She has a great way of breaking through an NPC mind IMO.

She has a great way of breaking through an NPC mind IMO.

This video is so weird. And incredibly unjust. The woman commentator begins by showing us a video of Charlie happily engaging with his little daughter. Because himself and Erika his wife had made the decision not to expose their children's faces to the public, the commentator suggests that this is not a real daughter. She further suggests that because he looks at the camera a lot while being filmed it is all an act which reinforces her theory that it is not his daughter.

Any parent knows - I did it myself - that when you are playing with your kids and a spouse is filming you, you tend to look at them a lot to include them in the fun. NORMAL. This suggestion of this commentator is nuts. I''m just shaking my head here.

It gets worse. Next the commentator switches to analyzing Erika's hands: she mentions long nails being associated to witchcraft, that the diamond studded G on her ring is a Freemasonary symbol, that she has unidentifiable faint marks on her hand that warrant attention (??!!).

Half the western female population wear these long nails.
Erika tells us her daughter's name starts with G.
Scars.

All NORMAL.

The commentator then questions why, if the Kirks are so private, did she post the scenes of herself saying her last goodbyes to her husband lying in an open casket.

The answer is obvious to anyone who has suffered  any kind of grief. It's her way of grieving. Of sharing who last (physical) moment with her beloved with the public who also loved/admired him. NORMAL.

We are now almost half way through the video. There were other crazy suggestions made (eg. wondering about the significance of the Charlie's buttons; one closed, other open) but I'll stick with the main points.

The commentator now starts commentating on Erika's speech about her husband's murder which took place in Charlie's office. She casts suspicion on Erika's ability to smile through her tears and maintain her composure when other widows have said they could not do that. This is quickly followed by suggesting that the wall in the office, made of bricks painted over in white paint, is a Masonic symbol.

Emotion is a funny thing. In crisis situations a person can go from crying to laughing, to being extra busy, to shutting down. Couple that to the fact they each and everyone of us have different temperaments. I'm choleric. And I can tell you if that was my husband that had just been assassination, I would be deadly calm and all my emotions would be channeled to pushing back. The pain and the tears would come later. Her reaction is NORMAL. Having a painted white brick wall in one's office is NORMAL.

Wearing white runners and taking a picture of them is NORMAL. My daughters do it all the time.

Sharing day to day things such as baby bottles of breast milk is NORMAL.

Sharing a picture of a large amount of blood samples taken is NORMAL. Erika is talking about having to do regular blood tests for a condition associated with having her second child. The commenter says that blood is free-masonic, therefore.

The nonsense just goes on and on. The commentator even suggests that the way Erika's baby's fingers are held is a 666 sign. My husband listened to three minutes of this video and walked away declaring the commentator mad.

Now we come to the reason I even bothered to watch the nutty video - the claimed Scientology connection.

Ok. So Kirk is invited to speak at one of Grant Codone's venues. Grant, a successful entrepreneur, is the author of the 10 X Rule that shows you how to achieve success no matter what your background is. He and his wife are Scientologists. Grant Cordone's wife and Erika Kirk were later invited to speak at the 2025 Young Women's Leadership Summit at the gαylord Texan Resort & Convention Center in Grapevine, Texas.

That's it. Both venues were nothing to do with Scientology per say. They were about self-improvement and how to successfully do that.  NORMAL. Bishop Williamson invited a Rabbi to talk to the seminarians. Does this make him a secret Joo?

People have to stop this. You are turning this into a witch hunt against the Kirks. Looking for every little thing that might be construed as 'a symbol'.

Again, you really are naive. You admit that both venues were about "self-improvement and how to successfully do that." That is exactly what Scientology focuses on. Can you really be this ignorant?

And the women's conference attended by Erika was a TPUSA conference. She would have held sway over who was invited. And from the looks of her photos with Elena Cardone, they were very friendly with each other. As usual, the objective evidence proves you wrong.
https://www.scientology.org/beginning-services/scientology-life-improvement-courses
....................

Yes, both venues were about self-improvement. Christianity is about self-improvement too. Stop twisting it. Go start a witch-hunt on the Pro-life movements who invite all sorts to speak. Go start a witch-hunt on Bishop Williamson who asked a Rabbi to speak to his seminarians. Why stop at the Kirks? You are on a roll.

This video is so weird. And incredibly unjust. The woman commentator begins by showing us a video of Charlie happily engaging with his little daughter. Because himself and Erika his wife had made the decision not to expose their children's faces to the public, the commentator suggests that this is not a real daughter. She further suggests that because he looks at the camera a lot while being filmed it is all an act which reinforces her theory that it is not his daughter.

Any parent knows - I did it myself - that when you are playing with your kids and a spouse is filming you, you tend to look at them a lot to include them in the fun. NORMAL. This suggestion of this commentator is nuts. I''m just shaking my head here.

It gets worse. Next the commentator switches to analyzing Erika's hands: she mentions long nails being associated to witchcraft, that the diamond studded G on her ring is a Freemasonary symbol, that she has unidentifiable faint marks on her hand that warrant attention (??!!).

Half the western female population wear these long nails.
Erika tells us her daughter's name starts with G.
Scars.

All NORMAL.

The commentator then questions why, if the Kirks are so private, did she post the scenes of herself saying her last goodbyes to her husband lying in an open casket.

The answer is obvious to anyone who has suffered  any kind of grief. It's her way of grieving. Of sharing who last (physical) moment with her beloved with the public who also loved/admired him. NORMAL.

We are now almost half way through the video. There were other crazy suggestions made (eg. wondering about the significance of the Charlie's buttons; one closed, other open) but I'll stick with the main points.

The commentator now starts commentating on Erika's speech about her husband's murder which took place in Charlie's office. She casts suspicion on Erika's ability to smile through her tears and maintain her composure when other widows have said they could not do that. This is quickly followed by suggesting that the wall in the office, made of bricks painted over in white paint, is a Masonic symbol.

Emotion is a funny thing. In crisis situations a person can go from crying to laughing, to being extra busy, to shutting down. Couple that to the fact they each and everyone of us have different temperaments. I'm choleric. And I can tell you if that was my husband that had just been assassination, I would be deadly calm and all my emotions would be channeled to pushing back. The pain and the tears would come later. Her reaction is NORMAL. Having a painted white brick wall in one's office is NORMAL.

Wearing white runners and taking a picture of them is NORMAL. My daughters do it all the time.

Sharing day to day things such as baby bottles of breast milk is NORMAL.

Sharing a picture of a large amount of blood samples taken is NORMAL. Erika is talking about having to do regular blood tests for a condition associated with having her second child. The commenter says that blood is free-masonic, therefore.

The nonsense just goes on and on. The commentator even suggests that the way Erika's baby's fingers are held is a 666 sign. My husband listened to three minutes of this video and walked away declaring the commentator mad.

Now we come to the reason I even bothered to watch the nutty video - the claimed Scientology connection.

Ok. So Kirk is invited to speak at one of Grant Codone's venues. Grant, a successful entrepreneur, is the author of the 10 X Rule that shows you how to achieve success no matter what your background is. He and his wife are Scientologists. Grant Cordone's wife and Erika Kirk were later invited to speak at the 2025 Young Women's Leadership Summit at the gαylord Texan Resort & Convention Center in Grapevine, Texas.

That's it. Both venues were nothing to do with Scientology per say. They were about self-improvement and how to successfully do that.  NORMAL. Bishop Williamson invited a Rabbi to talk to the seminarians. Does this make him a secret Joo?

People have to stop this. You are turning this into a witch hunt against the Kirks. Looking for every little thing that might be construed as 'a symbol'.

All of these things you are explaining away really add up.  I know of no Catholic moms that would take a picture of their baby’s hands that way, no Catholic moms that I know have an “all seeing eye” anywhere on their child’s clothing or shoes.  These things are not coincidences.