NS Germany, Fascist Italy, the French Kingdom, and the Russian Empire were independent of Jєωιѕн power ... but not Fox News! Did you know Rupert Murdoch is Jєωιѕн?
Anyway, the rise of ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic liberalism has been peculiar to the modern era, but it has not had total control over everything, of course.
The Jєωs may be in a precarious positon at the top too. Worldiness offers only so much security. If the Jєωs are a disastrous people, how can they avoid the disaster of themselves?
The power of the Church is grace that builds on nature and that has been institutionalized for natural law abiding communities --- actual nation states. There are national and institutional powers at work in the Church.
A Catholic nation among Catholic nations is a real possibility. The Church does not harm the nations or their sovereignty. It brings them light.
Yet the eucharistic and sacramental powers of the Church are institutional. The New Testament is institutional and historical, before it is national.
The spiritual power is greater than the natural. The Holy Spirit is greater than any nation, and all the nations, but he is not so much beyond his "institutions".
You're too smart for me, Donachie! I still don't understand.
There are people here better prepared to discuss the Jєωs and modern history than me.
I'm only adding qualifiers and "haecceitas", which is a habit.
For example, many liberals and others misinterpret the beatitudes and think Jesus was like a communist or a door mat. However, this is not the case.
Jesus was a King, the King of Kings, and he was not throwing pearls to swine. Everything he said was trinitarian in character. Everything he spoke was from the sanctuary --- the altar and the throne. Nothing that he said was from the mob.
God is the best, and it's not an ego trip when he loves his own way the most; and his way should be loved the most since it is always the best.
The beatitudes are qualified by the Trinity and contemplation of the Trinity first. Not the soup kitchen run around. With profound "haeccetias", Jesus was speaking first of the excellence and absolute superiority of life within the sanctuary of the trinity, when he preached the beatitudes, not the liberal soup kitchen run around.
Martha had her pots and pans, and Mary had the better part.
What in the world does this have to do with a practical discussion of Jєωιѕн cօռspιʀαcιҽs and the struggle for survival of nation states?
Since the question is "power", it's just a qualification of the term, as people examine it with "haecceitas".
The power of a group is more than national, and the Jєωιѕн cosa nostra has been coincidental with liberalism more than any specific nation, imo.
Liberalism has been empowered by the Jєωs, and the Jєωs have been empowered by it, that's why I mentioned the Napoleonic wars, the international banks and international law.
A lot of international law today is a NWO scam, imo. Look at Barbara Streisand.