Author Topic: Clinton pre-chosen? (Read 1840 times)

Geremia · « **on:** August 02, 2016, 01:48:15 PM »

The MSM and rigged "voting" will very likely choose Clinton because

1. ;

2. ;

3. .

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #1 on:** August 02, 2016, 02:00:22 PM »

Quote from: Geremia

The MSM and rigged "voting" will very likely choose Clinton because

1. ;

2. ;

3. .

The national elections are not rigged. If the elections were, Trump would not be where he is.

ClarkSmith · « **Reply #2 on:** August 02, 2016, 11:38:52 PM »

The DNC emails Wikileaks posted on their website proved the media was directly involved in getting Clinton the nomination.

And if one denies the validity of the DNC emails, then why are all the DNC officials being released ?

3 More Top DNC Officials Released

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #3 on:** August 03, 2016, 01:59:01 AM »

Quote from: ClarkSmith

The DNC emails Wikileaks posted on their website proved the media was directly involved in getting Clinton the nomination.

And if one denies the validity of the DNC emails, then why are all the DNC officials being released ?

3 More Top DNC Officials Released

This was Clinton's race since 2008 when she BARELY lost to Obama in the convention. Had only a handful of superdelegates switched, we would have a Clinton/McCain election in 2008.

With no opposition, this is the DNC's race to rig.

Geremia · « **Reply #4 on:** August 04, 2016, 07:55:20 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

The national elections are not rigged. If the elections were, Trump would not be where he is.

Perhaps. The media of late has been running ridiculous stories about Trump possibly dropping out, etc. It seems the MSM is trying to prevent Trump voters from showing up at the polls.

Ohio, at least, in the 2012 election was certainly rigged.

When has the mainstream media ever been wrong in their exit-poll predictions? They use <1% sample sizes, and they correctly predict who the winning candidate is. It seems their puppeteers have foreknowledge about a pre-selected winner.

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #5 on:** August 04, 2016, 09:01:49 PM »

The RNC wants Trump to drop out because they think he's a lunatic who's going to ruin the party. And they do have a point.

If Trump continues what he's been doing, Clinton wins the election hands down. You get at least 4 years of Hillary unless she gets αssαssιnαtҽd or something.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #6 on:** August 05, 2016, 03:30:58 AM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

Quote from: Geremia
The MSM and rigged "voting" will very likely choose Clinton because

1. ;

2. ;

3. .

The national elections are not rigged. If the elections were, Trump would not be where he is.

The nationals are rigged. The system is rigged.

Stubborn · « **Reply #7 on:** August 05, 2016, 06:22:08 AM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

Quote from: Geremia
The MSM and rigged "voting" will very likely choose Clinton because

1. ;

2. ;

3. .

The national elections are not rigged. If the elections were, Trump would not be where he is.

I don't know they are rigged as in fraudulent voting, but they most certainly are rigged via media reporting. All the Jєω media needs to do is run a million stories that favors one or the other candidates or slanders/praises one of them, and they'll steer the sheeple to vote for the candidate the Jєωs want in there.

All they really need to do is to keep reporting national polls that trumpet one of the candidates with a growing lead; "if the election were held today, granny would win 72% to Trump's 28%" type of thing.

Stubborn · « **Reply #8 on:** August 05, 2016, 06:25:30 AM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

The RNC wants Trump to drop out because they think he's a lunatic who's going to ruin the party. And they do have a point.

If Trump continues what he's been doing, Clinton wins the election hands down. You get at least 4 years of Hillary unless she gets αssαssιnαtҽd or something.

Trump reminds me of the candidate in the original movie; The Manchurian Candidate and in some way, granny reminds me of his wife in that movie.

Geremia · « **Reply #9 on:** August 05, 2016, 09:39:38 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn

they most certainly are rigged via media reporting. All the Jєω media needs to do is run a million stories that favors one or the other candidates or slanders/praises one of them, and they'll steer the sheeple to vote for the candidate the Jєωs want in there.

Yes, this is the #1 factor. This is what is happening contra Trump.

Fraudulent, computer-rigged voting isn't as important as the MSM factor.

Degrelle · « **Reply #10 on:** August 05, 2016, 09:47:22 PM »

Quote from: Geremia

Quote from: Stubborn
they most certainly are rigged via media reporting. All the Jєω media needs to do is run a million stories that favors one or the other candidates or slanders/praises one of them, and they'll steer the sheeple to vote for the candidate the Jєωs want in there.
Yes, this is the #1 factor. This is what is happening contra Trump.

Fraudulent, computer-rigged voting isn't as important as the MSM factor.

I agree. The same happens up here in Canada, where the MSM is 100% in favour of the Liberal Party and they essentially gift-wrapped the election this past November to Pierre Trudeau.

A good example of the media bias may be found with regards to Dinesh D'Souza's film Hillary's America, which was recently released. Rotten Tomatoes, which aggregates MSM reviews and viewer reviews is telling:

The MSM movie critics almost universally despise the film giving it a 4% rating (i.e. 96% of MSM gives the film a negative review), whereas the audience score is 84% (i.e. 84% of the regular people who went out and watched the film and posted a review to Rotten Tomatoes gave it a favourable review). The media bias against this film is quite blatantly obvious here, and this is not surprising in the least since it attacks Hillary.

cf. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hillarys_america_the_secret_history_of_the_democratic_party/

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #11 on:** August 06, 2016, 08:23:21 AM »

Quote from: Geremia

Quote from: Stubborn
they most certainly are rigged via media reporting. All the Jєω media needs to do is run a million stories that favors one or the other candidates or slanders/praises one of them, and they'll steer the sheeple to vote for the candidate the Jєωs want in there.
Yes, this is the #1 factor. This is what is happening contra Trump.

Fraudulent, computer-rigged voting isn't as important as the MSM factor.

The MSM has nothing to do with Clinton winning were she to win. There's a lot of Republicans who simply won't vote for Trump. They hate his policy positions and what he's proposed.

Degrelle · « **Reply #12 on:** August 07, 2016, 12:43:59 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

The MSM has nothing to do with Clinton winning were she to win. There's a lot of Republicans who simply won't vote for Trump. They hate his policy positions and what he's proposed.

I don't know that you can say the MSM would have "nothing" to do with a Clinton victory. One might be skeptical of how munch influence they have, but surely you can't deny that they're capable of swaying a significant number of ignorant voters who get all of their information about candidates from MSM?

It seems indisputable that MSM is hiding Hillary's bad points, and playing up the good, while doing the opposite with The Donald.