Feb 15, 2018, 1:49 pm  2 Reply

1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/07/1950-to-2010-not-one-mass-public-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/

.
A reporter and commentator today said that we get all concerned over the wrong things.
.
There were several people who noticed this shooter's odd behavior in the past but they didn't want to say anything because someone might get offended. Thanks to the libs, we're teaching children to be too worried about offending someone with what we say.
.
So what's worse? They're afraid to say "odd behavior" because they could be talking about someone who's transɛҳuąƖ or black or Moslem or Mexican or Jєω (but not Christian because insulting Christians is fair game somehow). Is it worse that someone "feels offended" for a minute or two or that 17 innocent people are dead forever?
.
As for teachers being armed, how can you be sure that a wayward "student" won't find a way of grabbing the gun?
.
You could have armed guards but that costs more, you know.
.
Come to think of it, the insurance rates would likely go up if teachers were permitted to conceal and carry.
But maybe that would only be for a short time, then the rates would go down after a few years.
.

As America wails about some psychopathic  killer shooting up a school and wondering how and why it happened, I ask, why is anybody surprised? In America, we live in a culture of death everyday. Tens of millions of unborn murdered since Rode vs Wade, tens of millions more have suffered extermination, directly or indirectly, by the unjust invasion(s) of sovereign nations since WWII by the "Land of the free..."

On the day of this massacre, marked the 78th anniversary of the incineration of more than 100,000 civilians in Dresden, on Ash Wednesday, by the murderous Churchill, were is the outcry?! Were is the justice?!

This Nation, and it's Allies, have much to answer for... these shootings are but child's play compared to what's in store for us.

Lord, have mercy!
_____________________________________


78 Years Ago Today Churchill Incinerated 100,000 Defenseless Civilians in Dresden

"In the sky Allied fighter planes caught sight of the civilian train and opened fire on the children inside, whose blood was soon pouring out of the wreckage."
Michael Hoffman Feb 14, 2018
The original headline of this article was: 'The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday'

---

[size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}][size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}][size={defaultattr}]
It was Shrove Tuesday, 1945 in the magnificent German art city of Dresden, which was packed with helpless Christian refugees fleeing the Red Army of the Stalinist USSR. Dresden’s native Lutheran and Catholic children, dressed in their festive Saxon folk costumes, were aboard a train taking them home after Mardi Gras parties at different points in the far-flung city.


Still merry from the night’s festivities, they cavorted on the train prior to Ash Wednesday, February 14, and the solemnities that would be observed even in wartime, in memory of the passion and death of Jesus. In the sky Allied fighter planes caught sight of the civilian train and opened fire on the children inside, whose blood was soon pouring out of the wreckage.



He is the real war criminal
This carnage registers almost not at all in the American mind. The h0Ɩ0cαųst in Dresden, lasting two days and killing at least 100,000 people, like the atomic h0Ɩ0cαųst in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, usually merits not much more than a few sentences or a single paragraph in the back pages of metropolitan newspapers, unlike “Yom HaShoah (יום השואה) h0Ɩ0cαųst Remembrance Day,” in April, which is observed with countless civic, educational and media events, hosannahs, apologies and genuflections, from the Vatican to the White House. The barely remembered German and Japanese victims of Allied war crimes were of the wrong race and religion.


In the spring of 1945, after prosecuting the bombing h0Ɩ0cαųst against every major German city, and with the end of the Second World War in sight in Europe, Winston Churchill began to consider his reputation in the post-war period, when the 500,000 German innocents he ordered incinerated could come back to haunt him and stain his prestige. On March 28, 1945 he issued a deceitful, back-stabbing memo blaming the mass incineration on his own Bomber Command and by insinuation, upon its commander Arthur hαɾɾιs, whose force would be denied a post-war campaign medal, and hαɾɾιs a peerage.
hαɾɾιs and Bomber Command had been only following Winston Churchill’s explicit orders, yet Churchill attempted to shift responsibility onto the corps of airmen who had suffered among the highest casualties of any branch of the British military.


Churchill, like many others, endeavored to blame Germany for being the first to saturate civilians with terror-bombs —at Guernica in Spain on behalf of Franco’s forces, and in Rotterdam, during the war with Holland. In both cases Churchill stated that thousands had been killed. Even one death is regrettable of course, but less than 100 people were killed in Guernica according to historian David Irving, and less than a thousand in Rotterdam, when the Luftwafe accidentally struck a margarine factory and the flammable liquid burned houses nearby.

Churchill had said “thousands” died in Guernica, and that 30,000 perished in Rotterdam, which is more than what Deborah Lipstadt says died in the two-day inferno in Dresden (the absurdly low figure of 25,000 is now the officially fixed count to which the “news media” comform without deviation).
The Germans had pledged not to be the first to bomb civilian centers in Britain. Churchill had hoped they would carpet bomb London to give him the excuse to silence the large peace movement in England which was dogging him in 1940, at a time when the Germans had not dropped a single bomb on London, almost a year after Britain had declared war on Germany.
The British Prime Minister obtained his pretext toward the end of August, 1940, when a lone, wayward German bomber “lost its way flying up the Thames” river. It had orders to attack an oil refinery, but instead dropped its bombs on London’s East End. No one was killed thankfully, but Churchill was elated.
He had the excuse he needed to massively retaliate against Berlin, knowing Hitler would respond in kind, and that the British peace movement would vanish in the smoke and flames of the “Battle of Britain” and the “Blitz.” Churchill ordered a hundred bombers to attack Berlin. Royal Air Force (RAF) commanders warned him that the Luftwaffe would do the same to London.


At this juncture we pause to contemplate the bloody treason that was at the heart of Churchill’s soul: he wanted as many of his own English civilians in London to die as possible, so he could point to their deaths as the justification for a total war against Germany, and he succeeded in his objective.


Some of the victims of the Allied h0Ɩ0cαųst in Dresden
To this day the war crime the leaders of Britain and the United States perpetrated in Dresden is justified on the basis of the tired fable that “Germany did it first to Rotterdam and Guernica,” and “Look at the terror the Germans visited upon London.” Nothing that occurred in Guernica, Rotterdam, or for that matter London, begins to even approach the scale of the h0Ɩ0cαųst that the firebombs of the air forces of Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt inflicted on Dresden.
On September 4, 1940 Hitler gave a speech in which he stated that if the “mad drunkard” Churchill continued to attack Berlin, the Germans were not going to stand by and take it. It was Neanderthal thinking on the führer’s part: you club me over the head and I will club you. Hitler was almost always outfoxed by the clever machinations of the masonic treachery at the heart of Britain’s ruling class.


No matter what Churchill ordered, Hitler should have limited his air campaign to British military sites and munitions factories (the Luftwaffe never bothered to attack the factories that built Britain’s Lancaster bombers).

On September 6 the English people heard the ominous drone of a fleet of Luftwaffe bombers flying up the Thames. Some 3,000 Londoners subsequently died. Now Churchill had what he wanted. You won’t find these facts in the multi-volume history he wrote, or in the pages of the work of the conformist historians. To learn the truth one must read and study the revisionists, particularly the demonized David Irving, the preeminent military historian of World War II in the Atlantic theatre.
Irving’s nemesis, Deborah Lipstadt meanwhile, has taken it upon herself to deny the h0Ɩ0cαųst casualty figure of 100,000 for Dresden, but God help any one of us who would have the temerity to doubt the Six Million casualty figure of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity, or even to apply the word “h0Ɩ0cαųst” to what happened in Dresden.
I challenge any reader to collect the legacy media’s descriptions of the bombing of Dresden from the 1990s onward and count how many term it a h0Ɩ0cαųst.
The extent to which we are imprisoned in an Orwellian dystopia of our own making is revealed when we consider the fact that it is regarded as highly insensitive or indeed “anti-Semitic” to violate the self-appointed Newspeak h0Ɩ0cαųst trademark appropriated by the Holy People, and apply it to the German cities that were incinerated, or to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though those war crimes were genuine h0Ɩ0cαųsts by dictionary definition: “Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire. Origin: Greek holokauston, from holos ‘whole’ and kaustos ‘burned.”


Even in the liturgy of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity it is not decreed that most Judaic victims of the nαzιs perished by fire. A half-million German civilians and three-quarters of a million Japanese civilians (including the victims of the fire-bombing of Toyko), were indeed burned to death, yet it is a thought crime to say so. Tell me we are not all cowards for allowing truth itself to be forbidden. We live in тαℓмυdic times.

This writer is sometimes accused, as a researcher in the field of the Babylonian тαℓмυd, of seeing the тαℓмυd where it is not. It is not so much the тαℓмυdic texts themselves that we observe in our society, but the results of their influence. The single most remarkable dimension of тαℓмυdic halacha is its narcissistic exceptionalism, born of the self-worship it inculcates.
Prof. Lipstadt, who has made an career out of stigmatizing anyone who doubts any aspect of the “h0Ɩ0cαųst” narrative, as a diabolic “h0Ɩ0cαųst denier,” is free to deny, without negative consequences, the h0Ɩ0cαųst in Dresden, because of her exceptional status as one of the Holy People. She may do as she likes with history, in ways that the rest of us may not. For that reason alone we cannot respect the religion of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity.
It is not history. It is a product of тαℓмυdic megalomania. Few of us tolerate fanatical egoism from Catholics, Protestants or Muslims. The very idea raises our secular indignation and “Separation of Church (or Mosque) and State!” is our cry, in the face of it. But to shout “Separation of ѕуηαgσgυє and State!” in nations where h0Ɩ0cαųstianity is the last truly believed state religion in the otherwise agnostic West, would be unthinkable for anyone who valued their reputation, employment, personal safety, or in Europe, freedom from incarceration.
Beyond the “Jєω and gentile” entanglement is the fratricide: Churchill and his top military circle were not Judaic, yet they set afire the medieval cities of their German cousins, who only two generations before had comprised the royal blood within the House of the German-speaking Queen Victoria.


A thousand years of national and religious wars in Europe had not managed to wreak the destruction which Mr. Churchill and U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt directed against the cultural treasure houses of western civilization, in cities like Dresden. They tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him.

Yet “conservative Christian” American university professors and administrators in institutions of higher learning such as Michigan’s esteemed Hillsdale College, which is the recipient of millions of dollars in donations from “Conservatives” seeking to preserve western civilization, have hallowed Churchill into a paragon of decency, courage and western leadership. This view of this mass murdering vandal is such a defect of vision as to be fatal spiritually, culturally and politically on a national scale.
If the powers that be decided, for example, that Russia needed to be fire-bombed, given sufficient pretext our “Conservatives” would do it all over again in the name of “civilization.” The blood of the innocent in Moscow and St. Petersburg would signify no more to the Hillsdale College type of crusaders than the charred bodies of the civilians in the apocalyptic wreckage of Dresden.
American civilization in 2018 is not worthy of the name. We have the illusion of a civilization, which we cherish for our own aggrandizement and nostalgia. “Conservative” America has made common cause with the тαℓмυdic mentality, as did Antonin Scalia, another of its plaster saints.
At the start of Lent 2018, seventy-three years after the Allies’ mass murder in Dresden, we inhabit the money changer’s house, where Christ on the Cross is sold not just for a buck, but for a bucket of тαℓмυdic vindication.

https://russia-insider.com/en/78-years-ago-today-churchill-incinerated-100000-defenseless-civilians-dresden/ri22531[/size][/font][/size][/font][/size]

Potentially Deadly Mass Shooting Thwarted, Ignored by MSM



This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Monday, February 19, 2018: 
Mainstream media (MSM) bias was never more clearly displayed than when it ignored what could have been one of the deadliest mass shootings in American history in favor of the Florida school shooting. It happened the same day — Valentine’s Day — in Amarillo, Texas, when an armed street person entered the Faith City Mission and took between 100 and 150 worshipers hostage. Joshua Len Jones, age 35, who had been attending the morning service, left the building, retrieved a handgun, reentered the building, and threatened worshipers with it
The MSM was no doubt alerted by local media as soon as the event took place. But what unfolded would not serve their anti-gun agenda and be the headline in the evening news. “Man with nasty hateful dangerous probably illegal firearm shoots and kills dozens” would scream the headline.
One Clay Murdock, a student at the mission, refused to run or hide. Instead, he chose to run toward danger, tackling Jones with the help of other church security people. As far as the MSM was concerned, that was the end of the story: no shooting, no one killed or injured, a nothing burger, move on, looking for something else to cover. Hours later, the Florida school shooting occurred, and the MSM had a horrific tragedy that it could then use to flog its anti-gun narrative: firearm, deranged killer, 17 innocent lives lost.
Of course, it is understandable that such a horrific crime would get national and international publicity. But why doesn’t the MSM point out that the killings occurred in a gun-free zone (the school) where the victims were defenseless? It does not fit the anti-gun narrative. And why doesn’t the MSM also point to examples where the intended victims refuse to allow themselves to become victims? Again, it does not fit the narrative.
Unfortunately, the heroic Murdock got shot for his trouble. As he was wrestling Jones to the ground he managed to take the handgun from the attacker at the very moment when Amarillo’s finest arrived on the scene: “man with gun!” Two officers fired, hitting Murdock. The APD later apologized for shooting the wrong man.
The potentially lethal tragedy at Faith City Mission in Amarillo was covered by local TV station, WLOX, and the Amarillo Globe News. It wasn’t covered by ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, Fox News, the New York Times, the Boston Globe, the Los Angeles Times or the Chicago Tribune. While they were busy spinning the tragedy in Florida to promote their anti-gun agenda, they did not want to include anything — about the Florida shooting or any other story — that might detract from that agenda.
At this writing, Jones was taken into custody and charged with aggravated kidnapping while Murdock is in hospital recovering from surgery following the incident.

We need to guard our Churches especially during Sunday Mass.  Perhaps if someone in the congregation is a off Duty
Police Officer or a security guard. WE have to be beware who comes into the church during Mass.

I don't know if this event is fαℓѕє fℓαg, but the media is downplaying Cruz's admission that his biological mother was Jєωιѕн:

--http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2018/02/is-nikolas-cruz-Jєωιѕн.html

The recent mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida has been all over the news as of late, but while the media have been quick to claim that the shooter Nikolas Cruz was an ‘anti-Semitic nαzι who wanted to gas Six Million Jєωs’. (1) That this is a rather bad troll operation is however not widely publicized in the media. (2)
 
 While the same media outlets – which claimed the manifestly mixed-race Cruz as some kind of ‘White Supremacist’ – have been much, much quieter about the fact that in the same allegedly ‘anti-Semitic’ rants.
 
 Cruz also stated that he was – in fact – Jєωιѕн.
 
 The Times of Israel glosses over this fact quickly by implying it was some sort of psychological pathogen when it writes that: ‘In one anti-Semitic tirade, Cruz referenced his biological mother, saying: “My real mom was a Jєω. I am glad I never met her,” CNN said.’ (3)
 
 Arutz Sheva does likewise:
 
 ‘In one post about his biological mother, Cruz said: “My real mom was a Jєω. I am glad I never met her,” according to CNN. He also said that he hated Jєωs because he believed they wanted to destroy the world.’ (4)
 
 In other words; the Jєωs wish to represent Cruz’s Jєωιѕнness, which - as Cruz has clearly identified his biological mother as Jєωιѕн – as being incidental. They don’t wish to even discuss the fact that Cruz’s Jєωιѕн mother’s abandonment of him may have played a critical role in him becoming the mass-murdering school shooter he turned out to be.
 
 In essence Jєωs want to be Cruz’s victims rather than acknowledging the simple fact that they also played a pivotal role in creating the conditions for Cruz’s shooting spree.
 
 

References

 (1) https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-florida-shooter-said-he-hates-Jєωs-claims-they-want-to-destroy-world/ ; https://www.timesofisrael.com/tomented-by-florida-shooting-Jєω-crew-buddies-find-solace-in-each-other/
 (2) https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2018/02/17/adl-duped-white-supremacists-plays-key-role-spreading-hoax-parkland-shooter/
 (3) https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-florida-shooter-said-he-hates-Jєωs-claims-they-want-to-destroy-world/
 (4) https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/242098

JUST ANOTHER HOAX...