And he answers this in the debate. He said he was being sarcastic....and then he went full throttle on the fraudulent 2020 election.
Something I found weird, was it's like Kamala hαɾɾιs was reading these forums in preparation and used many of the points other posters here have used against Trump... that was very weird... because of course, she knows Pro-lifers aren't likely to vote for her, she just needs Pro-lifers to get cold feet regarding Trump for example, to divide and conquer his base of Pro-lifers.
Same thing with those of us who know 2020 was rigged in many ways... she isn't likely to get their vote, but she can use such things to try and divide Trumps base, if you thought Trump came around on the 2020 rigging thing, then shouldn't you be happy?
The other lies too were off the charts... It was rather surreal IMO as I would've wanted to just say halfway through, who are controlling you 3? And why aren't I debating them? I mean, I'm pretty sure I remember watching video of Kamala once saying she liked the Australian buy-back scheme so what is she talking about and why can't she be honest? Likely because they have all the data mining and spyware and so they already know where most people stand on particular issues so she has to change all the time based on that data hence not being a real person.
God Bless