Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: JD Vance vs Trump  (Read 8372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NishantXavier

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
  • Reputation: +209/-531
  • Gender: Male
Re: JD Vance vs Trump
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2024, 08:07:59 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Posted the stats that some 41 States have banned or restricted abortion thanks to the huge victory of Dobbs that overturned Roe v Wade. Will find it later on if needed and post it here.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6479/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #16 on: October 18, 2024, 08:25:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another thought occurred to me. If Trump gets in but continues to flip-flop or be liberal on abortion, God may even strike Trump dead e.g. in 2025 or allow an assassination attempt on him to succeed. In that case, Vance would take over immediately, implement Project 2025 (he has praised it) and fight abortionist terrorism (that's what it is) by every legal means possible with a goal toward its ultimate abolition.

    Project 2025 is a Christian nationalist platform. Wiki: "Critics have characterized Project 2025 as an authoritarian, Christian nationalist plan to steer the U.S. toward autocracy.[11][13][14][15] Legal experts have said it would undermine the rule of law,[16] separation of powers,[5] separation of church and state,[17] and civil liberties.[5][16][18]". Vance has repeatedly expressed his support of the proposal. Trump is a little lukewarm but mostly only to get the necessary votes to be elected. Vance is a Christian nationalist pro-lifer who rejects separation of Church and State. Traditional Catholics of course know that separation of Church and State is an error condemned by Pius IX.
    Something similar has come to my mind as well.  I think, unlike previous recent VP's, he could very well become President before the end of Trump's term.


    Offline josh987654321

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 801
    • Reputation: +253/-414
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #17 on: October 18, 2024, 08:29:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't know how the statistics for the number of abortions performed are compiled but I've read that since Roe V Wade was overturned they have actually increased.

    Ironic, I read the exact same thing in 2016 from people trying to prevent Trump from overturning Roe v Wade... The democrats used to say 'safe, legal and rare' and the 'rare' part is what naïve Catholics (giving them the benefit of the doubt) would cling to using this same faulty argument, as if we were on the same team but going about it differently... then when they corrupted enough of society and got their numbers up they showed their true colours. 

    Offline josh987654321

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 801
    • Reputation: +253/-414
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #18 on: October 18, 2024, 08:31:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Something similar has come to my mind as well.  I think, unlike previous recent VP's, he could very well become President before the end of Trump's term.

    You could never achieve progress in such a manner, one cannot win like that. Even if the worst were to happen you would respect his wishes for the rest of his term that you were filling in for, then when getting elected for the role you can do as you wish IMO.

    God Bless

    Offline NishantXavier

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 621
    • Reputation: +209/-531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #19 on: October 18, 2024, 08:37:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Agreed, 2Vermont.

    I have a confession to make. I prayed for Ginsburg to die. I read a theology manual that says it's permissible to pray for someone's death to be hastened if they are doing evil and provided one also prays for them to repent and die in grace. I did that because I read in an Axios article a source say Justice Amy Barrett, a devout pro life Catholic and mother of 7 (we Catholics had huge role to play in Roe v Wade, so we can rightly take credit in that huge victory; some Evagelicals helped; but only Catholics active in Catholic action, which the Church has always highly encouraged), was being saved to replace Ginsburg. But it was not certain Ginsburg would retire in time. 

    So I prayed as I did. Apparently, it worked. I have no regrets. She is dead now. I hope, for her sake, she repented and died in grace and saved her soul. But the wicked witch and abortionist terrorist (for that is what she is) is responsible for the h0Ɩ0cαųst and murder of millions. So are the others enabling the crime and the greatest genocidal h0Ɩ0cαųst of our age along with the persecution of 360 million Christians around the globe which the Jєωιѕн press is deliberately silent about. We must be united, stay strong, stay the course, and fight effectively to complete the beginnings of victory by abolishing abortion.


    Offline josh987654321

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 801
    • Reputation: +253/-414
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #20 on: October 18, 2024, 08:45:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I have a confession to make. I prayed for Ginsburg to die. I read a theology manual that says it's permissible to pray for someone's death to be hastened if they are doing evil and provided one also prays for them to repent and die in grace.

    I don't know about that, much better to just pray for their repentance and leave it in God's hands IMO.

    I did smirk when she tried to hold out until after the election so Biden could appoint someone pro-abortion and instead she died just in time for Trump to appoint another judge. That was interesting IMO, prevented her from doing more evil before she left.

    God Bless

    Offline NishantXavier

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 621
    • Reputation: +209/-531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #21 on: October 18, 2024, 08:50:04 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, brother. It was Divine Providence that struck her dead. May God have Mercy on her wicked soul and grant, if it is His will, that she at least made an act of faith in Christ, and contriton for her sins, before she died. St. Padre Pio says we can pray for souls even after their death that they died in grace. As I said, I read a theologian say it is permissible. We are fighting a war. God is with us, and He will ensure our final victory, which will be His, and His Mothers, and the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart will come. Obviously abortion will be abolished when it begins.

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13204
    • Reputation: +8318/-2572
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #22 on: October 18, 2024, 09:22:57 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    . I read a theology manual that says it's permissible to pray for someone's death to be hastened if they are doing evil and provided one also prays for them to repent and die in grace. 
    Correct.  Because praying for death isn’t an evil, as we will all die.  Death is simply a stage of life. 


    Offline NishantXavier

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 621
    • Reputation: +209/-531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #23 on: October 18, 2024, 10:52:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Correct.  Because praying for death isn’t an evil, as we will all die.  Death is simply a stage of life.
    Agreed. And for some, who have lived well, death is the entrance to eternal life and Paradise. For others, who lived poorly but were not totally wicked, it is an entrance into purgatory and to heaven after it. For others, it is a terrible judgment and a sentence to eternal death, i.e. hell.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6479/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #24 on: October 18, 2024, 11:49:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Posted the stats that some 41 States have banned or restricted abortion thanks to the huge victory of Dobbs that overturned Roe v Wade. Will find it later on if needed and post it here.
    I see you haven't reposted it, but I think the data is important to share.  So, I am reposting it:

    State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy | Guttmacher Institute

    Offline Soubirous

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2109
    • Reputation: +1665/-44
    • Gender: Female
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #25 on: October 18, 2024, 01:26:30 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
  • Scroll down to Table 2 on that  Guttmacher Institute webpage. That's where the salient facts are. Look at each of the columns and their explanatory headings as well as the footnotes.

    ALL of the states make exception for the life of the mother. However, medical intervention in such cases is NOT "abortion" neither in theological nor in bona fide medical terms. See this recent thread for further discussion of that reality.

    Onto the next columns. The only jurisdictions that make no other exceptions are Arkansas, Oklahoma, South Dakota. That's it.

    Total current US population is around 340 million. Now figure those three states. AR @ 3M + OK @ 4M + SD @ 929K = approx. 8 million of all ages. So right now, (based on general population rather than the more relevant sub-population of women of child-bearing age) abortion is illegal for only 2% of the US population.

    That's what we're dealing with. That's what Dobbs got us. Two percent. That's what those few states had ALREADY through the shrewd use of anti-clinic zoning ordinances, waiting periods, heartbeat laws, professional licensing standards, etc.

    In those other 47 states plus District of Columbia, opportunistic loopholes for "general health of the mother", "physical health of the mother", rape, incest, and lethal fetal abnormality allow any pro-abortion doctor -- and in some states even a loosely defined/credentialed "health care practitioner" --  in effect to allow it  on demand for the whole of gestation. Can't get a waiver, travel a couple hours and the deed is done. Or order pills legally through the mail.

    As for those fetal abnormality diagnoses, look for citations of how often those test results turnout to be inaccurate. Yet that doesn't stop "health care practitioners" who shame mothers who want to do the right thing and carry to term, and lo and behold, the baby's healthy. Oops averted, as when frightened mothers do abort and more conclusive genetic testing finds nothing abnormal at all.

    Bottom line, argue all you want amongst yourselves about the pro life vote and its political utility and election season nuances and whether Trump and Vance are disingenuously playing to the middle when they're really at heart in it for the babies, multi-dimensional chess and all that.

    Free will opinion is one thing. But letting the pro-abort cynics trick you into ignoring the DATA and repeating their opportunistic terminology?

    And abortion's only one issue, for which the data at least is easy to find . If anyone thinks the PTB aren't bamboozling full spectrum to get acquiescent buy-in for whomever they dump on us next month , then there's no helping those folks. TDS has gone horseshoe.

    Let nothing disturb you, let nothing frighten you, all things pass away: God never changes. Patience obtains all things. He who has God finds he lacks nothing; God alone suffices. - St. Teresa of Jesus


    Offline M1913

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 110
    • Reputation: +127/-60
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #26 on: October 18, 2024, 01:38:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Scroll down to Table 2 on that  Guttmacher Institute webpage. That's where the salient facts are. Look at each of the columns and their explanatory headings as well as the footnotes.

    ALL of the states make exception for the life of the mother. However, medical intervention in such cases is NOT "abortion" neither in theological nor in bona fide medical terms. See this recent thread for further discussion of that reality.

    Onto the next columns. The only jurisdictions that make no other exceptions are Arkansas, Oklahoma, South Dakota. That's it.

    Total current US population is around 340 million. Now figure those three states. AR @ 3M + OK @ 4M + SD @ 929K = approx. 8 million of all ages. So right now, (based on general population rather than the more relevant sub-population of women of child-bearing age) abortion is illegal for only 2% of the US population.

    That's what we're dealing with. That's what Dobbs got us. Two percent. That's what those few states had ALREADY through the shrewd use of anti-clinic zoning ordinances, waiting periods, heartbeat laws, professional licensing standards, etc.

    In those other 47 states plus District of Columbia, opportunistic loopholes for "general health of the mother", "physical health of the mother", rape, incest, and lethal fetal abnormality allow any pro-abortion doctor -- and in some states even a loosely defined/credentialed "health care practitioner" --  in effect to allow it  on demand for the whole of gestation. Can't get a waiver, travel a couple hours and the deed is done. Or order pills legally through the mail.

    As for those fetal abnormality diagnoses, look for citations of how often those test results turnout to be inaccurate. Yet that doesn't stop "health care practitioners" who shame mothers who want to do the right thing and carry to term, and lo and behold, the baby's healthy. Oops averted, as when frightened mothers do abort and more conclusive genetic testing finds nothing abnormal at all.

    Bottom line, argue all you want amongst yourselves about the pro life vote and its political utility and election season nuances and whether Trump and Vance are disingenuously playing to the middle when they're really at heart in it for the babies, multi-dimensional chess and all that.

    Free will opinion is one thing. But letting the pro-abort cynics trick you into ignoring the DATA and repeating their opportunistic terminology?

    And abortion's only one issue. If anyone thinks the PTB aren't bamboozling full spectrum to get acquiescent buy-in for whomever they dump on us next month , then there's no helping those folks. TDS has gone horseshoe.
    This needs to be a post.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6479/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #27 on: October 18, 2024, 02:28:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Ironic, I read the exact same thing in 2016 from people trying to prevent Trump from overturning Roe v Wade... The democrats used to say 'safe, legal and rare' and the 'rare' part is what naïve Catholics (giving them the benefit of the doubt) would cling to using this same faulty argument, as if we were on the same team but going about it differently... then when they corrupted enough of society and got their numbers up they showed their true colours.
    I guess I'm confused as to why overturning Roe v Wade was the wrong thing to do when pro-lifers fought so hard to make it happen for decades.  Now that it happened, pro-lifers are upset?  :confused:

    Offline NishantXavier

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 621
    • Reputation: +209/-531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: JD Vance vs Trump
    « Reply #28 on: October 18, 2024, 09:54:21 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I guess I'm confused as to why overturning Roe v Wade was the wrong thing to do when pro-lifers fought so hard to make it happen for decades.  Now that it happened, pro-lifers are upset?  :confused:
    Yes, it defies credibility. The overturning of Roe v Wade was a colossal victory. I knew many good pro lifers who, having fought the good fight for decades, nevertheless thought and never dared to dream that Roe v Wade would be overturned in their lifetimes. Now, it has and they're very happy. Everyone should be. There should be rejoicing in the streets and a holy resolve to complete the initial victory by pushing on to complete victory.

    I would push for a 15 week federal ban from the next administration. Hopefully, Vance can get it done, and Trump (once in office) will reverse himself and get it done. During the primary, Mike Pence cited a statistic that showed 70%+ of the American people are ok with an abortion ban after 15 weeks. Therefore that should be the minimum federal standard. Desantis committed to such a ban. Some others bemoaned the fact that liberal states and liberal democrats were ok with abortion "in the 9th month", after 40 weeks or even after birth, but didn't see the clear solution to that was a minimum federal standard. And although the 60 votes in the Senate required will be tough, that is only 60% of the senate, and the senators must be convinced using that 70% statistic and other facts. If republicans get even 52-55 pro-life republican votes and a few more independent or moderate democratic votes, that number can be reached. Then they must slowly push for more. It is an uphill battle that still remains before us. And the battle must simultaneously be opened on all fronts, that is in the courts as well, both federal and supreme.

    So with prayer, perseverance, incremental steps, and patience, that battle can be won, just like the Roe battle was. Step 2 and Step 3 after a 15 week ban is implemented could be a 6 week ban and then Life at conception act.

    "Gallup’s writers chose to tout the post-Dobbs shift in favor of abortion in this poll, but even after this shift, here’s a telling fact: only 37% of Americans believe that abortion should be legal in the second trimester, while 55% say it should be illegal. Lindsey Graham’s proposed “national abortion ban” kicked in at 15 weeks. The poll asked about the “second three months of pregnancy,” which begins in the 13th week. Again, this isn’t new. Gallup has always found that a majority believe second-trimester abortions should be illegal"https://www.aei.org/op-eds/gallup-poll-shows-most-americans-would-vote-for-a-15-week-abortion-ban/ And hearts and minds should change also. Let's pray and work for abortion abolition.

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5081
    • Reputation: +1683/-376
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co