I think Matthew needs to ban all your jokers who cite Grok as if it were reliabled.  Next you're going to be quoting Snopes.

Come one people, and remove your heads from your own posteriors, would you?

There is in fact evidence that Massie WAS at least at one time part of the Demolay Masonic group, though whether he actively participates to this day is up for debate.  But just because "Grok" says it's "baseless" (their favorite word that they weaponized against those who knew the 2020 election had been rigged), well, it's almost more likely that the opposite is true.  Demolay is geared toward youth from 12-21, so he would no longer be part of that group, though it's not unlikely that those who had been members were "sheep-dipped" into a deeper participation in Masonry but without it being publicly reported.

General rule of thumb is that anybody who's anybody, or, basically, allowed to be anybody, by the Power that Be, either are controlled, either being paid off or blackmailed or both, or else they're allowed to get into office because they serve some purpose, whether (knowing or unknowingly) serving as a controlled opposition figure that people can falsely put their hopes in an therefore release the pressure of their frustrations in false hope, such as people who felt that way about Ron Paul.  They were never going to let Ron Paul go anywhere, but they used him to distract people into thinking he was their Great White Hope, as it were.  Then of course his son made the perfunctory visit to wail at the wall.

It's what the whole Q operation was all about ... where people were pacified by the false hope presented by Q.

In the case of Massie, we know that the majority of those who oppose Israel are Leftists, so they're not going to support Massie for other reasons ... wihch means that Massie is already divided-and-conquered, and you can be sure that he got the message loud and clear after the sudden death of his wife ... after which a Jew boasted publicly that he hopes that as a result of his wife's death Massie had learned his lesson (and undoubtedly was told his children were next through less public channels).

I've contacted his lodge and I'll post any response I get from them.  Perhaps he demitted but I think his voting record demonstrates his lack of principles.  His liberalism has surfaced since his wife passed.  And we Kentucky trads do care about snakes like Massie.  

You stated in your initial post that "he's a member of the lodge."  That's a declarative statement in the present tense, one stated as a fact.  I will continue to wait for your best evidence that Thomas Massie is indeed "a member of the lodge."

He's literally a member of a masonic lodge, yes. It's not even hidden that he is. 

I took these screenshots myself.  Demolay International claims that Massie is a Senior Demolay in their official social media at going back at least to 2013.  Senior means he is still a member but is over 21.  Massie is tagged so he is aware of it.  He's a lawyer so if he didn't want this out there he knows how to get it taken down.  This is the same as if it was published in a newspaper or magazine from a legal perspective.  His failure to deny it is extraordinary evidence.  

An extraordinary claim calls for extraordinary evidence.  What exactly is your best evidence?  Go for it!

It's not extraordinary

Evidence looks pretty solid despite Mat's gratuitous denials.  While it's not absolutely certain, almost nothing in life has absolute certainty ... and this would appear to be morally certain, if for no other reason that the claim has been persistent and yet Massie has never denied them.  That's like when Bergoglio kept giving interviews to Scalfari where he was alleged to have said grossly heretical things, where Bergoglio never denied the allegations and in fact invited Scalfari back repeatedly.  One can be morally certain that Bergs said exactly what Scalfari reported ... even if there's no smoking gun.