Excellent. I actually think that Stew Peters got him thinking along those lines by trying to get him to emphasize that angle, and had I been Mr. Giuffre, I would have emphasized that aspect to get more time with Stew, since we know that's 90% of his schtick, to go after Jews.
So, IMO, this is what Our Lady meant by the "errors of Russia". Jewry set up Communism precisely to go after the Church. Bella Dodd admitted to having placed over 1100 young men in seminaries, and there were many others doing the same thing. By the time of the 1958 Conclave, there were many Commie agents among the Cardinals, some of them Jews, but other Goy cooperators (Masons) ... and that's how they pulled off Vatican II. As I wrote on the other thread, they thought they had their man in Pius IX, but God "converted" him (at least from extreme liberalism) by the graces of the office and the protection of the Holy Ghost over the papacy. So that's when they devised the Siri plan ... and it worked.
Bp. Sanborn was interviewed by Stephen Kokx the other day. It was a tidy little Q&A-style primer for sedevacantism. Kokx pitched all of the objections, and Bp. Sanborn swung the bat. The bishop said something that was a home run for me. I won't go into the context or the precise substance of his reply. Rather I will repeat merely the subject and predicate: "The traditional movement was derailed."
Not only would I agree with this, but the details and the ways in which it has been derailed would fill volumes.
One of the primary derailments is the abject failure of the traditionalist clergy/media to precisely define the novus ordo as a Jєωιѕн infiltration and hard
military takeover of the worldwide Offices of the Church, starting with the Papacy. I suspect that these men kept quiet for fear of persecution and loss of their 501c3 status.
vatican ii is an act of war. No one says this. No one identifies the nature of the thing. No one identifies the combatants. Rather a perverse propaganda storm has been thrown up in its wake, to the effect either that vatican ii was the peaceful, harmonic, and organic act of the Roman Church, or that it is a mere problem "
in the Church."
The warring jews have insisted - both in their conciliar circus and in so-called tradition - that the novus ordo and the Church be professed as being identical. What percentage of traditional Catholics are sedes? 10%? 12%? The vast majority of self-nominated traditionalists - starting with the SSPX - profess this identification, which is utter falsity, utter absurdity.
Worse still, the sedevacantists, who refuse to equate the novus ordo and the Church, nevertheless refuse to precisely qualify the novus ordo. Sedevacantist clergy and media seem to want to avoid naming the jews as operating and controlling the novus ordo, just as they operate and control all infiltrations and revolutions on earth. I refuse to use the term modernists, not because modernists do not exist; but because the term is mostly employed now as a euphemism so that one does not have to make the most correct and most precise nomination.
The derailment of the traditional counterstrike has always been due to false definitions, false identifications, false explanations, and false predications being shoved down Catholics' throats.
Louis Verrecchio has begun to explicitly identity the novus ordo with the jews. I cannot think of another who has made similar public statements. Now Giuffre is stepping up. God bless him. This truth needs to "go viral." It is the
sine qua non of the true defense of the Catholic Faith.
Topic: Candace Owens Opinions Please? (Read 1150 times)