Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Cartoon reminds me of Trump  (Read 5602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Conspiracy_Factist

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
  • Reputation: +157/-19
  • Gender: Male
Cartoon reminds me of Trump
« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2016, 06:52:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Matto
    I think Trump is the best of the candidates, but I am not voting. As for David Duke endorsing him, the only encounter I have had with Dr. Duke was when I watched him debating Alex Jones. He came across to me as an intelligent likeable guy though I don't support much of what I know that the KKK has done in the past.


    No matter what they are or aren't / were or weren't, you simply don't associate with the KKK in the 21st century unless you are, in fact, racist. Whether or not they currently promote racism is rather irrelevant as it is what they are known for and there's no rewriting history at this point.

    I think the fastest route to another Clinton as president would be to vote for Trump in the primary because I think far too many on the Rep side of the isle wouldn't even bother to show up and vote for him. Did you read his Howard Stern comments? He speaks publicly and repeatedly about who he'd like to fornicate with, but can't bring himself to outright condemn Planned Parenthood or the KKK? The man is repulsive.
    for th
    you've fallen for the  mainstream media attack on Trump,hook line and sinker...as if he associates himself with the kkk lol, Dr Duke was in the kkk decades ago, Trump was right not to fall into their trap

    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2671
    • Reputation: +1684/-444
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #16 on: March 01, 2016, 08:04:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Centroamerica

    I've given this a deal of thought. I'll be voting for Trump if he wins the republican ticket. At first I thought the wall was stupid and archaic. It didn't solve the problem of people who overstay their visas. But this issue has been discussed also. The fact is is that the wall will be beneficial to narco infested Mexico. Mexican drug lords push their drugs across the border and get their guns and ammunition in return. The wall is needed. Plus if they put better practices in place for stopping and tracking those who overstay visas and better e-verify to workplace docuмents, the problem will be greatly alleviated. This would mean that Americans might have to update their last early 1900s form of identification...i.e. Social security cards will likely have chips and fingerprints like every other nation on the planet.

    There is one candidate that is ballsy enough to say that mohemedans should be stopped from entering the US. You won't see that again. I think people should definitely support him. He refuses to be bought. Did you see how he called out Jeb's donars in the audience? About time somebody called it like it is. I'm not saying he is going to do great things or that he is perfect, but he is better than the others.


    It's a sad state when I can't decide if you're being serious or not.

    I just went and cast my ballot for someone who:

    - is in favor of building the wall
    - is in favor of enforcing immigration laws and not granting blanket amnesty
    - is in favor of strengthening e-verify and tracking visa holders so they can be deported accordingly
    - is in favor of not allowing extreme Muslims into the US

    plus...

    - has never donated indiscriminately to every campaign in an attempt to "buy" them all
    - is realistic about the likelihood of successfully deporting 11 million people
    - doesn't make wild claims with no realistic plan of how they'll be achieved
    - doesn't degrade women with comments like "nice t**s, no brains"
    - is 100% against abortion and organizations which promote abortion

    No, he's not perfect either, but he's better than Donald Drumpf.

    As an added bonus, he's the only Republican candidate who isn't in favor of mandatory vaccinations.



    Those are good qualities, so I can agree with your decision. It is rational. I am being serious.

    On another note, Donald called Rosie a fatty or something. I don't hate him for it. He's not the most moral person, but not of the candidates are.

    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...


    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +1866/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #17 on: March 01, 2016, 08:31:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Centroamerica

    I've given this a deal of thought. I'll be voting for Trump if he wins the republican ticket. At first I thought the wall was stupid and archaic. It didn't solve the problem of people who overstay their visas. But this issue has been discussed also. The fact is is that the wall will be beneficial to narco infested Mexico. Mexican drug lords push their drugs across the border and get their guns and ammunition in return. The wall is needed. Plus if they put better practices in place for stopping and tracking those who overstay visas and better e-verify to workplace docuмents, the problem will be greatly alleviated. This would mean that Americans might have to update their last early 1900s form of identification...i.e. Social security cards will likely have chips and fingerprints like every other nation on the planet.

    There is one candidate that is ballsy enough to say that mohemedans should be stopped from entering the US. You won't see that again. I think people should definitely support him. He refuses to be bought. Did you see how he called out Jeb's donars in the audience? About time somebody called it like it is. I'm not saying he is going to do great things or that he is perfect, but he is better than the others.


    It's a sad state when I can't decide if you're being serious or not.

    I just went and cast my ballot for someone who:

    - is in favor of building the wall
    - is in favor of enforcing immigration laws and not granting blanket amnesty
    - is in favor of strengthening e-verify and tracking visa holders so they can be deported accordingly
    - is in favor of not allowing extreme Muslims into the US

    plus...

    - has never donated indiscriminately to every campaign in an attempt to "buy" them all
    - is realistic about the likelihood of successfully deporting 11 million people
    - doesn't make wild claims with no realistic plan of how they'll be achieved
    - doesn't degrade women with comments like "nice t**s, no brains"
    - is 100% against abortion and organizations which promote abortion

    No, he's not perfect either, but he's better than Donald Drumpf.

    As an added bonus, he's the only Republican candidate who isn't in favor of mandatory vaccinations.


    Kasich licks jew boots like all the rest.  But you have almost persuaded me that he's the best the GOP has to offer, so I may vote for him in the primary.  I would consider voting for Kasich, Cruz, or Trump this fall (probably in that order of preference now that you've caused me to take a closer look at Kasich).

    Trump doesn't have much going for him to start with and I fear that he would curtail our liberties on a whim.  I have about decided that Cruz is the establishment's "maverick," and that the NWO/Zionist GOP's plan has been a ticket with some combination of Bush/Rubio/Cruz all along.  Kasich is clearly establishment, but almost as clearly not their first choice.

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +1866/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #18 on: March 01, 2016, 10:11:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Centroamerica

    I've given this a deal of thought. I'll be voting for Trump if he wins the republican ticket. At first I thought the wall was stupid and archaic. It didn't solve the problem of people who overstay their visas. But this issue has been discussed also. The fact is is that the wall will be beneficial to narco infested Mexico. Mexican drug lords push their drugs across the border and get their guns and ammunition in return. The wall is needed. Plus if they put better practices in place for stopping and tracking those who overstay visas and better e-verify to workplace docuмents, the problem will be greatly alleviated. This would mean that Americans might have to update their last early 1900s form of identification...i.e. Social security cards will likely have chips and fingerprints like every other nation on the planet.

    There is one candidate that is ballsy enough to say that mohemedans should be stopped from entering the US. You won't see that again. I think people should definitely support him. He refuses to be bought. Did you see how he called out Jeb's donars in the audience? About time somebody called it like it is. I'm not saying he is going to do great things or that he is perfect, but he is better than the others.


    It's a sad state when I can't decide if you're being serious or not.

    I just went and cast my ballot for someone who:

    - is in favor of building the wall
    - is in favor of enforcing immigration laws and not granting blanket amnesty
    - is in favor of strengthening e-verify and tracking visa holders so they can be deported accordingly
    - is in favor of not allowing extreme Muslims into the US

    plus...

    - has never donated indiscriminately to every campaign in an attempt to "buy" them all
    - is realistic about the likelihood of successfully deporting 11 million people
    - doesn't make wild claims with no realistic plan of how they'll be achieved
    - doesn't degrade women with comments like "nice t**s, no brains"
    - is 100% against abortion and organizations which promote abortion

    No, he's not perfect either, but he's better than Donald Drumpf.

    As an added bonus, he's the only Republican candidate who isn't in favor of mandatory vaccinations.


    Here is Kasich's National Security team:

    https://johnkasich.com/nationalsecuritygroup/

    I recognize some names from the Bush administrations.  Get ready to fight more kike wars if he gets elected.

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 5663
    • Reputation: +4416/-107
    • Gender: Female
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #19 on: March 02, 2016, 01:25:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
     Get ready to fight more kike wars if he gets elected.


    I don't think there are any Republican's left that this doesn't apply to.

    With Rubio you get US troops on the ground in Syria.
    With Cruz you get carpet bombing.
    With Drumpf, ISIS mothers, fathers, wives and children get taken out too... bring on the war crimes!

    You might have a chance with Carson. I don't know what his plan is.


    Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 5663
    • Reputation: +4416/-107
    • Gender: Female
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #20 on: March 02, 2016, 02:50:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Conspiracy_Factist
    Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Matto
    I think Trump is the best of the candidates, but I am not voting. As for David Duke endorsing him, the only encounter I have had with Dr. Duke was when I watched him debating Alex Jones. He came across to me as an intelligent likeable guy though I don't support much of what I know that the KKK has done in the past.


    No matter what they are or aren't / were or weren't, you simply don't associate with the KKK in the 21st century unless you are, in fact, racist. Whether or not they currently promote racism is rather irrelevant as it is what they are known for and there's no rewriting history at this point.

    I think the fastest route to another Clinton as president would be to vote for Trump in the primary because I think far too many on the Rep side of the isle wouldn't even bother to show up and vote for him. Did you read his Howard Stern comments? He speaks publicly and repeatedly about who he'd like to fornicate with, but can't bring himself to outright condemn Planned Parenthood or the KKK? The man is repulsive.
    for th
    you've fallen for the  mainstream media attack on Trump,hook line and sinker...as if he associates himself with the kkk lol, Dr Duke was in the kkk decades ago, Trump was right not to fall into their trap


    The Speaker of the House thought this issue was serious enough to call him out on it. Is he mainstream media too?

    http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/03/01/paul-ryan-donald-trump-kkk-controversy-st.cnn/video/playlists/donald-trump/

    "I've also said that when I see something that runs contrary to who we are as a party and as a country, I will speak up. So, today I want to be very clear about something. If a person wants to be a nominee of the Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games. They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people's prejudices.  ... This is fundamental and if someone wants to be our nominee, they must understand this. I hope this is the last time I need to speak out on this race."

    Offline Centroamerica

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2671
    • Reputation: +1684/-444
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #21 on: March 02, 2016, 04:31:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: OHCA
     Get ready to fight more kike wars if he gets elected.


    I don't think there are any Republican's left that this doesn't apply to.

    With Rubio you get US troops on the ground in Syria.
    With Cruz you get carpet bombing.
    With Drumpf, ISIS mothers, fathers, wives and children get taken out too... bring on the war crimes!

    You might have a chance with Carson. I don't know what his plan is.




    Carson is an absolute idiot who said he would start war with Russia to please the joos. I hope Trump gets in...

    Two must see videos.




    We conclude logically that religion can give an efficacious and truly realistic answer to the great modern problems only if it is a religion that is profoundly lived, not simply a superficial and cheap religion made up of some vocal prayers and some ceremonies...

    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +1866/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #22 on: March 02, 2016, 04:32:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: OHCA
     Get ready to fight more kike wars if he gets elected.


    I don't think there are any Republican's left that this doesn't apply to.

    With Rubio you get US troops on the ground in Syria.
    With Cruz you get carpet bombing.
    With Drumpf, ISIS mothers, fathers, wives and children get taken out too... bring on the war crimes!

    You might have a chance with Carson. I don't know what his plan is.


    Good point.  I am getting closer everyday to writing in Buchanan in November.


    Offline OHCA

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +1866/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #23 on: March 02, 2016, 04:43:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Conspiracy_Factist
    Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Matto
    I think Trump is the best of the candidates, but I am not voting. As for David Duke endorsing him, the only encounter I have had with Dr. Duke was when I watched him debating Alex Jones. He came across to me as an intelligent likeable guy though I don't support much of what I know that the KKK has done in the past.


    No matter what they are or aren't / were or weren't, you simply don't associate with the KKK in the 21st century unless you are, in fact, racist. Whether or not they currently promote racism is rather irrelevant as it is what they are known for and there's no rewriting history at this point.

    I think the fastest route to another Clinton as president would be to vote for Trump in the primary because I think far too many on the Rep side of the isle wouldn't even bother to show up and vote for him. Did you read his Howard Stern comments? He speaks publicly and repeatedly about who he'd like to fornicate with, but can't bring himself to outright condemn Planned Parenthood or the KKK? The man is repulsive.
    for th
    you've fallen for the  mainstream media attack on Trump,hook line and sinker...as if he associates himself with the kkk lol, Dr Duke was in the kkk decades ago, Trump was right not to fall into their trap


    The Speaker of the House thought this issue was serious enough to call him out on it. Is he mainstream media too?

    http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/03/01/paul-ryan-donald-trump-kkk-controversy-st.cnn/video/playlists/donald-trump/

    "I've also said that when I see something that runs contrary to who we are as a party and as a country, I will speak up. So, today I want to be very clear about something. If a person wants to be a nominee of the Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games. They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people's prejudices.  ... This is fundamental and if someone wants to be our nominee, they must understand this. I hope this is the last time I need to speak out on this race."


    Of course he spoke out--yet another ploy for the establishment to try to derail Trump.  I am not a Trump fan by a long shot.  But, for whatever reason, he has the establishment going nuts.  So the establishment's Speaker denouncing him means absolutely nothing to me.  On top of that, the Speaker used NWO code-speak.

    Offline MyrnaM

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6273
    • Reputation: +3629/-347
    • Gender: Female
      • Myforever.blog/blog
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #24 on: March 02, 2016, 08:25:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I promise I am not plugging Trump, I confess I am just as confused as anyone here but I enjoy this guy's videos, don't agree with all he says by no means but he always makes interesting points.

    Thought I would put this link just for interest:

    Please pray for my soul.
    R.I.P. 8/17/22

    My new blog @ https://myforever.blog/blog/

    Offline Conspiracy_Factist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 598
    • Reputation: +157/-19
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #25 on: March 02, 2016, 05:24:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MyrnaM
    I promise I am not plugging Trump, I confess I am just as confused as anyone here but I enjoy this guy's videos, don't agree with all he says by no means but he always makes interesting points.

    Thought I would put this link just for interest:


    there shouldn't be any confusion ,it's either you vote Trump or stay at home, I don't get my hopes high,if he starts to do what he's promising he will eventually be taken out ,just like Kennedy


    Offline CWA

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 98
    • Reputation: +124/-3
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #26 on: March 02, 2016, 05:44:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    A Final (I think) Few Remarks on Voting as a Moral Act
    BY Mark Shea
     Posted 12/16/11 at 1:00 AM

     

    Just a couple of things, prompted by some interesting and reasonable remarks by various readers.  First, one reader objects to my proposition that how voting changes the voter is vastly more significant than how the voter’s vote changes the outcome of an election:

       
    Quote
    If everyone thought about voting the way you do, then the worst candidates would always win elections.  The pure of heart would never vote.  Would the sacrifice of the widow in any possible scenario end with that result?


    I don’t see how my reader’s logic makes any sense.  First, of course, it relies on the perpetual straw man being advanced throughout this argument: that the refusal to support grave intrinsic evils worthy of the everlasting fires of hell is to demand “purity of heart” from a candidate.  That is, I repeat, rubbish.  It is not “perfectionism” to demand that we not be asked to support grave evil.  It is absolute bare minimum human decency.  I’m not looking to elect St. Francis of Assisi.  I’m looking to not be asked to put my soul at risk for everlasting damnation.  No matter how it’s spun, I do not believe I should take my puny penny of choice and give it to the service of grave evil that Mother Church warns is worthy of the fires of hell.  And frankly, if everyone thought the way I do, we would not be stuck with the utterly dreadful Ruling class we have because we would not stand for being manipulated into a perpetual choice between two parties who try to force us to support their preferred grave evil, all while scheming to strip the rest of us of our most basic civil rights.  It is nonsense to say that an electorate intolerant of grave evil would produce a political class committed to grave evil, just as it is nonsense to say that a political class committed to supporting grave evil will produce a virtuous or happy civilization.  Good trees bear good fruit and bad trees bear bad fruit, as our increasingly corrupt civilization attests with eloquence.

    My reader continues:

     
    Quote
     You can’t pretend that voting is just about your soul, Mr. Shea, though it undoubtedly is about that.  You make a good point.  But focusing on yourself in this situation is not the Catholic way.  And getting involved in societal change at the grassroots, or whatever you believe to be the ‘real’ way society gets better [perhaps some presumption there on your part?] is not a reason to elide doing your part to make it better in a ‘macro’ way, so to speak, also.

        I believe the catechism urges us to vote as part of our responsibility as citizens.


    I don’t pretend that voting is just about my soul.  It is, obviously, a public act ordered toward our relationship with the state. But to characterize voting one’s conscience as “focusing on yourself” is a radically poor understanding of the act.  The focus is not on self when voting one’s conscience.  It is, at least for a well-formed Christian, on God as all moral acts are.  The counsel of Christ to a paganized world seeking such things as power, winning, control, food, shelter, money (which is largely what politics concerns itself with) is this:

       
    Quote
    Therefore do not be anxious, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the Gentiles seek all these things; and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well.  (Matthew 6:31-33)


    Seeking first his kingdom means, among other things, not allowing the desire for power or winning to predominate over anything God absolutely forbids—such as grave moral evil.  ... it is clear that we cannot under any circuмstances support a gravely and intrinsically immoral act.  What we may do ... is support a candidate who supports a gravely and intrinsically immoral act if, in doing so, we are not supporting the grave evil he supports, but trying to support some proportionate good.  We are not bound to support such a candidate and, if there is no proportionate good, we are bound not to support such a candidate.

    So here’s the deal: I see no proportionate good in supporting candidates from either party who support grave evil.  I do, however, see a proportionate good in refraining from voting should no candidate appear on the ballot who does not advocate grave evil.  Why?  Because while my vote, as a public act, does have an infinitesmally small effect on the outcome of an election (much as an air molecule has an infinitesmally small effect on an oncoming train) the overwhelmingly large impact my vote has is on me.  That’s not “focusing on myself”.  That’s focusing on God and my duty to obey him.  The notion that politics is the “real” way a society gets better, and that the actions of individuals acting in obedience to God is somehow vaguely self-centered, or narcissistic, or unrelated to the common good is one of the more curious ways that Catholic teaching has been supplanted by the groupthink and power politics of the postmodern era.  The world was not changed by the early Church jockeying for political power and disobeying their consciences in order to play ball with corrupt powers and “win”.  It was changed and healed by people who sought first the kingdom and refused to play ball by doing such “minor” compromises as offering a pinch of incense to Caesar—even at the cost of their lives. When Caesar stops asking me to do things that are directly repugnant to the teaching of the Church, I will happily play ball.  Lots of life is negotiable.  But grave intrinsic evil is not negotiable and I will have to give an account of my soul for how I acted when some political player asked me to back him as he sought to do things I know are evil.

    Another reader remarks:

    Quote
       When a dear, pious, and prayerful friend of mine in the throes of very nearly this same discussion threw up her hands in exasperation and said, “What should we do? Just sit at home and pray?” I knew I’d found a worm in our hearts.


    I hear you. Just as I find it extremely ominous that Christians keep talking as though “not wanting to go to hell” is the height of fussy prissy perfectionism, so I find it astounding to hear Christians talk as though politics is the primary way of salvation while prayer, trust in God, and obedience to conscience are the last, not the first, resort.  We don’t come out and say it (partly because we aren’t fully aware we think this way and partly because we dimly sense that if we said it out loud we would realize how faithless it really is) but many of us have deeply internalized the conviction that piety is fine for ineffectual types without the ruthlessness to get dirty and get the job done, but the *real* action is in the political arena. In the same way, all the stuff which suggests that voting one’s conscience and refusing to cooperate with evil is narcissistic makes it clear that the whole concept “seek first his kingdom and his righteousness and all these things will be added to you” is, at bottom, disbelieved by not a few Christians. The pressure to play ball with corrupt power and not make waves with “selfish, perfectionist” desires to not commit sin worthy of hell is portrayed as “realism”, when in fact, it is the height of unrealism to think one vote out of 50 million has any more power to change the outcome of an election. My vote will not change a national election, but it will change me. That’s hard-headed realism.  And if enough voters start to embrace that realism and seek first his kingdom, instead of seeking first “winning”, we will see a real change for the better in our political climate.

    Copyright © 2013 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6712
    • Reputation: +3085/-1600
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #27 on: March 02, 2016, 06:04:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: OHCA
    Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: Centroamerica

    I've given this a deal of thought. I'll be voting for Trump if he wins the republican ticket. At first I thought the wall was stupid and archaic. It didn't solve the problem of people who overstay their visas. But this issue has been discussed also. The fact is is that the wall will be beneficial to narco infested Mexico. Mexican drug lords push their drugs across the border and get their guns and ammunition in return. The wall is needed. Plus if they put better practices in place for stopping and tracking those who overstay visas and better e-verify to workplace docuмents, the problem will be greatly alleviated. This would mean that Americans might have to update their last early 1900s form of identification...i.e. Social security cards will likely have chips and fingerprints like every other nation on the planet.

    There is one candidate that is ballsy enough to say that mohemedans should be stopped from entering the US. You won't see that again. I think people should definitely support him. He refuses to be bought. Did you see how he called out Jeb's donars in the audience? About time somebody called it like it is. I'm not saying he is going to do great things or that he is perfect, but he is better than the others.


    It's a sad state when I can't decide if you're being serious or not.

    I just went and cast my ballot for someone who:

    - is in favor of building the wall
    - is in favor of enforcing immigration laws and not granting blanket amnesty
    - is in favor of strengthening e-verify and tracking visa holders so they can be deported accordingly
    - is in favor of not allowing extreme Muslims into the US

    plus...

    - has never donated indiscriminately to every campaign in an attempt to "buy" them all
    - is realistic about the likelihood of successfully deporting 11 million people
    - doesn't make wild claims with no realistic plan of how they'll be achieved
    - doesn't degrade women with comments like "nice t**s, no brains"
    - is 100% against abortion and organizations which promote abortion

    No, he's not perfect either, but he's better than Donald Drumpf.

    As an added bonus, he's the only Republican candidate who isn't in favor of mandatory vaccinations.


    Kasich licks jew boots like all the rest.  But you have almost persuaded me that he's the best the GOP has to offer, so I may vote for him in the primary.  I would consider voting for Kasich, Cruz, or Trump this fall (probably in that order of preference now that you've caused me to take a closer look at Kasich).

    Trump doesn't have much going for him to start with and I fear that he would curtail our liberties on a whim.  I have about decided that Cruz is the establishment's "maverick," and that the NWO/Zionist GOP's plan has been a ticket with some combination of Bush/Rubio/Cruz all along.  Kasich is clearly establishment, but almost as clearly not their first choice.

    Kasich is not only a Zionist boot-licker, but he also supports abortion in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is in danger.
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline Cera

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6712
    • Reputation: +3085/-1600
    • Gender: Female
    • Pray for the consecration of Russia to Mary's I H
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #28 on: March 02, 2016, 06:13:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Trump: will the powers-that-be destroy him?
    by Jon Rappoport
    February 22, 2016
    Trump.  He's for real.  No he isn't.  He means what he says.  No he doesn't.  He's a joke.  He's serious.  He's a liberator.  No, he's the next Mussolini.  He's sane and lucid.  He's off his rocker.  He cares about people.  He's a racist.  He'll take American back where it belongs.  He'll drive it over a cliff.

    Whatever you think about the man, his campaign has just acquired a new level of reality, after his victory in South Carolina.  And the people who were looking to destroy him have greater reason to pursue their goal.

    I'm not just talking about the Republican Party bosses.  I'm talking about the Rockefeller Globalists, who are watching Trump attack their trade treaties, as he vows to bring jobs back to America.  Those treaties are the Globalists' holy of holies.  They're portals to an emerging world of much deeper poverty and suffering---and as such they're vital to a new grotesque Globalist planetary order.

    Trump now has a straight shot at the Republican nomination.  Apparently, nothing he says, short of claiming God and Jesus are fairy tales, will affect his poll numbers.

    One line of attack against him would occur at the nominating convention.  If the GOP honchos, by hook or by crook, can keep Rubio and Cruz in the race, they might be able to enter the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, in July, with split numbers---no clear winner.  After that split vote holds up on the first ballot, all bets are off.  The brokers will move in and start making deals behind the scenes.  Delegates can switch their positions.  

    The main target would be Cruz.  Promise him the moon; get him to release his delegates and declare he favors Rubio, who is the GOP's man.  Rubio is who the Party bosses want.  

    But if Cruz stands firm, and if two or three more ballots fail to produce a winner, then the GOP would do a switch and tell Rubio that, for the sake of the Party, he has to fall on his sword and instruct his delegates to line up for Cruz.  In other words, the GOP will do anything to stop Trump, including losing the general election.  

    A scene like this at the Republican Convention would enter a new kind of hell.  Trump supporters, seeing the theft of the nomination in real time, ballot by ballot, would blow the roof off the Arena.  

    If Trump enters the Convention with the nomination locked up, or if he emerges the winner after a few ballots, the GOP will face a dilemma.  Should they back him to the hilt or back away, undermine him, and let Hillary demolish him in November?

    On his part, if Trump sees his own Party betraying him, he can go directly to the American people and tell them what's happening---and how this is clear evidence that the Republican GOP needs a complete overhaul---a feat he promises to accomplish.  Then, even if he loses the election, he'll become the de facto leader of his Party, and the bosses will feel his wrath.  This is what the GOP honchos fear most.  They can handle losing the election, but being thrown off the ramparts of their little fiefdoms and crashing on the rocks below, rattlesnake blood oozing from broken veins...that would be the ultimate devastation.

    Meanwhile, the Globalist elite are lining up and considering their options.  How about a straight assassination?  Donald has a heart attack in a hotel room.  Or at a ranch in Texas.  Probably better to choose another state.  Obviously, the uproar over a stolen nomination at the Quicken Arena would be nothing compared with the fallout from a hit.  The very pillars of the "democracy" would fracture.

    There is always an upside to chaos, from the Globalists' point of view, but other options may be open.

    If, by some miracle, he wins the nomination and the general election...

    A sit-down with Trump.  Now.  Just in case.  Explain to the man that trade treaties, once signed, can't be thrown in the trash.  They're legally binding.  As President, Trump would face unconquerable opposition on that front.  However, how about a deal?  Donald's strong suit.  Certain accommodations can be made.  Negotiations with China and Mexico, to gain a "somewhat more favorable trade balance" for the US.  Looks good, seems good, and it is good, in a limited context.  Nothing overtly radical.  But a political victory.  The trade treaties remain undisturbed.  NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, TPP are in place.  Bring some, but not many, manufacturing jobs back to the US.  A few mega-corporations will cooperate.  Again, looks good, seems good.  The press will issue compliments.

    Overall result?  Slightly more than cosmetic, far less than triumphant.

    "It's the best you can hope for, Donald.  You're a businessman.  You're, above all, sensible.  You can get something, or you can try for the moon and fall out of the sky and crash and get nothing.  Use your mentality, step up to reality."

    "As for the Big Wall along the Mexican border, you can put up a short piece of a wall, Donald.  A showpiece.  Great photo-op.  Mexico will pay for it, sort of.  You know how that works.  And then you can stem part of the flow of immigration.  Just enough to make a difference, if we massage the numbers.  You're good, we're good, it's a win-win, which is what every deal aims for."

    Understand that these Globalists can be very persuasive, because they're smart and reasonable, and they already hold many cards in the deck.  As with any major crime organization, they present "the client" his options, given the shape of the landscape in which they are the kings and the princes.

    It's a re-make of Godfather One.  Brando has mob power.  Given his position, he's a reasonable and generous and even caring man---as long as the supplicant comes to him with respect.  And if the supplicant himself is reasonable, so much the better.  

    Does Trump truly understand what being a populist means, according to a definition few men can fulfill?  It means going back to the people every time a bribe or compromise is offered to him and explaining it and denouncing it and rejecting it and demanding that the people support him, as he goes up against the Olympians of this world.  It means exposing the real art of the real deal.

    Is Trump that man?  Is it possible?  The Globalist crime bosses of deep politics have no doubts.  They're sure he isn't.  Why would he be?  His whole career has been based on wheeling and dealing to arrive at his objectives.  They see him as just another client.

    "All right, Donald, we can give a little on trade imbalances and immigration.  But look on the bright side.  You can command the Armed Forces.  Here's a list of targets you can bomb with impunity.  You can act tough and talk tough.  You can protect the security of the United States and ratchet up your poll numbers."

    I'm sketching these deals in order to reveal the difference between a real populist and a fake one.  There are almost no real ones in politics, because the price they have to pay is too high.  They have to return to the people, over and over, and tell them about all the temptations that are being laid out and offered on the golden table---compromises which will essentially change nothing, but instead will derail efforts at true reform.  Real populists would have to take their case, over and over, back to the people, and if necessary shatter the foundations of "political business as usual."

    They'd have to wear a real suit of armor and ride on a real horse.  

    They'd have to make a commitment that exceeds anything they ever imagined.

    There is campaign talk, election talk, and Presidential talk.  The first two are easy.  Even Presidential talk is easy for a sold-out occupant of the Oval Office.  He can do it in his sleep.  The script writes itself.  But when was the last time a true rebel took control of the White House?  When was the last time a man went up against the Globalists while wearing the mantle of Commander-in-Chief?

    If you don't understand Globalism, look at operations designed to look like humanitarian heraldry while decimating economies, cultures, traditions, health; while inducing broad chaos behind which a "new order" can emerge to "solve the unrest."

    Look, for example, at the fraudulent climate agenda (lowered energy production for the whole planet); the "migration wave" (a cuмulative chaos-inducer); the destruction of education systems (addled minds incapable of following a line of thought); medical care (kills 2.25 million people each decade in the US alone); "free trade" (allows mega-corporate plunderers to roam the world and wreak havoc on local producers and national economies).

    These and other operations are woven together to soften up the world population and make control far easier to implement, from above.
     
    Pray for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

    Offline CWA

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 98
    • Reputation: +124/-3
    • Gender: Male
    Cartoon reminds me of Trump
    « Reply #29 on: March 02, 2016, 06:22:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ann Barnhardt

    So you think a man who builds mirror ... skyscrapers and names them all after himself is cause for hope? Rilly?

    To say that watching people fawn over the psycho carnival barker Trump makes me nauseous with despair is putting it mildly.
    ...

    So, who said the following? I’ll give you forty-seven guesses:

    1) “I probably identify more as Democrat.”

    2) “I’ve been around for a long time. And it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans.”

    3) “Nancy — you’re the best. Congrats. [signature]”
    —Handwritten note to Speaker Nancy Peℓσѕι

    5) “I’m totally pro-choice.”

    6) “I want to see the abortion issue removed from politics. I believe it is a personal decision that should be left to the women and their doctors.”

    7) “I’m very liberal when it comes to health care. I believe in universal health care.”

    8) “The Canadian plan also helps Canadians live longer and healthier than Americans… We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan.”

    9) “By imposing a one-time 14.25 percent net-worth tax on the richest individuals and trusts, we can put America on sound financial footing for the next century.”

    10) “I think he [Obama] has a chance to go down as a great president.”


    Stumped?  I’ll give you a hint.  This person has donated over $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, and Hillary Clinton sat in the FRONT ROW of this person’s most recent wedding.

    I’d just like to also mention for the record the fact that we are all up-in-arms about Pope Francid and his Franboys getting ready to eviscerate the sacrament of marriage later this fall, but don’t even bat an eyelash when public figures have a string of ex-spouses.  I guess I’m just being completely unreasonable, unrealistic and… wait for it… IMMODERATE to expect any degree of intellectual consistency from anyone, ever.  After all, it’s a post-modern world, and the essence and battlecry of modernism is, “WE DON’T ACTUALLY BELIEVE WHAT WE BELIEVE!”

    So here’s the answer.  All of the quotes above are from the second coming of George Washington, or Constantine – oh, no wait.  The second coming of Constantine is Putin…

    …That developer of mirror... skyscrapers which he then names after himself, because that is so totally NOT indicative of anything even remotely problematic:



    The only function I would attend with Bill and/or Hillary Clinton, people who are rapists, murderers and guilty of capital crimes against humanity, would be their public executions.