Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Santorum calls it quits....  (Read 8357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline alaric

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3139
  • Reputation: +2280/-386
  • Gender: Male
Santorum calls it quits....
« on: April 10, 2012, 02:46:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now it's down to the man in the magical underwear.  :facepalm:

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/rick-santorum-calls-mitt-romney-concede-180027008.html

    Rick Santorum ends presidential campaign after conceding to Mitt Romney in phone call


    After calling Mitt Romney to say he is ending his presidential campaign, Rick Santorum announced the end of his presidential campaign Tuesday during a press conference in Pennsylvania, his home state.
    "We will suspend our campaign effective today," Santorum said surrounded by members of his family in Gettysburg.
    Santorum spent the weekend off the campaign trail with his three-year-old daughter, Bella, who suffers from a rare genetic disorder, after she was rushed to the hospital Friday.
    "We made a decision over the weekend that, while this presidential race for us is over, for me, and we will suspend our campaign effective today, we are not done fighting," he said.
    Few thought Santorum would make it this far.
    The former Pennsylvania senator spent most of 2011 on a grueling and often lonely campaign tour through Iowa. His strenuous underdog campaign was organized by a skeleton staff and run the old fashioned way: By methodically speaking with voters face-to-face, town by town. Candidates like Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain rose and fell throughout 2011, while Santorum spent the year mostly relegated to the far end of the debate stage. He was a long-dormant volcano due for a surprise eruption.
    In the final days before the first Republican caucuses in Iowa--a contest on which Santorum rested his entire strategy--it appeared that his campaign would be laid to rest in the state where it was born. Iowa Republicans did not turn their eyes to the man who had spent more time in their state than any other candidate until the very end, but they ultimately awarded him with a surprise, hair's-breadth victory--not formally confirmed until weeks after the vote--that helped keep his fledgling campaign afloat into the spring.
    The first public whispers of his impending rise came with a CNN poll released three days after Christmas that showed Santorum in third place among likely Iowa caucus-goers, higher than he had ever been before in a public opinion survey. When CNN first announced the poll, Santorum was greeting a small group of supporters at a furniture store in Dubuque. As he weaved between La-Z-Boy recliners and leather couches, a reporter showed Santorum the poll results on her Blackberry. Santorum paused and read the results. While composed, his face revealed an expression of shock mixed with relief.
    "I feel very, very good about how things are going and it's nice to see that reflected in some of the polls," Santorum said after surveying the good news on the reporter's phone. "But we have a lot of work to do. A lot of work."
    Before the good polls began to pour in, it was not entirely uncommon for Santorum to hold town halls in which only a handful of supporters bothered to show up. The heart of Santorum's Iowa support rested in the deep red northwest corner of the state, a solid four-hour drive from Des Moines, where many reporters made their home base. At the time, driving all the way to the South Dakota border to see the candidate, even when no other candidates were in the state, didn't seem worth the effort."I'd usually make the drive to see a candidate," one reporter, comfortably nursing a beer at a Des Moines hotel bar, said in early December. "But it's Santorum."
    By New Year's Eve, when a Des Moines Register poll showed Santorum gaining swift momentum, the grim outlook among reporters covering his campaign would change. In the final days before the caucuses, if you arrived on time for an event, you'd be stuck outside in the cold. Every pizza place, coffee shop and diner Santorum visited was jam packed with supporters, media and curiosity seekers, sometimes hours before his arrival.
    For the first time in the entire cycle, Romney turned his gaze to Santorum, about whom the Romney campaign didn't even bother to collect early opposition research, according to a report published much later by Politico. Romney criticized Santorum on the stump during a New Year's Day rally for spending 16 years in Washington in the House and Senate, one of the first times Romney took time out of his stump speech to discuss Santorum.
    "I think it shows that we're on the move," Santorum said in response. "And we're resonating with the people of this state."
    He was right. While an initial count of Iowa votes showed Romney winning by a mere eight votes, the final results--released several weeks later during the South Carolina primaries, a scenario that robbed Santorum of the boost in news coverage that traditionally comes from winning the Iowa caucuses--put Santorum over the top by 34 votes.
    "This is a solid win," Santorum said during a stop in South Carolina two weeks after the Iowa caucuses. "It's a much stronger win than the win Governor Romney claimed to have."



    Over the next few contests, Santorum took a backseat role to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who defeated Romney in South Carolina before Romney scored a win in Florida. Dogged by an aggressive series of attack ads run by the Romney campaign in Florida, Gingrich's momentum slowed after South Carolina, leaving the door open for Santorum to take his position as the alternative candidate to the former Massachusetts governor. Against most predictions, Santorum swept a three-state contest on Feb. 7, winning caucuses in Colorado, Minnesota and a non-binding primary in Missouri.
    Santorum was back on the map, and would remain Romney's greatest challenger for the remainder of the race.
    Over the next two months, Santorum would go on to win only a handful of states, as Romney increased his delegate lead. By the time Romney won a majority of votes in the Wisconsin primary on April 3rd, most observers within the party and in the media declared an end to the Republican primary cycle. Romney would take it, they predicted. But with his home state looming just three weeks away, Santorum vowed to press on.
    "If this thing was all about D.C. pressure for us to get out, we'd have never even set foot in Iowa," Santorum spokesman Hogan Gidley told reporters the night Romney swept contests in Wisconsin, Maryland and the District of Columbia. "This thing's been going on for a long time. We're not worried at all about the pressure we're going to get from the outside D.C. world, we've had it from the get-go."
    While Santorum voiced confidence that he would win Pennsylvania, where he lost his Senate seat in 2006 to Bob Casey by the record margin of 18 percentage points, state polls leading up to the primary date showed momentum to be on Romney's side.
    "I walked out after the Iowa caucus victory and said 'game on,'" Santorum said in Gettysburg. "I know a lot of folks are going to write--maybe even those at the White House --'game over.' But this game is a long, long, long way from over. We are going to continue to go out there and fight to make sure that we defeat President Barack Obama."


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #1 on: April 10, 2012, 03:02:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Santorum is a neo-con, but Romney is worse.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline ora pro me

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 648
    • Reputation: +380/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #2 on: April 10, 2012, 08:57:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, why isn't Ron Paul even mentioned in that article?  No surprise!  I don't know if Dr. Paul has a snowball's chance here but I do know that we need to pray and sacrifice for our country.

    Pray to Our Lady of Guadalupe, the Patroness of the Americas and to St. Frances Xavier Cabrini and to the Guardian Angel of our country.

     :pray:  

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #3 on: April 11, 2012, 10:15:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As I have told others, the repukelicans have not put forth a viable candidate that can win against Obama.

    Offline cateran

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    • Reputation: +41/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #4 on: April 11, 2012, 12:07:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sedetrad
    As I have told others, the repukelicans have not put forth a viable candidate that can win against Obama.


    It's irrelevant whether or not either party puts forward a "viable" candidate. They would simply be going through the motions, since the Owners have already decided that Obama will have a second term.


    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #5 on: April 14, 2012, 03:42:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: cateran
    Quote from: sedetrad
    As I have told others, the repukelicans have not put forth a viable candidate that can win against Obama.


    It's irrelevant whether or not either party puts forward a "viable" candidate. They would simply be going through the motions, since the Owners have already decided that Obama will have a second term.


    How do you know?

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #6 on: April 14, 2012, 04:13:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Busillis
    Quote from: cateran
    Quote from: sedetrad
    As I have told others, the repukelicans have not put forth a viable candidate that can win against Obama.


    It's irrelevant whether or not either party puts forward a "viable" candidate. They would simply be going through the motions, since the Owners have already decided that Obama will have a second term.


    How do you know?


    I believe he is implying that the votes are rigged and that presidents are chosen in advance. He actually would be correct.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #7 on: April 14, 2012, 06:58:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: Busillis
    Quote from: cateran
    Quote from: sedetrad
    As I have told others, the repukelicans have not put forth a viable candidate that can win against Obama.


    It's irrelevant whether or not either party puts forward a "viable" candidate. They would simply be going through the motions, since the Owners have already decided that Obama will have a second term.


    How do you know?


    I believe he is implying that the votes are rigged and that presidents are chosen in advance. He actually would be correct.


    Yeah but I think he means something more. Like he has a source that provides good evidence for why Obama has been selected for another four years. I don't see why that would be so.


    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #8 on: April 14, 2012, 08:16:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The way I think the process works is the elite make sure only certain politicians can be in the running to win, but who it comes down to at the end is anyone's guess. Even the elite will not be sure who gets in, but will do the preliminary work to guarantee one of their own wins the White House.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #9 on: April 14, 2012, 09:15:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Busillis
    The way I think the process works is the elite make sure only certain politicians can be in the running to win, but who it comes down to at the end is anyone's guess. Even the elite will not be sure who gets in, but will do the preliminary work to guarantee one of their own wins the White House.


    It's true that they decide what politicians will be in contention to win, but they also select presidents. Perhaps not always, as I'm sure they could have cared less who won in 2004 between Bush and Kerry. They are certainly capable of rigging votes though. Here is what they state in the "Protocols of the Zionist Jєωs":

    Quote
    WE NAME PRESIDENTS
    11. In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents.

    12. By that time we shall be in a position to disregard forms in carrying through matters for which our impersonal puppet will be responsible. What do we care if the ranks of those striving for power should be thinned, if there should arise a deadlock from the impossibility of finding presidents, a deadlock which will finally disorganize the country? ...

    13. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some "Panama" or other - then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honor connected with the office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defense in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that same blind slave of ours - the majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution. (Iran? Grenada? Kuwait? Iraq? Panama? Somalia? Bosnia? Kosovo? Indonesia?)

    14. It is easy to understand that in these conditions the key of the shrine will lie in our hands, and no one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation.

    15. Besides this we shall, with the introduction of the new republican constitution, take from the Chamber the right of interpolation on government measures, on the pretext of preserving political secrecy, and, further, we shall by the new constitution reduce the number of representatives to a minimum, thereby proportionately reducing political passions and the passion for politics. If, however, they should, which is hardly to be expected, burst into flame, even in this minimum, we shall nullify them by a stirring appeal and a reference to the majority of the whole people ... Upon the president will depend the appointment of presidents and vice-presidents of the Chamber and the Senate. Instead of constant sessions of Parliaments we shall reduce their sittings to a few months. Moreover, the president, as chief of the executive power, will have the right to summon and dissolve Parliament, and, in the latter case, to prolong the time for the appointment of a new parliamentary assembly. But in order that the consequences of all these acts which in substance are illegal, should not, prematurely for our plans, fall upon the responsibility established by us of the president, WE SHALL INSTIGATE MINISTERS AND OTHER OFFICIALS OF THE HIGHER ADMINISTRATION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT TO EVADE HIS DISPOSITIONS BY TAKING MEASURES OF THEIR OWN, for doing which they will be made the scapegoats in his place ... This part we especially recommend to be given to be played by the Senate, the Council of State, or the Council of Ministers, but not to an individual official.

    16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so, besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government constitutional working, the pretext both for the one and the other being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State.


    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #10 on: April 15, 2012, 07:25:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's interesting! I need to reread the Protocols. I read it a long time ago and it made me nauseous.


    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #11 on: April 15, 2012, 04:05:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here are the full Protocols:

    http://biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm#Table of Contents
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.

    Offline Busillis

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 262
    • Reputation: +118/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #12 on: April 15, 2012, 04:15:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks but I have them as a pdf.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Santorum calls it quits....
    « Reply #13 on: April 15, 2012, 04:16:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ah, ok. :)
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.