Author Topic: Internet Clampdowns  (Read 533 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaramieHirsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
  • Reputation: +867/-200
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Internet Clampdowns
« on: March 13, 2016, 07:40:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't know if I posted about this last October.  So I'll just post this today.  There's a bunch of links I provided in the blog post.  

    Internet Clampdown Prophecy Fulfilled: Aurini Banned

    It seems that we're reaching a point where emboldened SJWs (as well as Cuckservatives and other cowardly narcissists) are deciding to clamp down on the speech of those they don't like.  And I mean, it's ramping up a lot.  

    Here's some highlights from the post:

    Quote
    From Aurini:

    What YouTube is trying to do, is turn it into the Disney Channel. So, if you want to talk garbage about the Kardassians, or Paris Hilton, or if you want to, you know, review the latest Avengers movie, that stuff's all okay. But as soon as you want to have an actual conversation...it's turning into the corporate world. The corporation is taking over the entire world. These speech guidelines that you're expected to obey at work are becoming the standards for everyone everywhere.


    Quote
    From Trump:

    You know if we do that to one of their rallies, you know what happens?  Front page how bad we are.  Okay?  Front page.  We do that at one of their rallies, to Bernie or to Hillary, and they would say: "Isn't that terrible?" The press, the dishonest press!  They're the most dishonest people in the world.


    Quote
    From Vox Day:

    Most conservatives in the corporate community have prided themselves on being "colorblind" with regards to the political spectrum. I suspect that many of them will, sooner or later, understand that they have to abandon that position as being no longer tenable or intellectually justifiable.


    Quote
    From me:

    The Left--the Blue Team, as Davis Aurini calls them--has no interest in letting you talk.  They don't even want you to have your job.  They want you fired for who you are.  They want you to be fired, starve, lose your children--probably be shot and thrown in a ditch.  That is what the Left wants.  They do not respect you if you are on the Right.  They will not defend your rights, or your right to voice your opinion.


    Hope you like it.  

    I'm off to bed.  

    -LH
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 799
    • Reputation: +320/-95
    • Gender: Male
    Internet Clampdowns
    « Reply #1 on: March 13, 2016, 12:29:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LaramieHirsch (Mar 13, 2016, 8:40 am)
    It seems that we're reaching a point where emboldened SJWs (as well as Cuckservatives and other cowardly narcissists) are deciding to clamp down on the speech of those they don't like.  And I mean, it's ramping up a lot.

    That should be no surprise at all.

    How many years have passed since personal-privacy advocates began to warn applicants for corporate or governmental employment--especially the younger ones--that that the corporate busybodies among "human resources" specialists might insist on access to the Facebook pages of  a jobless applicant (with lots of time on her|his hands for elaborating them)?  It seems to me that I've even read (in the last few months, in a traditional printed news publication) that some of those specialists are routinely insisting on being given the personal passwords of applicants!  Simply because in the prevailing economy, they can!   Not only is there the potent appeal of power, but also the prospect of livening up lunch-time conversations with their coworkers, at least when off-site, never mind any corporate rules that might forbid such conversations.

    So I have no doubt that the majority of those busybodies are undisturbed by being the agents of increased violation of personal privacy, when they extend their inspection from evidence of intoxication, or dangerous activity, or even illegal activity, as foolishly documented (e.g.: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter <[...]/media/> URLs), into thoughtcrime.  How so? 
    · Plausible expressions of hostility toward the U.S. H1-B visa program, because of how the applicant believes it's unfairly stretching the time he|she needs to find a job that fits his|her education & experience?   Might a reader find unflattering words about Indians or Pakistanis?
    · Plausible expressions of opposition toward publicity by the State of Florida (March 2016) about its official & eager efforts to recruit medical specialists from Puerto Rico to work in Florida?  Which reminds me that I have a niece in college now in Central Florida, and by the most recent specific reports, she planned to major in nursing.  And among Continental U.S. regions nowadays, only New York (City?) is home to more people born in Puerto Rico than is Central Florida.

    Both my bulleted examples of thoughtcrime are related to the broad sociopolitical issue of immigration, and expressing opposition to it, no matter how logically or specifically, is thoughtcrime when judged by the norms of social justice.  Norms to which the vast majority of "human resources" specialists almost certainly subscribe, because otherwise, it seems highly unlikely that they could've earned the degrees that admit them to that field.  Or wouldn't have endured the leftist SJW brainwashing and peer-pressure that prevails in notoriously leftist soft-sciences fields (needlessly redundant wording?) like psychology and sociology.


    Offline HiddenServant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2839
    • Reputation: +75/-2
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Internet Clampdowns
    « Reply #2 on: March 13, 2016, 06:26:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •   This is not good nor should it be taken lightly on
    how controlling the bad media is !  :pray:

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16