by Slad
Report: Inspector General Will Declare FBI, DOJ Broke Law in Clinton Email Probe
May 24, 2018 in News by Slad



inShare
Save

 
Source: Breitbart


A new report suggests an imminent Inspector General (IG) report may rule that FBI and Justice Department officials broke the law in their handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry said Thursday that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has “found ‘reasonable grounds’ for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s,” adding that the top watchdog official has “referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution.”

Paul Sperry@paulsperry_
BREAKING: IG Horowitz has found “reasonable grounds” for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution
12:18 PM – May 17, 2018

• 33.2K
• 18.6K people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy
In response to growing calls for a second special counsel to probe the Clinton email probe, along with FISA abuses that took place during the 2016 election, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in March the appointment of Utah’s top federal prosecutor, John Huber, to probe potential wrongdoing.
It was revealed this week that the Inspector General’s highly-anticipated report was submitted for review.
“Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks,” the Wall Street Journalreported.
Multiple reports suggest the report will be made public by the end of May.

 
Share this:

http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/report-inspector-general-will-declare-fbi-doj-broke-law-in-clinton-email-probe/

Multiple reports suggest the report will be made public by the end of May.

.
The end of May has come and gone. What happened?

The IG report was released yesterday, and it is one of many to come.  There is a specific report concerning the clinton emails, from what I understand.

This is what Q has been hinting at for 6 months.  Good news.  

Who is Q?

Oh him, Q anon; "he" was pretty reliable in Oct. - Jan 2018, when "he" was on  4chan. Jerome Corsi was the person who did the most to bring him to the larger public. But then "he" changed into someone else who suddenly began to attack Corsi. Not the same person who was Q anon in the beginning.

If you didn't know who Q was 2 posts ago, how do you know so much about Q vs Corsi 2 hours later?

I disagree with your sources.  Corsi and InfoWars wanted to consolidate the Q viewers so their ratings would go up.  To them, it's all about $.  Q doesn't ask for $, doesn't advertise, doesn't sell anything.  They ask questions and post info and try to get people to research and educate themselves.  Corsi and infowars started to discredit Q when they realized that viewers were leaving them and getting the information from many other sources for free.  Then Corsi lashed out and said that Q was fake.

Corsi is controlled opposition and a closet zionist.  Infowars is controlled opposition, also pro-zionist.  You'll never hear anything anti-isreal on infowars.  Why is that?

There have been more confirmations of Q's data in the last 2 months than the previous 6 months combined.  Q is proven to be working with the president.  Corsi/infowars do not have such 'inside' info and they are jealous.  

Last year he was known as Q-anon -- when he first when public with Jerome Corsi and then Alex Jones. After his name was taken by another person I blew the new Q-anon off and forgot about "him." Never followed him anymore so didn't know the "new" Q-anon is now called Q. What happened to the real Q-anon?
I am open to new information; do you have data on more confirmations of "Qs" new data? If this new "Q" is actually controlled opposition, we would expect to see a lot more information than the real Q-anon used to give. The real Q-anon was risking his life by providing info.