“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” (Hebrews 10:31). 

53 Republican senators.

Susan Collins, Mitt Romney, Lisa Murkowski ... a vote before the election will be very, very close since you can't count on these three fools.

Best ram someone (good) through ASAP before election post haste!!!

Source

Ted Cruz explains why RBG's Seat must be filled before the election

Republican Senator Ted Cruz says President Donald Trump needs to nominate a successor Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg next week, and that the Senate should confirm that choice or the country risks a constitutional crisis.
 
“I believe that the president should, next week, nominate a successor to the court. I think it is critical that the Senate takes up and confirms that successor before Election Day,” Senator Cruz told Sean Hannity on Fox News.
 
“Democrats and Joe Biden have made clear they intend to challenge this election. They intend to fight the legitimacy of the election. As you you know Hillary Clinton has told Joe Biden ‘under no circuмstances should you concede, you should challenge this election.’ and we cannot have election day come and go with a 4-4 court.”
 
Cruz continued, “A 4-4 court that is equally divided cannot decide anything. And I think we risk a constitutional crisis if we do not have a nine-justice Supreme Court, particularly when there is such a risk of … a contested election.”
 
Cruz then shared his experience litigating Bush vs. Gore case and how the country didn’t know for 37 days who the president-elect was. “I think we have the responsibility to do our job. The president should nominate a principled constitutionalist with a proven record and the Senate … should do our job and protect the country from the constitutional crisis that could result otherwise.”

One of her many racist/eugenicist comments for any leftist family members who forgot.

“Frankly,” said Ruth Bader Ginsburg in July 2009, “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.”
The great added blessing of Roe: Not only could it give women the “right” to abortion, but it could open the way for the federal government, via Medicaid, to fund abortions of children in undesired populations.
That assessment by Ginsburg was provided in a July 7, 2009 piece in the New York Times Magazine, titled, “The Place of Women on the Court.” And for 25 years, succeeding a pro-life justice named Byron White, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has held the Planned Parenthood seat on the nation’s high court, where she has fought for the hopes and dreams of Margaret Sanger’s organization.

https://spectator.org/amy-coney-barrett-vs-ruth-bader-ginsburg/

I don't know if Trump will have time to replace her before the election, but if he does that'll be another small miracle.

It will be a miracle only in the sense that it would mean Republicans in the Senate would have to grow spines.  I've already read news reports that three Republicans want to wait until after the election.

It will be a miracle only in the sense that it would mean Republicans in the Senate would have to grow spines.  I've already read news reports that three Republicans want to wait until after the election.

If Trump and the Republicans don’t get a good justice in before the election then they have as much blood on their hands as Ginsburg did.

CNN just reported on some tweets released by Scalia’s son quoting his father as raving about how great a friend RBG was to him.  How can you call such a demonic woman your friend?  This goes to show that even an otherwise decent Catholic justice was in many ways a naturalist given to human respect.

CNN just reported on some tweets released by Scalia’s son quoting his father as raving about how great a friend RBG was to him.  How can you call such a demonic woman your friend?  This goes to show that even an otherwise decent Catholic justice was in many ways a naturalist given to human respect.

Just one word:  Ecuмenism.  

I'm confused about how a person can be described as a "decent Catholic" and a "naturalist given to human respect".  It would seem that the two descriptions are incompatible.