Isn't "Muslim morals" an oxymoron?

Honestly, I couldn't care less about them overrunning the Western countries. Raping women as tribute to Allah isn't any worse than cutting up babies and selling their parts on a legalized baby part market.  Both societies are disgusting drek in my eyes, save for Poland and most of Spain....for now at least.  The only difference being that Muslims are more outwards with their disgusting horrific-ness , while Western secular societies tend to try to hide it.

Western countries are in general at least still scandalized by the brutality of those PP perps, Muslim society celebrates their atrocities and then goes to great lengths to defend their depravities, even trying to say it is allowed/commanded by their "religion".

Oh, you'd be surprised. There's just as many people defending it and celebrating it as a "Fantastic contribution to medical science" as there is people condemning it.

I do think that preserving Western Civilization is vital as it has it's roots in Christianity, it is badly wounded right now, but not in it's death throws - yet. I do not believe that it will disappear entirely until Christ the King returns. We must show Him that we are willing to fight for what He established, if we give up it demonstrates to Christ that we do not care for what he has given us; even if we lose ground, which we certainly are, we must remain in the battle to the last.

Oh, I agree, that preserving Western Civilization is vital, I'm just saying to do that, we have to destroy the modern civilization of the West, which is as far away from traditional Western Civilization as you can get.  I'm not 'giving up' anything by giving up a secularist, religiously tolerant, human rights practicing, gαy fondling, false version of Western civilization.

No one is defending PP actions as being commanded by religion,

They defend abortion with the UN's declaration of universal human rights, which is pretty much a de facto secularist religion, even if they don't want to admit it.  It's a collection of infallible dogmas, that are declared to be an incredibly obvious truth that everyone is supposed to be able to see, that are forced on the world through secular 'Jihads', and anyone who refuses to follow them is seen as an evil sub-human that must be subverted and destroyed, and even though it's literally the least reasonable, most untenable, evil, and evidence-less religion ever, it still is one none-the-less.

Quote from: Marlelar

I do think that preserving Western Civilization is vital as it has it's roots in Christianity, it is badly wounded right now, but not in it's death throws - yet.  I do not believe that it will disappear entirely until Christ the King returns.  We must show Him that we are willing to fight for what He established, if we give up it demonstrates to Christ that we do not care for what he has given us; even if we lose ground, which we certainly are, we must remain in the battle to the last.

If the near-universal codification of religious indifferentism, materialism, protection and promotion of sɛҳuąƖ immorality, elevation of sodomy to the level of matrimony, wholesale butchery of unborn infants, and subservience to international Jєωry that currently exists in the nations that once comprised Christendom does not constitute a Western Civilization in its death throes, then what, by your standards, would?

What's the threshold; Satanism formally installed as the State Religion? Obligatory Sodomy and Abortion?

It seems to me that (and I've been telling friends this theory for about 3 years already) we will see the pro-Sodomite activists approach their logical ultimate development when they achieve as state law that all citizens MUST be Sodomites insofar as being willing to participate in Sodomy, and anyone who dares voice opposition to Sodomy would be breaking the law, and therefore subject to capital punishment for their opposition to Sodomy.

For it is the nature of Sodomy to propagate itself, and practitioners of same are constantly looking for ways of spreading their vice far and wide.  It is for no small reason that sane civilizations in the past have outlawed it due to the near and present danger to society that it is at its core.

Are you of the belief that an organism can't be considered "dead" until it's fully maggot-infested and in the advanced stages of putrefaction? Because, I can assure you, a corpse can, for a time, still retain the superficial appearance of the living creature it once was whilst still very much being as dead as the proverbial doornail. In my opinion, this latter illustration describes the state of Western Civilization from about a century ago. I'd say at its current stage, the corpse has already taken on a pretty ghastly pallor and has started to exude a perceptible odor of decay.