I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?

I believe Candace is genuinely motivated by her grief over losing her "brother" to a public assassination. She is also Choleric - the same temperament as myself so I get it - which means if you threaten her or her family, you'll have a war you wish you hadn't started; she won't back down; the more you push the harder she'll push back. As for her husband and children, I think she understands that this issue is bigger than herself - and that if she hides away now, the risk and danger facing her family, and everybody else's family, will be even greater if these invading Zionists are allowed to freely bully American citizen's into silence while they take over their country. So yes, I trust her 100 per cent. I don't always agree with some of her conclusions but I do believe she is genuinely trying to unearth the truth. And one of the best ways of facing down a bully is to light up their threats with a spotlight - show the world what they are doing.

100% deliberate controlled opposition.

1) Shilled for Trump during the entire 2024 campaign cycle.

2) THEN suddenly realized that Trump was in favor of the genocide in Gaza (despite his having made that entirely clear)

3) after Trump started filling his administration with Jews and their puppets, Owens issues an absurdly histrionic public "warning" that Trump's administration was being "infiltrated" ... LOL ... as if Trump was not doing it on purposes

4) during 2024, instead of investigating something REAL, like Trump's actual ties to Jews, to Epstein, etc. -- she creates a distraction and wastes everyone's time by investigating the true race of Kamala's grandmother

5) having come from Shapiro's organization, from which she had been allegedly bounced for suddenly becoming an "αnтι-ѕємιтє", she was clearly unleashed from there to go out as controlled op

6) comes out of nowhere to win some made-up "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" award to give her street cred ... when there were far more worthy candidates with years of track record in the area

7) THEN, when again she should have been investigating Trump administration's ties to Epstein, to the Jews, etc. ... she puts all her energy into investigation yet another monumental question, the gender of Macron's concubine, as if 1) this affects anyone in the US, 2) 99% of France didn't already know all about it and it had not been thoroughly investigated already by the French (she came up with nothing new), 3) 80% of the French public wouldn't actually approve of the entire thing.  Seriously?  This all you got, Candace?  Let's say it's proven he's a man.  What happens?  Absolutely nothing.  She could be investigating cнιℓd тrαffιcking rings among government high officials, Trump's relationship with Epstein, Trump being an Israeli asset, etc. ... but she wastes time and creates distractions with total garbage

8) with her latest claim that Macron's government is trying to αssαssιnαtҽ her, she's completing her mission of making anyone who doesn't buy the mainstream narrative about Kirk to be a nutjob

9) she's suddenly become the "number one podcast in the world" (in terms of views per episode or something).  THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN UNLESS YOU ARE AN ASSET.  Other people who are much closer to the truth are shadow banned, hidden by search algorithms, etc.  If she were an actual threat to the establishment, nobody would have ever heard of her.  Same goes with ALL the other big names.  Those who actually are over the target (like Dustin Nemos) ... they're relegated to near-total-obscurity by their algorithms

There's almost zero doubt that she's a controlled asset.  Now, what her motivations are, whether she's just been bought off, is blackmailed, is threatened, or whether she's just a willing conspirator totally on board with the cause ... we can't know that.  We can know that she's a controlled asset.  There's no other explanation for her having covered up for Trump the entire 2024 campaign by creating stupid distractions, and then emerging all surprised that Trump supports the genocide, absurdly winning some "αnтι-ѕємιтє" of the year award, undoubtedly made up out of thin air just for her to win, likely by Shapiro and company, and then creating the additional distraction right during the peak of the Epstein uproar by focusing on Macron's male concubine, never actually doing thorough investigations of cнιℓd тrαffιcking, Trump's ties to Epstein, Trump's being an Israel asset, etc.  You can often tell who someone is by those things they do NOT investigate.  But, you can't accuse Owens of being an Israel shill cause muh "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award", and of course she was "kicked out" by Shapiro (100% fabricated to create her back-story), and she will occasionally make some comment about Gaza and whatnot (while never doing indepth investigations of the matter ... but instead worrying about Macron's concubine).  But, as with all of them, they will say enough so they can shake off the accusation of being an Israeli shill.

Same thing with Kirk.  Kirk, Alex Jones, and a couple of the others, started all making the exact same criticisms of Israel all at the same time.  Why?  Simple.  Israel was losing the PR battle so badly on account of Gaza that the shills absolutely lost all credibility and had become worthless as shills.  So they were all greenlighted to start criticizing Israel at the same time.  Alex Jones, right at the same time that Kirk was making his comments, was saying the exact same stuff, and even went so far as to blame Israel for 9/11.  But you will notice that all of them very subtly laid the blame on Netanyahu.  They'll throw Netanyahu under the bus to take the blame so as to exonerate Israel and Jews in general from guilty.  That's why they also allowed the recent protests in Israel, etc.  They have no problem throwing that guy under the bus just like the proverbial scapegoat that gets its name from the ceremony by the same people.  They'll lay all the sins of Israel and Jews on Bibi, and throw him off the cliff and/or under the bus, thereby wiping their hands of it.  That's always been their plan and their tactic.  But, they had to rehabilitate the absurdly-blatant pro-Israeli shills, since having lost all credibility, they were like salt that had lost its savor and had become useless.

That's also, BTW, why the alt right are pushing the "Kirk was killed by Israel narrative".  While the mainstream narrative is that some Leftist transgender type did it, which most will buy, (and explains the previous operations by transgenders) ... the alt right was allowed to blame Israel, all as part of the agenda to say, "no, these Israel shill operations, they're not really Israeli shill operations".  Charlie Kirk is not dead, and is likely playing checkers with Epstein as we speak in "Valhalla" (some tropical island) ... surrounded by young girls.  But the Israel PR operations was losing so badly (admitted by the ADL even) that they had to do something to re-establish its credibility.

Candace Owens is among those that are part of this agenda.

But, now she's taking it a step further by "kookifying" the "Israel killed Kirk" theory that she helped promote with the latest "Macron's trying to αssαssιnαtҽ me" absurdity.  Most people are responding that she has some mental problems.

These guys are very good at the psychologcal manipulation.  They're evil, but not stupid.

Do we think the Jews didn't realize that the Gaza operation would result in this backlash and blowback?  They absolutely did, so they set up the responses well ahead of time, playing actual 5D chess with the diabolical chessmaster in charge, the devil himself ... who's likely at the 10D level.  This was all pre-planned and wargamed out.

"OK, look, we can't genocide the people in Gaza without massive blowback.  Here's how we'll plan out the reaction to soften the blow and turn it around."

Next step that they're prepping is a fαℓѕє fℓαg in the US to be blamed on Muslims.  That's why they put Mamdami in.

Oh, BTW ... did you see the comments Bibi recently made about who Israel will be disentangling themselves from reliance upon the US, and also threatening US cities with being nuked?

That sounds to me as though they're about to pull the plug on the US, where they're going to hit us with those terror attacks, so that the US economy will collapse, US will become a military vassal state for Israel, and everyone will get behind attacking more of Israel's enemies of them.  When the economy goes down, more people join the military out of sheer desperation.

They're going to punish the US for failing to support Israel in their genocide as much as we were supposed to.

Their assets have been talking about the "swarming multi-city attack" on the US ("bigger than 9/11") since early this year, and it's probably coming out way very soon.

I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?

Personally I don't really like her.  I think she spins things for her own benefit, like most journalists.  I won't go as far as she just controlled opposition.  Meaning some person is paying her to do what she does.  I would say that her pride  let's her be tempted by the devil and that is why she sounds like controlled opposition. Just my two cents.

Show is probably he,around 80 percent of Hollywood and other important people are reversed,I warn you there are some nudity in this channel.

https://youtu.be/ntwL80GbQ7Q?si=jm4GVDGo-WAvh1EU

A woman who puts a photo of herself posing pregnant in the opening of her show is not worthy of being listened to.

I believe Candace is genuinely motivated by her grief over losing her "brother" to a public assassination. She is also Choleric - the same temperament as myself so I get it - which means if you threaten her or her family, you'll have a war you wish you hadn't started; she won't back down; the more you push the harder she'll push back. As for her husband and children, I think she understands that this issue is bigger than herself - and that if she hides away now, the risk and danger facing her family, and everybody else's family, will be even greater if these invading Zionists are allowed to freely bully American citizen's into silence while they take over their country. So yes, I trust her 100 per cent. I don't always agree with some of her conclusions but I do believe she is genuinely trying to unearth the truth. And one of the best ways of facing down a bully is to light up their threats with a spotlight - show the world what they are doing.

I would’ve agreed with you at one time Boru and I still sometimes watch her videos. A couple of things that made me become suspicious, firstly her absolute obsession with whether Brigitte Macron is really a man. Maybe s/he is… certainly s/he looks dodgy and the way they met was unsavoury as is the fact she’s so much older than her husband. But there is so much corruption and bad stuff about, why her obsession with Macrons? It makes Candace seem a bit unhinged. I think it’s likely Michelle Obama is male but I wouldn’t think it’s the most important thing people need to know about. 

Also yes it’s important to call out bullies but I hardly think the deep state being out to αssαssιnαtҽ you is classed in the same category as some girl you need to slap at school because she called you a b**ch! Where is Candace husband the English Lord in all fhis? Is he happy his wife and children and maybe himself might be murdered… and for what? A political opinion, a journalist investigation, not a matter of the faith. Candace is not St Margaret Clitheroe a mother who was crushed to death because she hid Catholic priests in post reformation England. She’s not the martyrs who are being murdered in Nigeria because they are Christians.

Another thing that is odd is how some of my real life female friends are acting like she’s the next one for sainthood…she’s not a martyr unless someone murders her for her faith. Not because she is obsessed with Israel and the anatomy of a European presidents wife. 

Candace is either very very imprudent with a massive ego and wish for attention putting her children in danger when her first duty is to them and her husband or, as some here like Ladislaus believe, she’s faking the whole thing, working for the deep state. idk but I get the intuition not to trust her.