Author Topic: Census: Shows millions less voted in 2020 ɛƖɛctıon than official Tally  (Read 141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10176
  • Reputation: +3186/-186
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
Census reveals weird anomaly: Shows millions less voted in 2020 ɛƖɛctıon than official tally

US Census data released last week called into question the official vote tally from the 2020 ɛƖɛctıon. As part of the Census, the government collects data on citizens who self-report as having voted in presidential ɛƖɛctıons. The collected data shows an unusual anomaly in the reported results.
According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000. On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.
Speaking to pollster Richard Baris during an episode of “Inside the Numbers,” lawyer Robert Barnes historically, the Census tends to “pin on the nose” the recorded vote numbers with the actual results. In other words, often the two data sets reasonably match.
Barnes is right. For example, the bureau was nearly spot-on in 2008, slightly under-reporting that 131,100,000 voted, while the official results showed 131,300,000 ballots cast.
Of course, sometimes the Census has missed the mark. But for decades, in almost every case where the Census grossly botched the results, it was because the bureau over-recorded the number of those who voted.
Consider the following: In 1992, the Census over recorded the official results by slightly more than nine million. In 1996, the Census again over recorded the number of reported voters by roughly nine million. Similarly, the bureau recorded the number of those who voted in the 2004 ɛƖɛctıon as 125 million, while official results placed the total at 122 million.
The same over-recording phenomenon occurred in 2012, with the Census over-reporting the number of voters by several million. In fact, even in 2016 where the Census was quite close, it still over-recorded the official ɛƖɛctıon results.
ɛƖɛctıons in US history, Barnes is convinced the Census data is powerful circumstantial evidence that fraud was afoot in 2020.
Click here to help keep articles like this free by supporting the ɛƖɛctıon Wiz today!
Barnes asked, “Why are there five million more ballots counted in the presidential ɛƖɛctıon than reported voting according to the Census data, which has almost always been accurate?” He continued, “Isn’t it amazing that it [under reporting] is almost exactly the number of questionable Bıdɛn ballots?”
Barnes said:
“It’s as good of evidence as you could possibly have that there were five million … questionable ballots … that the Census itself says are counting votes of people who claim they didn’t vote.”
Barnes pointed out the Census data also calls into question a number of contested states too.

Source: ɛƖɛctı posted 5/10/21


Share This Article...

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 26208
  • Reputation: +22565/-308
  • Gender: Male
Did anyone, even the idiots who support Bıdɛn, really think that he got 80 million votes -- more than σbαmα, despite winning very few counties nationwide?

As some astute pundits pointed out, if you take those figures as the truth, then apparently σbαmα wasn't so great, nor have we made that much "progress" in the woke department -- because apparently σbαmα merely rode in on white Bıdɛn's coattails! 

But seriously, the facts don't add up at all.

This ɛƖɛctıon was stolen in broad daylight, before our eyes.

We are living in a banana republic. Enjoy.
Feeling generous? Want to say "thank you"? Feel free to send gift(s) from my Amazon wishlist!

Start session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16