Body language proves that Ford was not being genuine. Watch the video below.



Note that Ford did not cry, but falsely lowered her voice to give the false impression that she was close to tears. She never cried or sniffled, nor did she grab a tissue. Instead she held her head high in defiance. Ford also played the cute puppy pose with her head tilted to the side to gain public sympathy.

Her performance was well rehearsed and choreographed:
1. how she would speak (lowering her voice and using a vocal fry to pretend that she was crying),
2. how she would position her head, tilting it to the side (cute puppy pose) or raising it high in the air in defiance,
3. how she would use hand gestures to gain advantage,
4. how she would use her eyes to plead with the Democrats on the panel,
5. how she would constantly shift her eyes ... a sign that she was lying.
6. how she would shift her body to gain attention and advantage, and
7. how she would move her glasses off her face. Did she even need those glasses?

On the contrary, Judge Kavanaugh did cry and did sniffle as he described and shared the raw emotions that he felt.

Surely no one would ever lie in front of Congress?!?    :o

...Note that Ford did not cry, but falsely lowered her voice to give the false impression that she was close to tears. She never cried or sniffled, nor did she grab a tissue. Instead she held her head high in defiance. ...

.
Maybe she should have gone to the same acting classes as Nayirah al-Sabah.   

.
They're calling her "Doctor Ford" but now she isn't a licensed psychologist. So what kind of "doctor" is she?

Ford has her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology, but she is not licensed to practice psychology.
She can teach and do research, but Ford cannot counsel people.

Handwriting analysis done on Ford's sample shows that she has a tendency to lie

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/christine-blasey-fords-body-language


The analysis of Ford’s body language is consistent with certified graphologist Leeann Springer’s analysis of Ford’s handwriting:

Christine Ford’s writing…is a combination of “writer/printer” which some use in the math field. However, those writers/printers have clear, well-formed and easy to read writing, which Ford severely lacks in her writing.

She clearly wants no connection to the past, which is evidenced in her “right hand column writing”. She strays from being on task, and has forgetfulness. There’s a lot of “scratching over” strokes, which is what some of us term as “litter box scratching”. There’s obvious signs of addiction, sometimes, it’s drugs, alcohol, sɛҳuąƖ or something totally out of control in a person’s life.

There is a clear disconnect in what she is thinking vs. what she is writing. Although, I don’t have the original writing, I’d safely venture to say “she has misplaced pressure throughout the writing, which borders on severe mood swings.

She is trying to stay in control by writing in an AB slant (controlled writing) but in some areas there is a “severe abnormal left slant” as though she is falling over backwards. The body of her writing which is frozen in the AB slant does not match with her signature, which means she wants to appear one way to the world, but not in reality. She wants to appear friendly and warm to others, but isn’t.

She is a middle zone writer, which means she’s only concerned with the here and now and lives for the moment.

Overall impression is that her writing is poorly integrated, choppy, not free flowing, scratched over, she has some rebellion in her strokes and is stubborn. She also lacks high self-esteem and for a person who is in education, she certainly has low goals, as witnessed with the very low “t” crossings, poorly formed thinking letters “m’s and n’s”. It’s not just one trait that is measured in HA, it’s collectively analyzed.

She is someone though, that probably wants her own way, seen in many threaded strokes in her writing. She is careful not to divulge too much about herself on a personal level. Her writing lacks logic, most of all, and does show addictive behavior that is not beneficial. We analysts have also seen this in those who’ve beaten addiction, but still live with the residual damages, which is recorded in the brain. Handwriting is indeed brain-writing.

Referring to Ford’s number zero (0) in “2018”, which contains a small oval, her not dotting i’s, and her low-cross t’s, Springer explains:

Loops inside ovals or hanging jabbed marks on ovals, indicates lying. If seen throughout the writing, it is pathological lying, also seen in self-absorbed narcissists.

When ovals are inside ovals and there’s a lot of threading (imagine a long thread) the person is not truthful. Scratching throughout a writing, if there’s no brain damage, is deception. We call it the litter box scratch and we all know why cats scratch litter. If an oval is looped on both sides (imagine hair parted in the middle with bangs hanging on each side) indicates big liars. Those who forget to dot i’s, cross t’s and have cover strokes in small “m’s and n’s” are secretive and they can play people.

When I listened to her testimony I found it incredible that there was so much she didn't remember but she remembered that the other boy sat on the bed "TWICE" as the attack was occurring.  Exactly twice.  She knew and remembered this detail despite all that was (supposedly) going on at the time.  And yet so many general facts she just could.not.remember.  Amazing.

And that "vocal fry".  It reminds me of a kid who is faking a cry.

Who is the guy on the right?

https://twitter.com/MikeTokes/status/1046121628331966464

Mike Tokes (@MikeTokes)

BOMBSHELL:
Christine Blasey Ford’s brother worked with
Peter Strzok's sister-in-law at Exelis Inc,
a US Defense and Intelligence contractor.
•Jill Strzok is Peter Strzoks' sister-in-law
•Jill Strzok works with Thomas Blasey
•Thomas Blasey is Christine Ford's broth...

Interesting that Christine Ford did not contact one of her two lawyer brothers to help defend her.
Perhaps the Blasey brothers both know that Chrsitine was not molested by Brett Kavanaugh.