Quote from: MyrnaM

The truth is, all the candidates are very imperfect in different ways, so why argue about who is your favorite, as long as you vote, because a no vote, is a vote for Obama, the worse of the bunch.

They'll rig it, most likely.

The problem is, even if Romney gets elected, that's still a victory for the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr. The protocols I posted a week ago say specifically that they name presidents. That's why Ron Paul has no chance, he would ruin everything they're aiming for. So to keep him from being the nominee, they have to rig the votes. He no doubt won Iowa, and probably won Maine as well.

What they do every election is pick the two at the top -- the top Republican and the top Democrat and let the American people choose between them. If you look at the 2004 election between Bush and Kerry, they were both asked on LIVE TV if they were "skull and bones" members, to which they both sort of chuckled and said they were but that they couldn't talk about it. So no matter who won that election, it hardly mattered. Either way the NWO would continue to make progress.

You are right Myrna that Obama is the worst of them all. But someone like Romney isn't going to provide as much change from Obama's presidency as he claims. They're all for the NWO, with a few exceptions such as Ron Paul. Santorum probably doesn't knowingly support the NWO, but his stance on war helps it whether he realizes it or not.

My point? No matter who wins the election in 2012, America is toast until the chastisement comes.

I agree....Romney would destroy this country....based on the thing I have read in this thread...it seems that Santorum would expand the federal government in certain ways yet shrink the federal government in other ways. I think with him it's not so much of an overall expansion of federal government but rather a restructuring of a federal government. With Romney your definitely going to get an overall expansion of the federal government. Any type of nationalized healthcare is going to take up a large chunk of the federal spending budget...which means sacrifices in the military and other social programs. In the long run people would be angry so the federal government would raise taxes. Anyways...Romney/Obamacare would expand the federal government by a lot.

And speaking of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, does no one else find it interesting that the two times George Bush Sr publicly called for a NWO were on September 11th? First NWO speech from Bush was on 9/11 1990, second and final one was on 9/11 1991. A coincidence? I highly doubt it. And Romney is good friends with the Bush family? That's scary.

If you really think about it...why even try to resist the inevitable? we know that eventually there will be a one world government, and the antichrist will come during this time...so why try to make moves (whether by voting or whatever) to delay the inevitable?

Im voting Santorum.

What else do you need to know?

It claims to be Catholic and yet it thinks cooperation with evil is OK because the evil is "inevitable."

Don't forget its a Israel loving robot!

You are a little Satan.

Quote the chapter and verse that says we must cooperate with evil because it is inevitable.

I am not voting.

To vote is to endorse a system that is corrupt in its entirety.

You are too young to vote, anyway.

Nowhere in the Book of Daniel were God's people encouraged to cooperate with evil because they could not change it.  Should the three Hebrew Children not have gone into the furnace and "voted" for the king because resistance was futile?  We are Catholics, not Borg.

The fact that the Bible says that there will one day be a one world government suggests that there is nothing we can do to change that. Why? because everything the Bible says is the truth. Nothing in the Bible has ever shown that it was possible to avoid a prophetic outcome.

Should we try to delay the inevitable? I don't really know. I would just leave it up to God.

Quote from: SpiritusSanctus

And speaking of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr, does no one else find it interesting that the two times George Bush Sr publicly called for a NWO were on September 11th? First NWO speech from Bush was on 9/11 1990, second and final one was on 9/11 1991. A coincidence? I highly doubt it. And Romney is good friends with the Bush family? That's scary.

If you really think about it...why even try to resist the inevitable? we know that eventually there will be a one world government, and the antichrist will come during this time...so why try to make moves (whether by voting or whatever) to delay the inevitable?

Im voting Santorum.

That makes no sense. That's practically the equivalent of saying "It's inevitable that the antichrist is coming, so I may as well adhere to the religion of the antichrist". You seem to be forgetting that it is God who will triumph, not satan, and those who do not worship God will not be saved. So why just give in?

A NWO may be inevitable, but that doesn't mean we should give into it. God will only allow it to go so far.

Quote from: Diego

You are a little Satan.

Quote the chapter and verse that says we must cooperate with evil because it is inevitable.

Daniel 11...that is where it talks about the end of the world and how their will be no sovereignty left (One World Government).

Your not that smart.

"Your" is a possessive adjective.

"You're" is a contraction of "You are."

Daniel 11 concerns Antiochus as a type of the anti-Christ.

Catholics are not allowed to cooperate with sin, even by inaction.

You're not that smart, but you're a little Satan.