-
ATF’s Secret & Illegal Gun Registry Just Got More Dangerous — It’s About to be Powered by Federal Government AI
Ammoland Inc. Posted on August 3, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/atfs-secret-illegal-gun-registry-just-got-more-dangerous-federal-government-ai/) by Tred Law (https://www.ammoland.com/author/tred-law/)
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/atfs-secret-illegal-gun-registry-just-got-more-dangerous-federal-government-ai/
Opinion
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-mCj3MWSLGQ/hqdefault.jpg)
As the federal government rolls out its sweeping artificial intelligence strategy—ingesting “all government data” into machine learning models—gun owners have every reason to be alarmed.
Michael Kratsios, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, recently confirmed (https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2025/07/white-house-tech-director-breaks-down-plan-balance-ai-national-security-and-export-promotion/407102/?ref=aisecret.us)that “all the government data that the government has is going to be ingested into models” to improve citizen services, including permits, taxes, and healthcare. That’s not just parking passes and passports—that potentially includes firearm transaction records, too.
This raises a red flag for anyone following the ATF’s quiet construction of a digital database of gun owner records (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/01/fight-heats-up-to-destroy-atfs-illegal-gun-owner-registry/)—a practice that violates federal law but has continued for years under both Democrat and Republican administrations. Despite clear legal prohibitions against a centralized registry, the ATF currently maintains nearly one billion firearm transaction records, many of them digitized and partially searchable.
The Database That Shouldn’t Exist
According to FOIA responses and internal ATF memos (https://www.ammoland.com/2022/05/gun-owners-of-america-uncover-proof-of-a-secret-gun-registry/), the Bureau receives millions of out-of-business dealer records every month. These records include sensitive data from ATF Form 4473s—name, address, firearm description, and more. Although ATF claims that this information can’t be searched by name, it’s only because that feature is “disabled”—not deleted. With just a few keystrokes, ATF could turn this passive database into an active weapon against gun owners.
Gun Owners of America (GOA) has gone further, exposing that the ATF has encouraged active FFLs to submit current records voluntarily (https://www.ammoland.com/2021/11/old-dealers-records-prompt-concerns-of-backdoor-gun-registry/), even before closing shop, expanding this illegal registry far beyond its already bloated scope
Enter AI: From “Woke Filtering” to Weaponized Data
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/18-U.S.C.-926a3-600x244.jpg)
18 U.S.C. § 926(a)(3)
The Trump administration’s recent executive order (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/preventing-woke-ai-in-the-federal-government/) aims to prevent “woke AI” in federal procurement. It promises that large language models (LLMs) used by the government will be “ideologically neutral” and “truth-seeking.”
But what about privacy? What about the enforcement of laws like 18 U.S.C. § 926(a)(3), (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/926) which prohibits the federal government from maintaining a firearms registry?
Nowhere in the policy is there a guarantee that firearms ownership data will be excluded from AI ingestion. No safeguard. No carve-out. Just blind faith that bureaucrats will do the “right thing” with mountains of sensitive information—despite decades of evidence to the contrary.
If firearm transaction records become part of these national AI systems, what’s to stop future administrations—or even foreign actors who compromise the system—from querying this data to locate, target, or harass law-abiding gun owners?
Who Will Hold the Line?
Congress isn’t asleep at the wheel—at least not all of it. In January 2025, Congressman Michael Cloud and Senator Jim Risch reintroduced the No REGISTRY Rights Act (https://cloud.house.gov/posts/release-rep-cloud-and-sen-risch-introduce-bill-to-block-federal-gun-registry), a direct response to the ATF’s illegal stockpiling of gun owner data. (https://www.ammoland.com/2022/01/atf-keeping-920-million-searchable-firearm-records/) The bill would dismantle the ATF’s Out-of-Business Records Imaging System (OBRIS), which currently holds over 920 million firearm transaction records, many of them digitized and indexed for rapid retrieval. Cloud’s investigation into this system, along with a damning report by Gun Owners of America, revealed how easily this database could be misused to build a door-to-door gun confiscation list.
The legislation is refreshingly simple in its goals. First, it requires the complete destruction of the ATF’s existing registry. Second, it allows gun dealers to destroy their records when they go out of business—reversing Biden-era rules that forced permanent retention. And third, it prohibits any federal agency from creating or maintaining a gun registry ever again.
The bill is supported by a coalition of liberty-minded lawmakers and gun rights champions, including GOA, the National Association for Gun Rights, and the NRA. But make no mistake—this fight isn’t over just because President Trump is back in the White House.
The bill still faces resistance in Congress from anti-gun lawmakers and bureaucrats who would rather sweep the registry issue under the rug than deal with it lawfully.
What Can Gun Owners & Advocacy Groups Do?
The only way to force this bill across the finish line is sustained pressure from gun owners across the country. Contact your representatives. Demand passage. The gun registry must not only be defunded—it must be destroyed. And the AI age only raises the stakes. Because if this registry survives, it may not be a human bureaucrat pulling your file—it might be an algorithm doing the government’s dirty work.
- Call for Immediate Deletion: Demand that any AI system built by the federal government be explicitly barred from ingesting or accessing any firearms-related records—whether paper, scanned, or digitized.
- Push for Enforcement of Existing Laws: Congress must enforce 18 U.S.C. § 926(a)(3) and hold the ATF accountable for violating it. Any federal employee found knowingly participating in building a gun registry should face consequences.
- Support REGISTRY Destruction Legislation: The GOA-backed bills are vital. Gun owners should contact their senators and representatives to co-sponsor and support these efforts.
- Demand Transparency: FOIA requests should continue, especially as new AI projects come online. The public deserves to know which data sources are being fed into these models—and whether your gun record is among them.
- Educate and Mobilize: Local and state-level activism remains one of the best tools to apply pressure upward. Host town halls, educate other gun owners, and make sure this issue doesn’t fly under the radar.
The fusion of unchecked artificial intelligence with illegally maintained federal firearm records should set off alarms for every freedom-loving American. AI can either empower citizens or enable tyranny—it depends entirely on who controls the data. Right now, gun owners are losing that battle.
The government must not be allowed to digitize our rights away. Let this be a wake-up call. Stay armed with the truth—and stay involved. The future of the Second Amendment may depend on what you do today.
-
UNITED STATES V. MILLER: How the Second Amendment Was Subverted
https://www.ammoland.com/2013/12/united-states-v-miller-how-the-second-amendment-was-subverted/
Ammoland Inc. Posted on December 11, 2013 (https://www.ammoland.com/2013/12/united-states-v-miller-how-the-second-amendment-was-subverted/) by F Riehl, Editor in Chief (https://www.ammoland.com/author/fg3hht991x/)
By Dean Weingarten
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Miller-of-U.S.-v-Miller-photograph-from-Brian-Frye.jpg)
Miller, of U.S. v Miller, photograph from Brian Frye
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Gun-Watch-Logo.jpg) (https://www.ammoland.com/tags/gun-watch/)
Gun Watch
Arizona – -(Ammoland.com (https://www.ammoland.com/))- In 2008, Brian L. Frye (https://works.bepress.com/brian_l_frye/) published the seminal paper on the history of United States v. Miller, the single most important second amendment case before U.S. V. Heller.
While Miller no longer holds as much significance in second amendment cases as it used to, the way in which the government manipulated the case in order to deprive American citizens of their second amendment rights deserves detailed study.
In “THE PECULIAR STORY OF UNITED STATES V. MILLER (https://www.scribd.com/doc/122415466/us-v-miller)“, Professor Frye’s meticulous scholarship shows that much of what went on behind the scenes differs sharply from what we have been told.
Frye’s essay consists of 34 pages, packed with footnotes docuмenting original sources. He summarizes his conclusions in this early paragraph:
This essay suggests the conventional wisdom is only half-right, because Miller did less than generally supposed. Part I presents a brief historiography of Miller. It argues scholars have not provided an entirely convincing account of the Supreme Court’s holding in Miller, largely because they focus on the original meaning of the Second Amendment. Part II recounts the history of the case. It shows Jack Miller was a career criminal and government informant. It finds Miller was a Second Amendment test case arranged by the government and designed to support the constitutionality of federal gun control. And Part III analyzes Miller in light of this history.
I do not think that Professor Frye goes far enough. The facts appear like a conspiracy to strip Americans of their second amendment rights through collusion of the judge, prosecutors, and defendant’s council in the case. The only bright spot was the actual Supreme Court decision which held that arms related to the militia were protected by the second amendment. With appellate courts packed with Roosevelt appointees over his four terms, the appellate courts only interpreted Miller in ways to remove any protection for the second amendment.
Notice a couple significant points below. First, that Miller and Layton were not allowed to plead guilty, and this was from Judge Ragon, who was the rabid equivalent of Charles Schumer of today. Second, Judge Ragon appointed the defense counsel, Paul E. Gutensohn.
On June 2, 1938, Miller and Layton were both indicted on one count of violating 26 U.S.C. § 1132(c) by transporting an untaxed short-barreled shotgun in interstate commerce. Both Miller and Layton pleaded guilty, but Ragon refused to accept their plea and appointed Paul E. Gutensohn as counsel.
Now Judge Ragon has the case he wants, the defendants he wants and the defense council that he wants. Judge Ragon then creates the only defense for the case, his memorandum opinion.
On June 11, 1938 Miller and Layton demurred to the indictment, claiming that it presented insufficient evidence of a transfer requiring payment of a tax and challenging the constitutionality of the NFA under the Second and Tenth Amendments. Surprisingly, Ragon immediately issued a memorandum opinion sustaining the demurrer and quashing the indictment. He held that the NFA violates the Second Amendment by prohibiting the transportation of unregistered covered firearms in interstate commerce.
Professor Frye goes on to provide details that explain much that seems peculiar, and even insane, about the 1934 National Firearms Act. What sense is there to make short barreled rifles and shotguns, which are the functional equivalent of pistols, subject to insanely high taxes ($200 in 1934 was equivalent to $4,000 in 2012) and to such extreme levels of regulation that it deterred the vast majority of people from even attempting to comply? The answer is that the 1934 NFA was designed to make pistols as hard to get as machine guns. Judge Ragon had pushed for legislation to do this while he was in congress. Michigan had already provided a lesson for the drafters of the 1934 NFA. In 1925, Michigan (https://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/11/michigan-moves-to-repeal-obsolete-gun.html), lobbied by the KKK, had passed a pistol licensing scheme, in order to keep black people disarmed. In 1931, Michigan had outlawed short barreled rifles and shotguns. What was the point of keeping black people from having pistols, if they could simply procure rifles or shotguns, saw off the barrel and stock, and have a functional pistol without having to go through the permit process that they were effectively barred from?
As originally proposed, the NFA also applied to pistols and levied a $1000 tax on manufacturers and importers. However, after the NRA and other firearms associations opposed the inclusion of pistols at the public hearings, the restrictions on pistols were eliminated. The Ways and Means Committee approved the bill without reservation, and the Finance Committee recommended amending the tax on manufacturers and importers to $500, which the House accepted. Congress explicitly disclaimed any intention to include “pistols and revolvers and sporting arms” because “there is justification for permitting the citizen to keep a pistol or revolver for his own protection without any restriction.”
The effective ban on short barreled shotguns and rifles was left in the legislation, because few people owned them at the time.
Before he became a judge, Ragon represented the Fifth District of Arkansas in Congress from 1923 to 1933. As a congressman, he was a vocal advocate of federal gun control. In 1924, Ragon introduced an unsuccessful bill prohibiting the importation of guns in violation of state law, and vigorously supported another bill prohibiting the mailing of most pistols, which eventually passed in 1927. Basically, Ragon wanted to prohibit firearms used by criminals, including pistols. “I want to say that I am unequivocally opposed to pistols in any connection whatever. If you want something in the home for defense, there is the shotgun and the rifle, but a pistol is primarily for the purpose of killing somebody.” And he specifically dismissed Second Amendment objections to federal gun control. “I cannot see that violence to the Constitution which my friend from Texas sees in this bill.” If Arkansas could prohibit pistols, so could the United States.
The bit about using shotguns for self defense could have come directly from the mouth of Vice President Joe Biden (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHZ7zXLvOkY&feature=player_embedded). Perhaps VP Biden left off the rifles in his comments, because the Obama administration is trying to ban many rifles.
Judge Ragon was closely tied to the Roosevelt administration, and had been appointed to his judicial seat by President Franklin Roosevelt.
A prominent Democrat, Ragon endorsed Roosevelt in 1932 and helped push the New Deal through the Ways and Means Committee. In return, Roosevelt made him a district judge. The NFA was part of Roosevelt’s New Deal program, enacted with broad support shortly after Ragon took the bench. But the Federal Firearms Act of 1938 (sic) was stirring up popular opposition, much of it based on the Second Amendment. The government needed to silence the complaints, and Miller was the perfect vehicle. Ragon had presided in an O’Malley prosecution, so he knew Miller was a crooked, pliable snitch, who wouldn’t cause any trouble. And Gutensohn was a comer who knew the game and got his due. Ragon’s memorandum opinion presented no facts and no argument. With no defense muddying the waters, it was the government’s ideal test case.
In an extremely rare move, the government appealed the case directly to the Supreme Court. I do not believe it could happen today. Perhaps a legal scholar can explain how the government lawyers were able to jump over the appellate court. Then the defense attorney, Gutensohn, (remember, appointed by Judge Ragon) steps away from the case, and does not participate in oral arguments or a written brief.
Supreme Court Clerk Charles Cropley wrote to Gutensohn on March 15, informing him the Supreme Court had accepted the appeal and expected to hear oral argument on March 31. Gutensohn wrote back on March 22, asking why he had not received the record or the government’s brief and emphasizing that he represented Miller and Layton pro bono.
Cropley replied on March 25,informing Gutensohn that the government had submitted a type-written brief and he could do the same. In the alternative, Cropley suggested the court could postpone oral argument until April 17.
But on March 28, Gutensohn replied by telegram: “Suggest case be submitted on Appellants brief. Unable to obtain any money from clients to be present and argue case = Paul E Gutensohn.”
With no one but the government presenting any evidence in the case, a decision was made, based on the presented “facts”, which included the effective lie that short barreled shotguns were not used by the military.
The decision came quickly. On May 15, 1939, Justice JamesClark McReynolds “drawled from the bench: ‘We construe the amendment as having relation to military service and we are unable to say that a sawed-off shotgun has any relation to the militia.’”
The New York Times, reliably “progressive” provided journalistic cover for the judicial coup. Note that this is seven years after the New York Times gave Walter Duranty a Pulitizer Prize for effectively covering up the mass murder in the Ukraine by the Soviet Union. The Pulitzer has never been pulled.
The unanimous vote was 8-0, as Justice Douglas was recused.The papers were bemusedly pleased. The New York Times noted, “The record in the case of Miller and Dayton [sic] does not show for what purpose they were taking the sawed-off shotgun across State lines. Government officials felt, today, however, that the McReynolds decision had given them a new instrument with which to fight bank robbers, gangsters and other criminals, whose favorite arm is the sawed-off shotgun.”
In a pattern that we see followed today, a congressman called for even more draconian gun laws, and had the gall to say that they would not hamper people from “purchasing or possessing a firearm”.
And Jackson soon asked Congress to enact legislation requiring the registration of all firearms, in order to foil subversives:
“’It is to be particularly noted that the legislation, the enactment of which I recommend, would in nowise improperly limit the freedom of action of peaceful, law abiding persons. The contemplated legislation would not hamper or hinder any person from purchasing or possessing a firearm. It would merely require him to register the firearm and to record any transfer of the weapon.’”
As often happens with snitches, Miller met an unhappy end a short while later.
At about 9 a.m. on April 3, two or three men in a car picked up Miller at his home in Ketchum, Oklahoma.
The next day,around noon, a farmhand named Fisher discovered Miller’s bullet-ridden corpse on the bank of the “nearly dry” Little Spencer Creek,nine miles southwest of Chelsea, Oklahoma.
Miller was shot four times with a .38, twice in the chest, once under the left arm, and once through the left arm. The .45 automatic next to him had been fired three times.
Miller’s confederate did much better. He got a sweetheart deal for his part in the charade.
On January 8, 1940, Layton pleaded guilty to the reinstated NFA charge and Ragon sentenced him to five years probation.
Judge Ragon did not live to see the political rewards for his conspiracy against the second amendment and the American people.
Ragon expected an appointment to the Eighth Circuit, but died suddenly of a heart attack on September 15, 1940.
We owe a great deal to the scholarship done by Professor Frye. This is the definitive work on how the Miller case was set up to deprive the American people of their second amendment rights. It is worth reading in its entirety in order to see the nuances and the attention to detail in the original sources.
us v miller (https://www.scribd.com/doc/122415466/us-v-miller) by richard_rowland (https://www.scribd.com/richard_rowland)
©2013 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch (https://gunwatch.blogspot.com/)
-
To defeat Scribd's control freak paywall pimps, see the attached file.
-
Though not an advocate of binary triggers, I thought the question would sniff out any anti-gun bias. Surprise, an answer!
-
U.S. Senate Candidate Jim Carlin Pledges Support for National Concealed Carry Reciprocity
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/u-s-senate-candidate-jim-carlin-pledges-support-for-national-concealed-carry-reciprocity/
-
ATF Can’t Stop Shooting Itself in the Foot—Even Under Trump
Ammoland Inc. Posted on August 21, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/atf-cant-stop-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-even-under-trump/) by Ammoland Editors & Staff (https://www.ammoland.com/author/ammoland-editors-and-staff/)
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/atf-cant-stop-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-even-under-trump/
WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump’s reforms at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) were meant to put the agency back on track.Zero Tolerance is gone (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/06/atf-ditches-zero-tolerance-turns-page-to-new-era/), a pro-gun director is in place (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/04/daniel-driscoll-to-be-named-new-atf-acting-director/), and the firearm industry was told the agency would return to its core mission: fighting crime and illegal trafficking, not harassing gun dealers or law-abiding citizens.
But old habits die hard. This week, the Washington Field Division of the ATF lit up social media for all the wrong reasons. A post on X showed a photo of an agent lifting a suspect’s shirt to reveal a pistol stuffed into his waistband. The caption warned that “many people attempt to conceal firearms on their person or belongings which puts everyone involved at risk.”
Instead of calming fears, the message backfired—badly.
The Problem With ATF’s Framing
The trouble wasn’t the photo, but the words. The ATF didn’t say the suspect was a convicted felon, a trafficker, or otherwise barred from owning a firearm. They simply portrayed concealed carry itself as a danger.
For millions of Americans, that’s a direct insult. As one user, @DiscoMephisto, (https://x.com/DiscoMephisto/status/1958180382869778708) put it: “Millions upon millions of us conceal firearms upon our persons. There are people out there, doing things they shouldn’t do, who should be at risk.”
The U.S. Supreme Court has been clear: carrying a firearm outside the home is constitutionally protected. In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), the Court struck down restrictive “may issue” carry laws.
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Mark-W.-Smith-of-Four-Boxes-Diner-jumped-into-the-thread-telling-ATF-directly-600x320.jpg)
Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner jumped into the thread, telling ATF directly: “Please speak with the Washington ATF field office about the Second Amendment and the Bruen decision. I suspect their social media person lacks the relevant knowledge.”
That’s why Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner jumped into the thread (https://x.com/fourboxesdiner/status/1958181142118494535), telling ATF directly:
“Please speak with the Washington ATF field office about the Second Amendment and the Bruen decision. I suspect their social media person lacks the relevant knowledge.”
Backlash From the Gun Community
The replies were nearly unanimous in their condemnation. Some were sharp, others sarcastic, but all pointed to the same problem—ATF still doesn’t understand that lawful gun owners are not the enemy.
- “As is their … right. Disband,” wrote @GATOR_eternal, echoing the frustration many feel.
- “2A is not a suggestion. Go [expletive] yourselves,” posted @thiccWifWaffle, gathering over two dozen likes.
- Others reminded ATF of its history: Ruby Ridge, Waco, Fast & Furious. “Wanna see what we see looking into your world?” asked @MarionMor1sson, listing decades of abuses.
Even critics outside the gun-rights world saw the post as tone-deaf. One user literly replied: “Y’all are tone-deaf.” LOL.
Why Messaging Still Matters
To the average ATF agent, the photo was just another day at work. But messaging like this shows why the agency still struggles for legitimacy—even after reforms under Trump.
The firearms industry was cautiously optimistic earlier this year when Acting Director Daniel Driscoll promised to move away from “punitive” Biden-era tactics. “Law-abiding dealers deserve a system that treats them fairly, not like suspects,” Driscoll said in June. (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/06/atf-ditches-zero-tolerance-turns-page-to-new-era/) And NSSF, the industry’s trade association, welcomed the new partnership approach.
But every time a field office paints concealed carry as inherently dangerous, that optimism takes a hit. For a community already skeptical of federal overreach, the ATF’s words confirm the worst suspicions: that the agency still doesn’t respect the Second Amendment.
The Bigger Lesson
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/D-FENS-1058-AM-Aug-20-2025-600x559.jpg)
D-FENS 10:58 AM · Aug 20, 2025: “Take a look into our world. This is a scenario Americans face when combating violent government agencies and murderous agents. Many agents attempt to step on the necks of free people, which puts everyone involved at risk.”
Gun owners aren’t looking for special treatment. They just want the government to recognize their rights. When ATF talks about “concealed firearms” as a public threat, it’s not targeting violent criminals—it’s casting a shadow over every law-abiding carrier.
That’s why the backlash was so fierce, and why the bureau’s credibility problem isn’t going away anytime soon. Until ATF learns to speak the language of the Constitution, every misstep on social media will remind gun owners why they don’t trust the rogue and deadly agency.
As one reply summed it up (https://x.com/WilfordTB/status/1958181969935618249): “Take a look into our world. This is a scenario Americans face when combating violent government agencies and murderous agents. Many agents attempt to step on the necks of free people, which puts everyone involved at risk.”
Even after Trump, ATF’s messaging still backfires—because no amount of reform can fix a culture that views lawful gun owners as suspects.
-
Blistering Amicus: ‘Second Amendment Not Allowed to Prevail in 9th Circuit’
Ammoland Inc. Posted on August 26, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/blistering-amicus-second-amendment-not-allowed-to-prevail-in-9th-circuit/) by Dave Workman (https://www.ammoland.com/author/dworkman/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Scales-of-Justice-Gun-Laws-Court-Gavel-Judges-iStock-Denise-Hasse1136158583-600x403.jpg)
Does the Second Amendment get fair treatment in the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals? A new amicus brief casts serious doubt. iStock-Denise Hasse1136158583
In a blistering 29-page amicus brief (https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Yukutake-Amicus-Filed.pdf) submitted to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case known as Yukutake v. Lopez, the attorney representing the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners takes the court to task for its history of “routinely granting en banc rehearing to overturn Second Amendment victories.”
The case challenges Hawaii’s restrictive handgun purchasing requirements, which were initially struck down by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. However, as the amicus brief details, “For most other types of litigants in the Ninth Circuit, en banc rehearing is statistically almost as rare as a Supreme Court cert grant, and prevailing parties after a three-judge panel almost always keep their victories. But rehearing is practically a matter of course in this Court whenever litigants challenging gun laws prevail on final judgment before a three-judge panel. With only one very recent exception in which en banc did not occur because the state of California did not petition for rehearing, every appellate victory for the Second Amendment has been reversed en banc.”
The amicus brief was submitted Monday by attorney Konstadinos T. Moros, SAF director of Legal Research and Education. It was submitted on behalf of SAF, the California Rifle & Pistol Association and the Second Amendment Law Center.
Moros made his argument abundantly clear when he wrote, “It’s as indefensible as it is clear: the Second Amendment is (save for the recent exception of Nguyen) not allowed to prevail in the Ninth Circuit.”
In a prepared statement (https://saf.org/saf-partners-file-amicus-brief-challenging-hawaiis-firearms-purchase-laws/), SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb observed, “These arbitrary restrictions in Hawaii are unique and burdensome with no parallel in other states. We urge the Ninth Circuit to either reinstate the three-judge panel’s ruling striking down these laws or rule in favor of the plaintiffs, ensuring that the Second Amendment is treated with the respect it deserves.”
Hawaii law imposes a 30-day limit for the permit-to-purchase a firearm, and then requires a police inspection of the purchased firearm within five days. SAF contends this violates the Second Amendment by placing an undue burden on citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights.
“If a gun owner living in Hawaii or the West Coast desires to challenge a particular gun law they believe violates the Second Amendment, this Court’s track record serves as the ultimate chilling effect to dissuade them from bothering to turn to the court system,” the brief notes. “More distressingly, some of these decisions were demonstrably wrong, and the challengers’ unsuccessful arguments were later vindicated by subsequent Supreme Court decisions.”
Later in the brief, Moros cautions, “An en banc rehearing that tears away yet another victory by plaintiffs seeking to vindicate their Second Amendment rights will merely confirm that this Court will ‘continue to twist the law and procedure to reach [its] desired conclusion.’ In that sad scenario, Second Amendment litigants will have nothing left but the hope that the Supreme Court finally tires of receiving the ‘judicial middle finger’ from this Court and begins regularly reversing its rulings.”
Coincidentally, in a recent report published in the Tennessee Star, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch is noted to have “called out lower courts on Thursday for a pattern of defying Supreme Court rulings.”
While Gorsuch was discussing non-Second Amendment cases, his message seemed clear: Lower courts have developed a habit of ignoring decisions from the high court, and it needs to stop.
In his amicus, Moros referred to other cases won by gun rights litigants before three-judge panels, only to have those decisions reversed by en banc rulings.
“That is an all-too-common trend in this Circuit that leaves Second Amendment litigants feeling hopeless, with any panel victories for them seemingly destined for vacatur,” Moros writes. “’Trend’ is perhaps putting it much too lightly, because when a panel of this Court actually strikes down a law for violating the Second Amendment, the ruling ‘will almost certainly face an en banc challenge.’”
He expresses concern that another recent decision by a three-judge panel, in Rhode v. Bonta, which struck down (https://fox40.com/news/california-connection/court-strikes-down-california-gun-control-law-background-checks-for-ammo-unconstitutional/) California’s background check requirement for ammunition purchases, will also be reversed by an en banc hearing.
The amicus offers this stunning dissection of the Ninth Circuit’s focus on reversing Second Amendment victories: “Normally, a case receiving en banc review is exceedingly rare. For context, in 2022 and 2023, there were a combined 16,343 new appeals filed in this Court. In that same two-year period, 1,351 en banc petitions were filed, of which just 26 were granted rehearing. In other words, only about 2% of en banc petitions are granted, and only about 0.16% of all filed appeals ever get en banc review. Yet despite how rare en banc rehearing is overall, somehow every single case in a final judgment posture in which plaintiffs prevail on Second Amendment challenges has received en banc review, with only one very recent exception in which California did not seek en banc review…”
If the Ninth Circuit needed a wake-up call, the SAF amicus brief is ringing the telephone off the hook.
-
Former ATF senior official now working for Everytown
Ammoland Inc. Posted on August 26, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/former-atf-senior-official-now-working-for-everytown/) by Lee Williams (https://www.ammoland.com/author/lee-williams/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Mitchem-600x600.jpg)
Marianna Mitchem, ATF’s former Associate Assistant Director of Field Operations (Industry Operations), is now working for Everytown for Gun Safety. (Photo courtesy ATF).
Marianna Mitchem, ATF’s former Associate Assistant Director of Field Operations (Industry Operations), is now working for former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun group, Everytown for Gun Safety, according to a former ATF senior official who did not want their name used in this story.
Mitchem has turned on the ATF since joining Everytown, the former official said. She is reaching out to her former colleagues, trying to target Glock and Glock-type handguns.
Mitchem began her 20-year ATF career in 2005 as an IOI, an Industry Operations Investigator, who inspect gun shops to make sure their records and inventory are docuмented correctly. She worked unarmed and was never an ATF Special Agent, who are armed and charged with enforcing federal law.
Mitchem was promoted to field supervisor in 2011, and by 2014, was put in charge of Industry Operations for ATF’s Phoenix Field Division.
She moved to Washington D.C. in 2017, when she became ATF’s deputy chief of Field Management Staff. One year later, she was promoted to Chief.
In 2019, Mitchem became ATF’s deputy chief of staff, and reported to ATF’s director. One year later, she became the chief of the Firearms and Explosives Industry Division.
Mitchem held her final position as Associate Assistant Director of Field Operations (Industry Operations), from March 2024 until she left in May 2025.
Anti-gun history
The former ATF senior official who worked with Mitchem said she was smart, a good communicator but very anti-gun.
Things changed for Mitchem when former President Joe Biden appointed Steve Dettelbach to run ATF, the former official said. Mitchem was given more duties and responsibilities.
The former official described her as “Dettelbach’s puppet.” She was his “superstar,” and was responsible for ATF’s frame or receiver ruling and for going after “ghost guns.”
The actions Mitchem took regarding these un-serialized firearms were wrong, the former ATF official said. The agency included pre-1968 firearms on its “ghost gun” list, even though firearms manufactured prior to 1968 were not required to have serial numbers. Homemade firearms, which do not require serial numbers in free states, were also added to the list.
In addition, if law enforcement officers could not find a serial number, the firearm was still added to the “ghost gun” list, because the ATF never checked or verified any of the firearms added to the list.
This caused ATF and other agencies to question the validity of its own database, which Mitchem was responsible for creating. However, the Biden Administration used the list strongly to promote its anti-gun efforts.
Takeaways
Attempts to contact Mitchem were not successful. Her cell phone has been disconnected and changed. Voice messages, emails and texts left with Everytown were not returned.
The former senior official who spoke out against Mitchem said now that she’s gone, there is only one anti-gun senior official left at the ATF.
This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here (https://secure.anedot.com/saf/ijp) to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.
-
Fifth Circuit Rules NFA Registration is Constitutional
Ammoland Inc. Posted on August 28, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/fifth-circuit-rules-nfa-registration-is-constitutional/) by John Crump (https://www.ammoland.com/author/johncrump/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Unconstitutional-Law-Justice-Trial-Judge-Ruling-iStock-gorodenkoff-1346156698-600x338.jpg)
Unconstitutional Law Justice Trial Judge Ruling iStock-gorodenkoff 1346156698
A three-judge panel from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) rules on suppressors are Constitutional.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and state law enforcement officials raided the home of George Peterson in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Mr. Peterson operated a firearms business, PDW Solutions, LLC, out of his residence. The ATF asked for the search warrant after a Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office deputy allegedly purchased two handguns from the man. According to court docuмents, Mr. Peterson did not report the transaction. ATF regulations require a federal firearms licensee (FFL) to submit a multiple handgun sale form if more than one handgun is sold at one time.
After that sale, an ATF agent and a confidential informant allegedly committed a straw purchase at the man’s home. Mr. Peterson was also only supposed to conduct business at gun shows and out of a leased storage unit. The ATF claims that he was doing business out of his home, which violated the terms of his FFL.
During the raid on Peterson’s home, ATF agents discovered a suppressor inside a safe located in his bedroom closet. This suppressor was not purchased from a manufacturer or dealer. Mr. Peterson made the suppressor himself using a kit and materials he acquired. The found suppressor did not have a serial number and was not registered with the ATF’s National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) as required by the NFA.
A grand jury in the Eastern District of Louisiana indicted Peterson for possession of an unregistered suppressor. In a pre-trial hearing, the man filed motions to dismiss the indictment and to suppress the evidence obtained through the ATF’s search of his property. He argued that the NFA’s registration requirements violated Second Amendment protections. He also claimed that the search warrant violated his Fourth Amendment rights against illegal search and seizures. The District Court rejected the two motions. Mr. Peterson entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his pre-trial motions.
Mr. Peterson argued that the NFA’s suppressor-registration requirement unconstitutionally burdens his Second Amendment rights. Initially, the federal government attempted to argue that suppressors are not “arms (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/03/doj-lawyer-argues-suppressors-are-not-protected-arms-then-reverses-course/)” but merely accessories. After a pushback from Washington, that argument was withdrawn, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) admitted that suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment, but stated that they can still be regulated via the NFA.
The judges used a Bruen analysis in their decision. The first step of a Bruen analysis is to look at the original text (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/08/scotus-defends-trumps-policies-but-stays-silent-on-your-gun-rights/) of the Second Amendment. Mr. Peterson is a member of the “people,” and even the government admitted that suppressors are protected arms. The court proceeded to the second step, where a law must be consistent with the nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulations. This analysis is intended to be conducted through the use of historical analogues from the founding era.
The judges highlighted that Bruen challenged a “may-issue” regime. The NFA is theoretically a “shall-issue” regime. They pointed to Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s comments in Footnote 9 of the Bruen opinion. In the Footnote 9 dicta, Kavanaugh said that shall-issue licensing regimes are constitutionally permissible, including fingerprinting, a background check, a mental health records check, and training in firearms handling and in laws regarding the use of force, among other possible requirements. Dicta is a statement that is not essential to a resolution of a case. It is commentary, guidance, or opinion.
The dicta states “shall-issue licensing regimes are constitutionally permissible, subject of course to an as-applied challenge if a shall-issue licensing regime does not operate in that manner in practice.”
Because of this dicta, the three-judge panel affirmed the District Court’s ruling on the Second Amendment pre-trial motion. Mr. Peterson also attempted to argue that there was a lack of probable cause for the search warrant, thereby violating his Fourth Amendment rights. The court did not agree with him and affirmed the dismissal of this pre-trial motion as well.
Mr. Peterson can ask for an en banc hearing where the panel’s decision would be vacated and the full Fifth Circuit bench would hear the case, or he could file for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tPZbp9B-xb4/hqdefault.jpg)
-
Here's the rub… for weapons manufactured or imported after May 2018 there is no "shall issue." Quite the contrary post-'86 NFA weapons shall NOT be issued the necessary tax stamp.
Peterson manufactured the suppressor himself after May 2018, hence Peterson really needs a better lawyer.
-
"…this is the first time the DOJ has asked to argue against the gun law."
DOJ Moves to Join Fight Against Illinois’s Assault Weapon Bans
Ammoland Inc. Posted on September 3, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/doj-moves-to-join-fight-against-illinoiss-assault-weapon-bans/) by John Crump (https://www.ammoland.com/author/johncrump/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/psa-sabre9-600x338.jpg)
DOJ Asks to Argue Against Illinois’s Assault Weapon Bans
In an amazing turn of events, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division is asking to take part in oral arguments against Illinois’s Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA) at the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
PICA is a so-called “assault weapons” ban law with restrictions on the allowed capacity of firearm magazines that went into effect in 2023. The law prohibits almost all semi-automatic rifles with certain cosmetic features, including the most popular long gun in the United States, the AR-15. Following the law’s passage, various lawsuits emerged across the state. These various lawsuits got consolidated under Barnett v. Raoul (https://www.ammoland.com/2024/09/crucial-battle-for-2a-rights-begins-over-illinois-gun-ban/).
At the District Court level, the plaintiffs challenging the law would be granted a preliminary injunction (https://www.ammoland.com/2024/11/federal-judge-strikes-down-illinois-assault-weapon-ban-major-win-for-gun-owners-rights/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) against the law from taking effect. A preliminary injunction is used to maintain the status quo while a case moves through the legal process. The court must find that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of the case, will suffer irreparable harm, and the balance of interest is in their favor. The District Court’s decision was stayed pending an interlocutory appeal after the state filed for an emergency stay against the injunction.
A three-judge panel from the Seventh Circuit would take the case but rule against granting a preliminary injunction. The judges on the case were Andrea Wood, Frank Easterbrook, and Michael Brennan. Both Wood and Easterbrook are known for their anti-gun beliefs, so the plaintiffs had an uphill battle. The judges used a Bruen analysis (https://www.ammoland.com/2024/11/how-bruen-decision-reinforced-our-second-amendment-rights/) to decide that Illinois law was constitutional.
The first step is to see if the plain text of the Second Amendment protects the conduct. In Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that arms in common use cannot be banned. Even though AR-15s are the most popular rifle in the country, two of the three judges said they are not in common use (https://www.ammoland.com/2023/11/gun-rights-groups-vow-to-appeal-the-seven-circuit-ruling-on-assault-weapons/) for self-defense and therefore not protected by the plain text of the Second Amendment.
Because, according to the judges, the plaintiffs failed at step one of Bruen, there was no need to proceed to step two, where the defendants would have to produce historical analogues from the founding era showing that the gun law is consistent with the history and tradition of the nation’s firearm regulations. Judge Brennan vehemently disagreed with the majority’s opinion.
The plaintiffs requested an en banc hearing, in which the panel’s ruling would be vacated and the full bench would hear the case. Most believed that an en banc hearing would be granted because of how the Bruen analysis was used to deny the preliminary injunction. Still, the Seventh Circuit decided not to review the case en banc and let the panel’s decision stand. The plaintiffs filed for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, but the writ was denied, although Justice Samual Alito and Clarence Thomas would have granted certiorari. The rest of the Justices thought it was too soon to get involved because the merits of the case had not been heard, but hinted in Snopes and Ocean State that they were willing to take the case or one similar.
Oral arguments for the merits of the case have been set for September 22. Multiple groups and entities have filed amicus briefs. One of those government organizations was the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/06/doj-files-amicus-brief-opposing-illinois-assault-weapons-ban/), led by Harmeet K. Dhillon (https://x.com/AAGDhillon).
In a shocking turn of events, Ms. Dhillon herself has asked the Seventh Circuit to allow her to argue against PICA. If granted, she will be given five minutes out of the plaintiff’s time to make a case as to why the law is unconstitutional. There is no guarantee that the court will grant the request, but this is the first time the DOJ has asked to argue against the gun law.
The filing reads: “If the Court grants this motion, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, Harmeet K. Dhillon, will present oral argument on behalf of the United States.”
Even with the federal government’s backing, the plaintiffs face an uphill battle since the panel is made up of what many people consider to be two rabid anti-gun activist judges out of the three that sit on the panel. Even if the plaintiffs lose, they are expected to ask for an en banc review, but there is no guarantee that it will be granted. They could also file for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, and there is a feeling among legal experts that this is the case that SCOTUS will take to decide the constitutionality of magazine and assault weapon bans.
-
Lawsuit Filed Against Colorado’s Governor Polis For Unconstitutional Gun Control Scheme
Ammoland Inc. Posted on September 3, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/lawsuit-filed-against-colorados-governor-polis-for-unconstitutional-gun-control-scheme/) by Ammoland Editors & Staff (https://www.ammoland.com/author/ammoland-editors-and-staff/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Jared-Polis-PolisForCO-proud-of-my-lifetime-F-rating-from-the-NRA-img-X-600x526.jpg)
Jared Polis @PolisForCO (https://x.com/PolisForCO/status/993922096223862784) I’m proud of my lifetime “F” rating from the NRA
LAKEWOOD, Colo. – Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF) has filed suit (https://mslegal.org/cases/del-toro-v-polis/)against the State of Colorado on behalf of law-abiding citizens whose Second Amendment-protected rights are being violated by the state’s new gun control law, SB25-003. (https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-003)
MSLF represents six individual plaintiffs and the Colorado Shooting Sports Association (CSSA), directly affected by the law’s restrictions. Israel Del Toro, a decorated Air Force veteran and the lead plaintiff, survived an IED blast in Afghanistan and lives with severe injuries. Colorado’s law bans the only firearms and accessories he can physically use, like force-reset triggers and AR-platform pistols — effectively denying him the ability to defend himself. Colorado is trying to take away the very freedoms he fought to protect.
The new law enacts a permit-to-purchase scheme for firearms that could take months to process, leaving citizens stuck in bureaucratic limbo, but is also extremely vague when identifying the types of firearms it bans.
It piles on red tape, requires the payment of excessive permit and processing fees, and reclassifies common firearms and accessories as “dangerous or illegal weapons” – criminalizing their possession. These are all conditions that amount to an effective ban of semi-automatic firearms.
This case is part of a growing movement to stop states from defying the Supreme Court’s clear rulings on the right to keep and bear arms. Colorado’s permit-to-purchase scheme is a direct affront to the Constitutional rights recognized in District of Columbia v. Heller and reaffirmed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Supreme Court confirmed that carrying a firearm in public for self-defense is a longstanding right—and no other Constitutional right requires proving a “special need” to exercise it.
Colorado’s restrictions have no basis in our nation’s history or traditions.
“If the State of Colorado were to try these backhanded tactics to limit any other fundamental right – whether that be religion, speech, or the right to counsel, those statutes would be quickly struck down as unconstitutional by even the most partisan of jurists,” said MSLF’s Center to Keep and Bear Arms, Michael McCoy.
“But when it comes to the Second Amendment, these tactics to limit our God-given tight to keep and bear arms for self-defense have born fruit for far too many states . . . and for far too long, No more! With the recent and clear precedent out of the United States Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit upholding the Second Amendment protected rights of law-abiding citizens, SB3 will not be able to survive review, and will be struck down. I am confident of that.”
MSLF is seeking a declaration from the courts that Colorado’s permit-to-purchase requirement is unconstitutional under Bruen, and that such laws must be struck down nationwide.
About Mountain States Legal Foundation
Mountain States Legal Foundation is a nonprofit, public-interest legal firm established in 1977. MSLF is dedicated to individual liberty, limited and ethical government, and the benefits of the free enterprise system. MSLF defends its clients through pro bono litigation and seeks victory for its clients at the highest level possible to establish binding legal precedents to benefit millions of Americans. Through its litigation and public discourse, MSLF educates the American public on the threat unrestrained government presents to our liberties. Learn more at mslegal.org.
-
From A/C
(https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-mulling-rule-restrict-transgender-individuals-owning-guns/story?id=125268875)
DOJ mulling rule that could restrict transgender individuals from owning guns: Sources. (https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-mulling-rule-restrict-transgender-individuals-owning-guns/story?id=125268875) So either trannies are barred from owning guns, or we get a Supreme Court decision saying even the mentally ill are allowed to own firearms. And either way, the left will now sound like an NRA convention as it takes the side of gun ownership being a right of everyone. A Xanatos gambit, if ever I saw one.
DOJ mulling rule that could restrict transgender individuals from owning guns: Sources
The discussions follow last week's Minneapolis Catholic church shooting.
ByAlexander Mallin (https://abcnews.go.com/author/alexander_mallin), Katherine Faulders (https://abcnews.go.com/author/katherine_faulders), and Luke Barr (https://abcnews.go.com/author/luke_barr)
September 4, 2025, 2:30 PM
https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-mulling-rule-restrict-transgender-individuals-owning-guns/story?id=125268875
Feds consider gun restrictions for transgender people
Feds consider gun restrictions for transgender peopleSenior DOJ officials have held internal deliberations over issuing a rule that could restrict transgender individuals from being able to own firearms, sources say.
Senior Justice Department officials have held internal deliberations in recent days over potentially issuing a rule that could restrict transgender individuals (https://abcnews.go.com/alerts/lgbt) from being able to own firearms, two officials familiar with the discussions confirmed Thursday to ABC News.
The policy discussions, which are believed to be in their early stages and driven in part by chatter in right-wing media, follow last week's Minneapolis Catholic church shooting that the FBI has said was carried out by a transgender woman (https://abcnews.go.com/US/minnesota-school-shooting-suspect-robin-westman/story?id=125029777).
Such a proposal could face significant pushback not only from civil rights groups but from gun rights organizations, which have historically been resistant to the issuance of any regulations restricting people's access to firearms.
(https://abcnews.go.com/US/minnesota-school-shooting-suspect-robin-westman/story?id=125029777)MORE: What we know about Minnesota school shooting suspect Robin Westman
(https://abcnews.go.com/US/minnesota-school-shooting-suspect-robin-westman/story?id=125029777)
There is no evidence to suggest transgender people are more likely to be violent than the general population. However, transgender people are far more likely than average to be the victim of a violent crime.
Still, the discussions have percolated in recent days among top officials in the Justice Department, including in the Office of Legal Counsel, which provides legal advice to all executive branch agencies.
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) and other major medical associations do not consider being transgender a mental illness and recognize transgender and gender diverse identities as normal variations in human expression. The APA distinguishes gender dysphoria -- which is defined as "clinically significant distress or impairment" that transgender individuals may experience when they feel a difference between their assigned sex at birth and their gender identity -- as a separate diagnosis, and supports gender-affirming care while opposing practices that try to change a person’s gender identity.
DOJ officials have debated whether having a diagnoses of gender dysphoria could disqualify someone under a federal law that restricts people who are "adjudicated as mental defective" from owning guns, sources said.
(https://i.abcnewsfe.com/a/66d78595-3a42-48e9-8991-de1fc7d568a1/doj-logo-mo_1756220659315_hpMain.jpg)
The Department of Justice seal during a news conference at the DOJ office in Washington, May 16, 2023.
Jose Luis Magana/AP, FILE
The possible move would be the latest escalation in an ongoing push by the Trump Administration to restrict the rights (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-administration-acknowledge-persons-gender-assigned-birth-officials/story?id=117894092) of transgender individuals -- and would appear to conflict with other moves by the Justice Department to lift what it has argued are unfair burdens restricting Americans' Second Amendment rights to bear arms.
Among its efforts, the DOJ has proposed a new rule that could restore gun ownership rights to certain people with felony convictions, and has said it would pursue civil rights investigations into cities that it says engage in a pattern or practice of depriving local citizens of their Second Amendment rights.
Laurel Powell, director of communications at the Human Rights Campaign, told ABC News in a statement, "The Constitution isn't a privilege reserved for the few; it guarantees basic rights to all. Transgender people are your neighbors, classmates, family members, and friends -- and we deserve the full protection of our nation's laws, not anti-American nonsense from the White House."
"If rights can be stripped from one group simply because of who they are, they can be stripped from anyone," Powell said.
A Justice Department spokesperson told ABC News, "The DOJ is actively evaluating options to prevent the pattern of violence we have seen from individuals with specific mental health challenges and substance abuse disorders. No specific criminal justice proposals have been advanced at this time."
-
ATF Classifies Unfinished P365 Fire Control Unit as a Firearm (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/atf-classifies-unfinished-p365-fire-control-unit-as-a-firearm/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GOA-ATF-P365-Letter-520x511.jpg) (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/atf-classifies-unfinished-p365-fire-control-unit-as-a-firearm/)
Ammoland Inc. Posted on September 5, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/atf-classifies-unfinished-p365-fire-control-unit-as-a-firearm/) by John Crump (https://www.ammoland.com/author/johncrump/)
A recent determination letter issued by the Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division (FATD), Firearms Technology Industry Service Branch (FTISB) shows that some anti-gun examiners still exist within the ATF.
-
27 State AGs Urge SCOTUS to Safeguard Citizens’ Access to Large Capacity Firearm Magazines
https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/10/27-state-ags-urge-scotus-to-safeguard-citizens-access-to-large-capacity-firearm-magazines/
By AG Staff (https://amgreatness.com/author/ag-staff/)
September 10, 2025
Acoalition of 27 state Attorneys General have filed a multi-state brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up and overturn a Washington State ban on so-called “high capacity” firearm magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
Breitbart reports (https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2025/09/09/exclusive-austin-knudsen-raul-labrador-other-ags-file-brief-urging-scotus-to-safeguard-citizens-use-of-plus-ten-magazines/) that four separate amicus briefs have been filed with the Supreme Court in regards to the case of Gator’s Custom Guns, Inc. v. Washington which challenged Washington state’s ban on standard capacity magazines that are not limited to an arbitrary number of rounds.
That case is currently on appeal from the Washington state Supreme Court which upheld the ban, following a Cowlitz County judge overturning the state law earlier this year.
In upholding the ban, a majority of Washington Supreme Court justices held that commonly-owned firearm magazines do not qualify as “arms” which are protected by the Second Amendment.
An amicus brief filed by the National Rifle Association states:
District of Columbia v. Heller’s plain text analysis expressly concluded that “[t]he Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms.” This Court should intervene to clarify that firearm magazines—regardless of capacity—are bearable arms that are presumptively protected by the Second Amendment.
The states of Montana, Idaho, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming, and the Arizona Legislature are arguing that the Washington Supreme Court failed to show how a ban on “plus-ten magazines” comports with the 2022 Bruen decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court will also likely be debating whether to grant certiorari in the California case of Duncan v. Bonta which challenges California’s magazine ban.
If the High Court grants certiorari, it will most likely consolidate the two cases.
Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador accused California and Washington state courts of attempting to rewrite the Second Amendment by excluding standard capacity magazines from its protection.
Labrador said, “These rulings would let anti-gun states ban virtually any firearm component by declaring the Constitution irrelevant, threatening every American’s ability to defend their family. We’re asking the Supreme Court to reject this infringement and ensure law-abiding citizens in every state can exercise their inalienable constitutional rights.”
Twitter (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/10/27-state-ags-urge-scotus-to-safeguard-citizens-access-to-large-capacity-firearm-magazines/)Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/sharer?u=https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/10/27-state-ags-urge-scotus-to-safeguard-citizens-access-to-large-capacity-firearm-magazines/)Parler (https://parler.com/new-post?url=https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/10/27-state-ags-urge-scotus-to-safeguard-citizens-access-to-large-capacity-firearm-magazines/)
-
The 9th Circuit Overturns a Man's Conviction for Holding a Shotgun on the Sidewalk in Front of His House
The decision, which hinges on an exception to the Gun-Free School Zones Act, does not say whether that law is consistent with the Second Amendment.
Jacob Sullum (https://reason.com/people/jacob-sullum/) | 9.25.2025 1:55 PM
Share on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2025%2F09%2F25%2Fthe-9th-circuit-overturns-a-mans-conviction-for-holding-a-shotgun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house%2F)Share on X (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2025%2F09%2F25%2Fthe-9th-circuit-overturns-a-mans-conviction-for-holding-a-shotgun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house%2F&text=The+9th+Circuit+Overturns+a+Man's+Conviction+for+Holding+a+Shotgun+on+the+Sidewalk+in+Front+of+His+House&via=reason)Share on Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2025%2F09%2F25%2Fthe-9th-circuit-overturns-a-mans-conviction-for-holding-a-shotgun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house%2F&title=The+9th+Circuit+Overturns+a+Man's+Conviction+for+Holding+a+Shotgun+on+the+Sidewalk+in+Front+of+His+House)Share by email (?subject=Shared+From+Reason.com%3A+The+9th+Circuit+Overturns+a+Man%27s+Conviction+for+Holding+a+Shotgun+on+the+Sidewalk+in+Front+of+His+House&body=https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2025%2F09%2F25%2Fthe-9th-circuit-overturns-a-mans-conviction-for-holding-a-shotgun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house%2F)Print friendly version (https://reason.com/2025/09/25/the-9th-circuit-overturns-a-mans-conviction-for-holding-a-shotgun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house/printer/)Copy page URL
(https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c800x450-w800-q80/uploads/2023/11/Broadwater-Elementary-School-Hulteng-CCM-800x450.jpg)
Broadwater Elementary School in Billings, Montana (Hulteng CCM Inc.)
A couple of years ago, Gabriel Metcalf was charged (https://reason.com/2023/11/02/a-montana-case-tests-the-constitutionality-of-the-gun-free-school-zones-act/) with a federal felony because he stepped onto the sidewalk in front of his house in Billings, Montana, while holding a shotgun. Metcalf, who had armed himself because of a dispute with a neighbor who was subject to a restraining order, was not violating state law. But because Metcalf lives across the street from an elementary school, prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Montana argued, he had violated the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA).
Metcalf argued that the GFSZA, which bans (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922) gun possession on public property within 1,000 feet of a primary or secondary school, violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms. This week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit sidestepped that issue, instead overturning Metcalf's conviction on the grounds that he arguably qualified for an exception to the GFSZA.
That law exempts anyone who is "licensed" to publicly carry a gun within school zones, provided "law enforcement authorities…verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license." But Montana is one of 29 states that allow (https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/types-of-concealed-carry-licensurepermitting-policies/unrestricted/) adults to carry guns without a permit, provided they are not legally disqualified from owning them. Although state legislators explicitly said (https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0450/chapter_0080/part_0030/section_0600/0450-0080-0030-0600.html) residents who meet those criteria should be considered "licensed" within the meaning of the GFSZA, federal prosecutors disagreed.
Last year, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Watters sided (https://reason.com/2024/02/07/based-on-loose-reasoning-a-federal-judge-rejects-a-challenge-to-the-gun-free-school-zones-act/) with the government, saying Metcalf did not qualify as "licensed" under the GFSZA. She also ruled that the statute is constitutional because it is "consistent with this Nation's historial tradition of firearm regulation"—the Second Amendment test established by the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoiation v. Bruen (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf).
The 9th Circuit's decision in United States v. Metcalf (https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/09/23/24-4818.pdf) does not address the latter issue. But two members of the three-judge panel concluded that Watters should have dismissed Metcalf's indictment because his understanding of "licensed" was plausible.
"The parties do not dispute that Metcalf holds a license pursuant to Montana Code section 45-8-360," Judge Lawrence VanDyke, a Donald Trump appointee, notes in an opinion (https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/09/23/24-4818.pdf#page=5) joined by Judge John B. Owens, who was nominated by Barack Obama. "Instead, they dispute whether Montana's procedure for issuing this license complied with the [GFSZA's] requirements."
Based on "the traditional tools of statutory interpretation, Metcalf has offered at least a plausible reading of the exception" for "licensed" gun owners, VanDyke says. "When we factor in the canon of constitutional avoidance and the rule of lenity, Metcalf lacked the appropriate notice to be convicted of violating the Gun-Free School Zones Act. Affirming Metcalf's conviction would be inconsistent with the principles of fair notice and of not punishing innocent conduct."
Metcalf "argued both here and in the district court that he is covered by the state or local license exception because Montana has 'verified that any individual who is not prohibited under the laws of Montana or who has not been convicted of a violent felony crime is qualified to receive a license to carry a firearm within a school zone,'" VanDyke notes. "In response, the government has argued both here and below that the Montana statute 'does not require that law enforcement authorities of the state verify that the individual meets those qualifications before obtaining a license,' so 'the Montana provision does not meet the federal requirements for the exemption to apply' and 'Metcalf's firearms possession was not exempted.'"
Although the latter view is "the better reading of the statute," VanDyke says, "we do not agree that this reading is the only plausible reading or that the statute is unambiguous." The government, he notes, seems to assume that law enforcement agencies can "verify" that someone qualifies for a license only by conducting a background check. Yet "dictionary definitions of 'verify' explain" that the word can also mean "assert, affirm, or confirm, as true or certain."
Under that broader definition, VanDyke writes, "Montana has in some sense 'verif[ied]' that Metcalf is qualified to hold a license by 'assert[ing]' that individuals are deemed to hold a license if they meet certain minimum qualifications. Thus, a subsequent 'licensing process' may not be necessary for the state to 'verify' that an individual is qualified under state law to hold a license."
VanDyke also notes that GFSZA is part of a broader statute that generally "defer to state determinations and state findings when concluding whether the [elements of] federal offenses and exceptions are satisfied." He says "Metcalf's reading of the license exception is consistent with Congress's repeated deference to states' findings and laws" in the surrounding statutory text. And he notes that the Supreme Court has said "federal courts should avoid interfering with state governments' internal decisions under the guise of statutory interpretation" unless Congress has made "a clear statement to the contrary."
The only prior federal appeals court decision addressing the meaning of "licensed" under the GFSZA likewise lends support to Metcalf's reading of the law, VanDyke says. In the 2000 case United States v. Tait (https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-11th-circuit/1177168.html), the government argued that an Alabama pistol license did not count under the GSFZA because the state did not require local licensing authorities to conduct a background check. The 11th Circuit rejected that argument.
Although "the Alabama law is extremely lenient," the appeals court said, "it is nonetheless the only pertinent law. Alabama has chosen its laws, and these are the laws which determine whether the federal statute's exception applies." The 11th Circuit concluded that "Alabama is free to set forth its own licensing requirements, and Congress chose to defer to those licensing requirements."
VanDyke argues that siding with Metcalf is also consistent with the constitutional avoidance doctrine (https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C1-10-1/ALDE_00013153/), which says courts should strive to avoid constitutional questions unless addressing them is necessary to resolve a case. In this case, he says, "the statute is susceptible to at least two plausible interpretations," one of which raises "serious questions" under the Second Amendment.
VanDyke also invokes the rule of lenity (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rule_of_lenity), which urges courts to favor defendants when interpreting ambiguous criminal laws. That rule aims to ensure that people are not convicted unless they had fair notice of conduct that could lead to their arrest and prosecution.
Metcalf "was informed by local authorities that it was permissible for him to be armed and that by possessing his firearm he was not violating the law," VanDyke notes. "Metcalf then initiated a conversation with federal authorities, during which he expressed concerns about his interactions with the local officials and explained 'how he has researched the law pertaining to firearms' and 'went to great lengths to articulate that he follows the law.'"
State law informed Metcalf that he was "licensed and verified by the state of Montana within the meaning of the provisions regarding individual licensure and verification in the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act." And "before the district court's decision in this case," VanDyke notes, "there was no court decision that could have put Metcalf on notice that the license the legislature conferred upon him was, in fact, invalid to comply with federal law. Given these facts, we cannot say that Metcalf received the 'fair warning…in language that the common world will understand,' with which the rule of lenity is concerned."
For similar reasons, VanDyke says, Metcalf's prosecution was inconsistent with "the presumption in favor of scienter"—i.e., a culpable state of mind. That presumption, he notes, "reflects the basic principle that 'wrongdoing must be conscious to be criminal.'"
Dissenting Judge Mary Schroeder, a Jimmy Carter appointee, criticizes (https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/09/23/24-4818.pdf#page=28) the majority's "tortured application of lenity and scienter principles." Since "this statute is not ambiguous," she says, the rule of lenity does not apply. She adds that scienter requires nothing more than Metcalf's "knowledge of facts constituting the elements of the crime," as opposed to "knowledge that the conduct violates a criminal statute."
Schroeder says the majority "essentially agrees" with Watters that Metcalf's prosecution was consistent with the Second Amendment. To the contrary, the other two judges explicitly avoided that issue (https://reason.com/2024/12/12/he-was-convicted-of-a-felony-for-holding-a-gun-on-the-sidewalk-in-front-of-his-house/). But they did note that Metcalf's convinction "'raise serious constitutional problems,' or at least 'serious questions,' under the Second Amendment."
The Supreme Court has said (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/) schools themselves qualify as "sensitive places" where guns can be banned without violating the Second Amendment. But that does not necessarily mean zones extending a fifth of a mile in every direction from school grounds fall into the same category.
Because schools are scattered throughout communities across the country, those zones cover a lot of territory. In most cities, it would be difficult for someone to travel without traversing one or more of them. The 9th Circuit's resolution of Metcalf's case leaves open the question (https://reason.com/2025/09/03/the-gun-free-school-zones-act-is-doubly-dubious/) of whether that situation is consistent with the right to bear arms that the Supreme Court upheld in Bruen.
-
Feds Move To Dismiss Marijuana And Gun Rights Case In Anticipation Of Landmark Ruling From Supreme Court
Published
on
September 26, 2025
By
Kyle Jaeger (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/author/kylejaeger/) (https://twitter.com/kylejaeger)
(https://www.marijuanamoment.net/wp-content/smush-webp/2021/04/gun-marijuana.jpg.webp)
The Trump administration is asking a federal court to dismiss one of multiple pending cases concerning marijuana and gun rights (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/trump-doj-notes-significant-disagreement-on-marijuana-consumer-gun-ban-in-new-supreme-court-filing/), in large part because it expects the U.S. Supreme Court to make a precedent-setting ruling on the issue.
In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on Tuesday, attorneys for the Justice Department urged a judge to dismiss a case “without prejudice” that involves a man charged in 2022 after police discovered cannabis and a handgun in his vehicle during a traffic stop.
Attorneys for the man, Jared Michael hαɾɾιson, also want the court to dismiss the case—but they take issue with DOJ’s specific request, as dismissing the case without prejudice would mean he could be prosecuted again. And they criticized the government’s arguments in support of its motion, noting that the department relied heavily on the length of the court battle that’s lasted three years. The lawyers also challenged the idea that outstanding Supreme Court cases that similarly deal with cannabis and federal firearms laws justify dismissal without prejudice.
But according to the federal government, the request would be “in the interest of justice,” while recognizing that the constitutionality of the statute in question–18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)—”remains open both in this case and in the country as a whole. ”
“There are currently seven petitions for certiorari pending before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) under the Second Amendment, six of which involve as-applied challenges, and are a mix of petitions filed by the United States and criminal defendants,” DOJ said, adding that they expect there’s a “reasonable likelihood that the Supreme Court will grant certiorari” in at least one of the pending cases.
“Continuing to pursue this case at this time would needlessly waste judicial and prosecutorial resources,” the government’s filing said.
“Second Amendment jurisprudence has developed significantly over the past three years. Nevertheless, based on the way the case was litigated three years ago, the Tenth Circuit held that certain arguments were waived and foreclosed the government from addressing them on remand. As a result, the United States believes that the interest of justice favors dismissal in this case to clear the way for a case that does not contain these impediments.”
hαɾɾιson’s lawyers said in their own filing on Tuesday that they have “no objection to dismissal in general.” However, they emphasized that such a dismissal should be ordered “with prejudice,” making it so he cannot be tried again for the same alleged crime.
“The government seeks to abandon this prosecution—for now—while keeping open the ability to prosecute Mr. hαɾɾιson again in the future,” his lawyers said. “Its request, if granted, would leave Mr. hαɾɾιson under the specter of reindictment at essentially any time, and for illegitimate reasons.”
The filing states that the government has acknowledged that part of its rational for making the request is because “it is unprepared for trial, the case is old, and it is constrained by appellate waiver rulings.”
“These are litigation choices and resource constraints attributable solely to the prosecution,” it says. “Allowing dismissal without prejudice under these circuмstances would permit the government to evade the consequences of its own decisions while keeping Mr. hαɾɾιson under indefinite threat of renewed prosecution.”
“The possibility that the Supreme Court may take up § 922(g)(3) in another case is not a valid reason to keep Mr. hαɾɾιson under threat of reindictment. Rule 48(a) permits dismissal when consistent with the fair administration of justice, not to hold defendants in limbo while appellate strategy plays out elsewhere. If the government believes a forthcoming decision will alter the legal landscape, it remains free to test that decision in a future case—but not at Mr. hαɾɾιson’s expense.”
The filing says the government’s rationale underscores why the dismissal should be made with prejudice, noting that the prosecution “has already consumed years of litigation, appellate review, and judicial resources.”
“Allowing dismissal without prejudice would perpetuate uncertainty, leaving Mr. hαɾɾιson indefinitely under the shadow of indictment despite the government’s own admissions that it cannot presently try the case,” it says. “That outcome is contrary to the fairness and integrity Rule 48(a) is designed to protect.”
“Where, as here, the government’s justifications rest on the age of the case, questions of resource allocation, and the constraints of prior litigation, the public interest is not served by leaving the door open to renewed prosecution. Finality, fairness, and the protection against harassment all point in one direction: the indictment should be dismissed with prejudice. Mr. hαɾɾιson therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant the government’s motion only to the extent of dismissing the indictment with prejudice.”
Last month in the case, the Tenth Circuit ruled that the government must prove that people who use marijuana “pose a risk of future danger” (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-appeals-court-says-government-must-prove-marijuana-users-pose-a-risk-of-danger-to-justify-gun-ban/) if it wants to justify applying a law banning cannabis consumers from owning firearms, siding with a lower district court that dismissed an indictment against hαɾɾιson.
The Justice Department appealed that ruling in 2023, sending it to the Tenth Circuit. That three-judge panel said in a recent filing that they “agree with much of the district court’s analysis” of the legal considerations, including its challenge to the federal government’s claims that there is historically analogous precedent substantiating the firearm ban for cannabis consumers.
Part of DOJ’s argument was that the ban is historically consistent with prohibitions on gun ownership by people with mental illness. The appeals court said “the government cannot justify” the current policy based on that standard.
The lower court largely based his initial decision on an interpretation of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/feds-must-defend-historical-rationale-of-banning-guns-for-medical-marijuana-patients-revised-lawsuit-argues-after-scotus-ruling/) in which the justices generally created a higher standard for policies that seek to impose restrictions on gun rights.
The ruling states that any such restrictions must be consistent with the historical context of the Second Amendment’s original 1791 ratification.
The historical analogues that the Justice Department relied on to make the case that the ban is consistent included references to antiquated case law preventing Catholics, loyalists, slaves and Indians from having guns.
The circuit court, for its part, said that “the government must show non-intoxicated marijuana users pose a risk of future danger” to support the current policy. “This inquiry, which may involve fact finding, is best suited for the district court.”
This opinion comes nearly a year after the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in the case (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-appeals-court-hears-challenge-to-gun-ban-for-marijuana-consumers/), with judges questioning not only the firearms prohibition itself but also whether it was within the scope of the appeals panel’s power to review the underlying lower court’s decision. Ultimately, they determined that they did possess that authority.
Meanwhile, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District, judges recently ruled in favor of medical cannabis patients (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-appeals-court-gives-medical-marijuana-patients-who-want-to-own-guns-a-win/) who want to exercise their Second Amendment rights to possess firearms.
In the background of these developments, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a series of cases challenging the gun ban for people who use marijuana.
The Trump administration has asked the high court to hear one of five relevant cases to resolve conflicting lower court decisions on gun rights for cannabis consumers (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/trump-doj-asks-supreme-court-to-uphold-ban-on-marijuana-users-owning-guns/) and other illegal drugs from owning firearms and uphold the prohibition.
In the request, the solicitor general reiterated his position that, despite recent appeals court decisions calling into question the constitutionality of the firearms ban for people who use cannabis—even in compliance with state law—the restriction is nevertheless lawful.
As a recent report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) explained the current legal landscape (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/courts-grapple-with-constitutional-attacks-on-law-barring-marijuana-users-from-gun-ownership-congressional-researchers-note/), a growing number of federal courts are now “finding constitutional problems in the application of at least some parts” of the firearms prohibition.
In a July ruling, for instance, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated a defendant’s conviction and remanded the case back to a district court (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/appeals-court-vacates-conviction-over-marijuana-users-gun-ownership-noting-lower-court-didnt-find-his-use-caused-a-threat/), noting that a retrial before a jury may be necessary to determine whether cannabis in fact caused the defendant to be dangerous or pose a credible threat to others.
By contrast, the Third Circuit earlier this month said in a published opinion that district courts must make “individualized judgments” to determine whether 922(g)(3) is constitutional (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-court-upholds-gun-ban-for-marijuana-users-but-requires-individualized-judgments-to-determine-dangerousness/) as applied to particular defendants.
The appeals panel ruled that while a person “need not have harmed someone, threatened harm, or otherwise acted dangerously to justify his disarmament,” the history of gun laws in the country requires that “district courts must make individualized judgments and conclude that disarming a drug user is needed to address a risk that he would pose a physical danger to others.”
Judges in that case noted that historical restrictions on gun ownership under “drunkenness and lunacy laws” in the U.S. “were still always based on an ‘individualized assessment’ rather than a categorical judgment.”
Earlier this year, a federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the ban was unconstitutional as applied to two defendants (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/another-federal-judge-rules-against-the-governments-ban-on-gun-ownership-by-marijuana-consumers/), writing that the government failed to establish that the “sweeping” prohibition against gun ownership by marijuana users was grounded in historical precedent.
A federal judge in El Paso separately ruled late last year that the government’s ongoing ban on gun ownership by habitual marijuana users is unconstitutional (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-judge-in-texas-rules-that-ban-on-gun-ownership-by-marijuana-user-is-unconstitutional-as-applied/) in the case of a defendant who earlier pleaded guilty to the criminal charge. The court allowed the man to withdraw the plea and ordered that the indictment against him be dismissed.
-
DOJ sues LA sheriff’s office in its first-ever gun-rights lawsuit over carry permit delays. (https://www.foxnews.com/us/justice-department-sues-la-county-sheriff-over-concealed-carry-delays)
DOJ Tells Court NJ’s AR-15 and Magazine Bans Violates Second Amendment. (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/09/doj-tells-court-njs-ar-15-and-magazine-bans-violates-second-amendment/)
-
YESTERDAY: Federal Court Rules Post Office Gun Ban UNCONSTITUTIONAL
For years, peaceable Americans have been forced to choose between mailing a package and exercising their Second Amendment rights. As of yesterday (https://q76y71yn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpolo.feathr.co%2Fv1%2Fanalytics%2Fcrumb%3Fflvr=email_link_click%26t_id=68dd8e99cb7ad89b0a3d56e6%26a_id=65679bf20c4b48357414b410%26e_id=65f093c4107985575c477208%26cpn_id=68dd8e99cb7ad89b0a3d56e5%26per_id=65ca65326cf6ba20409c543f%26email_addr=edsuter@mac.com%26rdr=https%3A%2F%2Fsaf.org%2Fsaf-victorious-in-post-office-carry-case%2F/1/01000199a21bb915-96d1a6b5-5a9d-4465-a180-2b1b024aef74-000000/dNgzTADuTAqCN_6OP40hXcWN5PI=446), that ends.
THE VICTORY: What Judge O'Connor Ruled
U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a 17-page opinion (https://q76y71yn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fpolo.feathr.co%2Fv1%2Fanalytics%2Fcrumb%3Fflvr=email_link_click%26t_id=68dd8e99cb7ad89b0a3d56e6%26a_id=65679bf20c4b48357414b410%26e_id=65f093c4107985575c477208%26cpn_id=68dd8e99cb7ad89b0a3d56e5%26per_id=65ca65326cf6ba20409c543f%26email_addr=edsuter@mac.com%26rdr=https%3A%2F%2Fsaf.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F09%2FGarland-opinion-9.30.25.pdf/1/01000199a21bb915-96d1a6b5-5a9d-4465-a180-2b1b024aef74-000000/6lNh4dLWtXq8N0nefhFGVYTWeWw=446) striking down the federal ban on carrying firearms in post offices — declaring it violates the Second Amendment.
Three Devastating Blows to Government Overreach:
- No Historical Precedent: Post offices existed before the founding. Despite 200 years of post office history, there were NO firearms restriction until 1972.
- Not a "Sensitive Place:" The court rejected the government's claim that all federal buildings are by default gun-free zones. Post offices don't rise to the level of courthouses or legislative assemblies.
- Government Can’t Hide From the Constitution: The government argued it could ignore the Second Amendment in post offices because it owns the buildings, so it was just banning guns there as a “landlord.” The court saw right through this "Hail Mary" and rejected it outright.
-
https://x.com/CCFR_CCDAF/status/1974137567387005355
-
CZ Denies Involvement in Canada Gun ‘Buyback’
Ammoland Inc. Posted on October 4, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/10/cz-denies-involvement-in-canada-gun-buyback/) by David Codrea (https://www.ammoland.com/author/david-codrea/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/No-Guns-Canada-NRA-ILA-600x338.jpg)
Canada is confiscating guns again. The question now is who in the industry will help them? IMG NRA-ILA
“Thank you for reaching out,” a Saturday email reply to this correspondent from Eva Svobodová, Head of External Relations and Spokesperson Colt CZ Group SE, begins. “Please note that Colt Canada is not and will not be involved in the Canadian Government firearms buy-back program from Canadian citizens. Our activities in Canada remain focused on serving military and law enforcement customers.”
The statement addresses a controversy that erupted on social media (https://waronguns.com/et-tu-cz/) Wednesday with allegations that Colt Canada, owned by the group, had been reported as the ”external service provider “ to assist the government in the destruction of firearms confiscated in its mandatory “buyback” program.”
Investigating the claim proved difficult, as neither the company nor the government were talking about it. Indeed, looking into the matter (https://waronguns.com/rendering-unto-cz/) turned up an interesting matter of note:
“Government secrecy: The government has indicated it would apply measures to protect the identity of vendors to “ensure vendors do not face reprisals or retaliation”. This means any contract awarded, particularly for a controversial initiative like the gun buyback program, may not be publicly announced in a prominent way.”
Since no one was talking, that essentially left enquiring minds four options (https://waronguns.com/cz-the-day/):
- Make it known they will boycott until an answer is forthcoming.
- Recruit shareholders to demand answers and clean house. “Colt CZ Group SE is a publicly traded company. You can find its stock on both the Prague Stock Exchange and the U.S. over-the-counter (OTC) market.” And you can also find its subsidiary companies.
- Interested parties (perhaps Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights?) could file for bid/purchase records under the Access to Information Act, Canada’s equivalent of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.
- Simpler than that would be if gun owners would just contact the company and urge it to clear this matter up while it can still control some of the narrative, as opposed to being dragged into the light with the worst look possible.
I opted for the latter and emailed the following inquiry to the Colt CZ Group SE group:
I urge you to confirm/deny resolve the ongoing controversy from internet allegations that your company is involved… Exercise what control you have now before someone else has it all.
The reply from Ms. Svobodová was forthcoming.
Others were receiving similar word but were also noting the denial was for involvement in the buyback and said nothing about the destruction of current or future seized assets. Since my email was specifically titled “Participation in Canada’s Gun Destruction Program,” playing around that would prove problematic.
Desiring to nail down the unequivocal truth, I sent the following reply:
Thank you for your response. I have two brief follow-ups if you would be kind enough to provide for the record responses: Was your company involved in the gun destruction program, to what extent, and is it now rescinding that decision? Can we expect a press release on this and when?
This column will be updated if and when new information becomes available.
Also see:
Alberta Government Responds to Firearms News Inquiry Regarding Ottawa Gun Grab (https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/alberta-ottawa-gun-grab/536340)
-
Buy back programs only encourages the bad guy to break into homes to steal guns from good guys to receive money.
-
https://www.ammoland.com/2025/10/multiple-gun-rights-groups-file-lawsuit-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-national-firearms-act/
Multiple Gun-Rights Groups File Lawsuit Challenging The Constitutionality Of The National Firearms Act
Ammoland Inc. Posted on October 11, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/10/multiple-gun-rights-groups-file-lawsuit-challenging-the-constitutionality-of-the-national-firearms-act/) by F Riehl, Editor in Chief (https://www.ammoland.com/author/fg3hht991x/)
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/National-Firearms-Act-NFA-Unconstitutional-600x318.jpg)
National Firearms Act NFA Unconstitutional
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, The American Suppressor Association (ASA), National Rifle Association (NRA), Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). The case, Jensen v. ATF, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
In what could become one of the most consequential Second Amendment battles in decades, a coalition of gun-rights organizations—including the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), American Suppressor Association (ASA), National Rifle Association (NRA), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC)—has filed a new lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).
The case, Jensen v. ATF (https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Jensen-v.-ATF-compliant.pdf), argues that the NFA’s registration requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and so-called “Any Other Weapons” can no longer be justified now that the tax originally used to enforce the law has been eliminated under the recently enacted “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
“With the tax now set to $0, the remaining registration requirements for these arms under the NFA have no constitutional basis,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “Completely removing them from the NFA is now a must, and this suit aims to eradicate the barriers to the exercise of the Second Amendment.”
The American Suppressor Association’s Executive Director Knox Williams added;
“Since 1934, the NFA has imposed unconstitutional restrictions on law-abiding Texans and Americans. Now that the excise tax on suppressors and short-barreled rifles has been removed, the registration regime is unlawful. ASA is fighting to uphold the Second Amendment rights of all Americans, and we will not stop until suppressors and other lawful firearms and accessories are no longer subject to unconstitutional regulations or registration requirements.”
Plaintiffs in the case include the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA), Texas State Rifle Association, FPC Action Foundation, Hot Shots Custom LLC, and three individual citizens.
“This is the best opportunity in a generation to eliminate major portions of the NFA since its inception nearly a century ago,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. “The government is going to be hard-pressed to justify the law as a tax without a tax, and the type of regulation seen in the NFA is without any historical support. We’re hopeful its days are numbered.”
Background: Why This Lawsuit Matters
The National Firearms Act of 1934 was the first major federal gun control law in the United States. Enacted during the gangster era, it imposed a $200 transfer tax (a massive sum at the time) and required registration of certain firearms considered particularly dangerous—like machine guns, silencers, and short-barreled rifles and shotguns.
While the law was justified as a tax measure rather than a direct gun ban—allowing it to survive early constitutional scrutiny—critics have long argued that its true intent was to discourage ownership through excessive cost and bureaucracy, not raise revenue.
Now, with Congress effectively zeroing out the NFA’s tax component, gun-rights groups argue that the entire legal foundation of the NFA collapses. Without a tax, they contend, the government can no longer claim the authority to maintain its registration system or impose criminal penalties for unregistered NFA items.
The lawsuit also draws on recent Supreme Court precedent, particularly NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022), which requires any firearm regulation to be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of gun laws. The plaintiffs argue there is no historical analogue to the NFA’s registry or its categorical restrictions, making the law unconstitutional under Bruen’s standard.
If successful, Jensen v. ATF could dismantle the NFA’s regulatory framework for suppressors and short-barreled firearms—effectively ending registration and removing one of the most burdensome remnants of early 20th-century gun control.
About the Key Players
- Second Amendment Foundation (SAF): Founded by Alan Gottlieb, SAF has been behind many landmark lawsuits expanding Second Amendment rights nationwide.
- American Suppressor Association (ASA): Since 2011, ASA has worked to legalize suppressor ownership and hunting use in dozens of states, streamline ATF processes, and fight misinformation about suppressors.
- Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC): This group works for the Second Amendment Foundation and is known for its aggressive litigation and social media outreach. FPC champions constitutional challenges to federal and state gun restrictions.
- National Rifle Association (NRA): The nation’s oldest civil rights organization supporting the right to keep and bear arms.
Together, these organizations are betting that Jensen v. ATF could mark the beginning of the end for a law that has regulated suppressors and short-barreled rifles for more than 90 years.
About The American Suppressor Association
Founded in 2011, the American Suppressor Association has been instrumental in promoting the rights of suppressor owners nationwide, advocating for legal reform, and educating the public about the benefits of suppressors. ASA’s successful campaigns have resulted in the legalization of suppressors in three states, the use of suppressors while hunting in 19 states, the defeat of numerous attempts to impose state level bans, and the dramatic improvements to NFA transfer times.
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASA_STICKERS_3x3Color_030714-225x225.jpg)
-
Bondi DOJ Backs Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners' Homes
by Tyler Durden
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bondi-doj-backs-warrantless-invasion-gun-owners-homes
Thursday, Oct 16, 2025 - 07:35 PM
By Aidan Johnston, Director of Federal Affairs for Gun Owners of America (https://x.com/RealGunLobbyist),
The Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi (https://www.gunowners.org/na011025/) is advancing an argument that threatens to hollow out the Fourth Amendment's core protection: that Americans may be secure in their homes against warrantless searches.
The lawsuit is Case v. Montana (https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/case-v-montana/). After a difficult breakup, William Trevor Case was at home alone when police arrived for a so-called "welfare check." They spent nearly an hour outside his house. Officers walked around the property, shined flashlights through windows, and even discussed calling his relatives or reaching him directly. They never did. Instead, they retrieved rifles and a ballistic shield, broke down his door without a warrant, and shot him.
(https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/2025-10-16_14-39-58.png?itok=tT2gtW-o) (https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/2025-10-16_14-39-58.png?itok=tT2gtW-o)
Case survived, but his rights did not.
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the police's warrantless entry. Apparently, the government's "reasonable suspicion" that Treavor Case might need "help" was sufficient to justify an armed warrantless intrusion into his home. That standard is alarmingly low. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause and judicial approval before government agents may enter a home. It does not permit entry based on a hunch.
And it was not as if obtaining a warrant would have been difficult. A recent Harvard Law Review study (https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/unwarranted-warrants-an-empirical-analysis-of-judicial-review-in-search-and-seizure/) found that 93 percent of warrants are approved on first submission, often in less than three minutes. With modern technology, police can draft and submit warrant requests directly from their phones. The officers in Montana had nearly an hour to seek judicial approval. They chose not to.
The U.S. Supreme Court addressed a similar issue in Caniglia v. Strom (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/593/20-157/) in 2021. In that case, officers entered a man's home without a warrant after a domestic dispute, claiming they were acting as "community caretakers." The Court unanimously rejected that argument. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the Fourth Amendment's protections do not vanish just because police say they are trying to help. The Court allowed for true emergencies—cases of imminent harm or death—but drew a clear line against open-ended "caretaking" exceptions.
The facts in Montana look nothing like an emergency. Body camera transcripts reveal that officers themselves doubted that Case required immediate aid. One noted that "chances are pretty slim" he needed urgent medical attention. They discussed staging medical personnel outside but decided against it. After forty minutes of hesitation, they declared the situation an "emergency" and broke in anyway.
In any other context, an armed entry without a warrant would be understood as unlawful. The Constitution does not stop at the property line of a gun owner. If a homeowner responds defensively to armed intruders, the law recognizes the basic right of self-defense. What transforms that same scenario into a police action is supposed to be the warrant requirement. Strip that away, and the police have no more right to enter than anyone else.
Pam Bondi's Department of Justice, however, has sided with Montana.
In an amicus brief (https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-624/374319/20250910194515551_24-624bsacUnitedStates.pdf), DOJ argued that when police are "providing aid" rather than investigating a crime, they should not need probable cause or a warrant. That claim, if accepted, creates a dangerous loophole: police may simply reframe their role to avoid constitutional limits.
The risks are obvious. A neighbor calls for a welfare check. Officers arrive, say they are caretakers, and enter without a warrant. Inside, they confront a homeowner startled by strangers in his house. The encounter escalates, and the mere presence of a firearm becomes justification for force. What began as a welfare check ends as a shooting.
The Framers wrote the Fourth Amendment to prevent precisely this kind of abuse.
Judicial oversight was designed to ensure that government agents could not force their way into private homes unless a neutral magistrate agreed the evidence justified it. By lowering the bar from probable cause to suspicion, the Montana court has eroded that safeguard.
Caniglia (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/593/20-157/) was unanimous and recent. For Pam Bondi's DOJ to back Montana in this case is not simply inconsistent with precedent; it also undermines the Fourth Amendment principle that the home is a place of security. If the Supreme Court accepts this reasoning, the Fourth Amendment will be reduced to a formality.
-
From John Lott:
(https://assets.nationbuilder.com/crimepreventionresearchcenter/mailings/2463/attachments/original/CPRC_Logo_Bold_web_address.jpg?1760369233) (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5YLSCLvRlt19C_N9qdWRbC1Gv5A13M4piWOk-YxYGj2l&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=2)
The new 2024 National Crime Victimization Survey reveals striking results (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRvWDmRGfS4gUuI61-OzbCpBM12QN0r323RlPgpGeKDzZKpSrhLWIrIxC6io_G4xyoc8BFUHgI3CucvXHhHu6bHBkEP49VCQtEHsYZj9qUEVMW1z0Vs2kgxihQQywrrRAYR9WWS6W0MHYVhFCn12mLs&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=3). In my new Real Clear Politics op-ed, I show how the media makes a serious mistake by focusing almost entirely on crimes reported to police instead of total crime data (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSZ59FGO9epS3Tp_guGu_CgD41fPOrpLxSQK8PLi-uttHi-6f7qgk6jir-kv8hlaeGSqXHPVapJe0ewOofkXFXJxvUWv30kCFk6RPR-5caM8A&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=4). As arrest rates have plummeted — a big drop that occurred under the Biden administration — fewer people have chosen to report crimes. The new data makes clear that crime has surged throughout Biden’s full term.
In another op-ed, I examine the disturbing text messages and other comments from Jay Jones, the Democratic nominee for Attorney General in Virginia. I explain the media missed a crucial element that makes Jones’ behavior even more troubling than most coverage suggests (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQVU6PxpfXyySh5V0nAJsKnsQgFhgUSgzht4vNd1zg74hYuf7AQNRnHrCI4nj5HEvox7wx937t-LMvLmOnmV3oxav0xKzBEBU9bwJ-JlujM6OTuoF71_ianriniiLBWAhc&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=5).
My research exposing major errors in the FBI’s active shooting data continues to draw widespread media attention. I’ve discussed the findings on several radio programs, including WMAL's O'Connor & Company (DC, worth listening to) (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRijTGcyoPIyPvodSSgBA92HJi0i2Ut0YsFB11qiNjSxLlsxhaPW7WT9V8pkJrrrvRkwEcEyOo3yrtE8vn6ZVkr6XGKzLqWvguE2SEk3Pt-nw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=6), WLW's The Bill Cunningham Show (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRijTGcyoPIyPvodSSgBA92HJi0i2Ut0YsFB11qiNjSxLlsxhaPW7WT9V8pkJrrrvRkwEcEyOo3yrtE8vn6ZVkr6XGKzLqWvguE2SEk3Pt-nw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=7), Iowa's KXEL (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpR4R0D-8Ai-xm-zRDWsxSNzTVo9skujEnMazv3dw0XzVrD71gQxlSL_3AobvPMtUQ0DseQnR4k3rnQujWBADDzmyWQykA3tiu9tTQKOwgSUOAthl7lzY2aJ_nXqXz0NInwhor_1gcX955SuEgASu7PG&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=8), Southern Oregon's KMED (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpS6-GRIgKN7tTNC6XT9PE1kWaKyrwJ46siaMZumoLBzoJoMzXh8IRfXW5gcIKRpOlK22wvxHDQoQrI-CtHPniiLC7jr8u0RwDmUjdhzc_ooVQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=9), and Cincinnati's giant 50,000-watt WLW (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQcCYC8S00rSibacI3EXC6ECkg9wpaG7H_Dxn6UMoNVxAjxLCavOPhZwnXuUoNk2Mv6ugEjvAyIrf7hcatIigu46bEgRtRgNxDgLGq_y54ZtA&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=10). It also received extensive long news stories on the front page of the Washington Times (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQX_RKVEwF8sqmnQ4f8iQ9KX-nZl_EZxk6wPvdCW80Ef1mugA75J1xYu-SM5J762MJv5beo7WlYMIxyq2IQVpzbnPa-sJs020XLSsuevKE12D52oJuo76dWFL6sdtsOt-wWFU3BuUWf0zUQykiz4-tLr_f7FUFW7qg5fteP-1g8kbfkNrzR65_0_c0qSQYZllg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=11) as well as the Washington Examiner (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSvGIFl1unPcpoPGKo-DCyO-P2wkXly01wEByq8PmKWPdeyxuRiGsWrU_tU9pHZ2l7NhsawQPJJCw9FeYzk8R3SjBfsAMF67fp3kESr15CcKaw_rupHoo06JA_Y02J1WvY&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=12). The national Vince radio show also discussed our new research (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSvf_e6OlTXuYFqfc-2ODlkTq1pmrB5a7kx6DNtqOKfa2WonUqgsmF8w9c8nd5u-Ix31Hxn0hAn1TZxKrWFg993vhiNCsdb4xxAcMPYOU07jWx9KsDVB4CBZUDDs6wXVTudsK88yQRB46qEwIi3iXOs&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=13).
Our efforts to challenge the false claims that mislabel leftist violence as “right-wing” violence continue to gain attention (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uP4sOabAts4sN5RirSd8VhjcpB9VgOBYpbPrv5XXPMzsnLAZ17DCAQ5uDjai3lDfRCZIc6_4JK7VMfi_I7oFYpGNf2VtGBulRSQoOgHYtQQPoGZnBrFWrJcgWGeSsco6m5c0h_NTfE00YYFYneb9CbcCc6DLUZ8Ud0EHMoVJkKp_KsO6ZK9HsEPXLvtFqcjL9CWci9vrm7KTi31HF6dR949k1kSXFbd0WUJ6IE7d7wFoQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=14). I’ve discussed this work on major radio shows and podcasts, including Charlotte’s WBT (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTny1zqKjk5SntZb2qtd-Zqw81NrcBomxp9ErYOT9DecYA9q6rYKJaphhICYHVcocBpp2u9EDNrmLTklq1egCd-YT9VvxZ9t2WqApiB1j73M6hyCRUDXRwtaTk3S7fhdgw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=15), John Solomon Reports (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTSuu81EATOmhH2enjx_9oEozNf-gw2ojtUCEQku-dMgd9OZomGTlQiLni0wmE5946atSMK3f3ddUEgcw4-o23GAZaOhSlev3IIqPTTjkhh_D0uXT55Rs8pikQ02pgHI6c&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=16), The Truth with Lisa Boothe (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSVe-qeoZEE7jo3iQ69mMpdTdV-4cqa-0thJ_-L8FSC9E3VDAgFjsAi5UXx7sIWW7VZ2E0QCxklMmw4fNb0S9TeMoai6mHuw9V3eJGnYXaOqA&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=17), Wisconsin’s (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpT7YWs4oLHjK4bdhh2CklYbIuZ95dURxtiyXiXW_wb8kL6B8kjNXWejoumobQy8FqFxCFmIJ6MEnrBkT2FbNpL6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=18)Vicki McKenna Show (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpT7YWs4oLHjK4bdhh2CklYbIuZ95dURxtiyXiXW_wb8kL6B8kjNXWejoumobQy8FqFxCFmIJ6MEnrBkT2FbNpL6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=19), the nationally syndicated (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQ-OPzXyaLUEbwQlhWVNJB1BNLv_M5y7qsLsE3yH2COiii508EqDgw91jGSPodzZPJ1C4EQSaLkY8FZERvqeuP6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=20)Bill Martinez Show (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQ-OPzXyaLUEbwQlhWVNJB1BNLv_M5y7qsLsE3yH2COiii508EqDgw91jGSPodzZPJ1C4EQSaLkY8FZERvqeuP6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=21), Armed American Radio (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpR70OxAckIwq4PLrK_-uVAitJ-8JQXKHA1y414F_rN38qCo9saKiOlNyOzYr49lCT_UxTubM2xWtGElgetgbmPuzbi64BFcrFuXPMjmU8ZJLdYAeusCmW6klX_5YlHcpdg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=22), and Oklahoma’s KQOB (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSYfVomg6QQ-fysa7Bmtpe53nDZHZrqXeYLee5LeNGO1koif8SBiKzesZfE1Zt_1P8lmxXPjI_8egq_LtS30rrhHLAHCo9zHboWGRGSK-5yfQ4BYg7talXMTSMrUYlYq6Y&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=23).
My summer trip to Argentina continues to receive media coverage from Aire Libre (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRXNNxGuWyFf6jdfo0qVUBdt3arpoNigfuS0CA5rKzbEnKEKgH6h-PA3OdP_eMZISk&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=24) and Full Aventura (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSmZojzDToJCznLO5Rkw1aNX-2y4U489Etw4gxcqIYDp5139s-UqrOSSQu2JBAtpBGF9AxAHkB30K5axYr43JMr3Q7Zyld5c5eNtVuXTGXR37RnAELxXoUw99OAIPjNuxTtc10B5tuIyfOwHVcPLP1t&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=25).
By the time the next email blast goes out, I expect to have significant new research ready on allowing teachers to carry guns in schools.
Regarding stories of defensive gun use, here is an instance of a woman shooting a man who had repeatedly abused and beaten her to protect herself and her children. As the police office in the video says, the woman “had no other choice but to defend herself and that is why people have guns.” (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uMRpkH3v9CMisu5UQIXNjqc_0x6hrYUaB6H1-j3JKyD9bwS60f1e3S8DYITLTUja2x-1rVplvMy0Wszo7Eru0hh0aiKp7QvGXXwIQb-gCwwfg2xjxLd5OqA-Ti77dsyC7GFboAYoyg-lwUVfSNtzeIKXwGaNlCqbokom6lRZ_4OKqpZ-mjseQI0GSHBZDevNCGCh_eVd4FH99-2AGg84uSbzvJop8GnebTlowzwT5ZNIHhnQxmcaVuzM98AyDlhxREmFczsi0uu2Zg9A0Wf2jE-&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=26) We have updated our list of defensive gun uses by people legally carrying concealed handguns for January 2025 (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uPJjpDsg4wliGjVN59RyVc8XQf5jlEs0zbIOopFfDa7eGo0ROKGqeo2m7w7MH_A2wccI7zBzTvLKQRDJlaLtjC48UPEn-QRI9hTYOt7c8XuKFySunrSRdGBMhelI5Ageu8&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=27).
If you haven’t already seen it, please watch our new video with John Stossel (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5c9WoqcNdVpm-X4CGtvBNlpdxwRx--Z8NOdhXqW-5prQaux34eQlaHeopRn-yD0Sv-4YGVumY-HRMAiZ5jBwhdl_tbV7YkahFtAMCX2XK6MBEP5j0D5G-3BZPVtA751YX1melaKauYZ7EfGX3qRIgLQkUQGaL8FRY4AnypSCkgqs&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=28), which covers our new research showing errors in the FBI’s active shooting reports (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5c9WoqcNdVpm-X4CGtvBNlpGqOe65RG1N3GQ8jO3aoMcW06jF78Y-hjI3dmCZCEXjWGd4U_-6y6eVdGs_ocTNbk5fWbrMyJGIM4X7GEHCv388vXqPywpGoPdxUnDvdoY3zY70cJ1U7MnQOlO4Z_g-1dGYtbG36jX-ATHeMmUffopCes15BvvN2igQ1Zh0jGQfYjqNGg-6H840Unmr92wUlW8v6NEsQxe3DBgy-sWCPEzwXHeKrMeNJ6LSnAbzRXzANczuwoMdZrNQhAfHWuK0JU&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=29).
Five of my books have now been translated into Portuguese (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uOnrbpZs5xiVysfN9s5L8w9DkygUZRhFBO5Hb99ZIZ3K8_dk7LomvSyqLT9CnAzllm-dBdD95Qxr4iyMHACDAN3VweEEOFhyHnS-Ora6mvC3w&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=30).
For those who haven't already done so, if you would like to help us get the information out to others, please consider posting reviews (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=s9qaB0zdsD0bISQpPU0Olj5hvMk1qrs-9o5J0C_nNL3fcqXnq0TXVTNrRhDAIpXCQvWuILyERgnv9n6GnzuClTWLj97E5geDdPo9AYUnjs14daCKa3OaGMamV09uIhz5_q-81J--D_76B3TEIjTndfl70YjwtbbEcyPoOHbUluz6GIigcGl951V_C8LSjUI5Fcs6ihtiZJKJC69SDLNJc8tf7DJrOE2r3bUFTKGEQOcTpJmlyHbdPkF6ecghw0oHPvaape0igZYP2uGVCeAnpFyKI5NzIDNKutmNz7QQakY7oPhW8us2XPvJGaBUDx6woVntSHwFihsgcbEafLSOFBvwtMvUe24FErsDT93h4Bri0JQ0gVIJynK48fIjHk7n&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=31) of our website on the Google business page that we have set up. The more positive reviews people post, the more Google will feature our webpage in their searches. Thank you very much!
We need help getting our research out. It doesn't do us any good to do all this work if people don't see it. If you have friends you think might find our emails interesting, please encourage them to sign up by sending them the link here (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/subscribe?e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=32). Thank you very much.
We need your support to continue doing the work that we do. I don't think that there is any organization with as small of a budget that regularly produces as much as we do. Thank you very much. (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5YLSCLvRlt19C_N9qdWRbC1Gv5A13M4piWOk-YxYGj2l&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=33)
.
Research (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5c9WoqcNdVpm-X4CGtvBNlp1cyYQ20VvppTztElmmRzYOPoef6iflQmGig2kCLAO_uCoTY6C6tsMv1UhOwWiUpkqq1dNFGB9XJrLEbeJdYCGqV4FGBd1oJYo6tyJVWUbVR9gvUVC8lBiMLmEV7bd-xZIBXP7RBHwNvrqfnIzg5dLViZqmZVn70sosgMfyH8a0g&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=34) (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uM7KQ9HWZZnCXH2HIYoNpvj1RaUCdrGlfE5FORoN25kitxbFByohjXmXqKuR1_OH-g&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=35)
Final 2024 Numbers Show Bigger Surge in Violent Crime Under Biden Than Previously Thought (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRvWDmRGfS4gUuI61-OzbCpBM12QN0r323RlPgpGeKDzZKpSrhLWIrIxC6io_G4xyoc8BFUHgI3CucvXHhHu6bHBkEP49VCQtEHsYZj9qUEVMW1z0Vs2kgxihQQywrrRAYR9WWS6W0MHYVhFCn12mLs&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=36)
Massive errors in FBI’s Active Shooting Reports from 2014-2024 regarding cases where civilians stop attacks: Instead of 3.7%, the correct number is at least 36%. Excluding gun-free zones, it averaged over 52.5%. In 2024, it was 62.5%. (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uPyKI7pTAWgKlqjAPT0wWSskGWf5vzy9a-hGNgL2_gfJPxEJty670_I7QL7OKlxw-YowSNFKgDDiVNypygAG5dAU-DCQ-BuWLAQy0xyg0DkUIE2BuRZ7xXQvI0UrzOWlA3kA9whdVCygwWg5TifqGwtzLg7dUYn7A_G45JGfi9CTw2t5aENN8b6Z5vGRtwjc8XyarJ6Jc5ShrCMSB0UkgyfEZX-g3XPE6tKW3_aqEf_lTS3fvbWx_uLkGLYMK7NsjQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=37)
.
Op-eds
At Real Clear Politics: What the Stats Really Say About Crime Surge (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSZ59FGO9epS3Tp_guGu_CgD41fPOrpLxSQK8PLi-uttHi-6f7qgk6jir-kv8hlaeGSqXHPVapJe0ewOofkXFXJxvUWv30kCFk6RPR-5caM8A&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=38)
At Townhall: Even More Disturbing Than Jay Jones’ Text Messages Is the Reason Behind Them (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQVU6PxpfXyySh5V0nAJsKnsQgFhgUSgzht4vNd1zg74hYuf7AQNRnHrCI4nj5HEvox7wx937t-LMvLmOnmV3oxav0xKzBEBU9bwJ-JlujM6OTuoF71_ianriniiLBWAhc&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=39)
.
Recent Talks
Talk at 2025 Gun Rights Policy Conference: The FBI Crime Data is a Politicized Mess (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uN9Ik61oaWyFMsdrAHnkK-_rJGTxbj_cAk-rddBqJ2JLvGSIQUF5jpK4951otTRxOESLYnIQwMDPXfUufNtjuDeQXHinAyhXKVGgqWjEEbSC6Sm1dN8oJC9r-wGuZ_ao9Q&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=40)
Talk at the Monday Meeting in New York City: Discussing the Recent Crimes at the School in Minneapolis, the Stabbing in Charlotte, and Charlie Kirk’s Assassination (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTAAwBFRTMHLOdRTiCM2TVKdhYqC6zEozlAuTbJ1nZOjTd4prkjcgV6avUSiulhfbpMkwJbU_g5W0WeVBdbIwFUUCISDLFH0OR3wIJYfWZQuOB8kNeQTDG5hNgvK1tSQTO-Kqgbwm67hrBDpvUBnGPqk1VwvNdtlMLJrshBSVOhsZuexJtPDRfWezVp2Ze0R4KwMibbrIore3N_3S0_232CbSYFtPAlQ-yhia_EvnIDHQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=41)
Talk in Buenos Aires – Mitos sobre el control de armas – Mas armas menos Crimen, English: Myths about gun control – More guns, less crime (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uMj9sIjDWUImrElD2VhF9m9rDVCFqRNpZIo6hp-18-2476_VLwEjLXtA-EHgzD27j5sYbjkmuCHDuHj7hPoKi_1AB5L2_aPNe1GwuZXYvpcVDhL83LJOp3spcFdnOA48_oNqQ1J1kfi4KL4juVZEomZnJrU04EqDUtERMTe73hvv7itRPpO_XxKd2oOQjXsEIM&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=42)
Full Aventura: John Lott in Argentina and Nuevo ReNAr: Much more than a stance in defense of guns (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSmZojzDToJCznLO5Rkw1aNX-2y4U489Etw4gxcqIYDp5139s-UqrOSSQu2JBAtpBGF9AxAHkB30K5axYr43JMr3Q7Zyld5c5eNtVuXTGXR37RnAELxXoUw99OAIPjNuxTtc10B5tuIyfOwHVcPLP1t&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=43)
Talk: Gun Control Myths (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uNYCD4qjq6dQluf90hSNIeE49yLOBqubdN1AS4_nCYDLQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=44)
Political Biases in the FBI’s Crime Data (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uNBUo_lX8tkr5BeJxpQbLE4U3rXKmjGo-0M924LrqN5yiSoN1WmzkHjVuQHLCD41lU&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=45)
.
Television/Podcast interviews
On NTD Newsroom: How Do We Stop Violence? (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSeMcj1VV-NO8wfq5EuAvALATg2hw6LbYdFKs5_Y0WTwafUUhuxEhK-2XurbEn-F60&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=46)
.
Radio interviews/Podcasts (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5QEjk2WA3d8F32KuJLtsaJMH-G-EwQDStSQrK1-zOY3sdMuypBYyw9cOJAM28nGE6LkuCE-a4dS3KV_0anhAQ78R3xOgihPWzaYb1NAxLZJYnrDuf2xhnll6URKtpIpOqw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=47)
Worth Listening to: On WMAL’s O’Connor & Company: To Discuss FBI’s Faulty Crime Stats (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSjKighVhA7Mb7m-j9Pdm33-KT6lI1QiIv8wClOjzX_vu348kx0kCApAnScH0mP12KJhTcWPyQP17Y3xO9rQtUT6nA6sONvOt2GPirvbaoRHG3fGI2X0QGM62E3nxTklDM&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=48)
On 700 WLW’s The Bill Cunningham Show: To Discuss the Problems with Crime Data (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRijTGcyoPIyPvodSSgBA92HJi0i2Ut0YsFB11qiNjSxLlsxhaPW7WT9V8pkJrrrvRkwEcEyOo3yrtE8vn6ZVkr6XGKzLqWvguE2SEk3Pt-nw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=49)
On KXEL’s Iowa Politics with Jeff Stein: To Discuss Massive Errors in FBI’s Active Shooting Reports (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpR4R0D-8Ai-xm-zRDWsxSNzTVo9skujEnMazv3dw0XzVrD71gQxlSL_3AobvPMtUQ0DseQnR4k3rnQujWBADDzmyWQykA3tiu9tTQKOwgSUOAthl7lzY2aJ_nXqXz0NInwhor_1gcX955SuEgASu7PG&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=50)
On Oregon KMED’s Bill Meyer Show: To Discuss Ideology and Violence (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpS6-GRIgKN7tTNC6XT9PE1kWaKyrwJ46siaMZumoLBzoJoMzXh8IRfXW5gcIKRpOlK22wvxHDQoQrI-CtHPniiLC7jr8u0RwDmUjdhzc_ooVQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=51)
On Cincinnati’s WLW: To Discuss ADL’s Biased Report on Extremist Violence (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQcCYC8S00rSibacI3EXC6ECkg9wpaG7H_Dxn6UMoNVxAjxLCavOPhZwnXuUoNk2Mv6ugEjvAyIrf7hcatIigu46bEgRtRgNxDgLGq_y54ZtA&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=52)
On WBT Charlotte’s The Brett Winterble Show: To Discuss Media Bias in Extremism Reports (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTny1zqKjk5SntZb2qtd-Zqw81NrcBomxp9ErYOT9DecYA9q6rYKJaphhICYHVcocBpp2u9EDNrmLTklq1egCd-YT9VvxZ9t2WqApiB1j73M6hyCRUDXRwtaTk3S7fhdgw&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=53)
On John Solomon Reports: ADL Misclassified Many Political Murders as Right-Wing (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTSuu81EATOmhH2enjx_9oEozNf-gw2ojtUCEQku-dMgd9OZomGTlQiLni0wmE5946atSMK3f3ddUEgcw4-o23GAZaOhSlev3IIqPTTjkhh_D0uXT55Rs8pikQ02pgHI6c&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=54)
On The Truth with Lisa Boothe: Is America Facing an Era of Political Violence (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSVe-qeoZEE7jo3iQ69mMpdTdV-4cqa-0thJ_-L8FSC9E3VDAgFjsAi5UXx7sIWW7VZ2E0QCxklMmw4fNb0S9TeMoai6mHuw9V3eJGnYXaOqA&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=55)
On The Vicki McKenna Show: To Discuss Extremist Violence (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpT7YWs4oLHjK4bdhh2CklYbIuZ95dURxtiyXiXW_wb8kL6B8kjNXWejoumobQy8FqFxCFmIJ6MEnrBkT2FbNpL6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=56)
On The Bill Martinez Show: To Discuss ADL’s False Claims (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQ-OPzXyaLUEbwQlhWVNJB1BNLv_M5y7qsLsE3yH2COiii508EqDgw91jGSPodzZPJ1C4EQSaLkY8FZERvqeuP6&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=57)
On Armed American Radio: To Discuss Gun Rights, Political Extremism, and Media Bias (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpR70OxAckIwq4PLrK_-uVAitJ-8JQXKHA1y414F_rN38qCo9saKiOlNyOzYr49lCT_UxTubM2xWtGElgetgbmPuzbi64BFcrFuXPMjmU8ZJLdYAeusCmW6klX_5YlHcpdg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=58)
On Oklahoma’s KQOB 96.9 FM: To Discuss The Bias in ADL’s Extremist Violence Report (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSYfVomg6QQ-fysa7Bmtpe53nDZHZrqXeYLee5LeNGO1koif8SBiKzesZfE1Zt_1P8lmxXPjI_8egq_LtS30rrhHLAHCo9zHboWGRGSK-5yfQ4BYg7talXMTSMrUYlYq6Y&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=59)
On 1440 Keys’ The Bob Jones Show: To Discuss Mental Health and Mass Public Shootings (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQlvgyH4EohSksnaFbRRkpnQtomJ3t8sJ7abwWAun3IhPv81VJbn890R35ytIw69Zsdt4lo_jm2j3vpSSHdMjLvqJFs51TiF09ijnpya325I4dStVIo_Tv6qjVOGAHPUsM&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=60)
On Armed American Radio: To Discuss Michigan Church Attack (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpR70OxAckIwq4PLrK_-uVAitJ-8JQXKHA1y414F_rN38uI96WZ6LJLyA2JyB2Gbvk9ClCHaC3nMr103wD3sJqS9&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=61)
.
Media Coverage
Washington Examiner: Armed citizens more effective in stopping shootings than FBI admits (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSvGIFl1unPcpoPGKo-DCyO-P2wkXly01wEByq8PmKWPdeyxuRiGsWrU_tU9pHZ2l7NhsawQPJJCw9FeYzk8R3SjBfsAMF67fp3kESr15CcKaw_rupHoo06JA_Y02J1WvY&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=62)
The Vince Show Mentions Our Research On Concealed Handgun Permit Holders Stopping Mass Public Shootings (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSvf_e6OlTXuYFqfc-2ODlkTq1pmrB5a7kx6DNtqOKfa2WonUqgsmF8w9c8nd5u-Ix31Hxn0hAn1TZxKrWFg993vhiNCsdb4xxAcMPYOU07jWx9KsDVB4CBZUDDs6wXVTudsK88yQRB46qEwIi3iXOs&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=63)
Our Work Discussed in The Washington Times: FBI provides inaccurate data on active shootings, armed citizens stopping gunmen, researcher says (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQX_RKVEwF8sqmnQ4f8iQ9KX-nZl_EZxk6wPvdCW80Ef1mugA75J1xYu-SM5J762MJv5beo7WlYMIxyq2IQVpzbnPa-sJs020XLSsuevKE12D52oJuo76dWFL6sdtsOt-wWFU3BuUWf0zUQykiz4-tLr_f7FUFW7qg5fteP-1g8kbfkNrzR65_0_c0qSQYZllg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=64)
Aire Libre: John Lott En Argentina (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRXNNxGuWyFf6jdfo0qVUBdt3arpoNigfuS0CA5rKzbEnKEKgH6h-PA3OdP_eMZISk&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=65)
Full Aventura: John Lott in Argentina and Nuevo ReNAr: Much more than a stance in defense of guns (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpSmZojzDToJCznLO5Rkw1aNX-2y4U489Etw4gxcqIYDp5139s-UqrOSSQu2JBAtpBGF9AxAHkB30K5axYr43JMr3Q7Zyld5c5eNtVuXTGXR37RnAELxXoUw99OAIPjNuxTtc10B5tuIyfOwHVcPLP1t&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=66)
CPRC in the News: Houston’s KTRH Radio, Fort Worth’s 1190AM Radio, Legal ιnѕυrrєcтισn, The College Fix, and More (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpT-reqImWWsjOfmo2LZIIOCd4T0SDDcryuRYflMCR7lymOFP8W1a5EMkSNgzN1hrOKVYcLUaki6XutHT2qWGkxzQY24CKDD5Uuh2O0-NiRMunvKqZPx6zFoHdEnsugXzaeydBCm1zPnWehiP1rlzPQW&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=67)
CPRC in the News: The Epoch Times, Red State, AOL, Louder with Crowder, Patriot Post, and more (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpT-reqImWWsjOfmo2LZIIOC33e_SeJh0nQ1ksYifu4adGpEl8tkY_ZkrChQhcHpHAmn7-Etgs1OfWAXbRhWzhKy7X_zE5Qtxbwu4DF8eysc5lKduzahGbJVrAFIWdflu7M&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=68)
.
Amicus Brief
Amicus Brief for the Supreme Court, Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Antonyuk, et al v James, that deals with Gun Free Zones in New York (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uP_mtteHHu9U_5HkGkjL8Qemeh3URWZKgWN3VRugPIx45ZavW9wuk5ZYaEb7psG43P_iZ1PdoqRVQz8l1XUdtJmNhsTN6AsVA75KBKyMKAzXw5b5TgBR8zYU5RaeCAz_Qa7akbiBLpwYXHbqzAB3zXgv3wxe5m7_d0Bu-VYW6Kce5tm_VFN9fhLyNDLt508uKc&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=69)
.
Televisions/Movie Show Bias on Guns
Yet Another Unsuccessful Defensive Gun Use on Entertainment Television, USA Network’s The Rainmaker (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uOOrHD2iRtZV-rU9xCeaE8UUBbwNben3KDu30_N6cmWpE7-3yOk9nRHhkExH_KiU9QjV6LV7BteXrjxP3VWj4me2C3fr2RXRoX3d5E5xUsZHiXfYw0UfYBEqWr-xROvQ6dA_SBYd8ZNnogg4xeexOk-&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=70)
.
Defensive Gun Uses (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uMqkSGRQSgQCK3LtnXdZXPz8YvpeVONGBpQcsAXCA0Vh4Y3nipkfT4SbY2Zo4b5_LYTE_Bmdqgz5zgRKuKf6AXh0KU5D8Ok59m8Bp1en7irB8KVR8LZXZIO_2tE2SC4ank&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=71)
Defensive Gun Uses By People Legally Carrying Guns: 31 Cases During January 2025 (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uPJjpDsg4wliGjVN59RyVc8XQf5jlEs0zbIOopFfDa7eGo0ROKGqeo2m7w7MH_A2wccI7zBzTvLKQRDJlaLtjC48UPEn-QRI9hTYOt7c8XuKFySunrSRdGBMhelI5Ageu8&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=72)
.
Other Testimony
Dr. Lott’s testimony Before the Wyoming state Senate Judiciary Committee on eliminating Gun-free Zones (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5adOicArsFdWd2Dsywet1uMoI4d6-hGUO1DYLbHJKfrgZ2K1i2SmIAb-dFxRlHUwAtPCuIk6HiTrLhYuWyevlrUnVWwDNiV5GEtnUNfcyZmzF5yWfuFqN4rMlk9xN9u2xzoXfsampkczpFutWbVkjLkAbvOaSTrahtnfM5wrzu20&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=73)
Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary on Gun Control (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5Sl-pWxMrA9OsIvjZE7LhRVnL30dRKOPF5PdloNkBj3QBM1-ltqSEBsEI8_iEmVVGrGjHEVkfF_isGsO3ps14eENOfUGqvoBbhqiq6lKBlqzJNrDVSQxMT_aWT-xWCZ0Hg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=74)
.
Other (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5QEjk2WA3d8F32KuJLtsaJO2vGaUOXcu4xgmWvHtdQ1TrZrQRtVRJnVVTRDdK8OswQyGIRzl4br3yNhQVCioCtiB0s3l0BuHwmBXVGIYydvEQ8OZ6vtFROJ5vDewQNbY_xcE7mdvFuJNW5Rb2WkOXoQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=75)
President Trump and FBI Director Hold News Conference, Part Discussing Gun Control and How the Administration is Investigating National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRSPA2Dgy3HDjxBCNKz-zRjprlOt3AgJaN-DGX8aA0HuizoRRBUVVyp6KvrhTTSmj5oFq-tH71XmQJSeZLTuobkibiRM4uWIP-hwto5VShiQcfvk1H_8IXuX3CU2h2LlD9KdYGoAPQFzNCPMAEY4lHDjeV9o8r3CpqMB3HbgFqBTy-QoDYNaJWp88W6K76-4slaos2cL_p7kiFwyxR3mwF0EV6-jWCL82jO87CVbP8YAg&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=76)
Bloomberg’s Everytown Quietly Scrubs Endorsement of Virginia Democrat Attorney General Candidate Jay Jones, the Bloomberg-funded group donated $200,000 to Jones’s campaign (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpRcMcroxPjqRCpnimEBk6Z8rSXSIFIPxUHNsqnb-7Y0__w_6EI51kxzjDsTjvReBvd0GKmeZnjOMuzAOBa7pT3ACcMFMK0vhO54eJVq3HChDhPjyOOLJlOpyB_gTb38GgPe89ixgkLvYHGcZcegarDjYrbhqvMw_SLkZ13j7ThaVrBJZbWcn1VEyynp3c-C8CdJFUuY9OKDWosEXfEbGJe-mPZhfObGjMqACDw3w_hhEQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=77)
Trump’s Memphis Safe Streets Task Force Arrests 850 Violent Criminals in First Two Weeks, 45 Missing Children Located (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpTY4usrbXkFzkfHN4FNoDA4Ldo0IJPhFXlt4ET_kgtWHG6DB7G_MA7QHJXfVNya0hT1E-4E-s8o2VqSN9fL2Dkp80jZRVpCz6rPaeepdtNP1fXlonSUr4aGXR9LImUsL-4n8QXGv2r7ukvusQkJvRcpknU2zJigIzTMspQNjJqtNQ&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=78)
Florida’s Largest Grocery Store Chain, Publix, will allow People to Openly Carry Guns in Their Stores (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpQXMuXr2pnIfSDoZi5RBGELypBrXohcbofMV42PwmAx6-mSCe2tP9nMyedxkivn6CP99xPNIUWlqgglbBsNic14wbU50-ZD7JRggXtEUfMzmmXxI7cgAZBF72udDpctw69UMGZdGE19KjSPCLR67mAm&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=79)
Survey Shows that a Large Percentage of People are Influenced to Buy a Gun Because of Mass Shootings (https://crimepreventionresearchcenter.nationbuilder.com/r?u=-x_Yl-Rt88DxpyxzvVNZ5T4Q_IEGb306RVHpnPSQkpS5O-jLtiz8zKTPqncTOGmu1QjSIT1DMqNKNdp9Pn91-mByZVB70c-fwlRjV4yyzySxN5RweRmHJv5sLEp-AydLSda_yJ3a9A76PNZiVh4Vp_wLSnMlSFVl4ZSjsUPypZojzBh_kBy2DxTw8GsirWtU&e=611eaee4d6cd7f2d08c1bbe9d1cb0bec&utm_source=crimepreventionresearchcenter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=october_18_2025&n=80)
Crime Prevention Research Center
358 S 700 E, Ste B, B409, Salt Lake City, UT 84102
http://crimeresearch.org (http://crimeresearch.org/)
johnrlott@crimeresearch.org (johnrlott@crimeresearch.org)
(484) 802-5373
-
Glock Confirms V Series, Discontinues Gen 4 & Gen 5 Pistols [UPDATED!]
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Glock-G17L_016-1-768x432.jpg)Sources reveal Glock plans to discontinue a large portion of popular pistols after November 30, 2025 - launching new models in their place.
BY Jacki Billings, Editor-In-Chief (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/author/jackibillings/),
Published October 20, 2025
22 Comments (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/glock-discontinue-popular-pistols/#comments)Bookmark
(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewpewtactical.com%2Fglock-discontinue-popular-pistols%2F)&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewpewtactical.com%2Fglock-discontinue-popular-pistols%2F&via=pewpewtactical&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewpewtactical.com%2Fglock-discontinue-popular-pistols%2F"] (http://"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Glock Confirms V Series%2C Discontinues Gen 4 %26 Gen 5 Pistols [UPDATED!) (http://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewpewtactical.com%2Fglock-discontinue-popular-pistols%2F&media=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pewpewtactical.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F07%2FGlock-G17L_016-1-1024x576.jpg&description=Sources reveal Glock plans to discontinue a large portion of popular pistols after November 30%2C 2025 - launching new models in their place.)Link copied to clipboard!
We review products independently. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission to help support our testing. Learn more (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/how-we-rate-reviews/).
Editor's Note: Article was updated at 9:48am ET with new info provided by Glock.
Austrian gun company Glock revealed company plans to discontinue a large portion of its pistols starting in November.
Glock issued a statement on October 21, 2025, regarding the leak of the company’s plans. “Yesterday, a retailer NOT affiliated with GLOCK Inc. made premature statements concerning the availability of certain GLOCK pistols. The individuals making these representations are not authorized to speak for GLOCK.
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Group-of-glocks-1024x715.jpg)
As part of GLOCK’s commitment to future innovations, we are making necessary updates to our product line to align with upcoming offerings. Our dedication continues to be with maintaining the highest level of quality, reliability, and accessibility that you expect from GLOCK.
The GLOCK V Series is here to establish a baseline of products while simplifying our processes.”
According to the company, V models will be available December 2025 and will include the following models:
- G17 V
- G19 V
- G19X V
- G45 V
- G26 V
- G20 V MOS
- G23 V
- G23 V MOS
- G21 V MOS
- G44 V
Glock also said that distributor exclusive models will be available, including:
- G19C V
- G45C V
- G17C V
- G19X V MOS TB
Trending: Best AR-15 (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-ar-15/), Best Concealed Carry Guns (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-concealed-carry-guns-caliber/), & Ammo in Stock (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/in-stock-ammo/)
Rumors on the New Lineup
BONUS: Shoot better. Download our exclusive shooting targets for FREE ($47 value) (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/offer/?d=28051371&h=&sh=)
Glock Store posted (https://www.instagram.com/p/DQCI9ofjWeC/) about Glock’s plans on social media, saying they’d received word that all Glocks will soon be discontinued except for the Glock 43, 43X, and 48X.
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/5.-Crimson-Trace-RAD-Pro-Gunsite-Glock-G19-1024x579.jpg)Glock G19
According to Glock Store, the discontinued models will be usurped by all new Glock models known as “V Models.”
The newer pistols will not come in MOS formats upon launch but will include features that prevent Glock pistols from being used along with switch conversion kits that make them full auto.
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/24.-Converted-Glock-17-1024x573.jpg)Glock 17 converted to full-auto
Pew Pew Tactical reached out to Glock for comment but received no word by the time of publishing. We confirmed with multiple sources close to the company, though, that they too have been informed that starting November 30, 2025, Glock will stop shipping the discontinued models.
That said, Glock’s own webpage lists popular models (https://us.glock.com/en/discontinued-models) like the Glock 17, Glock 17 MOS, Glock 19 Gen 4, and more as discontinued. According to the page, the decision to cut models out of the lineup was a strategic one.
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Glock-19-MOS-300x300.png) (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/go/psa/glocks/185989/)
Glocks (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/go/psa/glocks/185989/)
$522
at Palmetto State Armory
Prices accurate at time of writing
(https://www.pewpewtactical.com/go/psa/glocks/185989/)
- GrabAGun (See Price) (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/go/grabagun/glocks-3/185989/)
- MidwayUSA (See Price) (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/go/midwayusa/glocks-2/185989/)
“In order to focus on the products that will drive future innovation and growth, we are making a strategic decision to reduce our current commercial portfolio,” the company said.
“This streamlined approach allows us to concentrate on continuing to deliver the highest-quality and most relevant solutions for the market.”
Though Glock says the move is to provide a more focused lineup for consumers, California just announced last week that it was banning the sale of pistols that could be converted to “machineguns” — effectively putting an end to sales on most Glock pistols and Glock clones in the state.
(Read more in our article: California Bans Glock Pistols & Clones (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/california-glock-ban/))
Though Glock appears to be discontinuing some pistols, it does say support will remain for owners of discontinued models.
Pew Pew Tactical is tracking this story and will update it as more info is available.
If you’re looking to grab a Glock before it’s gone, we have some recommendations in our Best Glocks (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-glocks/), Best Glocks for Concealed Carry (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-glocks-concealed-carry/), and Best 9mm Glocks (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/ultimate-guide-every-9mm-glock/).
Latest Updates
October 21, 2025: Updated to include new information and comments from Glock.
-
Full auto seems like a good way to waste ammo in most cases. Some sort of specialized shot shell might be a better compromise.
I wish there was a high pressure (~20,000psi) .410 magnum 3.5" shells with a wide variety of loads.
-
Full auto seems like a good way to waste ammo in most cases. Some sort of specialized shot shell might be a better compromise.
I wish there was a high pressure (~20,000psi) .410 magnum 3.5" shells with a wide variety of loads.
In large degree, yes.
Belt-feds are another matter. Unlike slow-to-reload shotguns and unlike mad-fed full autos, which are useful in "room clearing" and other CQB, belt-feds can sustain fire.
My popcorn is getting cold while waiting for Antifa and BLM to face belt-feds the sustained resistance that they have long deserved. :popcorn:
-
Damned Jews… AGAIN!
New Jersey AG’s Lawfare Against Firearm Industry Enters New Territory
Ammoland Inc. Posted on October 31, 2025 (https://www.ammoland.com/2025/10/new-jersey-ags-lawfare-against-firearm-industry-enters-new-territory/) by Ammoland Editors & Staff (https://www.ammoland.com/author/ammoland-editors-and-staff/)
Opinion
By Shelby Baird Smith
(https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/New-Jersey-Attorney-General-Matt-Platkin-600x400.jpg)
New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin
New Jersey’s Attorney General Matthew Platkin is taking his campaign of lawfare into new territory with a worn-out playbook. In short, AG Platkin is attempting to use the U.S. judicial system to export New Jersey-style gun control to the rest of the country.
AG Platkin faces significant hurdles in convincing courts that New Jersey has the authority to dictate commerce in firearms in other states. Indeed, AG Platkin already backtracked on his promise to the courts that he wouldn’t use ill-defined and nebulous definitions in the law to wage a lawfare campaign against firearm industry members for engaging in lawful commerce. Yet, that’s exactly what he’s doing.
New Jersey AG Platkin filed a lawsuit (https://www.njoag.gov/ag-platkin-safe-office-and-division-of-consumer-affairs-sue-sig-sauer-over-defective-p320-handgun/) against SIG SAUER over the sale of the P320, citing the state’s Firearms Industry Public Safety Law, which calls for an ill-defined “reasonable controls” standard for “public nuisance” liability targeting the industry and the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA). The suit seeks to halt the sale of SIG SAUER’s P320 handgun, force a mandatory recall and cease the gun manufacturer’s advertising for the handgun.
Manufacturer Fires Back
SIG SAUER, for its part, responded to the lawfare in a press release (https://www.sigsauer.com/blog/sig-sauer-responds-to-new-jersey-attorney-generals-latest-attack-on-firearms-industry). The firearm manufacturer said AG Platkin’s legal complaint was filled with “numerous false and unsubstantiated claims.” Specifically, SIG SAUER noted that AG Platkin’s claims that the U.S. Army deemed the Modular Handgun System (MHS) “unsafe” is, in fact, “outright false.” SIG SAUER refuted AG Platkin’s claim that the company was eliminated from competition to provide the next sidearm to the U.S. military. In fact, SIG Sauer was awarded the contract.
SIG SAUER also rebuffed (https://www.sigsauer.com/blog/sig-sauer-responds-to-new-jersey-attorney-generals-latest-attack-on-firearms-industry) AG Platkin’s claims that the one of the handgun’s safety mechanisms can be disabled without pressure to the trigger. “This is also false,” the release stated. SIG SAUER noted that its engineers worked with the FBI Ballistics Research Facility and Michigan State Police, which commissioned the report, and found zero failures. Michigan State Police continue to carry the P320.
AG Platkin is pursuing his lawfare campaign against firearm manufacturers under a dubious “public nuisance” law aimed at firearm industry members that NSSF is currently challenging (https://www.nssf.org/articles/nssf-files-amended-claim-against-new-jersey-anti-plcaa-law-allowing-frivolous-lawsuits/) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Under that law, AG Platkin claims that SIG SAUER’s sale of the P320 constitutes “unreasonable conduct” that has “knowingly or recklessly created, maintained, or contributed to a public nuisance” in the state. The law, NSSF contends, is an end-run on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and violates the U.S. Constitution several times over.
NSSF previously sued to block New Jersey’s law from taking effect, but that suit was dismissed (https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4157453-appeals-court-dismisses-challenge-to-nj-gun-liability-law/) after a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit determined that NSSF lacked standing at the time to challenge the law. AG Platkin’s office disavowed to the appellate court that it had any intention of suing firearm manufacturers for engaging in lawful commerce or placing liability on firearm manufacturers for the criminal misconduct of third parties beyond their control. They promised to only sue for a company’s “own misconduct.”
Weaponizing Judicial System
But that’s not what AG Platkin did. Following his representations to the federal appellate court, AG Platkin waited only a few months before filing several lawsuits against industry members under the law for their participation in lawful commerce and seeking to hold them liable for harms caused by criminal acts of third parties.
For example, AG Platkin brought enforcement actions against two licensed firearms retailers for failing to determine whether customers who purchased magazines or rifle ammunition were prohibited from possessing firearms (beyond verifying that a purchaser of the latter is over the age of 18), despite no state or federal law requirement that retailers do so. AG Platkin’s claims were predicated exclusively on the theory that the retailers failed to employ “reasonable controls” under the aforementioned “public nuisance” law.
Then AG Platkin filed suit against another firearm manufacturer, GLOCK, Inc. AG Platkin’s frivolous lawsuit against GLOCK was filed shortly after the now- shuttered Biden-hαɾɾιs White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention colluded with Everytown for Gun Safety to sue GLOCK on behalf of the City of Chicago advancing the same claim based on a similar Illinois statute. Once Chicago sued, AG Platkin and a group of 11 other states and the District of Columbia threatened to sue (https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases24/2024-0326_Multistate-Letter-to-Glock.pdf) GLOCK as well.
Fearing that our other members would be AG Platkin’s next targets, NSSF moved to reopen the case and amended its complaint. NSSF’s Larry Keane said in a press release (https://www.nssf.org/articles/nssf-files-amended-claim-against-new-jersey-anti-plcaa-law-allowing-frivolous-lawsuits/) when the amended complaint against New Jersey was filed, “As feared, Attorney General Platkin has weaponized the judicial system against firearm manufacturers who have done nothing but engage in lawful commerce and have not violated any federal or state statutes. New Jersey is seeking to blame GLOCK and other industry members for the actions of criminals.”
Now, with AG Platkin’s lawfare against another firearm manufacturer, it is clear that AG Platkin never had any intention of limiting enforcement of New Jersey’s law to apply only to unlawful commerce or conduct within the state’s borders. Every firearm manufacturer, in any state, could be targeted by AG Platkin’s weaponization of the legal system.
The problem with New Jersey’s law is in its weak legal foundation. New Jersey’s law violates the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause.
New Jersey’s law is also preempted by the PLCAA under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. In 2005, Congress barred these sorts of baseless lawsuits when it passed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).
The PLCAA simply codified black letter tort law. The PLCAA keeps activist lawyers, and even state attorneys general, from placing the blame on members of the firearm industry for the criminal misuse of legal firearms lawfully manufactured and sold. No other industry in America had been targeted by such baseless, politically motivated lawsuits.
The PLCAA’s constitutionality has been upheld by every appellate court in the nation to consider the issue. Just this year, the U.S. Supreme Court exclusively relied upon the PLCAA in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos when it unanimously rejected Mexico’s frivolous claims seeking to hold major firearm manufacturers liable for the lawless actions of narco-terrorist cartels within Mexico’s own borders. The Supreme Court explained that dismissing the lawsuit accords with the PLCAA’s “core purpose,” as Congress enacted the statute “to halt a flurry of lawsuits attempting to make manufacturers pay for the downstream harms resulting from misuse of their products.” It was a resounding victory for the PLCAA and the rule of law.
But the fight is not over. NSSF is challenging New Jersey’s law. It’s a clear violation of the PLCAA. It’s a brazen attack on a constitutionally-protected industry. AG Platkin’s abuse of the courts to impose New Jersey-style gun control in other states, or in his own for that matter, cannot be tolerated.
-
Disarming goyim
https://archive.vn/D3CuT (https://archive.vn/D3CuT)
-
Disarming goyim
https://archive.vn/D3CuT (https://archive.vn/D3CuT)
Jews and gun control
disarming the goyim • a religious imperative
Judaism’s “Kill even the best of the Gentiles” religious imperative is no mere anachronism, but evident in the Jєωιѕн-inspired-and-controlled murder of over 60 million Christians “in a time when Jews had control over the Gentiles” under ʝʊdɛօ-Communism (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/perpetrators.html)! Judaism teaches that non-Jews must be exterminated (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/kabbalah.html) before their moshiach (“messiah” The Anti-Christ) comes to rule the world.
Perhaps more subtle than their violent disarmament of Christian Russians, Jews are currently waging full scale lawfare and economic war on gentile gun ownership, while the hypocrites arm Israeli civilians to the teeth, even children. They have unleashed all their economic weapons of mass destruction and media hegemony—censoring and demonetizing gun videos on their internet, skewing reporting, un-banking gun businesses, and funding massive agitprop and sympathetic politicians to disarm us Gentiles—to control us!
These two thought experiments explain why the Yehoudis are nervous about goyim guns:
The Mathematics of Countering Tyranny
by John Wesley Rawles, May 15, 2018
https://survivalblog.com/mathematics-countering-tyranny/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://survivalblog.com/mathematics-countering-tyranny/)
The Critical Fraction
by Eric Raymond
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8053 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8053)
A rough approximation: “…the critical fraction of American gun owners that would have to be hard-core enough to resist confiscation with lethal violence in order to stop the attempt is lower than 1 in 317. Probably much lower.”
No. Their Cold Dead Hands.
Parts 1 & 2
https://zerogov.com/no-their-cold-dead-hands-by-bill-buppert/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://zerogov.com/no-their-cold-dead-hands-by-bill-buppert/)
https://zerogov.com/no-their-cold-dead-hands-part-ii-by-bill-buppert/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://zerogov.com/no-their-cold-dead-hands-part-ii-by-bill-buppert/)
Judaism’s religious imperative:
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/acac035b1a48c13bf3b3fa5279d6694cb0dc6b80.jpg)
“Kill even the best of Gentiles… in a time of war or in a time when Jews have control over the Gentiles.”
details: Who is human? (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html)
Bloomberg tells pregnant Gentile “Kill it!”
“He told me to ‘kill it’ in a serious monotone voice,” Sekiko Sakai, a sales manager who filed the lawsuit in 1997, alleged. “I asked ‘What? What did you just say?’ He looked at me and repeated in a deliberate manner ‘kill it.’”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/16/michael-bloomberg-told-pregnant-employee-to-kill-it-past-lawsuit-alleges/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/16/michael-bloomberg-told-pregnant-employee-to-kill-it-past-lawsuit-alleges/)
So much for Everytown for Gun ‘Safety’ founder Bloomberg’s тαℓмυdic concept of ‘safety.’
Does he tell Jews to kill their babies?
Christianity’s religious imperative:
Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.1225-1274 A.D.(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/6a0f25aa12597c84de00209708a5d8fd9d0a7513.jpg)
defense of innocent life
If necessary, it is moral to kill an aggressor
in defense of innocent life
“…the act of self-defense may have two effects, one is the saving of one’s life, the other is the slaying of the aggressor. Therefore this act, since one’s intention is to save one’s own life, is not unlawful, seeing that it is natural to everything to keep itself in ‘being,’ as far as possible. And yet, though proceeding from a good intention, an act may be rendered unlawful, if it be out of proportion to the end. Wherefore if a man, in self-defense, uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repel force with moderation his defense will be lawful, because according to the jurists [Cap. Significasti, De Homicid. volunt. vel casual.], ‘it is lawful to repel force by force, provided one does not exceed the limits of a blameless defense.’ Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense in order to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's.”
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Q. 64 murder, Article 7
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3064.htm (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3064.htm)
a representative fraction of Jєωιѕн domination of
gun control agitprop
Jєωιѕн Attorney General of New Jersey Matthew Platkin proposes ammunition database and controls–encouraged by Jєωιѕн lobbyist Ari Freilich, state policy director at the Jєωιѕн Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/12/28/states-try-curb-mass-shootings-bullets-ammo-laws/10760437002/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/12/28/states-try-curb-mass-shootings-bullets-ammo-laws/10760437002/)
Disney’s Jєωιѕн CEO Bob Iger: Those of Us in Positions to Influence Laws, Shape Culture ‘Have an Extra Responsibility’ to Push Gun Control https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2022/12/07/disney-ceo-bob-iger-those-of-us-in-positions-to-influence-laws-shape-culture-have-an-extra-responsibility-to-push-gun-control/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2022/12/07/disney-ceo-bob-iger-those-of-us-in-positions-to-influence-laws-shape-culture-have-an-extra-responsibility-to-push-gun-control/)
Jєωιѕн Surgeon Joseph V. Sakran: Doctors Have an Obligation to Work to Outlaw Guns That Liquefy Organs and Explode Bones
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/sakran-doctors-have-an-obligation-to-work-to-outlaw-guns-that-liquefy-organs-and-explode-bones/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/sakran-doctors-have-an-obligation-to-work-to-outlaw-guns-that-liquefy-organs-and-explode-bones/)
Jєωιѕн Lawyer Jonathan Lowy spearheads new pressure group under the Foreign Agents Registration Act to generate “litigation and other pressure and activity from the international community” to ban guns.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/foreign-governments-are-taking-on-the-u-s-gun-industry/ar-AA13nhTv (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/foreign-governments-are-taking-on-the-u-s-gun-industry/ar-AA13nhTv)
Biden’s 2022 Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, an aggressive gun banner Jew Steve Dettelbach
https://www.timesofisrael.com/kentucky-republicans-claim-plot-by-Jєωιѕн-junta-behind-new-gun-control-czar/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.timesofisrael.com/kentucky-republicans-claim-plot-by-Jєωιѕн-junta-behind-new-gun-control-czar/)
Jєωιѕн politicians lead chorus calling for tighter gun laws
https://www.timesofisrael.com/Jєωιѕн-politicians-join-chorus-calling-for-tighter-gun-laws/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.timesofisrael.com/Jєωιѕн-politicians-join-chorus-calling-for-tighter-gun-laws/)
Everytown President John Feinblatt: The Midterm Results Were a Mandate for Congress to Act on Guns
https://www.everytown.org/press/everytown-president-john-feinblatt-the-midterm-results-were-a-mandate-for-congress-to-act-on-guns/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.everytown.org/press/everytown-president-john-feinblatt-the-midterm-results-were-a-mandate-for-congress-to-act-on-guns/)
Jєωιѕн Attorney Fieger Hopes Oxford School Shooting Lawsuit Leads To Gun Control
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/12/10/fieger-hopes-school-shooting-lawsuit-leads-to-gun-control-n53274 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/12/10/fieger-hopes-school-shooting-lawsuit-leads-to-gun-control-n53274) He also filed a Columbine shooting lawsuit and represented Jack "Dr. Death" Kevorkian.
After Using Unconstitutional Powers to Stop Evictions, CDC Director Sets Her Sights on Guns
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/after-using-unconstitutional-powers-to-stop-evictions-cdc-director-sets-her-sights-on-guns/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/after-using-unconstitutional-powers-to-stop-evictions-cdc-director-sets-her-sights-on-guns/)
How to Persuade Americans to Give Up Their Guns
The author, Atlantic Editor David Frum, also lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/10/responsible-gun-ownership-is-a-lie/619811/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/10/responsible-gun-ownership-is-a-lie/619811/)
How Shannon Watts and Her (Bloomberg’s) Everytown Cohorts Are Gearing Up for the Midterm Elections https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/how-shannon-watts-and-her-everytown-cohorts-are-gearing-up-for-the-midterm-elections/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/how-shannon-watts-and-her-everytown-cohorts-are-gearing-up-for-the-midterm-elections/)
Terry McAuliffe Got Nearly $500,000 from Bloomberg-Backed Gun Control Group in September
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/18/terry-mcauliffe-bloomberg-gun-control/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/10/18/terry-mcauliffe-bloomberg-gun-control/)
Bloomberg’s Everytown and Two Wounded LA County Deputies Sue Polymer80 Over ‘Ghost Gun’ Sale https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/everytown-and-two-wounded-la-county-deputies-sue-polymer80-over-ghost-gun-sale/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/everytown-and-two-wounded-la-county-deputies-sue-polymer80-over-ghost-gun-sale/)
Bloomberg’s Everytown Buys Ads to Push for Universal Background Checks https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/everytown-buys-ads-to-push-for-universal-background-checks/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/everytown-buys-ads-to-push-for-universal-background-checks/)
Giffords Sues Over "Ghost Guns" https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/08/18/san-francisco-da-giffords-sue-over-ghost-guns-n49011 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/08/18/san-francisco-da-giffords-sue-over-ghost-guns-n49011)
Bloomberg’s Agitprop Production Arm ‘The Trace’ Working to Silence Gun Influencers
Billions of shekels buy lots of propaganda and astroturf.
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/bloombergs-agitprop-production-arm-the-trace-working-to-silence-gun-influencers/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/bloombergs-agitprop-production-arm-the-trace-working-to-silence-gun-influencers/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/312bf028334c6b25c92e3b4c7899f6a52a42f74e.jpg)
Bloomberg-Founded Gun Control Group Pledges $8M to Turn Texas Blue [Anti-Gun]
“Everytown [for Gun Safety] senior political adviser Charlie Kelly commented: ‘[Texas is] clearly emerging as a top battleground state — there’s just no question about it — and it’s why we’re investing $8 million in the state this cycle. Between the investment and our network of 400,000 grassroots supporters, our goal is to do whatever it takes to elect gun sense candidates up and down the ballot in the state.’
“The gun control group made clear they hope, this year, to do in Texas exactly what they did in Virginia in 2019. Democrats took control of the Virginia legislature in 2019, thereafter pushing a slew of new gun controls on law-abiding citizens.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/10/bloomberg-founded-gun-control-group-pledges-8m-to-turn-texas-blue/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/10/bloomberg-founded-gun-control-group-pledges-8m-to-turn-texas-blue/)
Michael Bloomberg Blocks Video Of Him Recommending Disarming Young Black Males
Bloomberg demanded the Aspen Institute not publish video of him talking about how young black males needed to be disarmed, and if you had to, you “throw them up against the wall and frisk them.”
“We basically honor the wishes of our speakers and Mayor Bloomberg preferred that we not use the video for broadcast,” Jim Spiegelman, chief external affairs officer for the Aspen Institute told The Aspen Times.”
https://www.aspentimes.com/news/michael-bloomberg-blocks-footage-of-aspen-institute-appearance/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.aspentimes.com/news/michael-bloomberg-blocks-footage-of-aspen-institute-appearance/)
https://dailycaller.com/2015/02/13/michael-bloomberg-blocks-video-of-pro-gun-control-talk-from-being-published/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://dailycaller.com/2015/02/13/michael-bloomberg-blocks-video-of-pro-gun-control-talk-from-being-published/)
Grofman and Bloomberg want Virginians Guns
Neither are elected and both are…yes, we noticed.
https://identitydixie.com/2019/11/06/the-un-elected-californian-who-engineered-virginias-permanent-democrat-majority/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://identitydixie.com/2019/11/06/the-un-elected-californian-who-engineered-virginias-permanent-democrat-majority/)
Bloomberg-Bought Dems in Virginia Try to Ban Most Guns
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/bloomberg-bought-dems-in-virginia-try-to-ban-most-guns/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.intellectualconservative.com/bloomberg-bought-dems-in-virginia-try-to-ban-most-guns/)
Bloomberg Buys Virginia: Legislature Flips Blue, Path Cleared for Gun Control Laws
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/bloomberg-buys-virginia-legislature-flips-blue-path-cleared-for-gun-control-laws/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/bloomberg-buys-virginia-legislature-flips-blue-path-cleared-for-gun-control-laws/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/2a2dc3857e5a1f4ababb3c2406ba6588efc8e185.jpg)
Bloomberg’s Got an Anti-Gun Court Packing Agenda
“New York Billionaire Michael Bloomberg is … promising to pack the Supreme Court with ‘pro-gun control judges” if he were elected president.…Of course, Bloomberg also supports a slew of other Second Amendment restrictions. Bloomberg gun control-wish list includes requiring every gun buyer be issued a Department of Justice-endorsed permit to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms, enacting a federal age-based gun ban for adults under 21, repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) that blocks baseless lawsuits intended to bankrupt the gun industry and banning the private transfer of firearms.”
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/12/bloombergs-got-an-anti-gun-court-packing-agenda/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.ammoland.com/2019/12/bloombergs-got-an-anti-gun-court-packing-agenda/)
Editor’s note: Has Bloomberg ever told a Jew to kill her baby? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/16/michael-bloomberg-told-pregnant-employee-to-kill-it-past-lawsuit-alleges/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/16/michael-bloomberg-told-pregnant-employee-to-kill-it-past-lawsuit-alleges/)
Bloomberg Pledges 25 Million to Fight Concealed Carry
https://www.pagunblog.com/2017/04/11/bloomberg-pledges-25-million-to-fight-concealed-carry/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.pagunblog.com/2017/04/11/bloomberg-pledges-25-million-to-fight-concealed-carry/)
Mike Bloomberg’s gun-control group just vastly outspent the NRA to help Democrats win in Virginia
A gun-control lobbying group funded largely by billionaire Michael Bloomberg just helped Democrats take over the state government in Virginia – right in the National Rifle Association’s backyard.… it may also be a tipping point in the money battle over gun rights. Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun-control advocacy group that the former New York mayor helps fund, spent $2.5 million this year to influence voters in Virginia versus approximately $300,000 by the NRA, which has its headquarters in Fairfax, Virginia.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/06/mike-bloombergs-gun-control-outspends-nra-helps-democrats-win-virginia.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/06/mike-bloombergs-gun-control-outspends-nra-helps-democrats-win-virginia.html)
Everytown’s Finances
“Recently the [IRS] rule was changed so that non-profits could submit their Schedule B without identifying information. This provides some transparency but without allowing the Twitter mobs to target big donors.
So Everytown raised a record 67 million dollars in 2018, according to their Form 990. According to the Schedule B, 39 million of that was raised from one donor. I think we can all guess who that is. But even Mike Bloomberg has friends. They raised 4 million more dollars in million dollar donations.”
https://www.pagunblog.com/2020/01/08/everytowns-finances/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.pagunblog.com/2020/01/08/everytowns-finances/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bf115cba18ef712259427ff08b115780563af565.jpg)
Jewess encourages lying (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html) to disarm Americans
“If you're going to take people’s guns away, wait until you get elected -- then take the guns away,” she said. “Don’t tell them ahead of time.”
https://www.foxnews.com/media/joy-behars-guns-second-amendment (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.foxnews.com/media/joy-behars-guns-second-amendment)
So, another Jewess lies to disarm Americans, yet another case of lying to Gentiles (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html)
Under cover of the Covid-19 pandemic, Mayor Deborah Frank Feinen of Champaign, Illinois has been lying to conceal her Emergency Order authorizing a ban of gun and ammunition sales (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/14/illinois-mayor-issues-coronavirus-order-allowing-ban-on-gun-sales/). Just like (((Rahm Emanuel))) (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/rahm_emanuel_409199): “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.” She claims that “currently [there is] no intent (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.foxnews.com/politics/champaign-clarifies-firearms-coronavirus-emergency)…,” BUT section 6 of Exhibit A shows exactly what she authorized:
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/wandtv.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/5/51/551ced24-6535-11ea-9826-4f4fd396dacb/5e6b960454b21.pdf.pdf (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/wandtv.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/5/51/551ced24-6535-11ea-9826-4f4fd396dacb/5e6b960454b21.pdf.pdf)
[Editor's note: American gun owners should remember the provisions of the Stafford Act. The government is not allowed to seize guns under cover of an "Emergency"… as if a law will stop the out of control occupied US government. https://redoubtnews.com/2020/03/gun-rights-under-stafford-emergency-act/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://redoubtnews.com/2020/03/gun-rights-under-stafford-emergency-act/)]
Bay area Jєωιѕн moms take leading role in campaign against gun violence
https://jweekly.com/2013/03/08/bay-area-Jєωιѕн-moms-take-leading-role-in-campaign-against-gun-violence/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://jweekly.com/2013/03/08/bay-area-Jєωιѕн-moms-take-leading-role-in-campaign-against-gun-violence/)
How Michael Bloomerg bought the gun control movement
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/how-michael-bloomberg-bought-the-gun-control-movement/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/how-michael-bloomberg-bought-the-gun-control-movement/)
Bloomberg’s Gun Control Apparatus Lies (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html) to Virginia’s Gun Owners in Election Mailing
“…But no one should be surprised. Bloomberg and Everytown have a well-established history of bending or ignoring the truth, one even the legacy media cannot always ignore.”
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/11/bloombergs-gun-control-apparatus-lies-to-virginias-gun-owners-in-election-mailing/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.ammoland.com/2019/11/bloombergs-gun-control-apparatus-lies-to-virginias-gun-owners-in-election-mailing/)
Bloomberg Ad Makes Wildly Misleading Claim: 263 School Shootings ‘Since Trump Took Office’
https://www.dailywire.com/news/bloomberg-ad-makes-wildly-misleading-claim-263-school-shootings-since-trump-took-office (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.dailywire.com/news/bloomberg-ad-makes-wildly-misleading-claim-263-school-shootings-since-trump-took-office)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/8fdb52848fd28777806f136c750173e190af819e.jpg)
How the CIA, Mossad and “the Epstein Network” are Exploiting Mass Shootings to Create an Orwellian Nightmare
Following another catastrophic mass shooting or crisis event, Orwellian “solutions” are set to be foisted on a frightened American public by the very network connected, not only to Jeffrey Epstein, but to a litany of crimes and a frightening history of plans to crush internal dissent in the United States.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/)
Trump’s Chabadnik (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/chabad.html) daughter is doing the legwork to promote “…take the guns first, then do due process second” gun laws
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=126836 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=126836)
Jєωιѕн Attorney General Phil Jacob Weiser of Colorado Tells Sheriffs to Resign or Enforce Gun Seizures without Due Process
https://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2019/03/20/constitutional-stand-off-state-ag-tells-sheriffs-to-resign-or-enforce-red-flag-law/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2019/03/20/constitutional-stand-off-state-ag-tells-sheriffs-to-resign-or-enforce-red-flag-law/)
Jєωιѕн Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order, Halts Cody Wilson’s Publication of 3-D Gun Files–destroys both First and Second Amendment
When Judge Lasnik blocked Cody Wilson’s 3D printing database, he destroyed Free Speech and the RKBA.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/31/judge-issues-temporary-restraining-order-halts-cody-wilsons-publication-of-3-d-gun-files/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/31/judge-issues-temporary-restraining-order-halts-cody-wilsons-publication-of-3-d-gun-files/)
Levi Strauss Forms Gun-Control Group with Bloomberg, Pushes Employees to Donate
CEO Chip Bergh plans to spend millions advocating new gun-control laws
by Stephen Gutowski, September 4, 2018
https://freebeacon.com/issues/levi-strauss-forms-gun-control-group-bloomberg-pushes-employees-donate/
After Newtown, Jews Lead Renewed Push on Guns
https://forward.com/news/168063/after-newtown-jews-lead-renewed-push-on-guns/?p=all (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://forward.com/news/168063/after-newtown-jews-lead-renewed-push-on-guns/?p=all)
Revealed: Google Banning AdWords Like ‘Gun-Grips, Scopes and Sights’
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/11/google-banning-adwords-like-gun-grips-scopes-and-sights/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/11/google-banning-adwords-like-gun-grips-scopes-and-sights/)
YouTube Terminates Channel of Firearms Parts Retailer
by Mairead McCardle, National Review, June 10, 2018
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/youtube-guns-brownells-channel-shut-down/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.nationalreview.com/news/youtube-guns-brownells-channel-shut-down/)
Facebook Announces they Are Now Banning ALL Talk of Firearms, Ammo, or Gun Parts Trading
by The Free Thought Project, January 30, 2016
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/facebook-announces-censoring-talk-firearms-ammo-gun-parts-trading/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://thefreethoughtproject.com/facebook-announces-censoring-talk-firearms-ammo-gun-parts-trading/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bb6ff07088a7f9e277c32cb9f9d2263b983bbf16.jpg)
YouTube Demonetizing Gun Videos
All Outdoor, April 10, 2017
http://www.alloutdoor.com/2017/04/10/youtube-demonetizing-gun-videos/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.alloutdoor.com/2017/04/10/youtube-demonetizing-gun-videos/)
YouTube Plans to Shut Down Gun Instructional Videos
by Brian Doherty, March 23, 2018
https://reason.com/blog/2018/03/23/youtube-says-it-will-be-shutting-down-gu (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://reason.com/blog/2018/03/23/youtube-says-it-will-be-shutting-down-gu)
Bank of America to stop lending to some gun manufacturers in wake of Parkland massacre
by Amy B. Wang, Washington Post, April 11, 2018
https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/amy-b-wang/?utm_term=.b67641954325 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/amy-b-wang/?utm_term=.b67641954325)
Intuit Merchant Services Bans Nordic Components Credit Card Processing
by Robert Farago, January 24, 2013
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/01/robert-farago/chase-banks-intuit-merchant-services-bans-nordic-components-credit-card-processing/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/01/robert-farago/chase-banks-intuit-merchant-services-bans-nordic-components-credit-card-processing/)
Zionist Jews Are At The Forefront Of Advancing Gun Control In The United States
by Lee Rogers, Blacklisted News, May 12, 2013
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Zionist_Jews_Are_At_The_Forefront_Of_Advancing_Gun_Control_In_The_United_States/25956/0/32/32/Y/M.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.blacklistednews.com/Zionist_Jews_Are_At_The_Forefront_Of_Advancing_Gun_Control_In_The_United_States/25956/0/32/32/Y/M.html)
Jews and Jєωιѕн organizations lead the gun control campaign
by Kevin MacDonald, The Occidental Observer, January 1, 2013
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/jews-and-Jєωιѕн-organizations-lead-the-gun-control-campaign/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/jews-and-Jєωιѕн-organizations-lead-the-gun-control-campaign/)
Jews and Gun Control: A Reprise
by Andrew Joyce, The Occidental Observer, August 2, 2014
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/jews-and-gun-control-a-reprise/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/jews-and-gun-control-a-reprise/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bb4002ceceb7561aec7ee122270eccae9e2bde30.jpg)
Jews as a Hostile Elite
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/jews-as-a-hostile-elite/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/jews-as-a-hostile-elite/)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/?s=jews+and+gun+control&x=0&y=0 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/?s=jews+and+gun+control&x=0&y=0)
Bloomberg gun-control group targets more than 12 states
by Fredreka Schouten, USA Today, December 2, 2014
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/02/bloomberg-plans-gun-control-push-in-states/19785161/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/02/bloomberg-plans-gun-control-push-in-states/19785161/)
Report: Gun-Grabber Michael Bloomberg Willing to Spend $1 Billion to Win White House
by AWR Hawkins, Breitbart, January 25,2016
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/25/gun-grabber-michael-bloomberg-willing-to-spend-1-billion-to-take-white-house/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/25/gun-grabber-michael-bloomberg-willing-to-spend-1-billion-to-take-white-house/)
Soros (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/soros.html)-funded ‘National Gun Control Movement’ is all about starting an American cινιℓ ωαr
State of the Nation, February 21, 2018
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=94843 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=94843)
Democratic Financier George Soros (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/soros.html) Invested In Firearm Companies While Backing Gun Control Groups
by Andrew Perez, International Business Times, January 25, 2016
http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/democratic-financier-george-soros-invested-firearm-companies-while-backing-gun (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/democratic-financier-george-soros-invested-firearm-companies-while-backing-gun)
Soros, Bloomberg & Planned Parenthood Funding David Hogg’s Anti-Gun Student Protests
https://freedomoutpost.com/soros-bloomberg-planned-parenthood-funding-david-hoggs-anti-gun-student-protests/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://freedomoutpost.com/soros-bloomberg-planned-parenthood-funding-david-hoggs-anti-gun-student-protests/)
Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg each pledge $500,000 to gun control march by Florida students
https://www.jta.org/2018/02/21/news-opinion/united-states/steven-spielberg-and-jeffrey-katzenberg-pledge-500000-to-gun-control-march-by-florida-students (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.jta.org/2018/02/21/news-opinion/united-states/steven-spielberg-and-jeffrey-katzenberg-pledge-500000-to-gun-control-march-by-florida-students)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/3784e895da9706268a628558190736d138babf81.jpg)https://twitter.com/ColdWintrTheory/status/967587080061636608 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://twitter.com/ColdWintrTheory/status/967587080061636608)
NFTY [North American Federation of Temple Youth] Teens Are Leading the Way on Gun Violence Prevention
by Zachary Herrmann , 2/27/2018
“We are mobilizing in a wide variety of ways, both locally and nationally, for sensible gun laws. This is a moment unlike any in recent memory – and all over the U.S., Reform Jєωιѕн teens are leading the way. We take pride in this remarkable leadership, but pride is not enough. We need teens, young adults and the entire Movement to join NFTY, the Reform Jєωιѕн Youth Movement, and participate in powerful initiatives on the local, state and national level.”
https://urj.org/blog/2018/02/27/nfty-teens-are-leading-way-gun-violence-prevention (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://urj.org/blog/2018/02/27/nfty-teens-are-leading-way-gun-violence-prevention)
…but this same “NFTY” Jєωιѕн teen group that lobbies nationally to disarm goyim, funds trips to Israel to teach Jєωιѕн teens to shoot machine guns. Master Race (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html) hypocrites!
I Learned To Shoot An Assault Rifle — At My Jєωιѕн Youth Group
by Madeline Winard, March 19, 2018
https://forward.com/scribe/396759/i-learned-to-shoot-an-assault-rifle-at-my-Jєωιѕн-youth-group/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://forward.com/scribe/396759/i-learned-to-shoot-an-assault-rifle-at-my-Jєωιѕн-youth-group/)
‘I’ll Speak for My Lost Friend’ Teens Who Survived Parkland Shooting Prep for Gun Control Rally in Israel
Three survivors of the high-school massacre will be in Israel on March 23, at a demonstration calling for stricter gun control in the U.S. ‘I hope a lot of people come so we can share what we need to share,’ says Eden Hebron, 14…
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-teens-who-survived-parkland-shooting-prep-for-tel-aviv-gun-rally-1.5910092 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-teens-who-survived-parkland-shooting-prep-for-tel-aviv-gun-rally-1.5910092)
Who’s Really Behind March for Our Lives?
March for Our Lives masquerades as a spontaneous student movement, but is actually a front for several deep-pocket Jews, including Bloomberg, Katz, Warsavsky, Wishnow, Kieffer, and Vinik.
https://archives.frontpagemag.com/fpm/whos-really-behind-march-our-lives-daniel-greenfield/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://archives.frontpagemag.com/fpm/whos-really-behind-march-our-lives-daniel-greenfield/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/2882bb5bb5c6e03fe62eba1a4159b9576dafdbbf.jpg)
This Jєωιѕн Lawmaker’s Speech Helped Pass Florida’s New Gun Law
March 18, 2018 By Ron Kampeas
https://forward.com/fast-forward/396772/watch-this-Jєωιѕн-lawmakers-speech-helped-pass-floridas-new-gun-law/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://forward.com/fast-forward/396772/watch-this-Jєωιѕн-lawmakers-speech-helped-pass-floridas-new-gun-law/)
Dem Rep Wasserman Schultz Introduces Legislation Requiring Background Checks on Ammunition Buyers
by Pam Key, Breitbart News, March 26, 2018
U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz introduces Ammunition Background Check Act of 2018
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/03/26/dem-rep-wasserman-schultz-introduces-legislation-requiring-background-checks-ammunition-buyers/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/03/26/dem-rep-wasserman-schultz-introduces-legislation-requiring-background-checks-ammunition-buyers/)
Senator Chuck “Shomer Yisrael” must be Replaced by a Senator who will “Shomer” the U.S.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210309031200/http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2010/04/senator-chuck-shomer-yisrael-must-be.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://web.archive.org/web/20210309031200/http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2010/04/senator-chuck-shomer-yisrael-must-be.html)
Jєωιѕн Prof. Allan J. Lichtman (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Lichtman), collaborator with Southern Poverty Law Center (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/hate-pimps.html), calls for repeal of the Second Amendment
http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/excerpt-repeal-the-second-amendment (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/excerpt-repeal-the-second-amendment)
There is evidence that a rash of mass killings is another Operation Gladio fαℓѕє fℓαg operation designed to drive anti-gun sentiment:
OPERATION GLADIO C:
Government-Sponsored Domestic Terrorism Targets American Public Schools
State of the Nation, February 18, 2018
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=94576 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=94576)
Jews and U.S. Gun Control Legislation, 1968-present, partial list
- •1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Jєωιѕн Rep. Emanuel Celler’s House bill H.R. 17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jєωιѕн Sen. Thomas Dodd. America’s biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew.
- •1988: Senate bill S. 1523 is sponsored by Jєωιѕн Senator Howard Metzenbaum. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.
- •1988: Senator Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill — S. 2180 — to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called “plastic guns.”
- •1990: Jєωιѕн Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.
- •1993: Senate bill S.653 is sponsored by Sen. Howard Metzenbaum. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.
- •February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. Senator Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Jєωιѕн Rep. Charles Schumer.
- •1994: Senator Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.” Rep. Schumer sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.
- •September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Jєωιѕн Senator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Schumer.
- •1995: Jєωιѕн Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.
- •February 1995: Sen. Dianne Feinstein announces her goal of “…an outright ban [of all firearms], picking up every one of them — Mr. and Mrs. America turn ’em all in.…”
- •September 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Jєωιѕн Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.
- •1997: Senate bill S. 54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Dianne Feinstein and a non-Jєωιѕн Senator [Hatch], among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.
- •January 1999: Jєωιѕн Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.
- •January 1999: Senator Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would to require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.
- •February 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.
- •February 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.
- •March 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999.
- •March 1999: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.
- •May 2000: Senate bill S. 2515, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000, is submitted by Senators Feinstein, Senator Barbara Boxer, Sen. Lautenberg and Sen. Schumer. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.
- •January 2001: Senate bill S.25, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001, is sponsored by Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].
- •May 2003: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban is scheduled to expire in September, 2004.
- •October 2003: Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin [also Jєωιѕн] and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.
- •March 2005: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994″] which expired in late 2004.
- •March 2005: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.620, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994″] which expired in late 2004.
- •July 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1621 – Fifty-Caliber Sniper Weapons. This amendment would convert all .50 BMG firearms to NFA weapons.
- •July 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1622 – Fifty-Caliber Exclusion to S.397. This amendment would modify S.397 to allow suits when the firearm involved was a .50 caliber weapon.
- •July 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1633 – BATFE Safety Standards. This amendment allows law suits to continue/be brought if the product did not meet the safety standards as defined by the BATFE.
- •July 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1634 – ‘Sporting Use’ on Domestic Handguns. Applying ’sporting use’ clause requirements to domestic handguns could, almost completely, dry up the handgun availability in the United States.
- •November 2017: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces “Assault Weapon Ban of 2017,” S. 2095, the most far-reaching gun gun ban ever introduced in the US Knesset…er, Congress. Among the cunningly expansive definitions of “assault weapon,” the definition of pistol grip even implicates traditional wooden hunting rifle stocks. Shortly after introducing her ban, she leaked classified information and, when exposed, blamed her crime on “slow mental facilities” [sic] due to a cold.
- •March 2018: Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz introduces Ammunition Background Check Act of 2018
- •January 2019: Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn) introduce S.66 “Assault Weapon Ban of 2019,” co-sponsors include Senators Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
- •June 2019: Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) re-introduced the Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act. https://www.msgo.com/threads/legislation-to-repeal-the-protection-of-lawful-commerce-in-arms-act-introduced.109835/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.msgo.com/threads/legislation-to-repeal-the-protection-of-lawful-commerce-in-arms-act-introduced.109835/)
- •August 2019: Trump’s Chabadnik daughter Ivanka Kushner does the legwork to promote “…take the guns first, then do due process second” gun laws. http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=126836 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=126836)
- •August 2021: Feinstein, Blumenthal Introduce Bill Targeting Armslist https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/08/20/feinstein-blumenthal-introduce-bill-targeting-armslist-n49081 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/08/20/feinstein-blumenthal-introduce-bill-targeting-armslist-n49081)
- •January 2023: Sen. Dianne Feinstein Introduces Bill to Ban 205 ‘Assault Weapons’ https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/01/24/sen-dianne-feinstein-introduces-bill-ban-205-assault-weapons/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/01/24/sen-dianne-feinstein-introduces-bill-ban-205-assault-weapons/)
- •etc., etc., etc.
updated from original source: http://thezog.info/who-is-behind-gun-control/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://thezog.info/who-is-behind-gun-control/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/baeb74d7770a9439092ec7cb1bb0d8871afdf573.jpg)
Senator Chuck “Shomer Yisrael” must be Replaced by a Senator who will “Shomer” the U.S.
“My name as you know comes from a Hebrew word. It comes from the word shomer, which means guardian ... and I believe Hashem, actually, gave me the name as one of my roles that is very important in the United States Senate, to be a shomer for Israel, and I will continue to be that with every bone in my body.” (US Senator Charles Schumer interviewed by Nachum Segal, Apr 22, 2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20210309031200/http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2010/04/senator-chuck-shomer-yisrael-must-be.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://web.archive.org/web/20210309031200/http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2010/04/senator-chuck-shomer-yisrael-must-be.html)
The next in gun ban incrementalism, the “death by 1,000 cuts,” may be the trend of classifying firm religious belief as “mental illness” that can be used with “Red Flag Laws” to disqualify firearms ownership.
ʝʊdɛօ-Communism weaponized the use of psychiatric hospitalization to dispose of political and religious opponents.
This is the Next Tactic to Disarm Us
March 25, 2018
http://freedombunker.com/2018/03/25/this-is-the-next-tactic-to-disarm-us/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://freedombunker.com/2018/03/25/this-is-the-next-tactic-to-disarm-us/)
Brutal historical drawings from the Jєωιѕн Communist gulags
https://www.cvltnation.com/brutal-drawings-from-the-gulag/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.cvltnation.com/brutal-drawings-from-the-gulag/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/90e11874742dad92a035173df27cb24d9cdfa3b6.jpg)
Jєωιѕн junk science
So who is really behind gun control? Liars!
Jeremias 8:7-10; Osee (Hosea) 4:1-2; John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 3:9, 22:16; Titus 1:13-14
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/c7fdc211fe4819c6f1b78aa7fa592473e600bf9c.jpg)Josh SugarmannFounder, Violence Policy CenterCommunications Director, Coalition to Stop Gun Violence(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/7cd75de291afc1fa04579c62c8d46a25b588ffd6.jpg)
Josh Sugarman is the Founder of the Violence Policy Center, notorious for producing sensational “factoids” (factoids sound like facts, but are carefully crafted deceits). Consistent with Judaism’s encouragement of lying to gentiles (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html), Sugarmann confessed the utility of his deceit: “The public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a machine gun is presumed to be a machine gun — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.” Josh Sugarmann, Violence Policy Center, http://www.vpc.org/studies/awaconc.htm (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.vpc.org/studies/awaconc.htm)
Brazen in using such bold lies, it is no surprise that Sugarmann’s group also uses more subtle deceits, such as statistical cherry-picking. When a long-term trend shows a decrease in gun violence, Sugarmann’s group and others like him, will use a short-term reversal of the trend to craft a sensational “increase in gun violence.” A recent example: Cherry-Picking Statistics: How the Violence Policy Center Manipulates Data to Advance their Cause
NRA-ILA, January 26, 2018 https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180126/cherry-picking-statistics-how-the-violence-policy-center-manipulates-data-to-advance-their-cause (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180126/cherry-picking-statistics-how-the-violence-policy-center-manipulates-data-to-advance-their-cause)
Under Mark Rosenberg in the 1990’s and under Deborah Walensky now, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has been a tool of Jєωιѕн gun control. Their Jєωιѕн “researchers,” like Arthur Kellerman, have been a source of junk science, that was temporarily halted by law 1995-2021. In violation of the Dickey Amendment, the Biden administration has once again unleashed the CDC gun control agitprop.
For peer-reviewed exposés of the junk science, see the Antidotes (https://archive.vn/D3CuT#antidotes) section below.
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/b1f95851e1740d92421b291b75faa257247fd47d.jpg)
The peer-reviewed professional literature is not spared such hasbara deceits. Though not outed as Jews, several of the most high-profile Jєωιѕн gun ban proponents have been justly and severely criticized in the professional literature for their Pandemic of Propaganda (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://web.archive.org/web/20181014164315/http://www.gunsandcrime.org/epidemic.pdf) and the related Failure of Peer Review (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14998547_Guns_in_the_medical_literature_A_failure_of_peer_review). Junk science, errors of fact, design, and interpretation, crafting sensational statistical factoids, and outright lying are their stock in trade—and of course the Jєωιѕн media are accomplices in disseminating the lies—just iterations of lying to Gentiles (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html).
Look how far “medical science” has advanced since the exploding watermelons of the 1990's. In 2022 we have liquefying organs and exploding bones:
Jєωιѕн Surgeon Joseph V. Sakran: Doctors Have an Obligation to Work to Outlaw Guns That Liquefy Organs and Explode Bones
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/sakran-doctors-have-an-obligation-to-work-to-outlaw-guns-that-liquefy-organs-and-explode-bones/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/sakran-doctors-have-an-obligation-to-work-to-outlaw-guns-that-liquefy-organs-and-explode-bones/)
three antidotes for Jєωιѕн junk science on guns
Suter EA. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-guns-in-the-medical-literature-a-failure-of-peer-review.pdf)Guns in the medical literature--a failure of peer review. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-guns-in-the-medical-literature-a-failure-of-peer-review.pdf)J Med Assoc Ga. 1994 Mar; (3):133-48. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-guns-in-the-medical-literature-a-failure-of-peer-review.pdf)PMID: 8201280 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-guns-in-the-medical-literature-a-failure-of-peer-review.pdf)(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/d60cde7878d771feeba81237bf66f16c9ee53b9d.jpg) (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-guns-in-the-medical-literature-a-failure-of-peer-review.pdf)
Kates DB, Schaffer HE, Lattimer JK, Murray GB, Cassem EH. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/kates-et-al-pandemic-of-propaganda.pdf)Guns and Public Health: Epidemic of Violence or pandemic of Propaganda? (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/kates-et-al-pandemic-of-propaganda.pdf)61 TENN. L. REV. 513-596 (1994). (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/kates-et-al-pandemic-of-propaganda.pdf)(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/c3a9c6e5ba53c8dec7e818f1fd48e74ea93e006d.jpg) (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/kates-et-al-pandemic-of-propaganda.pdf)
Suter EA, Waters WC 4th, Murray GB, Hopkins CB, Asiaf J, Moore JB, Fackler M, Cowan DN, Eckenhoff RG, Singer TR, et al. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-et-al--violence-in-america-effective-solutions.pdf)Violence in America. Effective solutions. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-et-al--violence-in-america-effective-solutions.pdf)J Med Assoc Ga. 1995 Jun;84(6):253-63. Review. No abstract available. (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-et-al--violence-in-america-effective-solutions.pdf)PMID: 7616135 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-et-al--violence-in-america-effective-solutions.pdf)(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/d35162b7be5a6c3d2748fd57a606e4ece8c7321a.jpg) (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/assets/suter-ea-et-al--violence-in-america-effective-solutions.pdf)
Hypocrites! • Gun control for goyim, but not for Jews.
Matthew 6:2, 5; 15:7; 22:18; 23:13, 14, 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29; Mark 7:6; Luke 13:15
Israel Eases Gun Control, Up to 500,000 New Carry Permits Approved
by Luis Valdes, August 21, 2018
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/08/luis-valdes/israel-eases-gun-control-up-to-500000-new-carry-permits-approved/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/08/luis-valdes/israel-eases-gun-control-up-to-500000-new-carry-permits-approved/)
Tactical Rabbi Selling Shabbat Clothing For Armed Ultra-Orthodox Jews
by Dan Zimmerman, September 4, 2021
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/tactical-rabbi-selling-shabbat-clothing-for-armed-ultra-orthodox-jews/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/tactical-rabbi-selling-shabbat-clothing-for-armed-ultra-orthodox-jews/)
Jews Disarm the Goyim But Arm Themselves
by Henry Makow, August 8, 2019
https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/08/Jews-Disarm-the-Goyim.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/08/Jews-Disarm-the-Goyim.html)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/768a3c9e85dd45f2b68e6111b74eb4f5824a3c03.jpg)
Jєωιѕн supremacist Hypocrites!
Michael Bloomberg BUSTED on Gun Control Hypocrisy
https://youtu.be/RCC-rEx81PE (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://youtu.be/RCC-rEx81PE)
Guns for Jews No Guns for Gentiles
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/da9a91fbf9a6f286ab561a438a74d50ef9585e30.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/3d99ae932ab03b440b416f89801fdd99af61c2f8.jpg)
https://www.newsweek.com/change-gun-laws-europe-let-jews-carry- (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.newsweek.com/change-gun-laws-europe-let-jews-carry-arms-says-leading-rabbi-299102)
arms-says-leading-rabbi-299102 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.newsweek.com/change-gun-laws-europe-let-jews-carry-arms-says-leading-rabbi-299102) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/supporting-gun-control-is-the-Jєωιѕн-thing-to-do/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/supporting-gun-control-is-the-Jєωιѕн-thing-to-do/)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/92095a222efd894f3d84429e8aca6e34762dd749.jpg)
Rocker Ted Nugent, an NRA Board Member,
posted a graphic of Jєωιѕн gun control activists on Facebook.
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/04e9504231440c17682558b78d089280f293a828.jpg)
ADL Director Greenblatt slammed Nugent for being
“completely divorced from reality,” but…
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/0af116b4dfa1b786af85fceba5c7721f2d835b4a.jpg)
So once again,
“The Jew shrieks in pain as he strikes you.”
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/522066d6e0b785d67e45f4c496f1d1dc2ae5d009.jpg)
“1 shot, 2 kills”: Israelis target children and pregnant women (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/israelis-target-children.html)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/cd71a69caf0b87034830c921df6d5e7463f66dca.jpg)
Disarm Israel First!
-
Disarm Israel First!
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/4372f949470b935ef4d43609c8558d737b1735a3.jpg)
National Rifle Association
Oy vey! Even the NRA (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://membership.nra.org/Join/Annuals) finally noticed.
Deep denial (lying (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html))!
In NRA’s Response to School Massacre: Dog-whistle anti-Semitism, a Star-spangled Protocols of Zion—NRA chief LaPierre identified the enemies of his organization, and of America, as Jews - from Karl Marx to Bernie Sanders
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-in-nra-s-response-to-school-massacre-dog-whistle-anti-semitism-1.5845365 (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-in-nra-s-response-to-school-massacre-dog-whistle-anti-semitism-1.5845365)
“Longtime National Rifle Association chief executive Wayne LaPierre Thursday addressed criticism of his organization following the Florida school massacre, and his combative defense included expressions of dog-whistle anti-Semitism reminiscent of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ with descriptions of a powerful plot to destroy America's freedom by ‘European-style Socialists’ who he said had taken over the Democratic Party.
“LaPierre vowed that the NRA intends to go far beyond its role as a gun lobby, to warn Americans that all of their individual freedoms are being destroyed by a condescending intellectual elite. ‘I promise you this - the NRA will not only speak out, the NRA will speak out louder and we will speak out stronger than ever before,’ with its own television station and expanded media operations to resist ‘the Socialist corruption of our government.’
“Again and again in his speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Maryland, LaPierre identified the enemies of the NRA, and of America, as Jews - from Karl Marx to Bernie Sanders, from Hungarian-born h0Ɩ0cαųst survivor George Soros to former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg. LaPierre singled out Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York as one of the Democrats who are ‘liars to the core.’
“‘History proves it. Every time, in every nation in which this political disease rises to power, its citizens are repressed, their freedoms are destroyed, and their firearms are banned and confiscated. It is all backed in this country by the social engineering, and the billions, of people like [philanthropists of Jєωιѕн lineage <Haaretz's description, not ours] George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, and more.’
“LaPierre, who has led the NRA for three decades, outlined a vision of a vast conspiracy led by "European-style Socialists" who, he said, have turned the Democrats into a ‘party which is now infested with saboteurs’ and which has infiltrated and taken over such bodies as the FBI, the U.S. intelligence community, the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service.
“Their goal? ‘Absolute control, in every corner of our government, is their ultimate dream. These intellectual elites, they think they're smarter than we are. They think they're smarter than the rest of us. And they think they're better than we are. They truly believe it, and you know it, the privileged and the powerful. They think they deserve to be in charge of every lever of power.
“‘But you know what? The United States Constitution makes it absolutely clear that they are not in charge. We, the People are in charge of this country!’
“‘As usual the opportunists wasted not one second to exploit tragedy for political gain - Saul Alinsky would have been proud,’ LaPierre said at the beginning of the speech, implicitly linking the vocal survivors of the shooting which killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, to Alinsky, the late community organizer and political activist who was the son of Orthodox Jєωιѕн immigrants from Russia.
“Some 40 percent of the Stoneman Douglas high school student body is said to be Jєωιѕн.
“’The shameful politicization of tragedy - it's a classic strategy right out of the playbook of a poisonous movement,’ which, he went on to suggest, was the Democratic Party.…”
See also:
The Gun Lobby's Jєωιѕн Enemies List
by Nathan Guttman, Forward, February 8, 2013 https://forward.com/opinion/170775/the-gun-lobbys-Jєωιѕн-enemies-list/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://forward.com/opinion/170775/the-gun-lobbys-Jєωιѕн-enemies-list/)
NRA Chief LaPierre Identified the Enemies of his Organization, and of America, as Jews—From Karl Marx to Bernie Sanders
https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/64010/nra-chief-lapierre-identified-the-enemies-of-his-organization-and-of-america-as-jews--from-karl.html (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/64010/nra-chief-lapierre-identified-the-enemies-of-his-organization-and-of-america-as-jews--from-karl.html)
NRA’s Dana Loesch Deletes 2010 ‘Fired by a Jew’ Tweet That Some Call Anti-Semitic
by Jon Levine, The Wrap,March 2, 2018
https://www.thewrap.com/dana-loesch-nra-2010-fired-by-jew-tweet-resurfaces-anti-semitic/ (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://www.thewrap.com/dana-loesch-nra-2010-fired-by-jew-tweet-resurfaces-anti-semitic/)
National Organizations With Anti-Gun Policies https://archive.is/GGipw (https://archive.vn/o/D3CuT/https://web.archive.org/web/20230307105335/https://archive.is/GGipw)
memes • Save ’em • Use ’em!
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/c5b0c0cdc4003aef311b115c2e8a859c89754184.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/b87fc99f22c5394022db0cb6b1f72041c935b3f7.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/ff60fec898fd26f6ceffe156c9969a1ff26c67dd.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/dc75b8bf4164beb7100b24d3bf2e03e7b908d54e.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/35bb359cdc836d6363cf7afbcdadb1c84da552c1.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/3d30721ce3a7123347eb69b59bd546e091006615.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/54dee0407bb435d665bdc2c816524388669b0a1f.png)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bfe88b7b93a5d2280b8553a451667a5315974b16.png)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/f7f9bc3e6a6d5ef06bcaa104feae10a61e924883.png)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/b49aeebd80c85e20d345141f78afecbd9db9b788.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/cc75edb7497579e1e3dcd8f3bdbc5a103e192756.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bce5242d829c23b8da172bf47524704225fca9e9.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/ed5d6c9efa584ab4ff0909065efde88743d45fbe.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/1640570fdf193127e61b0c5e4b2dcb3ecc39bfe0.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/2a5e18609e83c089145db64c2482f56007d68644.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/147f1ff3e5bc3d471f7935ebba3f815d0ab67875.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/a598bd707e4a127d04a53246c3fcfdebe9bdad87.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/6e3c068541acf740a087eee0fac7b436d8032f3f.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/99f2175415fd5910d5da1d9cc88d9a27f241bbf5.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/79de45d038dc430b21d490a9e3b441399ee5c91e.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/3b6c9aab1941ea735a914287de4e0a23873c3037.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/578163b561448f39252ce13bf867d8aa95b35ce3.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/6b01ee6b5d4d7d276d81922469820eaf1647c72a.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/df49c906a20cb9b63d9bf6caedc2b3514e01b6e4.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/f24c2b3b3de5a7ad2bff29a602e6469cf34770d5.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/1b49823773944164cb37e33946c5169e4a35a5db.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/6aa964a954154f7ba42d7e48fb26c54cc03eea2e.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/592b088c04715d497f840b04e225c8f3d7cd48ff.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/f92eddd6458292a715a21444c51d4f4ba3fbb4dc.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/ccb4dc8cd18827011d2099ddab78355eae051510.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/661ff8dc9266c571a5c08692f7961ab2314b7698.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/1f8c088e4af0823580f1a8e15bbc4b1615793963.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/81ea7894e8a64a6a1fb786f12531e6722dd2a5fd.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/dac26d37504ba06465fab4aaba4c06f683d725c2.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/bb6085c96fac1b1059ad40abf1cdd8e9b6015c68.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/d5ba83b202d18116a308a6f12939a2d6f06fd6f0.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/c03fc6ad0ef662c974da9b7fa6182fc961fba073.png)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/43548bbd50b97a73502c2db1af3934a9e91e3838.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/d72165b42782b8998b63968a82f50f4d1c85f706.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/4772c58bb872ffd338b376ebaecb1bd6fae32852.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/778491df5bdbce41d88e39a1b7e4e752486d10b3.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/c07b59899f753d3d1a122ef9e31ed0aa8cfba40e.jpg)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/3bbf7a9b19ec835634c3aed8a71b939d0e46476b.png)
(https://d646wrg0pf5nns.archive.vn/D3CuT/57edded1002ff06c6434e10fcc5711500a4b7cb0.jpg)