Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Fuentes—data points  (Read 128969 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mat183

Re: Fuentes—data points
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2025, 02:34:26 PM »
Quote from: The Mrs on October 30, 2025, 07:34:12 AM
He seemed great on the JQ for a long time but the Charlie Kirk incident opened up my eyes.  He came out with the podcast explaining that Israel had nothing to do with it, it was just a troubled young gαy man that killed him, even though there are so many holes in that narrative.  I noticed in the Tucker interview he was making those same talking points, stressing how people should be fired or jailed for their opinions (Pam Bondi advocating for the same thing).  So there goes free speech.  Even though the concept of freedom in and of itself is problematic with our Catholic religion, the groundwork is laid out where both conservatives and libs are together calling for limits to free speech which will be bad for Catholics because of course (((they))) are trying to stifle the truth.
      There’s also video footage of him with a young man who is wearing a headband with cat ears at a restaurant.  Later in the video they are talking about how they are going to “rock and roll”.  There is a certain innuendo associated with that phrase that I don’t think I need to repeat here.  Would any real Catholic man on this forum be caught dead with some (looks to be) furry?  Very strange behavior if you ask me.  Those were the red flags for me personally.
Interesting, how any practicing Catholic on CI who actually listened to this interview in its entirety would still hold such a strong bias against this individual.

Tucker repeatedly tried to get him to buckle/bend on the JQ, but he adamantly refused to and unambiguously doubled down all the more.  Tucker tried to make like Israel should be treated like any other country.  Fuentes decisively rebutted him on that in more ways than one and most definitely in the way the Jews by their Jєωιѕнness made it different in a most drastically negative way.


If you do the research, you would quickly realize that Fuentes is clearly open to the possibility of Israeli involvement in the hit on Kirk, although at the same time he definitely does not exclude the possibility of the CIA carrying out the hit to the exclusion of Israhell.  


Fuentes clearly favors much of the Christendom of old including the Thomistic philosophy based traditional Catholic maxim: "Error has no rights" (error non habet ius).  For Fuentes this would entail the traditional Catholic nuanced restrictions on freedom of speech and press, i.e. media.  Pam Bondi's kind of  restrictions are anything, but that!  Fuentes has on various occasions made it abundantly clear that he is totally opposed to Bondi's so called anti-Semitic restrictions.



Sorry that the silly years old cat ears clip was such a red flag for you.  Perhaps, one day you will be able to get beyond that.
 



Logged

Offline Mat183

Re: Fuentes—data points
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2025, 08:30:13 PM »
Logged

Offline The Mrs

Re: Fuentes—data points
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2025, 08:23:52 AM »
Quote from: Mat183 on October 30, 2025, 02:34:26 PM


If you do the research, you would quickly realize that Fuentes is clearly open to the possibility of Israeli involvement in the hit on Kirk, although at the same time he definitely does not exclude the possibility of the CIA carrying out the hit to the exclusion of Israhell. 
 
Can you cite said research?  Here in this video he doubles down on the CIA’s, Freemasons’, and Israel’s lack of involvement.
https://rumble.com/v6zgmsc-nick-fuentes-on-max-blumenthal-backtracking-his-claim-of-charlie-being-blac.html
Logged

Offline Mat183

Re: Fuentes—data points
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2025, 09:02:15 AM »
Quote from: The Mrs on October 31, 2025, 08:23:52 AM
Can you cite said research?  Here in this video he doubles down on the CIA’s, Freemasons’, and Israel’s lack of involvement.
https://rumble.com/v6zgmsc-nick-fuentes-on-max-blumenthal-backtracking-his-claim-of-charlie-being-blac.html

I repeat myself.  I had said that Fuentes has made it clear that he is open to the possibility of Israeli involvement in the Kirk hit.  Simply listen in at 1:25 in the very video you provided where he states that very thing.

As far as the video you provided it is seen how Fuentes, a longtime Israel critic, has repeatedly mocked Blumenthal's apparent retreat as hypocritical and opportunistic.

Fuentes views Blumenthal—a Jєωιѕн journalist with a history of anti-Zionist reporting—as unreliable when it suits "the tribe," accusing him of inflating the story for clicks before dialing back under pressure from pro-Israel backlash.

In recent X posts (late October 2025), Fuentes highlights the backtracking to argue that even "based" leftists like Blumenthal ultimately protect Israeli interests, contrasting it with unfiltered America First voices like Tucker Carlson's. He frames it as proof of "coordinated" media spin, tying it to past grudges (e.g., Blumenthal's major hit pieces on Fuentes over his anti-Israel activism). Fuentes urges followers to reject such "permission slips" from establishment critics, positioning the saga as validation of his warnings about Zionist control in conservative circles. Overall, you, yourself can hear how Fuentes calls it "diabolical" how Kirk's death exposes these dynamics while Blumenthal "queens out" like the establishment shills he despises.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »