Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Maria Regina on August 23, 2019, 01:42:22 PM

Title: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Maria Regina on August 23, 2019, 01:42:22 PM
There was this post at facebook:

 (https://www.facebook.com/perry.morelli1?hc_ref=ARRsOYLcdnRtb_03LN_zDIYZGPUgfQSDM7osL8_hIYJXH4scqrWbzLNC1O4946v0ff0&fref=nf)
Quote
Perry Morelli (https://www.facebook.com/perry.morelli1?hc_ref=ARRsOYLcdnRtb_03LN_zDIYZGPUgfQSDM7osL8_hIYJXH4scqrWbzLNC1O4946v0ff0&fref=nf)
August 13 at 9:08 AM (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3350474681632912&set=a.100304206649992&type=3) ·
John Roberts flew with Epstein on at least two occasions.according to flight records, from March 22, 2010, and February 10, 2011.
 Could it be compromised, Chief Justice John Roberts? Is this why conservative Chief Justice John Roberts was such a staunch defender of the constitution until he got a "visit" from John Brennan and then suddenly became a huge fan of Obamacare?
 *BLACKMAILED*

When trying to get more information using duckduckgo.com, I was blocked from doing so. Instead, duckduckgo.com recommended a CNN story in favor of Justice John Roberts, a liberal fake-news snoops story (hoax alert), and then some stories about one of Epstein's sex slave who had the surname of Roberts.

This is the CNN article that duckduckgo.com recommended: https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/21/politics/john-roberts-obamacare-the-chief/index.html

Here is the fake-news hoax alert website that duckduckgo.com gave: https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3470791-fake-news-john-roberts-not-fly-with-epstein-on-at-least-2-occasions.html

Does anyone here have more information as to why Justice Roberts is now compromised in his decisions?
Is Roberts being blackmailed into ruling with the anti-life pro-clinton forces?

Is there a better search engine than Google or duckduckgo.com? Obviously, duckduckgo.com is now a compromised search engine. This is not the only time that duckduckgo.com has given skewed results.

Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: josefamenendez on August 23, 2019, 03:53:34 PM
Well, for years the rumor mills have said Roberts was gαy....this pic doesn't prove he is gαy, but certainly gαy-ish...
 
Is the guy with the food Freddie Mercury? :laugh1:

(https://ken_ashford.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/couldnt_be_gαyer_if_they_were_in_chaps.jpg)
Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Syracuse on August 23, 2019, 03:54:59 PM
That's why he granted the FISA warrant knowing the dossier was bogus and paid for by Piglary Clinton. It was all an attempt to remove a duly elected president. A soft coup d'état.

But Trump ain't doing anything to being those demons to justice. This tells me Trump is part of the Swamp, and the Swamp lives on ... He's president, and Epstein was arguably the most high profile apprehended criminal in the world who could literally bring down Congress, Hollywood, Media, Bankers, etc ... but Trump didn't use his powers and influence to make sure Epstein wouldn't become another ghost escaping trial.

INACTION AGAINST TREASON IS TREASON IN ITSELF- FROM DAY 1

LOCK HER UP: NO

WAR CRIMES PROSECUTED: 0

SWAMP CREATURES EXECUTED: 0

SWAMP CREATURE PROSECUTIONS: 0

BENGHAZI CRIMINALS BROUGHT TO JUSTICE: NO

9/11 DOMESTIC CRIMINALS BROUGHT TO JUSTICE: NO

GEORGE SOROS BROUGHT TO JUSTICE FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: NO

JUSTICE SCALIA’S MURDER AND COVER-UP INVESTIGATED BY THE ‘JUSTICE’ DEPT: NO

U.N. EXPOSED AND CONFRONTED FOR INITIATING ‘MIGRANT CRISIS’ IN WESTERN NATIONS: OF COURSE NOT

JULIAN ASSANGE – EDWARD SNOWDEN – MICHAEL FLYNN PATRIOTISM RECOGNIZED: NO- STILL UNDER PERSECUTION

WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS INVOLVED IN RAIDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND, FEDERAL PENSION SCAMS, ‘TOO BIG TO FAIL’, ‘STIMULUS’ AND ‘THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT’ SCHEMES BROUGHT TO JUSTICE: NO

ALLOWED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO BE SPENT ON A FRAUDLENT BOGUS INVESTIGATION, LASTING 2 YEARS, FROM ‘OPPOSITION’ WITH NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION TO JUSTIFY SUCH A SPECTACLE: YES

BREAK-UP OF BIG TECH CENSORSHIP CRIMINAL ORGS: NO

ALLOWING CONTINUED ENDLESS PRINTING FROM THE FED: YES

GOVERNMENT SPENDING CUT- REDUCED DEFICIT SPENDING: NO
 
TAX BREAKS FOR BILLIONAIRES AND MONOPLY CORPORATIONS: YES

WAIVES RAINBOW FLAG AND SUPPORTS ANTI-FAMILY AGENDAS: YES
 
CUT FEDERAL FUNDING TO PLANNED BUTCHERHOOD HARVESTERS AND DEALERS: NO

IRS ‘AUDITED’ FOR TARGETING OF TEA PARTY AND GRASS ROOTS ORGANIZATIONS: NO

FUNDING CUTS TO ‘INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING’ AKA INDOCTRINTION CAMPS: NO

ADDRESSING ISSUES OF AI/TECH THREATS, GEO-ENGINEERING, THE MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, SLOW KILL EUGENICS THRU BIG AG/ BIG PHARMA, ANTI-VACCINATION RIGHTS: NO

RENEGGING ON ALL POSITIONS OF SUBSTANCE- PULLING TROOPS OUT OF SYRIA -SHUTTING DOWN THE BORDER IF CARAVANS NOT STOPPED: YES

TORE UP INF (NUCLEAR ARMS TREATY) WITH RUSSIA IGNITING A NEW ARMS RACE: YES

SUPPORT OF STATE SPONSER OF TERROR WITH THE HOUSE OF SAUD COMMITTING GENOCIDE IN YEMEN: YES

HEAVY MEDDLING IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS IN VENEZUELA WITH ‘STRONG POSSIBILITY OF MILITARY OPTION’: YES

DISMISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR REAL PROGRESS IN PEACE TALKS WITH N. KOREA: YES
 
MORE GUN CONTROL / CONTINUED ATTACK ON 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS: YES

LAS VEGAS MASSACRE AND COVER-UP RE-INVESTIGATED BY FEDS: NO

INCREASE IN POLICE STATE SPENDING AND PRESENCE: YES

LAVOY FINICIUM’S MURDERERS BROUGHT TO JUSTICE: NO

REVOCATION OF PATRIOT ACT/SPYING ON CITIZENS: NO

INCREASING WAR EFFORTS AND MIC SPENDING: YES
Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on August 24, 2019, 06:15:21 AM
ccording to a 16-page financial disclosure form Roberts submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_the_Judiciary) prior to his Supreme Court confirmation hearings, his net worth was more than $6 million, including $1.6 million in stock holdings.[citation needed (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed)]At the time Roberts left private practice to join the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2003, he took a pay cut from $1 million a year to $171,800; as Chief Justice, his salary is $255,500 as of 2014. Roberts also holds a one-eighth interest in a cottage in Knocklong (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knocklong), an Irish village in County Limerick (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_Limerick).[111] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Roberts#cite_note-111)

Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on August 24, 2019, 06:23:47 AM
Justice Clarence Thomas (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Thomas) filed a concurring opinion, contending that the Court's prior decisions in Roe v. Wade (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade) and Casey should be reversed; Roberts declined to join that opinion.
In December 2018, justices Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh)joined the court's four liberal justices in a denial for writ of certiorari, (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_Certiorari) declining to hear a case brought by the states of Louisiana and Kansas to deny Medicaid (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicaid)funding to Planned Parenthood.[68] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-68) Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, the lower court rulings in favor of Planned Parenthood still stand.[69] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-69) In February 2019, Roberts sided with the court's liberal wing, in a 5–4 decision, granting a stay (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stay_of_execution) to temporarily block a Louisiana abortion restriction (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_abortion_restrictions_in_the_United_States).[70] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-70) The Louisiana law required that doctors performing abortions possess admitting privileges at a hospital near the facility providing the abortion, and the stay blocks that law pending review in the legal process.[71] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-71)[72 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-72)
Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on August 24, 2019, 06:30:46 AM
LGBT rights
In 2013, Roberts wrote the 5-4 majority opinion that the appellants seeking to uphold Proposition 8 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8_(2008)) in California, which was ruled unconstitutional by lower courts, did not have standing and the lower courts' rulings were allowed to stand and same-sex marriages resumed in California.[94] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-94) Roberts dissented in United States v. Windsor (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Windsor) in which the 5-4 majority ruled that key parts of the Defense of Marriage Act (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act) were unconstitutional.[95] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-95) The case allowed the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed in jurisdictions where legal. He dissented in the Obergefell v. Hodges (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges) case in which Kennedy wrote for the majority, again 5-4, that same-sex couples had a right to marry.[96] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-96) In Pavan v. Smith (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States), the Supreme Court "summarily overruled" the Arkansas Supreme Court's decision that the state did not have to list same-sex spouses on birth certificates thus siding with same-sex couples who filed the lawsuit; Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented but Roberts did not join their dissent leaving open speculation that he might have ruled with the majority.[97] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#cite_note-97)
Title: Re: Did Justice Roberts fly on the Lolita Express?
Post by: Viva Cristo Rey on August 24, 2019, 06:38:40 AM
Supported Obamacare.