Guess from now on, Buchanan is a sacred cow not to be touched....from now on, guess I will only remain silent on his hypocrisy or praise him to the highest heavens, otherwise, I am a bitter Pharisee like CM....
Pat can from hence forth have 2 differeing opinions and I will pretend he doesn ot.Like his support for torture:
http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1524
and:
http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1535
Can anyone join me in proposing Pat for sainthood, since any criticism of his views and writings=CM Phariseeism?? why wait for him to die to proceed.....we have one miracle already, that he can have 2 differing views and still be beleived, a miracle in itself.....Pat the Great (or else you are a CM-ite bub!)
Typical traditional Catholic overreaction. You are the only one who seems to be trying to disprove Buchanan's non-existent "infallibility".
all I was saying is the guy is messed up and wonderd why people do not see it....there is no overaction and non one at all ,ever ,anywehre said he WAS infallible...
what is this to you anyway?
please tell us how we should all act with Pat Buchanan.....all I did was post a article I did not wven write...
you faield to tell use how criticizing Pat is somehow equivalent to Cm, how it is eveil, sinful or anything else...you immediately jumped into this thread and treid to shut down conversation about the article and points with a straw man, that of:
criticise Past=CM
again, how should we act with Pat then?? Like Lew Rockwell? day after 2004 election, I emaield Lew and noted to him how Pat plays both sides, chiding GOP, then telling us all to vote GOP or else...Lew's response to me-read the article or dont...but non critical thinking at all taht Pat has 2 different personalitites almost...as for "everyone else", who knows what they think, most have not commented and many are not actively on this forum in last few hours.so, how is that conclusive....you alone seem to obssess over this and jump in to comment.......
No one, repeat, no one is saying Pat is infallible, but you are not saying it either, but attacking me for criticising Pat..not anyone else, Palin,etc-but only Buchanan...
rather then try, feebly, to put me in a box nad you and "everyone else" at the opposite end, how about-oh I dont know-trying to discuss the points of the article at hand? not as fun as straw manning me?
discuss the article and points raised in it, please.....and stop insulting those that are critical of a human beings views, namely Pat's.....Criticising Buchanan is in no way= CM attacking anyone...
I think that others will see I am not predicting Buchanans damnationnor if he is in cuм Benedicito,etc,etc....which is the tactic of CM
again,
stop shooting at the messenger of this article, me and discuss the article..