I used to like Owens, but she's been exposed as a controlled opposition gatekeeper.
So, she's allowed to be "αnтι-ѕємιтє" and even won some made-up award for "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year", that was obviously awarded to give her "street cred" as an "αnтι-ѕємιтє". So then, as a result, people think she's not controlled or working for some agenda.
After Ziopuppet Trump got elected, Owens went on Alex Jones to issue some quasi-solemn "warning" that Trump's cabinet was being infiltrated ... when it was Trump who was appointing all these scuм.
There are several different operations in play to insulate Trump from anything negative, and she's one of them. So, Trump allows Musk or Vance to go out there and take the heat for various unpopular anti-America-First agendas Trump is trying to push, so that THEY get associated with it, take the black eye, while Trump keeps a bit of distance to maintain the plausible deniability. "H-1B stuff? That's Musk who's behind that, not Trump." Musk took ALL the heat, venom, vitriol, and blame for that, while Trump stepped back and watched Musk getting beat up. This allows the MAGA-tard cult to continue to believe in their god Trump, where he can still be considered to be playing 10-D chess.
So, here, Owens is doing the same thing. If this "αnтι-ѕємιтє", nay, rather, "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" supports Trump and think that Zionists, neo-cons, and Deep State have just infiltrated his cabinet (by stealth, without his knowledge, much less involvement), then Trump must still be the "good guy" who's fighting Deep State, despite once again draining the swamp directly into his own administration and cabinet. If this "αnтι-ѕємιтє" supports Trump, then he CANNOT be a Zionist puppet.
It's pathetic. Yet must low-IQ morons are falling for it.
Recently, Vance floated the trial balloon of not pardoning the J6 protestors. He's boiling the frog here, starting with, "Well, the VIOLENT ones should not be pardoned." While suspicious, most Trumpsters might give in to that, "Well, I guess if they were violent and actually broke the law." Of course, their definition of violent will gradually slide, until those who merely acted in some threatening or menacing manner (subjectively determined) will not be released ... to the point that in the end 90% of them will remain political prisoners.
So, Vance, Musk, Owens, and some other appointments are being used as trial balloons, controlled opposition, gatekeepers, and as bad cops to his good cop, so that they can absorb the vitriol for any decisions that would be unpopular with an America-First base.
With this recent Macron thing, Owens is simply creating a diversion and a distraction (with the secondary benefit of getting more ratings due to the salacious nature of this "investigation"). Instead of focusing on much more important issues, like the impending fαℓѕє fℓαg to be blamed on Iran by the Ziopuppet Trump and his administration, she gets everyone distracted with this crap. Compared to those other issues, this is just meaningless Jerry-Springer-level nonsense. Who cares? So Macron's some kind of pervert. OK, we get that and already suspected/knew that. Most of the people who realize that his "significant other" is a man already know this without her "investigation", and the ones who don't already know it, well, 95% of them wouldn't care, and might actually consider it in his favor, that he's a tolerant / nice / kind / woke individual, and as for the "deception", they'd understand why he'd want to keep it under wraps to protect him-her from public scrutiny and abuse.