Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Fuentes cucks on abortion  (Read 1091 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Mat183

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 99
  • Reputation: +49/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
« Reply #30 on: Yesterday at 08:18:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Geremia on Yesterday at 06:18:54 PM
    Or does he support a Personhood Amendment to the Constitution?

    He endorsed the 2022 Life at Conception Act (a federal Personhood bill) on both the 12 Jan 2022 and 29 Jan 2023 shows.  When the constitutional route is raised, he answers yes—“it would be ideal to have an Amendment enshrining personhood from conception nationwide. That is the end goal.”

    Since then, he changed his stance. When asked (e.g., 17 Aug 2023 Q&A, 9 Oct 2023 AF Live), he says federal personhood sounds good in theory but would be “dead on arrival” and could risk cementing abortion jurisprudence if a liberal Court struck it down. Instead he calls for state-by-state abolition and, ideally, executive enforcement of the 14th-Amendment duty to protect life.
    Logged

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4887
    • Reputation: +1590/-363
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
    « Reply #31 on: Yesterday at 09:24:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • @Mat183 Thanks for the references.
    Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4887
    • Reputation: +1590/-363
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
    « Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 09:28:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mat183 on Yesterday at 08:18:58 PM
    He endorsed the 2022 Life at Conception Act (a federal Personhood bill) on both the 12 Jan 2022 and 29 Jan 2023 shows.  When the constitutional route is raised, he answers yes—“it would be ideal to have an Amendment enshrining personhood from conception nationwide. That is the end goal.”
    The end-goal should be making abortion illegal and punishing violators with a just punishment.
    Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4887
    • Reputation: +1590/-363
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
    « Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 09:37:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mat183 on August 15, 2025, 06:02:40 PM
    No, Fuentes is NOT giving a blanket allowance for abortion “for the life of the mother” or in “rape.”
    "if everyone was having sex within marriage", then "All children would be planned." is false.
    "if everyone was having sex within marriage", then "the only time you get an abortion is if it is a form of birth control" is false.
    "if everyone was having sex within marriage", then "there would be far fewer" abortions might be true.

    He should've said this, which is certainly true: "If abortion is criminalized and punished, then there would be far fewer abortions, because most citizens are law-abiding."
    Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4887
    • Reputation: +1590/-363
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: Fuentes pro-contraception
    « Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 09:39:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: alaric on Yesterday at 04:31:44 AM
    Getting married in an judaized society in no way saves the innocents from being slaughtered.
    Indeed. Even if 100% of the society is married, murderers still need to be punished, deterred.
    Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co

    Online Mat183

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +49/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
    « Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 10:01:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • How did the subject line go from the defamatory assertion of "Fuentes cucks on abortion" to the defamatory assertion of "Fuentes pro-contraception"?

    Logged

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 931
    • Reputation: +816/-214
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fuentes cucks on abortion
    « Reply #36 on: Today at 05:30:05 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Just because someone says "I support this/that", doesn't mean they support this/that.

    This is political theater through and through. It's gatekeeping 101. Say something based/true for a little, do some right wing alt stuff, and then real em' in. 

    Been doing this over and over since the 60's. 
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 [3]
    « previous next »