Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment  (Read 638 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31195
  • Reputation: +27112/-494
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I haven't verified all of these facts, but I know that the gist of the e-mail is basically true.

    Supreme court justices die every so often, and there's already one vacancy.

    Hillary would likely attack the 2nd Amendment, because she's very much against it (being a Communist and all), and of course she would nominate the most liberal Supreme Court justices possible.



    Some people have brought up the fact that they won't vote if the eventual nominee is not the person they wanted.  Let me put something in perspective.

        Justice Scalia's seat is vacant.
        Ginsberg is 82 years old
        Kennedy is 79
        Breyer is 77
        Thomas is 67.
        Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.
        These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.
        Think about that... 7-2.
         
        If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation.  Moreover, 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are viewed as lacking in mandate.

        Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.
           
        Anyone and Everyone who is saying that they won't vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize that if Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life.  Ever!!!

        KEEP HILLARY OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE!!!  VOTE for TRUMP and All Republican Candidates.

        Remember Romney? Three million conservatives who had voted for McCain did not cast a vote for Romney (for whatever reason) and the result was four additional years of Obama.
        (THANK YOU, IDIOTS!!!)

        AND ONE FINAL THOUGHT:  Hillary is already on record as saying that her buddy, Obama "would make a great Supreme Court Justice."

         DID YOU JUST READ THAT LAST SENTENCE?       NOW ARE YOU SCARED????
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline JezusDeKoning

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2940
    • Reputation: +1090/-2220
    • Gender: Male
    Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment
    « Reply #1 on: July 29, 2016, 11:07:19 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    I haven't verified all of these facts, but I know that the gist of the e-mail is basically true.

    Supreme court justices die every so often, and there's already one vacancy.

    Hillary would likely attack the 2nd Amendment, because she's very much against it (being a Communist and all), and of course she would nominate the most liberal Supreme Court justices possible.



    Some people have brought up the fact that they won't vote if the eventual nominee is not the person they wanted.  Let me put something in perspective.

        Justice Scalia's seat is vacant.
        Ginsberg is 82 years old
        Kennedy is 79
        Breyer is 77
        Thomas is 67.
        Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.
        These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.
        Think about that... 7-2.
         
        If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation.  Moreover, 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are viewed as lacking in mandate.

        Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.
           
        Anyone and Everyone who is saying that they won't vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize that if Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life.  Ever!!!

        KEEP HILLARY OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE!!!  VOTE for TRUMP and All Republican Candidates.

        Remember Romney? Three million conservatives who had voted for McCain did not cast a vote for Romney (for whatever reason) and the result was four additional years of Obama.
        (THANK YOU, IDIOTS!!!)

        AND ONE FINAL THOUGHT:  Hillary is already on record as saying that her buddy, Obama "would make a great Supreme Court Justice."

         DID YOU JUST READ THAT LAST SENTENCE?       NOW ARE YOU SCARED????


    Absolutely bloody not. Why? Because no one in their right mind would appoint Obama a Supreme Court Justice.

    He has no judicial experience at all. He's never served as a judge and hasn't practiced law in almost a decade - his law license expired long ago in order to run for office.
    Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary...


    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2655
    • Reputation: +1641/-438
    • Gender: Male
    Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment
    « Reply #2 on: July 29, 2016, 12:16:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Finally making sense again, I see. :farmer:
    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...

    Offline ClarkSmith

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 498
    • Reputation: +255/-8
    • Gender: Male
    Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment
    « Reply #3 on: July 29, 2016, 12:23:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Clinton took a  major hit when Wikileaks released the DNC emails . It looks like Bernie supporters will either vote Green, stay home, or go to Trump. However, the leaks came a couple of months too early and people will forget by election time.
     

    Offline Charlemagne

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1439
    • Reputation: +2103/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment
    « Reply #4 on: July 29, 2016, 01:58:26 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was wondering when you were going to see this, Matthew. I don't like Trump personally and he's a wildcard, but we know WITHOUT ANY DOUBT what Shillary will do.
    "This principle is most certain: The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope. The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member. Now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others. Therefore, the manifest heretic cannot be Pope." -- St. Robert Bellarmine


    Offline ClarkSmith

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 498
    • Reputation: +255/-8
    • Gender: Male
    Hillary could stack the Supreme Court - attack the 2nd amendment
    « Reply #5 on: August 01, 2016, 08:40:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The current Khan controversy only strengthens my belief that the media  is directly involved in getting Clinton elected.