-Catholic. He's just anti-Fatima, and anti "Immaculate Heart of Mary," which also seems to come from a personal interpretation of Scripture.
-
Apocalypse is a Greek word meaning revelation. St. John's Apocalypse starts like this:
[1] The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to make known to his servants the things which must shortly come to pass: [...]
(Douay-Rheims)
-
I would stay away from Fitzinfo. One can raise all the doubts one wants about Fatima, but it's difficult to doubt or dismiss the simple testimony of three Portuguese children. They did not obfuscate or lie, because, simply, they were incapable of deception. it's impossible to discount the Miracle of the Sun, which even Masonic newspapermen saw with their own eyes and were forced to acknowledge. Either the current pope, (which I doubt), or a future unknown pope will consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and there follow a period of peace. Our Lady said it would come late. It is late, to be sure, but The Virgin cannot lie. Remember, even a modernist pope like B16 told us that the story of Fatima was not yet over.
Michael Hoffman, like Fitzinfo, plays down the Fatima narrative. It is for that reason that I do not pursue an earlier friendship with Hoffman. I think he is probably right about a number of historical assessments, but concerning Fatima, he has seriously erred. I won't accuse Michael of being a heretic or promoting heresy. But it is necessary to note, that even if he were one, a heretic, like a broken clock, can be right two times a day.
-
He appears to base his strange views on is own interpretation of Scripture, from the book of "The Apocalypse of St. John the Apostle," which he terms as "Revelations," as the Protestants also term that part of Sacred Scripture.
I mistakenly thought he was anti-Catholic. He's just anti-Fatima, and anti "Immaculate Heart of Mary," which also seems to come from a personal interpretation of Scripture.
That's not true. I did not use it in the plural. I called in the "Book of Revelation". And, no, I am not a Protestant.
-
That's not true. I did not use it in the plural. I called in the "Book of Revelation". And, no, I am not a Protestant.
My mistake. I see now that you did not use it in the plural. You did write "Book of Revelation" initially in your article, then you just used "Revelation" after that.
I know that you aren't a Protestant. I was pointing out that Protestants refer to the Apocalypse of St. John as "Revelation." (both plural and singular).
In my experience, it's more properly traditionally to use the "Apocalypse of St. John." I have no idea what the EO tend to use to refer to that book of Sacred Scripture.
-
Just read the about page:
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/
(https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com)
Timothy Fitzpatrick (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com)
/ April 26, 2014 (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2935)
Rate This
My stance as an adherent of the Orthodox Christian faith is that at the very least, post-Vatican II Catholicism is anti-Christ.
(https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c86d4e8b38ce12778948e87f14d8bd3c?s=50&d=retro&r=G)Athan X (http://nowstuffnowblog.wordpress.com)
/ May 18, 2014 (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/#comment-3088)
Rate This
Tim Fitz, when you say Orthodox Christian Faith, do you mean as in Greek/ Russian/ Coptic Orthodox faith?
I’ve been trying to post some info on Mutt Lange/ Want Mat, but my post gets rejected. Please advise.
(https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/5e223aeb5092f895bfee60557b62765e?s=50&d=retro&r=G)Timothy Fitzpatrick (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com)
/ May 18, 2014 (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/#comment-3090)
Rate This
Yes, the standard definition of Orthodox Christianity. Perhaps try posting the Lange information again.
johnnyvoxx (http://gravatar.com/johnnyvoxx)
/ January 22, 2016 (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/#comment-8820)
Rate This
So are you Catholic or Orthodox, and by Catholic I mean pre-Vat II Catholic?
(https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/5e223aeb5092f895bfee60557b62765e?s=50&d=retro&r=G)Timothy Fitzpatrick (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com)
/ January 22, 2016 (https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/about/#comment-8823)
Rate This
I consider myself Orthodox but obviously with traditional Catholic sympathies.
-
That's not true. I did not use it in the plural. I called in the "Book of Revelation". And, no, I am not a Protestant.
Maybe not, but some of your comments give the impression of being a sola scripturist.
You say
Regardless, this obsession with Mary’s heart is not a teaching found in the writings of the Church Fathers. Therefore, it is NOT according to tradition, much less according to the Bible. This sacred heart stuff is, however, found in the writings of a heretic.
Firstly, is a devotion an obsession in your opinion?
Second St Luke tells us
"But Mary kept all these words, pondering them in her heart."
[Luke 2:19]
"And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject to them. And his mother kept all these words in her heart."[Luke 2:51]
Does your "orthodox" religion have any sort of antipathy to "devotion to a single body part—even Mary’s"?