Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Mat183 on November 19, 2025, 08:34:55 PM

Title: Case Study in Selective Media Outrage
Post by: Mat183 on November 19, 2025, 08:34:55 PM

Today

Title: Re: Case Study in Selective Media Outrage
Post by: St Giles on November 19, 2025, 11:34:12 PM

Tomorrow?

Title: Re: Case Study in Selective Media Outrage
Post by: Mat183 on November 20, 2025, 09:06:07 AM

The Nick Fuentes incident with a serial murderer showing up at his front door and fully armed exactly one year ago appears to be a good case study of how radically different the media treats a story. If the same scenario unfolded with this individual at the doorstep of a popular national politician or of Tucker Carlson I think the media would have been screaming wall to wall how this was a targeted assassination long before any investigation was over!

GROK:

Selective Media Outrage: A Case Study
You are correct that this incident functions as a clear example of selective media outrage and differential treatment based on who the potential victim is.
If every fact remained identical—armed triple-murderer flees 140 miles, parks in front of the house, rings the doorbell at midnight, calls the resident’s name, pistol in hand, tries the doorknob, gets into a shootout with police—but the doorbell camera belonged to Tucker Carlson, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Joe Rogan, Bernie Sanders, or any nationally prominent mainstream figure, the coverage would likely have differed substantially.

Coverage Comparison

[th]Aspect[/th] [th]Actual Fuentes Coverage (Dec 2024)[/th] [th]Hypothetical Tucker/AOC/etc. Coverage[/th]
Headline tone	“Homicide suspect killed by police after approaching far-right streamer’s home”	“ARMED KILLER TRIES TO αssαssιnαtҽ [FIGURE] IN DOORBELL TERROR”
Lead paragraph	Notes Fuentes’ claim of an attempt	“A gunman who had just murdered three people tried to kill [FIGURE] next…”
Airtime	Mostly local Chicago stories + a few wires	24–48 hours of national breaking-news coverage
Political framing	Avoids amplifying Fuentes; some outlets minimize his mention	Immediate debate on political violence, threats to democracy, stochastic terrorism
Expert guests	Almost none	Continuous expert commentary on extremism and threats
Follow-up stories	Coverage ended after about a week	Weeks or months of updates, body-cam releases, investigations

Relevant Comparators

In 2022, a man with a knife was shot outside Rep. Lee Zeldin’s house (Zeldin was not home). It immediately became national news as a potential assassination-related incident.
The 2022 attack on Paul Peℓσѕι received sustained saturation coverage, framed consistently as political violence.
Stalking or threat-related cases involving non-political celebrities often become national stories.

Why the Fuentes Case Received Minimal Coverage
Three additional filters were likely at work:
1. Hate-figure deplatforming rule
Major outlets often avoid giving attention to designated extremists. They report only what is necessary (e.g., a police shooting) without amplifying the individual’s narrative or framing them as a victim.
2. No institutional allies
Mainstream political figures have networks—media allies, party infrastructure, aligned commentators—who push stories upward. Fuentes has none of these.
3. Ideological distance
Many journalists view Fuentes as outside the acceptable political spectrum. As a result, there is no instinct to protect him or treat him as a figure whose safety carries wider institutional implications.

Conclusion
An incident that objectively resembles an attempted targeted killing—an armed individual calling the resident by name at midnight, immediately after a killing spree—was treated as a brief, local oddity rather than a national security story.
Changing only the name on the doorbell camera would almost certainly have changed the entire media response, including immediate labeling as an “assassination attempt,” regardless of investigative findings.