I can imagine youth and minority turnout being almost non-existent if Biden or Bloomberg win the nomination. At least Sanders has an ambitious(albeit naive and stupid) platform and a bit of charisma to excite young voters. The other two offer nothing but, like you said, the three adjectives Democrats revile most. 

To be a Baby Boomer, you had to be born AFTER THE WAR...you kno,,w, World War II. All the soldiers and sailors came home, with an appreciation for life and things that matter, and had many children to help forget the horrors of war.

Exactly right. When the category Baby Boom was created, one defining statistical characteristic was that conception was presumed to take place after the return home or demobilization of the father, presumed to be a soldier or sailor who had been overseas. As the very earliest returnees came home in June 1945, a baby who was born in March 1946 would be the earliest possible boomer.

As with most such categories in statistics, what it says about human life as it's actually lived is of more use to actuaries than to students of morals or psychology. Roughly half of the men in uniform in World War II were stationed stateside or spent a sizable amount of their service time stateside. In addition, almost no one who was thirty or older in 1941 spent even a day in the military unless he was someone with a special skill that Uncle Sam wanted. (Unsurprisingly, neurosurgeons constituted one such group.) Very few of these men put their family life on hold for four years.

It shouldn't be overlooked, either, that the years immediately after the war were the only ones in living memory where the government, via tax breaks and rhetorical propaganda, actively encouraged frequent pregnancies and large families. By 1960, when plans were well afoot to de-Christianize society, smaller and smaller families—but only white Christian families—were touted as desirable. The rest of the story is known to everyone.

Exactly right. When the category Baby Boom was created, one defining statistical characteristic was that conception was presumed to take place after the return home or demobilization of the father, presumed to be a soldier or sailor who had been overseas. As the very earliest returnees came home in June 1945, a baby who was born in March 1946 would be the earliest possible boomer.

As with most such categories in statistics, what it says about human life as it's actually lived is of more use to actuaries than to students of morals or psychology. Roughly half of the men in uniform in World War II were stationed stateside or spent a sizable amount of their service time stateside. In addition, almost no one who was thirty or older in 1941 spent even a day in the military unless he was someone with a special skill that Uncle Sam wanted. (Unsurprisingly, neurosurgeons constituted one such group.) Very few of these men put their family life on hold for four years.

It shouldn't be overlooked, either, that the years immediately after the war were the only ones in living memory where the government, via tax breaks and rhetorical propaganda, actively encouraged frequent pregnancies and large families. By 1960, when plans were well afoot to de-Christianize society, smaller and smaller families—but only white Christian families—were touted as desirable. The rest of the story is known to everyone.

Yes. As you point out, "By 1960, when plans were well afoot to de-Christianize society, smaller and smaller families—but only white Christian families—were touted as desirable. The rest of the story is known to everyone."
Even worse, they use their control of "education" and the media to promote human beings behaving as animals and engaging in sex unrelated to marriage, family or commitment. (Actually that is an insult to some species of animals who mate for life.)
They don't want "white" families; they don't want "white" anything because it reminds them of Western Civilization/ Christendom. They want 1984.