Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Anyone ELSE suspicious of Jill Stein?  (Read 258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 29031
  • Reputation: +24798/-402
  • Gender: Male
Anyone ELSE suspicious of Jill Stein?
« on: December 05, 2016, 10:15:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • She's pushing for these recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

    But let's face it -- she was nowhere near winning ANY of these states.

    Obviously she likes Hillary way more than Trump, or else she wouldn't be doing anything right now. Hillary was the only other person even in the running for actually winning the presidency.

    Stein is obviously a proxy/agent for Hillary -- so Hillary won't have to appear even more of a sore loser by whining and calling for a recount.

    Just like the USA created a separate organization, "ISIS", to do its dirty work.

    Isn't this as obvious as 2+2 = 4?

    Stein got less than 1% of the vote. Give me a break! She can't possibly be interested in this for personal or professional reasons. It has to be a "suitcase full of cash", a Democratic agenda, etc.

    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
    Anyone ELSE suspicious of Jill Stein?
    « Reply #1 on: December 05, 2016, 01:44:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew (Dec 05, 2016, 11:15 am)
    [Jill Stein is] pushing for these recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.  But let's face it -- she was nowhere near winning ANY of these states. [....]  Stein is obviously a proxy/agent for Hillary -- so Hillary won't have to appear even more of a sore loser by whining and calling for a recount.

    Would that be the Hillary whose campaign-proxies in the "mainstream news (& entertainment) media" did their mendacious (I doubt it was as benign as merely disingenuous) best to create a stink about Trump's refusal to unconditionally accept the "results of the election"?   When objective informed voters contemplate the corruption of the voting process caused by the illogical-but-vocal opposition--especially by Democrats and their identity-group sheep--to common-sense new laws that legally required voters to present verifiable identification before being issued a ballot?

    Quote from: Matthew (Dec 05, 2016, 11:15 am)
    Stein got less than 1% of the vote. Give me a break!  She can't possibly be interested in this for personal or professional reasons. [....] 

    In Florida, state law provides an automatic recount when the margin of the vote in a contest is 1/2% (i.e.: 1/2 of 1%).  Methinks I recall a limit in state law on granting unplanned recounts simply upon a candidate's formal request, (and I think I recall it) requiring a 1% preliminarily reported margin of votes cast in the contest (but that latter number is from fallible memory, so perhaps I ought to look it up and report herein).

    Altho' I'm reluctant to place limits on the fundamental act of a representative republic, it seems to me that a candidate ought to be required to be within 10% margin of (i.e.: relative to) the winning vote, or most generously, perhaps no margin any greater than 33% (that being the additive inverse to the majority required for ratifying treaties &c.) to be able to cause a recount without demonstrating probable cause for a miscount.  Not just in any court of law within the jurisdiction of the elective office, but in a court that completely encloses that jurisdiction."}

    Quote from: Matthew (Dec 05, 2016, 11:15 am)
    It has to be a "suitcase full of cash" [....]

    Methinks the Clinton Foundation would be eager to hand over at least 1 "suitcase full of cash" while it has such riches available.  Because a settled Electoral-College vote that confirms the election of D.J. Trump as president of the U.S.A. will devastate the  bribery  earnings of the Clinton Foundation.