Got one more:

Clone of Schlock

Thanks. Apparently Candace claims not to have had the V and was against mandates but I definitely don’t remember her speaking out at the time. 

Here she is in 2022 being attacked for "speaking out" against vaccines.

https://www.newsweek.com/candace-owens-remarks-pregnancy-vaccines-sparks-wild-debate-1809523

Type "Candace Owens voodoo" into your preferred search engine and you will discover that she reposted the video on her "Instagram Stories"

Unable to find this.

So, Owens posted on X that she has information regarding 9/11-style terror attack on the US during the second week of December.  Whether you think she's legit or an agent, it's worth watching, since she might be privy to such information in either case.

https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1994236827574608233

So, Owens posted on X that she has information regarding 9/11-style terror attack on the US during the second week of December.  Whether you think she's legit or an agent, it's worth watching, since she might be privy to such information in either case.

https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1994236827574608233

.

When I hear a prediction like this, I watch to see if it comes true, and if it doesn't, then I don't believe the person next time they make such a prediction. I think that's the only reasonable way to think about stuff like this, otherwise people are always wrong in their predictions and they somehow never lose any credibility, which I don't agree with.

When I hear a prediction like this, I watch to see if it comes true, and if it doesn't, then I don't believe the person next time they make such a prediction. I think that's the only reasonable way to think about stuff like this, otherwise people are always wrong in their predictions and they somehow never lose any credibility, which I don't agree with.

Makes sense.  So, first decision tree ... right or wrong?  If wrong, then she's discredited, and perhaps the entire point of her going off the deep end re: Macron, and then this prediction ... was in fact to discredit her conspiracy theories against Israel.  If she's right, the question remains open about the nature of her relationship to the sources feeding her this information.

Of course, with that said ... Alex Jones and some others make lots of predictions that don't pan out, but they keep on keeping on anyway.

Of course I found this same nobody youtuber; I am looking for factual information indicating that Candace Owens did what you allege.

No, you're not in fact "looking for factual information".  You beg the question regarding some of these heroes that you worship, from Trump to Owens, and anyone else ... and you're desperately attempting to debunk any and all criticisms of them.

If you were looking for factual information, you would find that she did repost the "voodoo" video, and you can find people defending her because ... the voodoo thing was a "joke", but that guy seemed pretty serious to me, and an actual devout Catholic (as she claims to be) wouldn't repost even a joke on that subject.  Now, the one thing you might argue would be that she didn't repost it personally, since she likely pays some staffers to manage these accounts.

It's just a question sometimes of putting together "dots", little pieces of circuмstantial evidence, including her sitting next to Kirk as both make the obvious Illuminati pyramid sign with their hands (quite clearly deliberate, since both of wouldn't have just accidentally or inadvertently done it) and repeatedy making the 6-6-6 hand gesture during her podcast.

But the bottom line is that if she were not at least a useful idiot, they simply wouldn't have allowed her to become this well know and have this big a reach.  Period.  That's the final "mic drop" on all these "influencers".

Of course I found this same nobody youtuber; I am looking for factual information indicating that Candace Owens did what you allege.

Right...if you are really interested in sleuthing it out, why don't you check out the Tiktok channel of the "voodoo granny" guy, find the original video, and check if the comments correspond to the screenshots I provided. 

The "heart" icon, with the number 46.8k, means that 46.8 thousand accounts "liked" that comment..the comment stating that Candace Owens shared the video on her IG Story. There appear to be many more comments to that effect on the voodoo video, saying that Candace shared it..many other tweets, Facebook posts, and YT videos saying she shared it

I also posted the screenshot which appears to show the voodoo video shared on Candace's IG Story..

What you will not find (and this is "good" for you, an excuse to justify your obstinacy), is the original "share" that Candace made of the Voodoo video. That is because putting something on your IG Story is a temporary thing. What you post to your IG Story only stays there for maybe 24 hours, or less. So all that is left as evidence is the countless people corroborating that she shared it to her IG Story, and a screenshot of her sharing it to her IG Story. But that of course is not sufficient evidence for Cera. It's just a mass psyop retcon