Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: dxcat40 on December 03, 2022, 03:56:14 PM
-
I haven't seen anyone post about this, so here is a link to the first Twitter thread in the series:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394
Explanation:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598778884639653891
ATS Commentary:
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1322582/pg1
Musk promises a Part 2 "tomorrow" (Dec 3):
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598864377750306816?cxt=HHwWgICq_cWrp7AsAAAA
-
Screenshots for posterity (apologies for quality):
(https://i.imgur.com/AbJA599.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/WdFRfjC.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/ZeQi84z.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/AAUHwNO.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/2bxVhNV.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/hN0yjQq.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/urEs9ML.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/lr2GnH6.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/rlbyTsD.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/MB9Oje3.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/WY5L1dq.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/ZPLPjnS.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/ApmcOq5.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/rL3yYdV.png)
-
So Musk has docuмentation that Twitter censored and banned opponents of the Democrats and big pharma, which is what everybody knew they were doing at the behest of the deep state.
I don't think the deep state is now going to investigate and prosecute itself in light of this evidence.
This is all one big yawn fest
-
So Musk has docuмentation that Twitter censored and banned opponents of the Democrats and big pharma, which is what everybody knew they were doing at the behest of the deep state.
I don't think the deep state is now going to investigate and prosecute itself in light of this evidence.
This is all one big yawn fest
Unfortunately I've found myself of the same opinion and find it difficult to care much about these docuмents. Are they just releasing this stuff to get people riled up for 2024 election season? The theater gets tiresome, and it does not help that so many Con Inc grifters are hyping it up.
-
Hopefully some of the mind-controlled will wake up to censorship.
Not to the collusion between social media and the Dems/ O'Bidens; but to the fascist collusion between the un-Constitutional corrupt "Intelligence" agencies and the social media monopolies.
-
It basically comes down to the fact that truth isn't something that most people care about. That's the reality of our
world. The crimes of Epstein, Hunter Biden, the US government(WMDs to justify the Gulf Wars) and a hundred other examples does nothing but elicit a shrug by the average person.
People use Twitter and other social media platforms to look at cat videos, Taylor Swift, or celebrity gossip.
Their attention span is so short that even school massacres hardly get any traction that they once did.
If you had to name the number of people left in government who have some integrity you could count them on one hand and still have a finger or two left over.
-
Are they just releasing this stuff to get people riled up for 2024 election season? The theater gets tiresome, and it does not help that so many Con Inc grifters are hyping it up.
FYI, not meaning to single anyone out, but I posted this not to praise Musk or suggest any kind of legitimacy, but to try to follow what narrative they are seeking to weave here, and potentially find the answer to your question in the above quote.
-
Scotus says on pg. 160 of a book that "an Intelligence cannot create a substance" ... now that's a tweet too ... does Trump want to Tweet like that? or Biden?
I think he means a created Intelligence cannot create a substance, "because such a being cannot immediately produce anything new any more than God could" ...
I'm so baffled by this Scotus fellow I barely have time for other tweets or Twitter. It's hard to find his original docuмents, even with all the resources of Jewgle or Google. Whatever. But I think Elon Musk still doesn't kinow which way the Moon goes any better than NASA.
I look through a lot of stuff sometimes and feel like I'm getting nowhere. I might as well go back to middle school ... much less high school ... but I too have my right to vote! I can vote!
(https://i.imgur.com/oO1lTUw.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/KDZPX6x.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/i5oAO9T.png)
-
"Looks like we will need another day or so"
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1599252162688655360?cxt=HHwWgICp9czX17EsAAAA
-
(https://i.imgur.com/wJNelyd.png)
https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601007575633305600?t=Hm10yZ2IIOuMzG0lVlKnXA&s=19
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1322884/pg1
-
I'm so baffled by this Scotus fellow I barely have time for other tweets or Twitter.
Scotus was the beginning of the decline of philosophy. He differed from the Angelic Doctor on many points.
(https://isidore.co/forum/index.php?topic=15.msg73#msg73)
It's hard to find his original docuмents
Scotus, Opera Omnia (http://www.sydneypenner.ca/os/scotus.shtml) (link courtesy: Ite ad Thomam (https://iteadthomam.blogspot.com/))
also the Franciscan Archive's Scotus page (https://www.franciscan-archive.org/scotus/)
-
Scotus was the beginning of the decline of philosophy. He differed from the Angelic Doctor on many points.
(https://isidore.co/forum/index.php?topic=15.msg73#msg73)Scotus, Opera Omnia (http://www.sydneypenner.ca/os/scotus.shtml) (link courtesy: Ite ad Thomam (https://iteadthomam.blogspot.com/))
also the Franciscan Archive's Scotus page (https://www.franciscan-archive.org/scotus/)
Scotus is a tough read. I have a book by Etienne Gilson on Scotus that I had to put aside because I was having a lot of difficulty following his thought.
-
Scotus says on pg. 160 of a book that "an Intelligence cannot create a substance" […]
I think he means a created Intelligence cannot create a substance, "because such a being cannot immediately produce anything new any more than God could" ...
So he's against socially constructed reality?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eqHlO0Q.png)
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281?t=g8eVmm-pgJZcB7kUkVKgqQ&s=19
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1322924/pg1
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eqHlO0Q.png)
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281?t=g8eVmm-pgJZcB7kUkVKgqQ&s=19
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1322924/pg1
Any minute now Biden's justice department is going to start filing charges against itself in light of these shocking docuмents.
-
Unfortunately I've found myself of the same opinion and find it difficult to care much about these docuмents. Are they just releasing this stuff to get people riled up for 2024 election season? The theater gets tiresome, and it does not help that so many Con Inc grifters are hyping it up.
Yes, it's too late, the sheeple already completely believe what the jew msm told and tells them to believe....
(https://i.imgur.com/SieUDtN.png)
-
“My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci,” Musk tweeted.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/my-pronouns-are-prosecute-fauci-elon-musk-to-release-twitter-files-on-covid-and-dr-fauci/
-
Scotus was the beginning of the decline of philosophy. He differed from the Angelic Doctor on many points.
(https://isidore.co/forum/index.php?topic=15.msg73#msg73)Scotus, Opera Omnia (http://www.sydneypenner.ca/os/scotus.shtml) (link courtesy: Ite ad Thomam (https://iteadthomam.blogspot.com/))
also the Franciscan Archive's Scotus page (https://www.franciscan-archive.org/scotus/)
(https://media.tenor.com/pO0TcsNV6DoAAAAC/greta-how-dare-you.gif)
:laugh1:
Scotus was a genius. And he single-handedly cleared the way theologically for universal acceptance of the true Catholic understanding of the Immaculate Conception. What led St. Thomas into his error on the matter was the inability that theologians had to reconcile freedom from Original Sin at the moment of conception with the necessity for all men to have been redeemed by Christ to be freed from Original Sin, an objection that Scotus dispatched with ease. Note, it's not that there wasn't universal belief in Our Lady's Immaculate Conception per se, or in principle, just that most believed that there had to be an instant during which Our Lady was in Original Sin in order for her to be freed from it; their objections were philosophical more than theological. Scotus' argument appears in the dogmatic definition made by Pius IX.
He differed with St. Thomas on philosophical subtleties that 99% of people have no clue about, and I actually like the fact that Scotus pushed a bit farther away from Platonism than where Aristotle ended up. He basically differed more with Aristotle than with St. Thomas. His articulation of the "formal distinction" was brilliant and not inconsistent with the same leanings in St. Thomas. Unfortunately, Scotus died relatively young and his followers did all kinds of violence to his writings, with many copies floating around that others took credit for and into which they interpolated some of their own thinking. Alas, sometimes the influence of William of Ockham (his rival) is confused with that of Scotus and Scotism is conflated with Okhamis, leading to this false charge against Duns. In any case, it almost appeared as if St. Thomas was a bit too enamored of "The Philosopher" (aka Aristotle), whereas Duns had no problem reconsidering some of Aristotle's thinking. Aristotle was not infallible as a Philosopher, and there's nothing un-Catholic about questioning some of his thinking. Where it came to theology both were solidly Catholic. In fact, it's that subtle push against Aristotelian thinking that enabled Scotus to push Catholic theology regarding the Immaculate Conception away from an artificial constraint.
It was because the 16th-century Scotists were ardent enemies of Renaissance humanism that these humanists coined the term that later became "dunce".
-
Scotus was the beginning of the decline of philosophy.
:laugh1: That would be William of Ockham.
Such a statement about Scotus is both ignorant and contrary to charity. He was wrong about some things, to be sure, but he'd make the best minds of Traddieland look like the wannabes and intellectual midgets we are without even trying.
-
:laugh1: That would be William of Ockham.
Such a statement about Scotus is both ignorant and contrary to charity. He was wrong about some things, to be sure, but he'd make the best minds of Traddieland look like the wannabes and intellectual midgets we are without even trying.
So, the major criticism of Scotus was with regard to the perceived "univocity of being," but that is actually a misunderstanding of what Scotus meant. It's nicely defended here by an Episcopalian "priest" of all people.
http://shell.cas.usf.edu/~thomasw/The%20doctrine%20of%20univocity%20is%20true%20and%20salutary.pdf
But the Doctor Subtilis can rightly glory in the fact that he single-handedly cleared the way for the Immaculate Conception and had his argument for it cited in the dogmatic definition by Pope Pius IX. Not too many canonized Doctors of the Church can say that.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/KgzjERT.png)
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1322970/pg1
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1601720455005511680?t=OZmm7SGFSb9xtNAVT7RGLQ&s=19
-
“My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci,” Musk tweeted.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/my-pronouns-are-prosecute-fauci-elon-musk-to-release-twitter-files-on-covid-and-dr-fauci/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/pronouns-prosecute-fauci-twitter-owner-elon-musk-release-twitter-files-covid-dr-fauci/
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1323014/pg1
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1601894132573605888?t=QQ7VLA6860aAmsbcg54xqw&s=19
-
(https://i.imgur.com/JOAJatp.png)
https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602364197194432515
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1323032/pg1 (contains easier to copy text version)
(https://i.imgur.com/2Ym5XnA.png)