Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken  (Read 376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline graceseeker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1305
  • Reputation: +129/-434
  • Gender: Female
illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
« on: November 21, 2017, 12:42:54 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • yeh, I have heard some stuff on the news, commentators, that doesn't make much sense.

    the gist of it is that Franken will probably not be "asked" or forced 2 leave Senate but Moore will lose his seat before he can be seated, according to some

    um... Moore has not been convicted

    w/ Franken, there is an actual photo.

    yes, the women's testimony can be "evidence" and yet at this point, again... Moore has not been convicted in court. That's not to say he didn't do it... but we don't KNOW

    if there is no trial

    so this weird commentary does not pass the logic test for me

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3475
    • Reputation: +1808/-222
    • Gender: Female
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #1 on: November 21, 2017, 04:37:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's also mighty convenient that accusers can be found for Moore at this particular time.  Doesn't pass the smell test for me.


    Offline PG

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1734
    • Reputation: +454/-468
    • Gender: Male
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #2 on: November 21, 2017, 09:23:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is a pretty good short video summarizing the claims of the accusers, and if you ask me, they are not credible accusers.  I don't think moore is guilty.   

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHdO0J82uuk
    "A secure mind is like a continual feast" - Proverbs xv: 15

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5527
    • Reputation: +2019/-37
    • Gender: Male
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #3 on: November 21, 2017, 09:37:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • With Franken, there is proof and a photograph that the event actually happened.

    With Judge Moore, there is just here say, he said, she said.  There are robo phone calls going on in Alabama looking for complaints against Judge Moore and is willing pay up to $1,000.00 for complaints.

    A woman said she was contacted by a reporter from the Washington Post and offered money for complaints against Judge
    Moore.

    In case you did not know:

    Judge Moore was removed from his State Supreme Court seat rather to surrender to have the Ten Commandments removed
    from the Alabama Supreme Court Building, and he would not allow any Judge and Justice of the Peace to perform gay weddings.

    Liberals since they lack any morals are famous in smearing Conservative candidates. They rather win elections and turn the
    country into a communist socialist Bolshevik police state in which all opponents are eliminated.

    This is the result of brainwashing and mind control in the schools, colleges, and universities.  Hollywood, and the TV.

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5527
    • Reputation: +2019/-37
    • Gender: Male
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #4 on: November 21, 2017, 09:56:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The age of consent in Alabama is 16 Years old and I believe it still is.  Judge Moore said that he always got permission from the Parents.
    My Mother married my Dad at age 17, my Dad was 27.
    Many of these allegations took place 30 to 40 years ago when he was in his early 30's and just out of the military.
    Judge Moore has ran for political office three times and no one came forward with any complaints.
    Why now!  Liberals play dirty to win elections.



    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3475
    • Reputation: +1808/-222
    • Gender: Female
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #5 on: November 21, 2017, 11:45:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The age of consent in Alabama is 16 Years old and I believe it still is.  Judge Moore said that he always got permission from the Parents.
    My Mother married my Dad at age 17, my Dad was 27.
    Many of these allegations took place 30 to 40 years ago when he was in his early 30's and just out of the military.
    Judge Moore has ran for political office three times and no one came forward with any complaints.
    Why now!  Liberals play dirty to win elections.
    My mom married my dad 3 weeks after she turned 17, he was 27-1/2.  What parent now would let their 16 year old daughter go out with a 27 year old man?  I have to say it would not have let my daughter near a man that old!  Although I must say mom's family had known my dad since he was 16 so his character was well known.

    Offline monka966

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 119
    • Reputation: +43/-18
    • Gender: Female
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #6 on: November 22, 2017, 07:47:50 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Courtesy of Introibo Ad Altare Dei blog (http://introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/):

    Judge Roy Moore is running for the United States Senate in Alabama. He was elected to the highest court in the state twice, and was removed from office both times for standing up for his beliefs. Moore, a Protestant, first refused to remove a monument in honor of the Ten Commandments from the courthouse in violation of a federal court order. He was removed from office, only to be reelected by the people of Alabama. He then refused to allow marriage licenses to be issued to sodomites, in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. He resigned after being suspended and announced he was running for Senator. Before the allegations of sexual impropriety with a minor (coming in with the timing and credibility of Anita Hill), one of Moore's most controversial statements was that Moslems should not hold public office. According to Worldnetdaily, he stated, "...common sense alone dictates that in the midst of a war with Islamic terrorists we should not place someone in a position of great power who shares their doctrine."

    When Congressman Keith Ellison of Minnesota (b. 1963) was elected as the first Islamic member of Congress in 2006, he insisted on taking the oath of office on the Koran (Ellison was a member of the Vatican II sect and graduated from a Jesuit school before converting to Islam--way to go Vatican II). Roy Moore protested by saying, "In 1943, we would never have allowed a member of Congress to take their oath on Mein Kampf, or someone in the 1950s to swear allegiance on the Communist Manifesto,.."

    Offline graceseeker

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1305
    • Reputation: +129/-434
    • Gender: Female
    Re: illogical to condemn Moore but not Franken
    « Reply #7 on: November 27, 2017, 03:46:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is a pretty good short video summarizing the claims of the accusers, and if you ask me, they are not credible accusers.  I don't think moore is guilty.  

     
    I cant get that site
    can you summarize the most egregious aspects of their claims?
    :-\


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16