Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Geremia on October 30, 2016, 09:10:43 PM

Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on October 30, 2016, 09:10:43 PM
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/Uv43Omf3AYg[/youtube]
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on October 30, 2016, 09:30:42 PM
The interview begins @10:37.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: harris on October 31, 2016, 12:37:31 AM
He was too nosey into Trumps prayer life...
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Incredulous on October 31, 2016, 01:41:33 AM
Does Raymond wear a toupee?

I'll bet he felt intimidated by Donald's blond mop ?
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Croixalist on October 31, 2016, 08:45:06 AM
Quote from: hαɾɾιs
He was too nosey into Trumps prayer life...


There's no way a non-practicing JPII/Mother Theresa fanboy presbyterian has a prayer life to speak of. I appreciate the strong bluff on that though. Wish I could believe half the stuff he's saying he believes. This is normally where integrity comes into play, but whatever. He's not Hillary and that's the single best thing anyone can say about him!
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on October 31, 2016, 09:43:38 AM
Quote from: hαɾɾιs
He was too nosey into Trumps prayer life...
Yeah, I thought so, too. I don't know how I (or any other Catholic) would even answer that question. Maybe I'd say I pray everyone becomes Catholic, but saying that wouldn't get me very far in U.S. politics.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Croixalist on October 31, 2016, 10:03:18 AM
If "what do you pray for?" is too personal for him, he shouldn't have run for office and pretended he was Christian or agree to do an interview on a (NO) Catholic network.  This was a softball question he could have used to reaffirm his stance on abortion, his family, or just maybe talk about Jesus Christ directly, but he would never let that happen. It's a major weakness for him and all traditionalists know it even if they don't admit to it.

But since we're so locked in on separating our faith from our public lives, something as innocuous as a "what do you wish for?" question becomes off limits. This election was over before it began folks. Catholics don't "win" these sorts of things, we never did and we never will. Thank you JFK, Governor Cuomo and Justice Scalia for trailblazing the moral paralytic doctrine for RCs in public office!
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on October 31, 2016, 11:33:06 AM
Quote from: Croixalist
It's a major weakness for him and all traditionalists know it even if they don't admit to it.
Yes, he's a heretic (at least materially).
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: rum on November 01, 2016, 08:43:20 PM
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Matto on November 01, 2016, 08:51:09 PM
Quote from: rum
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.

I plan on voting for Trump. I still believe he is a tool of the Jews though. But I believe there must be a conflict between different factions of the Jews which would explain his candidacy. It seems to me that there are some Jews who are content to fleece the "goyim" and leave the "goyim" in relative peace as long as they have their money, their yachts, their drugs, and their women (or young boys if they prefer). And there are other Jews who want to do everything they can to make the lives of all the "goyim" a living hell and kill off billions of people and start a nuclear war. So I believe Trump is supported by the Jews who are content to fleece us and live easy lives full of sensual pleasures and lust until they die and all go to hell forever. So I believe Trump is the lesser of two Jew evils.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on November 01, 2016, 09:17:55 PM
Quote from: Matto
I plan on voting for Trump. I still believe he is a tool of the Jews though. But I believe there must be a conflict between different factions of the Jews which would explain his candidacy. It seems to me that there are some Jews who are content to fleece the "goyim" and leave the "goyim" in relative peace as long as they have their money, their yachts, their drugs, and their women (or young boys if they prefer). And there are other Jews who want to do everything they can to make the lives of all the "goyim" a living hell and kill off billions of people and start a nuclear war. So I believe Trump is supported by the Jews who are content to fleece us and live easy lives full of sensual pleasures and lust until they die and all go to hell forever. So I believe Trump is the lesser of two Jew evils.
E. Michael Jones has recently argued (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCphRqm8p8c) that Trump's principles (e.g., his isolationism, American-exceptionalism, etc.) are against those of the "international Jew" that Henry Ford decried in his The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem (https://isidore.co/calibre/browse/book/5287).
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on November 01, 2016, 09:20:12 PM
Quote from: rum
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.
Yes, I voted for Trump, which seems to be the conclusion to draw taking the section "Conditions Under Which One May Vote for Unworthy Candidates (http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=42470)" of Fr. Cranny's Catholic Principles of the Obligation of Voting (https://isidore.co/calibre/browse/book/5603) into consideration. However, there are other sections of that work which would justify not voting at all, especially considering the satanic / revolutionary principles upon which the United States is founded (https://isidore.co/forum/index.php?topic=27.msg94#msg94). A small error in principles is a big error in the end. (Parvus error in principio, magnus est in fine. (http://www.catholicapologetics.info/catholicteaching/philosophy/axiomata.htm)) Some have argued that voting in such a country as the U.S. is akin to the ancient Christians offering incense to false-gods, but I think this is a bit far-fetched. Ultimately, I see the U.S. self-destructing, and then we Catholics can rebuild upon proper first-principles.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Croixalist on November 02, 2016, 10:19:03 AM
Quote from: rum
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.


I'm not voting now and I haven't voted for years. I'm voting with my Rosary instead this year. Republicans have been running the pro-life issue for as long as I've been alive and despite there being multiple periods of republican control of the legislative branch, nothing has been done to get rid of it. Curb it here and there, sure. Not good enough! As we've seen with the new progressive law-making court system in our country, any legitimate attempt to implement a ban which couldn't be worked around on the ground will be stymied or overturned outright.  

Its the same old story: say anything to get elected then flake out when it comes time to delivery on those promises. All they had to do was to bide their time because the general population was bound to get more depraved. We're at the point now where support for "pro-choice" and LGBT completely dominates the field on both sides. They don't even have to give lip service to it like they used to. Like I said, it's over already.

As for the Supreme Court making a Catholic stand on abortion, that will never happen. First we have the shining example of Scalia who would never, ever, dare to impose his Catholic views on anyone when it counted... then you have the fact that the only time the SC goes beyond their interpretive capacity to make new laws is when it is a liberal progressive agenda. It's methodical and deliberate while tools such as our dearly departed Scalia made sure the Catholic side never stood a chance. He died the same way he killed his Catholicism... suffocated by a pillow.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Caraffa on November 03, 2016, 10:35:44 PM
Quote from: rum
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.


Jєωιѕн opposition to Trump is almost unanimous on the donor front. The only one who have Trump a substantial amount was Sheldon Adelson who gave him $5 million, but he gave Romney $30 million in 2012.

If anyone could potentially weaken the anti-papal states, it would be Trump. Recall in one of the GOP primary debates the other Republican candidates freaked out when Trump talked about about making a deal between Israel and Palestine. What if that deal could lead to the gradual erosion of Israel? If the Jews lose Israel it will be a critical blow to their power.

At the very least, a Trump victory could help legitimize the other budding nationalist movements in Europe. Trump policies also suggest a possible end, or at the very least, a diminishing of Anglo-American hegemony. How do we know this? He wants to build a wall with Mexico at the border.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on November 04, 2016, 10:11:13 AM
Quote from: Caraffa
If anyone could potentially weaken the anti-papal states, it would be Trump. Recall in one of the GOP primary debates the other Republican candidates freaked out when Trump talked about about making a deal between Israel and Palestine. What if that deal could lead to the gradual erosion of Israel?
Yes, I do remember that.
E. Michael Jones might be right in his assessment that Trump, because of his years of working with Jews, understands them very well.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Alexandria on November 04, 2016, 02:34:44 PM
Doesn't Raymond Arroyo remind you of Peewee Herman?  

There is something about Arroyo that doesn't look right.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Geremia on November 04, 2016, 02:57:29 PM
Quote from: Alexandria
Doesn't Raymond Arroyo remind you of Peewee Herman?  

There is something about Arroyo that doesn't look right.
They probably use too much makeup on him.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: rum on November 04, 2016, 03:28:00 PM
I've always thought he was a fag. He even has the stereotypical fixation with Broadway musicals.


Good points from all about Trump. I still don't know if I'll vote for him. I never voted in my 20s due to indifference to politics. But since becoming aware of Jєωιѕн power I haven't voted because it's all a rigged game in their favor. I might go to the voting booth, purely out of curiousity about the process, and write someone in.
Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: Alexandria on November 04, 2016, 04:19:08 PM
Quote from: rum
I've always thought he was a fag. He even has the stereotypical fixation with Broadway musicals.


Good points from all about Trump. I still don't know if I'll vote for him. I never voted in my 20s due to indifference to politics. But since becoming aware of Jєωιѕн power I haven't voted because it's all a rigged game in their favor. I might go to the voting booth, purely out of curiousity about the process, and write someone in.


I think he's one too.

Title: EWTNs Arroyo interviews Trump.
Post by: rum on November 07, 2016, 04:07:09 PM
Quote from: Matto
Quote from: rum
Geremia, hαɾɾιs, Croixalist, and Incredulous:

Are you going to vote for him?

He's clearly under the thumb of the Jews (if not one himself), considering that 3 of his children are married to Jews and another one is dating a Jew, but there's an argument that he's the lesser of two evils.

Anti-abortion supreme court justices would be the main reason I'd vote for him, if i do.

I plan on voting for Trump. I still believe he is a tool of the Jews though. But I believe there must be a conflict between different factions of the Jews which would explain his candidacy.


This about sums it up. I'll probably vote for him, even though he doesn't represent a clear break from the Jєωιѕн stranglehold.