If the supreme court makes sodomite marriage the "law of the land" in the case that they have heard arguments and are due to release their decision later this month as expected, polygamy will soon be made a "constitutional right" as well.

There is a television show on a cable channel (called, I believe, "Polygamy USA") that is showing polygamous marriages in a positive light.  The American public is already being prepared.  

Polygamy is not a perversion like sodomy is.

I agree with you.  That's why it will actually be easier to get polygamy legalized and accepted by the majority of the people than sodomite marriage.

Polygamy will not be "officially" allowed due to tax and family law issues.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and Eunuchs have always been the "natural" high court officials of oriental and despotic governments.

I believe the goal down the road is to continue to elevate the social status of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, putting them in positions of authority, especially over heterosɛҳuąƖs, to glamorize unnatural vice among women and encourage young women to become bisɛҳuąƖs.  The birth rate will be one child per two women - and that will be a new model family - two women raising one child.

Yes, the groundwork has been laid for this.

I can already hear the apologetics for it now on a forum like FE.

"don't shun such people, the children aren't to blame, their children should play with Catholic children"

"You have no right to judge your gαy boss, you need to be charitable and keep the spirit of charity, and stick to your work"

Seriously, how many so-called Catholics would be fine with this?

How many nominal trads will try to get along with people who support such an outcome, while treating their own people with disrespect?

Seriously - already, there are a huge number of so-called Catholics, and possibly many trads, who prefer the above scenario to the "authoritarian" traditional family (though they may not admit it).  Prefer the thought of living with a girlfriend (there were lots of jokes about room-mates being "husbands" or "wives" a couple years ago) having a professional career, and engaging in promiscuity while raising a child together, to the thought of being a loving wife and mother of many children.  Really, many are far closer to the above scenario in their way of thinking and living than they are to the ideal of a Catholic wife and mother.

There will be many trads more embarrassed of coming from a large family or having relative with large families than they are embarrassed to get along with people who would support such a system.

The neo-SSPXers are for the most part no longer sincere.

Once they accepted selling their fellow Catholics down the river for the sake of the cult, once they accepted letting trashy Zionist scuм closely associate with the leadership, once they accepted double-talk about conciliarism, they accepted that resistance was futile.

They don't really care about serious resistance, they care about getting along in the world.

We need to be careful with rash generalizations.

1. Most resistance supporters are sincere tradition loving Catholics; not willing to out to the world.
2. Neo-Traditionalists would never support the resistance.
3. Not all of those who still attend the Neo SSPX, or support it, are insincere are not God Fearing. But all who aren't God-Fearing/ sincere, will certainly support it.

I'm not talking about the simple people who don't know better.  Or even the genuinely mistaken people.  

The people who write articles like the "Lessons of Hanukkah" and befriend the Zionist know exactly what they're doing.

Neotraditionalism is about keeping the simple people placated, saving face, while selling out.

It's very evident that the gradual sellout is taking place as the older generation passes away and into very old age and the younger generation comes of age.

Particularly among those for whom a public trad identity is very important: they want liberalization.