CathInfo.com

A good video demonstrating the pseudo science of climate change:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/X2SLYupjXujh/

.
How the hypothesis of "climate change" (a.k.a. weather) has been bolstered by tampering with the data:
.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZrZbL5Cd4eii/
.
I was waiting to hear how select weather stations have been disregarded because their temperatures have not risen enough.
I suspect that is one of the ways they tampered with the data but this video doesn't go into such details.
It sticks to the broader principles, such as time spans and acronyms for different data sets.
.
One such method, GHCN, uses land measurements from the contiguous United States, a small part of the earth's surface, 6.6%.
But their measurements account for 40% of the data that goes into this global temperature number for GHCN.
That ought to translate to a 2.64% reliability in their conclusions! (6.6% x 40% = 2.64%)
But the way global warming alarmists hype it up, you'd think it was more like 95% reliable!

There are no alternatives, because nothing else has the energy density of fossil fuels -- nor do any of the alternatives have the same EROEI (energy return on energy invested).

Growing corn for ethanol takes almost as much energy to produce as you get out of it!  The EROEI is 1:1, if not negative.
So it costs 1 joule of energy to produce 1 joule of energy from ethanol.

I think fossil fuels are more like 1:25 or 1:30 -- it's not even close.

No other fuel besides jet fuel could ever get a jet plane aloft, for example. Solar and wind energy simply wouldn't work.

In addition, ethanol production supports the Bayer-Monsanto global monopoly because corn production is largely dependent on Round Up's use as a desiccant to ensure a uniform crop production whether or not the corn is GMO (produced by Monsanto) or non-GMO.

In other words, the glyphosates in Round-Up are sprayed as an herbicide while the crop is growing, then it is sprayed again just before harvesting as a desiccant to serve as a mold inhibitor.

Ultimately Monsanto wins financially every time while cancer rates keep increasing in the agricultural communities due to increased toxic uses of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and desiccants.

With increasing cancer rates, the parent company Bayer is ensured a huge profit margin with the demand for pharmaceuticals used in chemotheraphy.

https://pharma.bayer.com/en/innovation-partnering/research-and-development-areas/oncology/

This is personal because I just lost two friends to cancer due to Round-up use. In addition, other friends have had repeated miscarriages due to living in agricultural communities where Round-Up and other toxic chemicals are used.