Author Topic: Dominique Strauss-Kahn and the revelation of the method. (Read 1445 times)

Raoul76 · « **on:** May 19, 2011, 12:13:43 PM »

I don't know how many people are following the Strauss-Kahn scandal, but it is enormous in France and pretty big here as well. Strauss-Kahn is a Jєωιѕн member of the Socialist Party who was considered a candidate for the presidency, as well as being the head of the IMF, the globalist institution. He has been accused of raping an African maid in a hotel in New York.

The revelation of the method here is that Strauss-Kahn apparently had a reputation as someone with big problems, but these were systematically covered up by the media -- which some of them now admit. All of those who say "Oh, the media couldn't possibly have covered up 9/11, there's too many people involved," how do you explain this? They are now ADMITTING that for certain issues, there is an "omerta" or code of strict silence. The final touch of gruesome irony is that, at the same moment the press openly admits this, people refuse to believe the accusations against Strauss-Kahn and say he was trapped by a conspiracy.

This is a classic case of people not believing the true conspiracy theories -- 9/11, the moon landings, etc. -- and believing there is a conspiracy against their liberal heroes.

Another conspiracy is the way that the press in France all call this guy "DSK," creating a sort of buddy-buddy image around him. They did their utmost to make him into a household name. Meanwhile, he's just another Jєω globalist among thousands. The scary part is that a lot of people thought he was their last best hope after Sarkozy. That is entirely due to the mind-warping manipulation of the press, who, as everyone should now realize, is simply the propaganda wing of the globalist ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic governments, with absolutely NO independence. It is under total control and nothing is revealed that "they" don't want revealed. Incidents like Watergate are false cօռspιʀαcιҽs that are meant to promote an image that the press is full of muckraking independents; this made the press seem credible for thirty years when the whole time it was bought and sold. The whole concept of "Woodward and Bernstein" was absolutely ingenious propaganda to make people believe this Nancy Drew fairy-story about news reporters fighting the halls of power, bloodhounds who won't stop until they reveal injustice, etc. ( note the Jєωιѕн involvement here as well ).

Telesphorus · « **Reply #1 on:** May 19, 2011, 12:50:30 PM »

It's pretty much par for the course for the French Left to defend monsters.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/247357/French-fury-over-lynching-of-IMF-boss-by-US-court

Exilenomore · « **Reply #2 on:** May 19, 2011, 01:02:39 PM »

Over here the politicians were discussing (in a sickening way) how the man supposedly really could not be held accountable for what he did because he just 'couldn't help himself', and being in a position of power made him unable to 'resist the drifts'. This was the despicable conclusion they reached after some evolutionist professor convinced them that rape is normal because we all come from monkeys! (Nonsense.)

Utterly disgusting. All of it.

I guess according to them only clerics should be punished for their crimes, but if you're a politician it is fine. This just seems to be some kind of sick joke.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #3 on:** May 19, 2011, 01:05:32 PM »

Quote from: Exilenomore

I guess according to them only clerics should be punished for their crimes, but if you're a politician it is fine. This just seems to be some kind of sick joke.

You know I was just thinking of how the Leftist tendency to protect evil-doers is one of the major causes of the abuse crisis. Rightists eat their own for one false word - but Leftists will defend twisted criminals. The difference is that the the liberals in the Church are forced to maintain the pretense of being conservatives. So of course they are shocked when they are finally treated like conservatives when they were just pretending to be on the right.

Of course the fact that this man is being prosecuted is probably something of a double cross as well. "Right-wing" Zionist Jєωs versus "Left-wing" masonic Jєωs.

Pah, it's all so degrading and disgusting. What a world.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 19, 2011, 09:34:14 PM »

Telesphorus said:

Quote

Of course the fact that this man is being prosecuted is probably something of a double cross as well. "Right-wing" Zionist Jєωs versus "Left-wing" masonic Jєωs.

That's exactly what it is, Tele, because a lot of people suspect this was a plot of the current President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is one of those right-wing Jєωs, the French equivalent of a neo-con. They say or suggest that he was worried about the competition, the Great White Hope that is DSK... Meanwhile, Sarkozy is the one who pushed to get his fellow Jєω the job as head of the IMF...

Let it be noted that "right wing" today means "professing open economic liberalism, laissez-faire capitalism," and that's about it. Not only the "right wing," but even the "extreme right wing" of France represented by Marine le Pen, have no interest in outlawing abortion. They don't even pay lip service to it like the American "right wing."

Back to DSK, I've been trying to puzzle it out for a while now. I find it very dubious that someone this powerful would be arrested and sent to Rikers' Island. It's the same with Bernie Madoff. These guys are above the law, way above. Are we supposed to believe that the police aren't bought and paid for? So many judges are Masons as well. To see someone like DSK arrested and hauled into court is as unconvincing as seeing a Rothschild in court, shackled and humiliated. It feels like Hollywood. You can almost see the movie, "The Globalist," about the rise and fall of the head of the IMF...

But what is the motive? Is it, as I often say about Watergate, a kind of feint in order to make it look like the system is occasionally fair? Strauss-Kahn is not really known in America, so if there is some kind of ritual going on here, it has to do with France, not with us. Maybe what the devil really wants is a kind of Jєωιѕн pseudo-martyr for people to weep and moan over. I will say, it's all very enigmatic, this one.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #5 on:** May 19, 2011, 09:48:56 PM »

Recently, my friend Anna told me about her experience at a college, where she says she was ostracized. She said there were some "Iranian Jєωs" there who were bigwigs on campus and were having orgies -- I can't remember if they were professors or administrators. But I will say, she claims to have reported them to the police and that they actually were punished in some way, were fired or arrested or something, I can't remember.

Could it be that Strauss-Kahn just went too far in this one moment and that there was no way to protect him, so he was thrown to the wolves? If you look at how Vatican II works, you can see how all the liberals work in all the institutions they control. You can do the most awful acts, as long as you're discreet about it. If you get sloppy and get caught, they'll try to transfer you somewhere until it all quiets down. It's only the people who are repeatedly sloppy who end up "disgraced." But this protection breeds a kind of pride, people who think they can get away with anything, and that is why so many Vatican II "priests" have been exposed despite the protection they must get from the mostly Masonically-controlled police force and the press.

The sloppy perverts are a threat to the cunning and controlled perverts, and therefore they are ditched, left to wither and die.

So I guess it is possible that Strauss-Kahn really did erupt in a kind of bestial moment, like the mask slipping for one moment, if he did commit this alleged crime. But he is probably at the stage where they will let it quiet down and give him another chance. Remember, a lot of these people defend Roman Polanski. I'm afraid that, as fond as I am of the French -- though it's really the Catholics in France that I'm fond of -- there is a salacious streak in their culture. One of their favorite kings is Henri IV who lived a grotesquely sleazy life, and they like him for that reason, because he was such a big stud.

France has a very macho culture. Even their feminism crumbles beneath this machismo, as you can see by the fact that Strauss-Kahn dominated the Socialist party above the female politicians like Aubry and Segolene Royal. But that's always the way it is. Just as males rule in the Church, they also rule in the realms of evil. Feminism is almost designed to lead to a backlash where women once again "discover their femininity" and give into men, but the trick is, they give into the wrong men, to jerks.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 21, 2011, 10:51:00 AM »

I should say that what was covered up is not that DSK was not necessarily that DSK was a potential rapist, but that he had an aggressive comportment towards women.