When I hear a prediction like this, I watch to see if it comes true, and if it doesn't, then I don't believe the person next time they make such a prediction. I think that's the only reasonable way to think about stuff like this, otherwise people are always wrong in their predictions and they somehow never lose any credibility, which I don't agree with.
Makes sense. So, first decision tree ... right or wrong? If wrong, then she's discredited, and perhaps the entire point of her going off the deep end re: Macron, and then this prediction ... was in fact to discredit her conspiracy theories against Israel. If she's right, the question remains open about the nature of her relationship to the sources feeding her this information.
Of course, with that said ... Alex Jones and some others make lots of predictions that don't pan out, but they keep on keeping on anyway.