Ann Romney once states that Mitt can argue both sides and even she was not sure what he beleived...likely, that comes from his work and also, mormonism, which takes a lot of back/forth views.

Not sure if smarter then obummer or not, obummer has charisma, but largely is a talking piece...Mittster and his boy Elroy sounds like the same old tired, tried GOP slogans and talking points..

True, elites have already decided.......try to get most people to see that and esp, onces that should know better and have had access to truth tellers, yet stil lget worked up....

There was a bomb in Denver yesterday. It was Obama's debate peformance.  

In all seriousness, alaric is right that the elections are rigged. Romney would be better than Obama, no doubt. But I'd be surprised if Romney won.

Even after a disastrous debate last night for Obama, this clown was still leading in the Ohio polls by eight percent. Historically, you don't win Ohio, you don't win the election.

The Mormon guy is on borrowed time.

Well put, living in an area heavily influenced by evangelicals, its amazing-seperate from their zionism-how they "trust in Jesus", then slavishly vote GOP over and over again, making excuses often, which tells me they knowsomething is not right going on, but still go GOP/ Most family/friends in this category are lining up for mormon cultic Romney, now....
Catholics, including those in "conservative" and "trad" circles do the same, influenced by them and by the cultre that does lend to Americanism (Recall, I had a long thread on this my first go around). At heart, the Catholic in influenced by the "american way of life" and protestants around them. Many are converts that, unlike yourself, do no see nad study, but are romanized protestants, never really leaving their old life in some degrees. Couple that w/talk radio, Fox News,etc and most Catholics are not better then Prots and hence, have little influence in society.
Add in the near obsession with forming interfaith groups to fight this or that, you get indifference.
Remember, one Catholic can make a difference and the Prots need us, we do NOT need them at all, in any group to do anything-comes down to supernatural grace and who is in the ark or not.

Both parties have bene captured and controlled by the Elites, call it NWO or whatever. Leon Skousans Naked Communist book is actually spot on on this, though he has one or both parties captured by "communists". Skousan, a mormon, still had some research and good common sense here and there..

So, most Catholics in the end-out of fear, lesser evils, ignorance,etc go to vote Dem or GOP.

I know a lady, early 40's, that actually in surprise told me one day "I never thought someone could be aq democrat  AND a christian"...she is a well meaning southern Baptist.....never in 40 yrs she thought that you could be registated as both and even, run as both....she is one that has GOP=Gods Own Party.....

SS, cannot see, in any category, how "Romney would be better", neither man will ensure survival and blessings-ie, tackle abortion, homos,etc...

I was talking to a friend last night, a man in his 80's, who agrees that both parties are corrupt, but when you scratch the surface, you hear all the Rush / Hannity talking points.

I may vote for Romney however, if only because putting this figurehead in office MAY stop Obamacare. Hence, fewer subsidized abortions. That may outweigh the destructive effects of his Reagonomics, which are being carried out by Obama anyway.

As I tried to explain to my friend, who complained about the "welfare state," economic liberalism is CREATING the welfare state. The two parties work together. Total economic liberalism and outsourcing destroy employment. You don't have to be a math genius to figure out that if a company hires 100,000 Chinese, that is 100,000 less Americans who are employed, and that those 100,000 Americans will then consume less, leading stores and restaurants to close down and stop hiring. Likewise, you don't have to be a math genius to figure out that if Chinese goods are cheaper, then American goods will not be competitive, leading to more job loss, which they now call deindustrialization.

This poverty, which is created by extremist economic liberals, then leads to more people being enslaved to the government for handouts i.e. the welfare state.

But no, these neo-cons just want to gripe about welfare. They have no problem with corporate welfare, with corrupt banks and giant corporations being bailed out. I guess the 40% or so of youth who are unemployed in Spain are all just lazy; too many siestas or something. The huge and growing unemployment around the world, it's because of lazy people... This is the 50's Cold War attitude which is so out of touch it's beyond belief that anyone still thinks like this.

Raoul76 said:

This poverty, which is created by extremist economic liberals, then leads to more people being enslaved to the government for handouts i.e. the welfare state.

Hasn't that has been the Communist/Socialist objective all along?   Instead of having people who are self reliant and hard working,  force everyone to become dependent onthe state to provides all the basic essentials of life from cradle to grave.  Couple this with the breakdown of the family (thanks to feminism sponsored by the leftists aka Commies) and the undermining of the Church the state naturally replaces the father and God.  This is exactly what happened in the USSR.