Author Topic: Pedophile Protection. (Read 3746 times)

roscoe · « **on:** May 06, 2009, 03:31:27 PM »

The house has passed it-- what's next? If Obomba signs it( and he will) anyone who criticises the rape of a child by a Homo will be brought up on Fed 'Hate' crimes charges. There is nothing on the websites of Alex Jones that says anything about this. CNN is not covering this either. BTW, an amendment to protect military veterans by the same method was defeated. I believe the Bill is known as the Kennedy Hate Crimes bill.

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** May 06, 2009, 03:34:38 PM »

Sorry-- here is the link

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/foxnewsripspedoprobill.htm

roscoe · « **Reply #2 on:** May 06, 2009, 03:46:18 PM »

Old news I guess as the v2'church' has been doing this for some time.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #3 on:** May 06, 2009, 08:17:21 PM »

Not that it's much better, but if this passes as is, simply criticizing the pedophile won't get you charged with a hate crime, only killing him would do so. Correct me if I'm wrong...

trent13 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 07, 2009, 01:12:01 PM »

What is this "hate crime" stuff? What is it's scope- does it just fall under antagonization, ostrazation, murder? To my way of thinking anything that would fall under the "Thou Shalt not Kill" commandment would be a hate crime - but why do "the outsiders" bother with a distinction (that was a murder, but this is a hate crime). It's so silly - if everyone would just acknowledge that there is only one true rule of law, God's, there wouldn't be any silly discussions by the government to decided whether or not a murder was a regular homicide or if it was a "hate crime." I even hate the phrase- that must be a hate crime - oh! It's soo gαy!

Dawn · « **Reply #5 on:** May 07, 2009, 04:45:15 PM »

Lybus · « **Reply #6 on:** May 10, 2009, 04:49:50 PM »

I cannot begin to understand how this got passed. How can you twist words and wrench arms to get people to believe that this is for the better? And I thought contempt for the hall of Congress could not go lower...

spouse of Jesus · « **Reply #7 on:** May 11, 2009, 04:42:02 AM »

It is time to abandon kissy kissy ways of interpreting the Gosple.
Stop the rose water version of catholicism, fight fight for little children are at danger.

Instead of a rosy cheecked always smiling Christ, I want to choose a Jesus that looks likes this: :really-mad2: :good-shot:

Lybus · « **Reply #8 on:** May 11, 2009, 09:35:02 AM »

lol, Spouse. What about the Jesus in my avatar? If you look at his face, it looks as though he knows exactly what you're up to. You can see disapproval all over him.

spouse of Jesus · « **Reply #9 on:** May 11, 2009, 10:16:03 AM »

YES. Do you mean disapproval of what I am up to, or what the whole world is up to?

Lybus · « **Reply #10 on:** May 11, 2009, 10:22:44 AM »

If Christ was just worried about you, the rest of us would either be saints or beyond hope

Irenaeus · « **Reply #11 on:** May 11, 2009, 10:21:10 PM »

What do you think about the mural from the National Shrine in Washington? It shows Christ coming to judge the world at the end of time. This is the only image of Christ that I've seen that shows him to be angry.

roscoe · « **Reply #12 on:** May 11, 2009, 11:08:06 PM »

:confused1:

roscoe · « **Reply #13 on:** May 12, 2009, 03:59:46 PM »

Neither Newsmax, Drudge or CNN has said one word about this pending legislation. i have not heard Alex Jones say anything either.

roscoe · « **Reply #14 on:** May 22, 2009, 12:04:43 AM »

Dawn reminded me in a PM that she had read Trance Formation by Cathy O' Brien. What reminded you of Sen Leahy?-- because he is the chair of Sen Judiciary and is pushing the PP bill?. Was he on TV supporting it?

That is a crazy book and the trick is to decipher the things that are true( if poss) Did you read the part about the Reptilians?