Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Candace Owens Opinions Please?  (Read 227035 times)

0 Members and 300 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Michaelknoxville

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 198
  • Reputation: +91/-129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
« Reply #150 on: Today at 04:46:25 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I looked at the video and in no way shape or form is she exposing the scamdemic.  She is laughing at left wingers claiming the virus is hitting the black Americans the hardest.  There is nothing in that video and I mean nothing where she questions the authenticity of the pandemic.  Separately as per quote, it sounds like Owens is questioning the financial motivation and you are only quoting a third party, not Owens herself.  Lastly, when and where did she shout from the rooftops, do not take the vaccine?
    Go back to that video and scroll down……. They list all of her twitter x doing exactly that exposing the scamdemic. You missed the page, you watched the video but you didn’t scroll down to get the story. The video was just one small portion of the article.

    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3412
    • Reputation: +2508/-439
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
    « Reply #151 on: Today at 04:50:26 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • She's going after the fαɢɢօts and the royal freak family in France for starters, that's more than 99 percent of " catholic" podcasters and " journalists out there, so that's good enough for me.

    And she's a woman with 4 kids who's taking on the entire judaic system, especially regarding israel and netanyahoo, to the point where their almost openly admitting they would assasinate her like kirk, that's a lot more than anyone on here is doing, until you personally put your ass on the line for your beliefs, you might want to consider that before you slam Owens for what she might have said or done in the past 


    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3412
    • Reputation: +2508/-439
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
    « Reply #152 on: Today at 04:58:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A lot of people and I mean a LOT of people dropped the ball om covid in the beginning,  there was so much misinformation out there it was insane, there are still many on here who believe the virus was a thing, other than a mind virus and global hoax and psyop.  I never heard her push the poke, actually she mocked it more than anything. A lot of people now , even ones that took the shot believe the vaxx was useless but can't wrap their brain around the virus was bs and still believe there was a " pandemic". ::)

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47684
    • Reputation: +28205/-5287
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
    « Reply #153 on: Today at 11:57:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • I'm less interested in years ago, since some people take longer than others to "wake up", but only the recent history, where she shilled for Trump and then clearly feigned surprise that he was appointing rabid MIGA types to his administration, sounding the "alarm" with an emergency announcement to Trump that his administration was being "infiltrated", and also acted surprised that Trump / Vance supported the genocide in Gaza (even though they made that quite clear during the campaing, while she ignored it then).  She ignored Trump's ties to the Jews, his support for the genocide, his ties to Epstein ... all of which should have been exposed by her investigations, but instead wasted everyone's time and created a distraction from these real issues by investigating ... the race of Kamala's grandmother.  Then, after having been apparently fired by Shapiro for Anti-Semitism, creating her backstory narrative, she came out of nowhere to win this "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" award that someone made up just to hand to her in order to establish some credibility, which she then used to do subtle gatekeeping for those who in fact had seen through the Jєωιѕн problem, a group whose numbers swelled by the millions during the genocide.

    Currently she's backing the "Israel killed Kirk" narrative, but that is in fact a very subtle misdirection, where it SOUNDS likes she's going after the Jews, and on the surface she is, but by doing this she is part of the move to re-establish the credibility of other gatekeepers out there after nobody was buying their crap anymore, since you can only try to sell that God will bless those who bless and curse those who curse ... IDF soldiers using pregnant women for target practice while laughing about it.  So they had to take a step back, begin issuing some criticisms of Israel, to re-establish any credibility whatsoever.  Otherwise, they're worthless to the cause.  At the same time that Kirk had allegedly gone rogue to "turn on" Israel, a number of the other Jew gatekeepers (like Alex Jones) were making the exact same criticisms, almost like that one montage during COVID times where you had dozens of news stations reading verbatim the same script.  They were allowed to make those criticisms for the reasons stated.  And that's where the Kirk psy-op comes in and the subtle gatekeeping by Owens.  You back the theory that Israel killed Kirk (Tyler Robinson patsy story was so ridiculous that they clearly meant it to sound ridiculous), but you back the Israel killed Kirk theory to reinforce the fact that these gatekeepers and shills for Israel were in fact legit turning on Israel and are not just controlled paid shills.  But you'll notice the very subtle redirection, where it was Netanyahu behind it, where he Tweeted his condolences within minutes, and allegedly had personally offered Kirk a huge donation to stay on board, one that Kirk allegedly turned down.  So when the dust settles, and the Jews send Bibi packing, all the Jєωιѕн crimes will be blamed on Scapegoat Bibi, so that the Jews can wash their hands of any responsibility, just like in the ceremony from which the term "scapegoat" derives.  And, in fact, Bibi is in real trouble right now in Israel, begging for pardon from corruption charges.  They're fake, and he'll be pardoned, but if they create the narrtive that thew Jews rose up to expel Bibi, then the trasnfer of blame and exonerations of Jews will be complete.

    So why would they do that, create a narrative that on the surface blames Israel?  Well, many millions have woken up to the Jews, so have gotten past that gate.  So they're targeting those.  You can't tell them that Israel is wonderful, since they've already broken through that gate, so you needed to establish higher-level gatekeepers, to subtly misdirect them, i.e. to Bibi.  And, since Owens has a big reach, at the same time she's serving as a "kookifier" to the non-initiated so that some people don't accidentally get turned into "αnтι-ѕємιтєs" by finding her gate.  That's where the "Macron's trying to αssαssιnαtҽ me" nonsense comes in.  She comes across as a nut job, and discredits the "Jews killed Kirk" theory, believing that it's the product of the same paranoid mind that imagined the Macron operation.  But I don't believe she's a straight "Kookifier" but had a mixed role, where those who buy into the idea that Macron's out to kill her are still being misdirected to Bibi by her antics.

    But the bottom line with Owens is that, and I'm surprised that people here on CI don't realize it ... NOBODY WHO IS ACTUALLY A THREAT TO THEM OR IS NOT CONTROLLED OR IS AT LEAST A USEFUL IDIOT SERVING THEIR PURPOSES SOMEHOW would every be permitted to get such a large audience and following by the Big Media and Big Tech that control things.  She'd have been shadow-banned into total obscurity, and if somehow that failed, discredited in some other way, or possibley even killed, before it ever got to this point.  These people have almost infinite resources and control and capabilities.  They could easily induce a fast-acting cancer to take her out, or even a heart-attack gun, or use various weapons they have to drive people insane ... they have almost limitless means to pull it off without drawing suspicion to themselves.  If their Tyler Robinson story is incredibly lame, it's lame by design, since they're evil but by no means stupid.  They KNEW that while might convince the most stupid of the lemmings, if everyone else "figured it out", it's because they were meant to, and they were meant to be misdirected in the manner explained above.  Just like with the Trump "assassination" stageplay, where if it became obvious it was a conspiracy, it was only because they meant it to become obvious.  They wanted people to conclude that Deep State just tried to kill Trump, which nearly everyone did, including mainstream types not otherwise prone to conspiracy thinking.  And that was to re-solidify Trump's skeptical base and get him elected.

    At the same time, interestingly, Bondi was using the Kirk psy-op to claim that we must shut down "hate speech", and "Anti-Semitism" in particular ... even though on the other side you had people claim that Kirk was killed precisely for BEING increasingly Anti-Semitic.  So they love using the same operation to have two opposite effects at the same time.

    What's building now is a fαℓѕє fℓαg attack on the US to be blamed on Muslims, to finish the misdirection away from anti-Jєωιѕн sentiment, to redirect it to Muslims again.  It's going to be quite horrific, and it'll traumatize the nation so much so that anyone who's anti-Israel will be rounded up and sent to Guatemala for supporting the terrorists.  They have long been playing that false dichtomy where if you protest against Israel's genocide, you're a "pro Hamas" protestor, or even that you're "for the terrorists".  That's ridiculous, but they've been preparing the programming.  So, then, after they pull off this next operation, αnтι-ѕємιтєs will be rounded up as enemy combatants who are aligned with the terrorists.  Israel's past atrocities will quickly be forgotten and we will once again unite with our "greatest ally", who's now squeaky clean too, having thrown that wicked Bibi off the cliff.

    Offline Michaelknoxville

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 198
    • Reputation: +91/-129
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
    « Reply #154 on: Today at 12:02:19 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm less interested in years ago, since some people take longer than others to "wake up", but only the recent history, where she shilled for Trump and then clearly feigned surprise that he was appointing rabid MIGA types to his administration, sounding the "alarm" with an emergency announcement to Trump that his administration was being "infiltrated", and also acted surprised that Trump / Vance supported the genocide in Gaza (even though they made that quite clear during the campaing, while she ignored it then).  She ignored Trump's ties to the Jews, his support for the genocide, his ties to Epstein ... all of which should have been exposed by her investigations, but instead wasted everyone's time and created a distraction from these real issues by investigating ... the race of Kamala's grandmother.  Then, after having been apparently fired by Shapiro for Anti-Semitism, creating her backstory narrative, she came out of nowhere to win this "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" award that someone made up just to hand to her in order to establish some credibility, which she then used to do subtle gatekeeping for those who in fact had seen through the Jєωιѕн problem, a group whose numbers swelled by the millions during the genocide.

    Currently she's backing the "Israel killed Kirk" narrative, but that is in fact a very subtle misdirection, where it SOUNDS likes she's going after the Jews, and on the surface she is, but by doing this she is part of the move to re-establish the credibility of other gatekeepers out there after nobody was buying their crap anymore, since you can only try to sell that God will bless those who bless and curse those who curse ... IDF soldiers using pregnant women for target practice while laughing about it.  So they had to take a step back, begin issuing some criticisms of Israel, to re-establish any credibility whatsoever.  Otherwise, they're worthless to the cause.  At the same time that Kirk had allegedly gone rogue to "turn on" Israel, a number of the other Jew gatekeepers (like Alex Jones) were making the exact same criticisms, almost like that one montage during COVID times where you had dozens of news stations reading verbatim the same script.  They were allowed to make those criticisms for the reasons stated.  And that's where the Kirk psy-op comes in and the subtle gatekeeping by Owens.  You back the theory that Israel killed Kirk (Tyler Robinson patsy story was so ridiculous that they clearly meant it to sound ridiculous), but you back the Israel killed Kirk theory to reinforce the fact that these gatekeepers and shills for Israel were in fact legit turning on Israel and are not just controlled paid shills.  But you'll notice the very subtle redirection, where it was Netanyahu behind it, where he Tweeted his condolences within minutes, and allegedly had personally offered Kirk a huge donation to stay on board, one that Kirk allegedly turned down.  So when the dust settles, and the Jews send Bibi packing, all the Jєωιѕн crimes will be blamed on Scapegoat Bibi, so that the Jews can wash their hands of any responsibility, just like in the ceremony from which the term "scapegoat" derives.  And, in fact, Bibi is in real trouble right now in Israel, begging for pardon from corruption charges.  They're fake, and he'll be pardoned, but if they create the narrtive that thew Jews rose up to expel Bibi, then the trasnfer of blame and exonerations of Jews will be complete.

    So why would they do that, create a narrative that on the surface blames Israel?  Well, many millions have woken up to the Jews, so have gotten past that gate.  So they're targeting those.  You can't tell them that Israel is wonderful, since they've already broken through that gate, so you needed to establish higher-level gatekeepers, to subtly misdirect them, i.e. to Bibi.  And, since Owens has a big reach, at the same time she's serving as a "kookifier" to the non-initiated so that some people don't accidentally get turned into "αnтι-ѕємιтєs" by finding her gate.  That's where the "Macron's trying to αssαssιnαtҽ me" nonsense comes in.  She comes across as a nut job, and discredits the "Jews killed Kirk" theory, believing that it's the product of the same paranoid mind that imagined the Macron operation.  But I don't believe she's a straight "Kookifier" but had a mixed role, where those who buy into the idea that Macron's out to kill her are still being misdirected to Bibi by her antics.

    But the bottom line with Owens is that, and I'm surprised that people here on CI don't realize it ... NOBODY WHO IS ACTUALLY A THREAT TO THEM OR IS NOT CONTROLLED OR IS AT LEAST A USEFUL IDIOT SERVING THEIR PURPOSES SOMEHOW would every be permitted to get such a large audience and following by the Big Media and Big Tech that control things.  She'd have been shadow-banned into total obscurity, and if somehow that failed, discredited in some other way, or possibley even killed, before it ever got to this point.  These people have almost infinite resources and control and capabilities.  They could easily induce a fast-acting cancer to take her out, or even a heart-attack gun, or use various weapons they have to drive people insane ... they have almost limitless means to pull it off without drawing suspicion to themselves.  If their Tyler Robinson story is incredibly lame, it's lame by design, since they're evil but by no means stupid.  They KNEW that while might convince the most stupid of the lemmings, if everyone else "figured it out", it's because they were meant to, and they were meant to be misdirected in the manner explained above.  Just like with the Trump "assassination" stageplay, where if it became obvious it was a conspiracy, it was only because they meant it to become obvious.  They wanted people to conclude that Deep State just tried to kill Trump, which nearly everyone did, including mainstream types not otherwise prone to conspiracy thinking.  And that was to re-solidify Trump's skeptical base and get him elected.

    At the same time, interestingly, Bondi was using the Kirk psy-op to claim that we must shut down "hate speech", and "Anti-Semitism" in particular ... even though on the other side you had people claim that Kirk was killed precisely for BEING increasingly Anti-Semitic.  So they love using the same operation to have two opposite effects at the same time.

    What's building now is a fαℓѕє fℓαg attack on the US to be blamed on Muslims, to finish the misdirection away from anti-Jєωιѕн sentiment, to redirect it to Muslims again.  It's going to be quite horrific, and it'll traumatize the nation so much so that anyone who's anti-Israel will be rounded up and sent to Guatemala for supporting the terrorists.  They have long been playing that false dichtomy where if you protest against Israel's genocide, you're a "pro Hamas" protestor, or even that you're "for the terrorists".  That's ridiculous, but they've been preparing the programming.  So, then, after they pull off this next operation, αnтι-ѕємιтєs will be rounded up as enemy combatants who are aligned with the terrorists.  Israel's past atrocities will quickly be forgotten and we will once again unite with our "greatest ally", who's now squeaky clean too, having thrown that wicked Bibi off the cliff.
    We’re not scared of it anymore. I’m not going to hide. I suck at hiding. I’m not going to pretend I can hide behind a vpn or any of this modern technology. We’re out in the open now shouting!!! They will have to Lock us all up or kick off a major war to stop us. We got the nations ear. I got no doubts they are in full panic mode
    to stop it and we don’t care! Lock us up
    torture us kill us or send us to the front lines. That’s a risk you have to be willing to take.


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47684
    • Reputation: +28205/-5287
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
    « Reply #155 on: Today at 12:24:30 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • We’re not scared of it anymore. I’m not going to hide. I suck at hiding. I’m not going to pretend I can hide behind a vpn or any of this modern technology. We’re out in the open now shouting!!! They will have to Lock us all up or kick off a major war to stop us. We got the nations ear. I got no doubts they are in full panic mode
    to stop it and we don’t care! Lock us up
    torture us kill us or send us to the front lines. That’s a risk you have to be willing to take.

    Meh, VPNs do nothing.  They know who all the "αnтι-ѕємιтєs" are already.