As does Nicholas J. Fuentes as well.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Nicholas Fuentes called Charlie Kirk a “fellow traveler” fellow traveler as in fellow Freemason

Stop speculating. IF that was said (no source provided) Fuentes probably meant that he and Kirk were on the same page on many issues.

Thank you for sharing this.  I have no doubt Our Lady interceded for him.

Interceded for what?  That he should successfully pull off the hoax that is going to be used to suppress the True Faith?

Kirk is not dead.  That was as staged an event as I've ever seen, almost as blatant as the collapse of Building 7.  Evidence is overwhelming.  Yet the weak-minded who succuмb to emotion and the fabricated psychological trauma, having been set up by the rendering the American public a nation of effeminate snowflakery.  Even IF Kirk had been killed, why should everyone mourn as if he were some national hero, or even a martyr of the Catholic faith?  What did he do except take huge amounts of Jєωιѕн money to become wealthy and famous, and then sell out all that is good, even by the natural law, having shilled for the atrocities of the Jews and their genocide in Gaza.  AND perhaps Our Lady should intercede for his vocal rejection of of the Immaculate Conception where he said that he's never join a religious which held that she never sinned.

So, the entire point of this psy-op, the fake "martyrdom of Kirk", via the "Canonization of Kirk" ... is already manifesting itself.  Now, since they did not roll out some pasty they claimed was an Iranian or something, the Jews are playing a more subtle long game here, rather than a direct fαℓѕє fℓαg, since so many people are onto them now, and such an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg would be obvious.

Blondi here, one of the most wicked women I've ever beheld, who covered up for Epstein in Florida (while Acosta also was rewarded with a cabinet position for the same under Trump I), she was rewarded for it by the AG appointment, and now has been busily covering up for the child rapists in this new positions of hers also ... and today she TIPPED THEIR HAND regarding the intent behind this hoax and psy-op.

I predicted within a day or two that the point of this was so that they could leverage it to stop down on "αnтι-ѕємιтєs".  So, the first thing they started doing, and when I first picked up on the agenda, was to spread around these videos of Leftists not only celebrating the purported assassination of Kirk, but even calling for more of the same.  Now, while the latter certainly justifies intervention from law enforcement, what they're doing is extending it also to those who celebrated Kirk's assassination, and because people had been subjected to the psychological trauma of seeing the blood pack spew out about a pint of red liquid within seconds, nearly everyone has gotten behind "rounding up" those who celebrated Kirk's demise.  And the next step will be to round up any who oppose the crap that Kirk was promoting, i.e. those who called out Kirk for his promotion of the genocide, creating this association of "if you are opposed to the Jew genocide, then you are FOR the assassination of Kirk".

They've been playing this game of applying the fallacy of "strawman by false dichotomy" for a while, where they characterize those protesting Israel as "Pro Hamas demonstrators" and "pro terrorists", aka terrorist enablers and accomplices.  Trump was dutifully spewing those lies also.  They're just one step away from declaring "Anti-Semitism" an act of terrorism that would justify rounding up the "αnтι-ѕємιтєs", since they're the same types that would be in favor of murdering the Great and All-Powerful Kirk.  If you're against the genocide, then you're FOR murdering Kirk and therefore a violent terrorist and need to be rounded up.  That's where they're going with this, and the dumbed down moronic American public are going along with it, as usual.  They didn't spend decades dumbing down the population for nothing.

Then there was that horrid Robbie-Parker-esque performance by the "grieving widow" Erika, where she's smiling, chuckling, engaging in pathetic over-dramatization, these fake whispers, and then after beginning her address to the corporate board (not, not to her family, or extended family, or the public for their prayers ... but to one board member after another called out by name), but after beginning by smiling and even laughing, she does a sudden snap into "sad face" that was so forced that it looked eerily like the abrupt Robbie Parker transition.  Relating the story of what she told her daughter about Charlie, she said her response, after claiming he was on some extended "mission for Jesus", was ... "your blueberry allowance is safe".  So ... the first thing you worry about is some stupid allowance, where they'll have more money than they'll ever know what to do with now?  Then when she was denouncing "they" who killed Charlie ... interesting that she used the plural when TPTB keep saying it was a lone wolf ... and threatening "them" with retribution, she had a look on her face, not of determination, but of an almost-diabolical hatred.  And, then thing is, she undoubtedly means by the "they" who killed [sic] Charlie those who disagree with his cause, namely, his shilling for Israel.

Israel has been BADLY losing the information war, since they could only tell people so long that the deliberate murder of infants and toddlers, and using pregnant women as target practice while laughing about it ... represents a moral righteousness that God will "bless" if you bless it, they could only say that so long before EVERYBODY with two brain cells and even a shred of humanity wouldn't buy that crap anymore and realized what a bunch of wicked demons they are.  They overplayed their hand, as admitted by a lot of the propagandists like the ADL, and so they're in trouble and needed to find a way to shut down "Anti-Semitism".

Now this tactic also reveals who the culprits behind it were, since they've played that game for decades now, where ... if you're against Jew war crimes, then you are "FOR the h0Ɩ0cαųst".  Same tactic of the strawman by false dichotomy slander that they're employing now, so we see that their fingerprints are all over this one, but, as I said, in a much more subtle way, since an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg would be recognized immediately.

So THIS is why they made this crap up.  AND we're already seeing, after they release the videos of people celebrating Kirk's death and calling for more of the same, they're actually going around getting people fired who are not only explicitly celebrating the "killing of Kirk" but people who are critical of Kirk and his positions.  I've had a couple people tell me directly, in person, face to face, that they're afraid of posting anything negative about Kirk on social media or on X.  Thus we see this operation having its intended effect.  Even if you don't round up millions of people who oppose the genocide, at the very least, this is a first step toward re-establishing the fear via this chilling effect on criticism of the Jew genocide.  Most people don't know, either, since this has been a distraction, that the Jews escalated their butchering of the people in Gaza.

So, the propaganda here that's a very subtle (and brilliant) misdirection here is that Kirk was αssαssιnαtҽd (by Israel) for having "turned on them", due to one or two mealy-mouthed weakly-worded "criticisms" of Israel, and more propaganda from the paid shill Candace Owens about his having turned down a large payout.  But if you look at the clips they submit as evidence, Kirk is doing absolutely no such thing.  In the one with Shapiro, he's basically pleading for help and saying, "Dude, nobody's buying this crap I'm selling anymore, but realize it's an obvious genocide, help me out here and give me something to work with."  Shapiro's expression, which some people claim is anger, looks more to me like disgust over Kirk's incompetence and "neediness", where a school might hire a math teacher, who then goes to the office very day with stuff like, "hey, this x+5=10 ... help me out here, how do I solve it."  That's the kind of reaction I see on Shapiro.  But, more than that, the entire rogue's gallery of Jew shills were at the same time making the exact same (weak) criticisms of Israel, but subtly redirecting it by blaming it on Netanyahu (rather than on Israel and Jews), whom many Israelis can't stand either.  So they gave them a short list of talking points they were green-lighted to attack Israel for.  Why?  Because they realized that their crap had become so transparent that everybody had come to realize that they were paid shills and liars, and thus they were quickly losing any effectiveness as gate-keepers.  But when they started this criticism of Bibi and Israel, they were able to rein their followers back in with "Hey, he can't be a Jєωιѕн- and Mossad- paid shill, since a shill would not say such things."  Jones went to far as to say, "we all know Israel had a big role in 9/11 but were just too afraid to say so".  I thought that Hell had frozen over.  Now, once they have re-established their "street cred" as NOT being Israeli shills, they have started to very slowly walk it back and resume their gate-keeping propaganda against Israel ... so taking a step backwards in order to take 3-4 forward.  That's EXACTLY the same stunt they pulled with the Trump fake assassination attempt, where those of his base who had wavered after Trump got exposed for the operative that he was, Agent Orange, during his first term, he was able to suck them back in, where both Alex Jones and even Mike Adams went on the air almost immediately saying (nearly verbatim), "I disagreed with a lot of what Trump did in his first term, but that's all out the window now.  Deep State just tried to kill him.  We HAVE to get him into the White House in November." ... and so they did.  It worked.

So, then, Blodi Beelzebub today finally began tipping their hand regarding the purpose of this psy-op, exactly as I had predicted.

Enjoy --

https://x.com/i/status/1967795745563771283

Interceded for what?  That he should successfully pull off the hoax that is going to be used to suppress the True Faith?

Kirk is not dead.  That was as staged an event as I've ever seen, almost as blatant as the collapse of Building 7.  Evidence is overwhelming.  Yet the weak-minded who succuмb to emotion and the fabricated psychological trauma, having been set up by the rendering the American public a nation of effeminate snowflakery.  Even IF Kirk had been killed, why should everyone mourn as if he were some national hero, or even a martyr of the Catholic faith?  What did he do except take huge amounts of Jєωιѕн money to become wealthy and famous, and then sell out all that is good, even by the natural law, having shilled for the atrocities of the Jews and their genocide in Gaza.  AND perhaps Our Lady should intercede for his vocal rejection of of the Immaculate Conception where he said that he's never join a religious which held that she never sinned.

So, the entire point of this psy-op, the fake "martyrdom of Kirk", via the "Canonization of Kirk" ... is already manifesting itself.  Now, since they did not roll out some pasty they claimed was an Iranian or something, the Jews are playing a more subtle long game here, rather than a direct fαℓѕє fℓαg, since so many people are onto them now, and such an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg would be obvious.

Blondi here, one of the most wicked women I've ever beheld, who covered up for Epstein in Florida (while Acosta also was rewarded with a cabinet position for the same under Trump I), she was rewarded for it by the AG appointment, and now has been busily covering up for the child rapists in this new positions of hers also ... and today she TIPPED THEIR HAND regarding the intent behind this hoax and psy-op.

I predicted within a day or two that the point of this was so that they could leverage it to stop down on "αnтι-ѕємιтєs".  So, the first thing they started doing, and when I first picked up on the agenda, was to spread around these videos of Leftists not only celebrating the purported assassination of Kirk, but even calling for more of the same.  Now, while the latter certainly justifies intervention from law enforcement, what they're doing is extending it also to those who celebrated Kirk's assassination, and because people had been subjected to the psychological trauma of seeing the blood pack spew out about a pint of red liquid within seconds, nearly everyone has gotten behind "rounding up" those who celebrated Kirk's demise.  And the next step will be to round up any who oppose the crap that Kirk was promoting, i.e. those who called out Kirk for his promotion of the genocide, creating this association of "if you are opposed to the Jew genocide, then you are FOR the assassination of Kirk".

They've been playing this game of applying the fallacy of "strawman by false dichotomy" for a while, where they characterize those protesting Israel as "Pro Hamas demonstrators" and "pro terrorists", aka terrorist enablers and accomplices.  Trump was dutifully spewing those lies also.  They're just one step away from declaring "Anti-Semitism" an act of terrorism that would justify rounding up the "αnтι-ѕємιтєs", since they're the same types that would be in favor of murdering the Great and All-Powerful Kirk.  If you're against the genocide, then you're FOR murdering Kirk and therefore a violent terrorist and need to be rounded up.  That's where they're going with this, and the dumbed down moronic American public are going along with it, as usual.  They didn't spend decades dumbing down the population for nothing.

Then there was that horrid Robbie-Parker-esque performance by the "grieving widow" Erika, where she's smiling, chuckling, engaging in pathetic over-dramatization, these fake whispers, and then after beginning her address to the corporate board (not, not to her family, or extended family, or the public for their prayers ... but to one board member after another called out by name), but after beginning by smiling and even laughing, she does a sudden snap into "sad face" that was so forced that it looked eerily like the abrupt Robbie Parker transition.  Relating the story of what she told her daughter about Charlie, she said her response, after claiming he was on some extended "mission for Jesus", was ... "your blueberry allowance is safe".  So ... the first thing you worry about is some stupid allowance, where they'll have more money than they'll ever know what to do with now?  Then when she was denouncing "they" who killed Charlie ... interesting that she used the plural when TPTB keep saying it was a lone wolf ... and threatening "them" with retribution, she had a look on her face, not of determination, but of an almost-diabolical hatred.  And, then thing is, she undoubtedly means by the "they" who killed [sic] Charlie those who disagree with his cause, namely, his shilling for Israel.

Israel has been BADLY losing the information war, since they could only tell people so long that the deliberate murder of infants and toddlers, and using pregnant women as target practice while laughing about it ... represents a moral righteousness that God will "bless" if you bless it, they could only say that so long before EVERYBODY with two brain cells and even a shred of humanity wouldn't buy that crap anymore and realized what a bunch of wicked demons they are.  They overplayed their hand, as admitted by a lot of the propagandists like the ADL, and so they're in trouble and needed to find a way to shut down "Anti-Semitism".

Now this tactic also reveals who the culprits behind it were, since they've played that game for decades now, where ... if you're against Jew war crimes, then you are "FOR the h0Ɩ0cαųst".  Same tactic of the strawman by false dichotomy slander that they're employing now, so we see that their fingerprints are all over this one, but, as I said, in a much more subtle way, since an obvious fαℓѕє fℓαg would be recognized immediately.

So THIS is why they made this crap up.  AND we're already seeing, after they release the videos of people celebrating Kirk's death and calling for more of the same, they're actually going around getting people fired who are not only explicitly celebrating the "killing of Kirk" but people who are critical of Kirk and his positions.  I've had a couple people tell me directly, in person, face to face, that they're afraid of posting anything negative about Kirk on social media or on X.  Thus we see this operation having its intended effect.  Even if you don't round up millions of people who oppose the genocide, at the very least, this is a first step toward re-establishing the fear via this chilling effect on criticism of the Jew genocide.  Most people don't know, either, since this has been a distraction, that the Jews escalated their butchering of the people in Gaza.

So, the propaganda here that's a very subtle (and brilliant) misdirection here is that Kirk was αssαssιnαtҽd (by Israel) for having "turned on them", due to one or two mealy-mouthed weakly-worded "criticisms" of Israel, and more propaganda from the paid shill Candace Owens about his having turned down a large payout.  But if you look at the clips they submit as evidence, Kirk is doing absolutely no such thing.  In the one with Shapiro, he's basically pleading for help and saying, "Dude, nobody's buying this crap I'm selling anymore, but realize it's an obvious genocide, help me out here and give me something to work with."  Shapiro's expression, which some people claim is anger, looks more to me like disgust over Kirk's incompetence and "neediness", where a school might hire a math teacher, who then goes to the office very day with stuff like, "hey, this x+5=10 ... help me out here, how do I solve it."  That's the kind of reaction I see on Shapiro.  But, more than that, the entire rogue's gallery of Jew shills were at the same time making the exact same (weak) criticisms of Israel, but subtly redirecting it by blaming it on Netanyahu (rather than on Israel and Jews), whom many Israelis can't stand either.  So they gave them a short list of talking points they were green-lighted to attack Israel for.  Why?  Because they realized that their crap had become so transparent that everybody had come to realize that they were paid shills and liars, and thus they were quickly losing any effectiveness as gate-keepers.  But when they started this criticism of Bibi and Israel, they were able to rein their followers back in with "Hey, he can't be a Jєωιѕн- and Mossad- paid shill, since a shill would not say such things."  Jones went to far as to say, "we all know Israel had a big role in 9/11 but were just too afraid to say so".  I thought that Hell had frozen over.  Now, once they have re-established their "street cred" as NOT being Israeli shills, they have started to very slowly walk it back and resume their gate-keeping propaganda against Israel ... so taking a step backwards in order to take 3-4 forward.  That's EXACTLY the same stunt they pulled with the Trump fake assassination attempt, where those of his base who had wavered after Trump got exposed for the operative that he was, Agent Orange, during his first term, he was able to suck them back in, where both Alex Jones and even Mike Adams went on the air almost immediately saying (nearly verbatim), "I disagreed with a lot of what Trump did in his first term, but that's all out the window now.  Deep State just tried to kill him.  We HAVE to get him into the White House in November." ... and so they did.  It worked.

So, then, Blodi Beelzebub today finally began tipping their hand regarding the purpose of this psy-op, exactly as I had predicted.

Enjoy --

https://x.com/i/status/1967795745563771283

Thank you for posting this, very refreshing and spot on!

I have read your response in its entirety and have given it some thought.  However, I am honestly surprised at your not giving the benefit of the doubt to Charlie Kirk as you have with Archbishop Vigano or Kanye West.  I always admired your defense of souls possibly working out their salvation.  Is it so hard to believe Kirk was converting?  He was beginning to question Israel’s many wicked crimes and deeds.  He praised Our Lady.  But you seem to think he is hiding out somewhere?  I don’t buy it, but then, I do not have the time to comb through hours of conspiracy theories that are put out no doubt to divert attention away from truth.  I must comment on his wife though… she is probably going through shock and anger.  I think she has conducted herself well.  I was surprised how numb I was at the deaths of persons close to me right after they occurred.  Going through the trauma of seeing her husband killed (if that is what happened, and I believe it is) she is probably numb and plowing through, getting herself together, trying to be strong for her children and her country.

For what it’s worth, I do agree with your predictions with how this will play out, the laws against antisemitism, etc.  But this weak mind thinks he’s dead.

The Charlie Kirk character is dead, that we can agree, but Ladislaus prediction for what will roll out, is already being rolled out, and will most likely continue through the other controlled op Fuentes, (and then probably gets kirked)

Just curious!  Please present your strongest credible evidence that Fuentes is in your words a "controlled op."

Mat- it seems you are already fully submitted to and tied to the character of Fuentes, meaning anything I provide will cause a visceral reaction and you will only respond with emotionalism, there is plenty of users on this forum who have provided the evidence of Fuentes being an OP.