Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran  (Read 325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5839
  • Reputation: +2090/-45
  • Gender: Male
Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
« on: May 11, 2019, 08:00:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    By Philip Giraldi

    May 11, 2019 "Information Clearing House" -   The United States is moving dangerously forward in what appears to be a deliberate attempt to provoke a war with Iran, apparently based on threat intelligence provided by Israel. The claims made by National Security Advisor John Bolton and by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that there is solid evidence of Iran’s intention to attack US forces in the Persian Gulf region is almost certainly a fabrication, possibly deliberately contrived by Bolton and company in collaboration with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It will be used to justify sending bombers and additional naval air resources to confront any possible moves by Tehran to maintain its oil exports, which were blocked by Washington last week. If the US Navy tries to board ships carrying Iranian oil it will undoubtedly, and justifiably, provoke a violent response from Iran, which is precisely what Bolton, Pompeo and Netanyahu are seeking.

    It would be difficult to find in the history books another example of a war fought for no reason whatsoever. As ignorant as President Donald Trump and his triumvirate or psychotics Bolton, Pompeo and Elliott Abrams are, even they surely know that Iran poses no threat to the United States. If they believe at all that a war is necessary, they no doubt base their judgment on the perception that the United States must maintain its number one position in the world by occasionally attacking and defeating someone to serve as an example of what might happen if one defies Washington. Understanding that, the Iranians would be wise to avoid confrontation until the sages in the White House move on to some easier target, which at the moment would appear to be Venezuela.

    The influence of Israel over US foreign policy is undeniable, with Washington now declaring that it will “review ties” with other nations that are considered to be unfriendly to the Jewish state. For observers who might also believe that Israel and its allies in the US are the driving force behind America’s belligerency in the Middle East, there are possibly some other games that are in play, all involving Benjamin Netanyahu and his band of merry cutthroats. It is becoming increasingly apparent that foreign politicians have realized that the easiest way to gain Washington’s favor is to do something that will please Israel. In practical terms, the door to Capitol Hill and the White House is opened through the good offices of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).


    Israel is desperate to confirm its legitimacy in international fora, where it has few friends in spite of an intensive lobbying campaign. It seeks to have countries that do not have an embassy in Israel to take steps to establish one, and it also wants more nations that do already have an embassy in Tel Aviv to move to Jerusalem, building on the White House’s decision taken last year to do just that. Not surprisingly, nations and political leaders who are on the make and want American support have drawn the correct conclusions and pander to Israel as a first step.

    One only has to cite the example of Venezuela. Juan Guaido, the candidate favored by Washington for regime change, has undoubtedly a lot of things on his plate but he has proven willing to make some time to say what Benjamin Netanyahu wants to hear, as reported by the Israeli media. The Times of Israel describes how “Venezuela’s self-proclaimed leader Juan Guaido is working to re-establish diplomatic relations with Israel and isn’t ruling out placing his country’s embassy in Jerusalem, according to an interview with an Israeli newspaper published Tuesday.”

    One would think that Guaido would consider his interview sufficient, but he has also taken the pandering process one step farther, reportedly displaying huge video images of the flags of both Israel and the United States at his rallies.

    This deference to Israel’s interests produced an almost immediate positive result with Netanyahu recognizing him as the legitimate Venezuelan head of state, followed by an echo chamber of effusive congratulations from US (sic) Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who praised the Jewish state for “standing with the people of Venezuela and the forces of freedom and democracy.” Donald Trump’s esteemed special envoy for international negotiations, Jason Greenblatt, also joined in, praising the Israeli government for its “courageous stand in solidarity with the Venezuelan people.”

    A similar bonding took place regarding Brazil, where hard right conservative leader Jair Bolsonaro was recently elected president. Netanyahu attended the Bolsonaro inauguration last December and the two men benefit from strong support from Christian Evangelicals. Bolsonaro repaid the favor by promising that Israel would be his first foreign trip. In the event he went to Washington first, but the state visit to Israel took place in April, just before that country’s elections, in a bid to demonstrate international support for Netanyahu.

    Brazilian Jews constitute a wealthy and powerful community which reacted positively to Bolsonaro’s pledges to fight corruption and high crime rates while also repairing a struggling economy. They also appreciated his stance on Israel. He committed to moving the Brazilian embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv, though he has backpedaled a bit on that pledge. And he also promised to shut the Palestinian embassy in the capital Brasilia. He famously asked and answered his own question, “Is Palestine a country? Palestine is not a country, so there should be no embassy here. You do not negotiate with terrorists.”
    Bolsonaro’s pro-Israel anti-Venezuela credentials also endeared him to Donald Trump on a visit to Washington in mid-March which was described by the media as a “love fest.” The Brazilian leader’s visits to Israel and the US as well as Guaido’s promises to Israel reveal that the foreign policies of Tel Aviv and Washington have become inextricably intertwined, with supplicant nations and politicians wisely seeking to do homage to both regimes to gain favor. It is a development that would shock the Founding Fathers, most particularly George Washington, who warned against entangling alliances, and it means that American interests will be seen through an Israeli prism, a reality that has already produced very bad results.

    Philip Giraldi is a former counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer of the United States Central Intelligence Agency and a columnist and television commentator who is the Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest.

    This article was originally published by "Strategic Culture Foundation "

     https://youtu.be/NXOSJU80A00



    Note To ICH Community

    We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.

    Thank you for your support.

    Peace and joy
     

     

    Offline Maillot Jaune

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +9/-8
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #1 on: May 11, 2019, 09:36:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If Iran converted to Catholicism, they could destroy the demonic forces of Israel and the United States of America.
    A cowspiracy among femtrads permeates the forum, and soytrads are oblivious.


    Offline Climacus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 20
    • Reputation: +9/-41
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #2 on: May 11, 2019, 11:55:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If Iran converted to Catholicism, they could destroy the demonic forces of Israel and the United States of America.
    Too bad Israel and Catholicism play for the same team.  

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5713
    • Reputation: +3155/-171
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #3 on: May 12, 2019, 12:43:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And what team would that be?

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 235
    • Reputation: +68/-78
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #4 on: May 12, 2019, 04:34:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Too bad Israel and Catholicism play for the same team.  
    What is that supposed to mean?


    Offline Climacus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 20
    • Reputation: +9/-41
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #5 on: May 12, 2019, 10:22:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is that supposed to mean?
    the Catholic Church and Israel are a partnership.  If Iran became a Catholic nation it would advance the partnership's world agenda not oppose it. 

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5713
    • Reputation: +3155/-171
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #6 on: May 12, 2019, 04:21:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Is that like when Hosea married his prostitute wife, Gomer?

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5713
    • Reputation: +3155/-171
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pandering to Israel Means War With Iran
    « Reply #7 on: May 12, 2019, 09:49:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • the Catholic Church and Israel are a partnership.  If Iran became a Catholic nation it would advance the partnership's world agenda not oppose it.
    And what is the  world agenda of the partnership of the Catholic Church with Israel of which you speak?


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16