Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Justinian on November 24, 2025, 05:30:57 AM

Title: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Justinian on November 24, 2025, 05:30:57 AM
I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Boru on November 24, 2025, 07:11:57 AM
I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?

I believe Candace is genuinely motivated by her grief over losing her "brother" to a public assassination. She is also Choleric - the same temperament as myself so I get it - which means if you threaten her or her family, you'll have a war you wish you hadn't started; she won't back down; the more you push the harder she'll push back. As for her husband and children, I think she understands that this issue is bigger than herself - and that if she hides away now, the risk and danger facing her family, and everybody else's family, will be even greater if these invading Zionists are allowed to freely bully American citizen's into silence while they take over their country. So yes, I trust her 100 per cent. I don't always agree with some of her conclusions but I do believe she is genuinely trying to unearth the truth. And one of the best ways of facing down a bully is to light up their threats with a spotlight - show the world what they are doing.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Everlast22 on November 24, 2025, 07:28:44 AM
she either a grifter or controlled op. 

I'm telling ya, they won't let the truth 100 percent out. These people are professional gate keepers. Do NOT BE DECEIVED
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 07:53:04 AM
100% deliberate controlled opposition.

1) Shilled for Trump during the entire 2024 campaign cycle.

2) THEN suddenly realized that Trump was in favor of the genocide in Gaza (despite his having made that entirely clear)

3) after Trump started filling his administration with Jews and their puppets, Owens issues an absurdly histrionic public "warning" that Trump's administration was being "infiltrated" ... LOL ... as if Trump was not doing it on purposes

4) during 2024, instead of investigating something REAL, like Trump's actual ties to Jews, to Epstein, etc. -- she creates a distraction and wastes everyone's time by investigating the true race of Kamala's grandmother

5) having come from Shapiro's organization, from which she had been allegedly bounced for suddenly becoming an "αnтι-ѕємιтє", she was clearly unleashed from there to go out as controlled op

6) comes out of nowhere to win some made-up "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" award to give her street cred ... when there were far more worthy candidates with years of track record in the area

7) THEN, when again she should have been investigating Trump administration's ties to Epstein, to the Jews, etc. ... she puts all her energy into investigation yet another monumental question, the gender of Macron's concubine, as if 1) this affects anyone in the US, 2) 99% of France didn't already know all about it and it had not been thoroughly investigated already by the French (she came up with nothing new), 3) 80% of the French public wouldn't actually approve of the entire thing.  Seriously?  This all you got, Candace?  Let's say it's proven he's a man.  What happens?  Absolutely nothing.  She could be investigating cнιℓd тrαffιcking rings among government high officials, Trump's relationship with Epstein, Trump being an Israeli asset, etc. ... but she wastes time and creates distractions with total garbage

8) with her latest claim that Macron's government is trying to αssαssιnαtҽ her, she's completing her mission of making anyone who doesn't buy the mainstream narrative about Kirk to be a nutjob

9) she's suddenly become the "number one podcast in the world" (in terms of views per episode or something).  THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN UNLESS YOU ARE AN ASSET.  Other people who are much closer to the truth are shadow banned, hidden by search algorithms, etc.  If she were an actual threat to the establishment, nobody would have ever heard of her.  Same goes with ALL the other big names.  Those who actually are over the target (like Dustin Nemos) ... they're relegated to near-total-obscurity by their algorithms

There's almost zero doubt that she's a controlled asset.  Now, what her motivations are, whether she's just been bought off, is blackmailed, is threatened, or whether she's just a willing conspirator totally on board with the cause ... we can't know that.  We can know that she's a controlled asset.  There's no other explanation for her having covered up for Trump the entire 2024 campaign by creating stupid distractions, and then emerging all surprised that Trump supports the genocide, absurdly winning some "αnтι-ѕємιтє" of the year award, undoubtedly made up out of thin air just for her to win, likely by Shapiro and company, and then creating the additional distraction right during the peak of the Epstein uproar by focusing on Macron's male concubine, never actually doing thorough investigations of cнιℓd тrαffιcking, Trump's ties to Epstein, Trump's being an Israel asset, etc.  You can often tell who someone is by those things they do NOT investigate.  But, you can't accuse Owens of being an Israel shill cause muh "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award", and of course she was "kicked out" by Shapiro (100% fabricated to create her back-story), and she will occasionally make some comment about Gaza and whatnot (while never doing indepth investigations of the matter ... but instead worrying about Macron's concubine).  But, as with all of them, they will say enough so they can shake off the accusation of being an Israeli shill.

Same thing with Kirk.  Kirk, Alex Jones, and a couple of the others, started all making the exact same criticisms of Israel all at the same time.  Why?  Simple.  Israel was losing the PR battle so badly on account of Gaza that the shills absolutely lost all credibility and had become worthless as shills.  So they were all greenlighted to start criticizing Israel at the same time.  Alex Jones, right at the same time that Kirk was making his comments, was saying the exact same stuff, and even went so far as to blame Israel for 9/11.  But you will notice that all of them very subtly laid the blame on Netanyahu.  They'll throw Netanyahu under the bus to take the blame so as to exonerate Israel and Jews in general from guilty.  That's why they also allowed the recent protests in Israel, etc.  They have no problem throwing that guy under the bus just like the proverbial scapegoat that gets its name from the ceremony by the same people.  They'll lay all the sins of Israel and Jews on Bibi, and throw him off the cliff and/or under the bus, thereby wiping their hands of it.  That's always been their plan and their tactic.  But, they had to rehabilitate the absurdly-blatant pro-Israeli shills, since having lost all credibility, they were like salt that had lost its savor and had become useless.

That's also, BTW, why the alt right are pushing the "Kirk was killed by Israel narrative".  While the mainstream narrative is that some Leftist transgender type did it, which most will buy, (and explains the previous operations by transgenders) ... the alt right was allowed to blame Israel, all as part of the agenda to say, "no, these Israel shill operations, they're not really Israeli shill operations".  Charlie Kirk is not dead, and is likely playing checkers with Epstein as we speak in "Valhalla" (some tropical island) ... surrounded by young girls.  But the Israel PR operations was losing so badly (admitted by the ADL even) that they had to do something to re-establish its credibility.

Candace Owens is among those that are part of this agenda.

But, now she's taking it a step further by "kookifying" the "Israel killed Kirk" theory that she helped promote with the latest "Macron's trying to αssαssιnαtҽ me" absurdity.  Most people are responding that she has some mental problems.

These guys are very good at the psychologcal manipulation.  They're evil, but not stupid.

Do we think the Jews didn't realize that the Gaza operation would result in this backlash and blowback?  They absolutely did, so they set up the responses well ahead of time, playing actual 5D chess with the diabolical chessmaster in charge, the devil himself ... who's likely at the 10D level.  This was all pre-planned and wargamed out.

"OK, look, we can't genocide the people in Gaza without massive blowback.  Here's how we'll plan out the reaction to soften the blow and turn it around."

Next step that they're prepping is a fαℓѕє fℓαg in the US to be blamed on Muslims.  That's why they put Mamdami in.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 08:04:47 AM
Oh, on the very morning of the Kirk event, the ADL released an article talking about how Israel was losing the PR battle, especially among the youth, college students, people of that generation.

Just another Cohencidence.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 08:12:17 AM
Oh, BTW ... did you see the comments Bibi recently made about who Israel will be disentangling themselves from reliance upon the US, and also threatening US cities with being nuked?

That sounds to me as though they're about to pull the plug on the US, where they're going to hit us with those terror attacks, so that the US economy will collapse, US will become a military vassal state for Israel, and everyone will get behind attacking more of Israel's enemies of them.  When the economy goes down, more people join the military out of sheer desperation.

They're going to punish the US for failing to support Israel in their genocide as much as we were supposed to.

Their assets have been talking about the "swarming multi-city attack" on the US ("bigger than 9/11") since early this year, and it's probably coming out way very soon.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 08:16:18 AM
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/pm-israel-aims-to-build-independent-arms-production-to-reduce-reliance-on-us/

https://www.rferl.org/a/farda-briefing-iran-israel-icbm-missile-us-east-coast/33555492.html

Second one entitled "Netanyahu's Missile Warning" migth as well be "Netanyahu's Missile Threat".

Of course, whatever happens here, we deserve it, since we voted Trump into office despite the fact that he was endorsing the Israeli genocide and made it clear that he would back it and fund it, so we as a nation have that blood on our hands, and we're going to pay the price.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Gray2023 on November 24, 2025, 08:33:40 AM
I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?
Personally I don't really like her.  I think she spins things for her own benefit, like most journalists.  I won't go as far as she just controlled opposition.  Meaning some person is paying her to do what she does.  I would say that her pride  let's her be tempted by the devil and that is why she sounds like controlled opposition. Just my two cents.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 08:46:42 AM
I love Candace Owens. If you think she is being dramatic that the powers to be put a hit out on her you may be wrong. The Brigette macron topic she exposed got her in real legal trouble. Real life legal trouble and what she is exposing around the tpusa organization regardless of who killed Charlie is damming information that is pushing her further up the hitlist of the global elites I don’t think any of this information can be contested and it’s backed up by multiple sources Including army rangers who are of the most credible stock left in the military.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rJjWx3Zlv0s&pp=ygUMdmFsaGFsbGEgdmZ00gcJCR4Bo7VqN5tD


Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: LoneWolf1988 on November 24, 2025, 08:50:11 AM
Show is probably he,around 80 percent of Hollywood and other important people are reversed,I warn you there are some nudity in this channel.

https://youtu.be/ntwL80GbQ7Q?si=jm4GVDGo-WAvh1EU
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 09:07:13 AM
I used to be a bit of a fan and watch her videos but recently I’m getting a feeling she’s motivated by drama and ego rather than real investigative journalism. She's recently publicly claiming that a hit man is out to kill her. Either this is true in which case shouldn’t she stop the social media and put her husband and children first or perhaps it’s all attention seeking? Do any of you trust her? What are your thoughts please?
As far as putting your family at risk for exposing the truth. I am lucky in the sense to have a family that would ride and die with me, even if they were not certain about whether I was right or wrong. I do not have a wife and kids so I’m talking parents and siblings but I’m aware of some spouses who would do the same. The righteous are as bold as lions. Self preservation has got us into the corruption we see all around us. So it’s strange to presume they have not weighed the cost/benefit as a family. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Russiantrad on November 24, 2025, 09:21:16 AM
A woman who puts a photo of herself posing pregnant in the opening of her show is not worthy of being listened to.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Everlast22 on November 24, 2025, 09:22:14 AM
A woman who puts a photo of herself posing pregnant in the opening of her show is not worthy of being listened to.
I don't listen to women online, unless my wife and I are looking into a new dinner recipe, other than that, women should not be online caking make-up on trad larping, especially. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Justinian on November 24, 2025, 11:29:55 AM
I believe Candace is genuinely motivated by her grief over losing her "brother" to a public assassination. She is also Choleric - the same temperament as myself so I get it - which means if you threaten her or her family, you'll have a war you wish you hadn't started; she won't back down; the more you push the harder she'll push back. As for her husband and children, I think she understands that this issue is bigger than herself - and that if she hides away now, the risk and danger facing her family, and everybody else's family, will be even greater if these invading Zionists are allowed to freely bully American citizen's into silence while they take over their country. So yes, I trust her 100 per cent. I don't always agree with some of her conclusions but I do believe she is genuinely trying to unearth the truth. And one of the best ways of facing down a bully is to light up their threats with a spotlight - show the world what they are doing.
I would’ve agreed with you at one time Boru and I still sometimes watch her videos. A couple of things that made me become suspicious, firstly her absolute obsession with whether Brigitte Macron is really a man. Maybe s/he is… certainly s/he looks dodgy and the way they met was unsavoury as is the fact she’s so much older than her husband. But there is so much corruption and bad stuff about, why her obsession with Macrons? It makes Candace seem a bit unhinged. I think it’s likely Michelle Obama is male but I wouldn’t think it’s the most important thing people need to know about. 

Also yes it’s important to call out bullies but I hardly think the deep state being out to αssαssιnαtҽ you is classed in the same category as some girl you need to slap at school because she called you a b**ch! Where is Candace husband the English Lord in all fhis? Is he happy his wife and children and maybe himself might be murdered… and for what? A political opinion, a journalist investigation, not a matter of the faith. Candace is not St Margaret Clitheroe a mother who was crushed to death because she hid Catholic priests in post reformation England. She’s not the martyrs who are being murdered in Nigeria because they are Christians.

Another thing that is odd is how some of my real life female friends are acting like she’s the next one for sainthood…she’s not a martyr unless someone murders her for her faith. Not because she is obsessed with Israel and the anatomy of a European presidents wife. 

Candace is either very very imprudent with a massive ego and wish for attention putting her children in danger when her first duty is to them and her husband or, as some here like Ladislaus believe, she’s faking the whole thing, working for the deep state. idk but I get the intuition not to trust her. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 11:47:20 AM
She's a CIA asset. 

Pure mind poison. 

If you want to learn about the subjects she fake covers, read Fr. Fahey. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: SimpleMan on November 24, 2025, 11:56:30 AM
I would’ve agreed with you at one time Boru and I still sometimes watch her videos. A couple of things that made me become suspicious, firstly her absolute obsession with whether Brigitte Macron is really a man. Maybe s/he is… certainly s/he looks dodgy and the way they met was unsavoury as is the fact she’s so much older than her husband. But there is so much corruption and bad stuff about, why her obsession with Macrons? It makes Candace seem a bit unhinged.

Candace had better be right about that, or what credibility she may now have will be gone.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 12:00:13 PM
Candace had better be right about that, or what credibility she may now have will be gone.

Oh, she's certainly right about that ... but all of the evidence had long ago been uncovered by various investigative journalists in France.  She did absolutely nothing ... except to create a huge distraction right in the thick of the controversy over Trump's non-release of the Epstein docuмents.  And let's say it's proven that Macron's concubine is a man.  What's going to happen?  He will only get more sympathy from the generally amoral public, for having to live secretly in shame due to our oppressive society.  And then what happens to anyone in the US?  Nothing.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to get away with having been involved in the crimes of Esptein.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 12:00:49 PM
She's a CIA asset.

Pure mind poison.

If you want to learn about the subjects she fake covers, read Fr. Fahey.

100% a controlled asset.  Not sure if CIA, Mossad, or some combination of them all, but yes.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 12:06:08 PM
She's a CIA asset.

Pure mind poison.

If you want to learn about the subjects she fake covers, read Fr. Fahey.
Fr. Denis fehey? He’s a huge reason I came back to the faith. His work on the social kingship of Christ and the rulers of Russia are must reads for any Catholic. I love Candace though. Out of all the mainstream converts, most of whom I do not trust like j.d Vance and such I have hope in Candace. I haven’t seen anything to convince me she’s not a Catholic now. People can change.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 12:07:16 PM
Oh, she's certainly right about that ... but all of the evidence had long ago been uncovered by various investigative journalists in France.  She did absolutely nothing ... except to create a huge distraction right in the thick of the controversy over Trump's non-release of the Epstein docuмents.  And let's say it's proven that Macron's concubine is a man.  What's going to happen?  He will only get more sympathy from the generally amoral public, for having to live secretly in shame due to our oppressive society.  And then what happens to anyone in the US?  Nothing.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to get away with having been involved in the crimes of Esptein.
I don’t know of any one who knows anything ignoring the Epstein cover up. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:14:24 PM
100% a controlled asset.  Not sure if CIA, Mossad, or some combination of them all, but yes.

Lad, have you ever read the book Weird Echoes From the Canyon, by David McGowan?

I had never heard of it, until a few days ago. Youtube has an audio version. It's very hard to absorb because of the pure satanic evil revealed. You can only take so much of it at a time. I'm halfway through.

BTW McGowan also exposed the fake moon landing. Perhaps you already know him from that. 

The subject matter of this book is Laurel Canyon in the 60's, and the true identities of the rock stars who populated it. It's a who's who of the military-intel complex. 

I've been awake now a long time, but I don't know the half of it. What I do know, however, has congealed - by virtue of reading this book - into a very lucid understanding of a particularly cogent fact: The CIA is mossad, is hollywood, is organized crime. It is one universal entity. One substance with many accidental forms. One octopus with many tentacles.

Candace is a suction cup on a tentacle of the great satanic octopus. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:19:01 PM
Oh, she's certainly right about that ... but all of the evidence had long ago been uncovered by various investigative journalists in France.  She did absolutely nothing ... except to create a huge distraction right in the thick of the controversy over Trump's non-release of the Epstein docuмents.  And let's say it's proven that Macron's concubine is a man.  What's going to happen?  He will only get more sympathy from the generally amoral public, for having to live secretly in shame due to our oppressive society.  And then what happens to anyone in the US?  Nothing.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to get away with having been involved in the crimes of Esptein.

Indeed. Her alleged expose was deployed to engineer street cred for her. 

Her "firing" from daily wire was "the guy being fired from a cannon" act. 

The Macron expose is her doing pony tricks around the circus ring, while everyone buys cotton candy and enjoys the show.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:33:02 PM
Fr. Denis fehey? He’s a huge reason I came back to the faith. His work on the social kingship of Christ and the rulers of Russia are must reads for any Catholic. I love Candace though. Out of all the mainstream converts, most of whom I do not trust like j.d Vance and such I have hope in Candace. I haven’t seen anything to convince me she’s not a Catholic now. People can change.

I have absolutely no desire to insult you, so do not take what I say as such. 

You are still stuck in the novus ordo mire. That's why I suggested to you that your spiritual journey is "young," and that, after a general confession, your best course is to continue to hit the books.

I recommend - among others - The New Montinian Church by Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga; The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, by Rama Coomaraswamy; and The Problems With the Other Sacraments, by the same Coomaraswamy.

I also recommend MHT Seminary Courses youtube channel. Bp. Sanborn is a great teacher. I don't hold to the thesis, but so what? His demonstrations are excellent and indispensable for understanding what the novus ordo is, in opposition to what the Church is.

Once you really understand what vatican ii and the novus ordo are, you will fully comprehend why Candace does not pass the Catholic litmus test.

And it is precisely this failure to pass the Catholic litmus test that constitutes the prima facie evidence that Candace is a shill - a very attractive shill, and a shill who has been engineered to attract .... well .... white Catholic males. She's a honeypot.

ISOC has a brand new youtube channel. In early December Gary Giuffre is coming on to discuss why the vatican ii church is Jєωιѕн. I'll post the vid here when it airs.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 12:33:44 PM
Lad, have you ever read the book Weird Echoes From the Canyon, by David McGowan?

No, but it sounds interesting.  Thanks for the tip.

Yes, I've come to the conclusion that they do not allow someone to somehow become the most popular podcaster in the world (by a certain metric) if she is any kind of threat to them, or, rather, if she does not serve their interests, and is likely a co-conspirator.  At the very least, though, in some way, shape, or form ... she serves their interests.  It would be childsplay for Big Tech and Big Media to have shadow-banned her so badly that she'd be strugging to get triple-digit views on any of her posts.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:38:08 PM
No, but it sounds interesting.  Thanks for the tip.

Yes, I've come to the conclusion that they do not allow someone to somehow become the most popular podcaster in the world (by a certain metric) if she is any kind of threat to them, or, rather, if she does not serve their interests, and is likely a co-conspirator.  At the very least, though, in some way, shape, or form ... she serves their interests.  It would be childsplay for Big Tech and Big Media to have shadow-banned her so badly that she'd be strugging to get triple-digit views on any of her posts.

Thou art correct on all counts. 

Get that book, and then lets discuss it here, eh?

I'll start a thread with the audiobook. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 12:40:27 PM
Indeed. Her alleged expose was deployed to engineer street cred for her.

Her "firing" from daily wire was "the guy being fired from a cannon" act.

The Macron expose is her doing pony tricks around the circus ring, while everyone buys cotton candy and enjoys the show.

Absolutely this.  It's nice to see someone else who sees through it.  Shapiro's firing was a type of "sheep dipping" her, trying to establish credibility as NOT being an Israeli shill (as everyone knew Shapiro to be), and then she comes out of nowhere and "sees the light", and magically wins this "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award" that someone made up obviously just so she could win it and get that credibility.  Long before Owens embarked on the Macron investigation, I saw a docuмentary by a French journalist who had already presented all the evidence, much of which Owens simply recycled and claimed that it was ground-breaking.  As if anyone truly cares ...  90% of the French public would probably revel in the fact that France was so forward-thinking and would be upset that he had to stay in the closet so long.  Then the stupidity about Kamala hαɾɾιs' grandmother being White.  Who cares?  It was widely known (and not disputed) that hαɾɾιs was more Indian than Black.  Nothing happened, since nobody cares.  "Well, well ... that makes her a liar."  And Trump lies almost every time his lips move.  Please find me a politician that doesn't lie on a regular basis and THAT should be the news.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 12:42:13 PM
Get that book, and then lets discuss it here, eh?

Sounds great.  I don't have too much time now, as my mother's health has been failing, and many things going on with the family ... where it would take me some time to get around to a full book, but hopefully just after Christmas when things quiet down (and i'm off work for a couple weeks or so).
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:44:19 PM
Sounds great.  I don't have too much time now, as my mother's health has been failing, and many things going on with the family ... where it would take me some time to get around to a full book, but hopefully just after Christmas when things quiet down (and i'm off work for a couple weeks or so).

Je comprend ...

I posted the link. You can read it on your phone from time to time. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 12:57:34 PM
Absolutely this.  It's nice to see someone else who sees through it.  Shapiro's firing was a type of "sheep dipping" her, trying to establish credibility as NOT being an Israeli shill (as everyone knew Shapiro to be), and then she comes out of nowhere and "sees the light", and magically wins this "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award" that someone made up obviously just so she could win it and get that credibility.  Long before Owens embarked on the Macron investigation, I saw a docuмentary by a French journalist who had already presented all the evidence, much of which Owens simply recycled and claimed that it was ground-breaking.  As if anyone truly cares ...  90% of the French public would probably revel in the fact that France was so forward-thinking and would be upset that he had to stay in the closet so long.  Then the stupidity about Kamala hαɾɾιs' grandmother being White.  Who cares?  It was widely known (and not disputed) that hαɾɾιs was more Indian than Black.  Nothing happened, since nobody cares.  "Well, well ... that makes her a liar."  And Trump lies almost every time his lips move.  Please find me a politician that doesn't lie on a regular basis and THAT should be the news.

Well explicated! What always perplexes me, is that many men who read up on cօռspιʀαcιҽs, and think they can spot them, yet cannot see through clear charades like this one. 

Don't you find just as sinister and creepy as halloween, the "conversion to opus dei" of Mrs. Jordan Peterson, her husband's migration to daily wire, and the stable over there of fake Catholic cucks - knowles, walsh, and now fraud, er I mean fradd?

Mossad has IVF'd a new species of Catholic clowns, er, I mean clones. On the test tubes it says ZIO-CINO. Fuentes and Owens are mutations of the same organism, who are given the fake-awake chromosome after three weeks of petri growth. LOL!!   
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Everlast22 on November 24, 2025, 01:03:21 PM
fake Catholic cucks - knowles, walsh, and now fraud, er I mean fradd?
Don't forget Marshall..
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 01:07:42 PM
Don't forget Marshall..

I left out an entire list of bad actors. I was talking only about daily wire. But marshall is at the top of the pile of grifting phonies.  
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 01:12:43 PM
These two even look disturbingly just like one another, to the point that I'd think they're related ...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G52Eh30bkAEv2tM.jpg)

Fuentes:  Wow, I just discovered that I had a great grandmother named Fuentes-stein, who was married to a guy name Shapiro.

Milei:  Wow, I just discovered that I have the same family name as Netayahu.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 01:15:41 PM
I have absolutely no desire to insult you, so do not take what I say as such. 

You are still stuck in the novus ordo mire. That's why I suggested to you that your spiritual journey is "young," and that, after a general confession, your best course is to continue to hit the books.

I recommend - among others - The New Montinian Church by Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga; The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, by Rama Coomaraswamy; and The Problems With the Other Sacraments, by the same Coomaraswamy.

I also recommend MHT Seminary Courses youtube channel. Bp. Sanborn is a great teacher. I don't hold to the thesis, but so what? His demonstrations are excellent and indispensable for understanding what the novus ordo is, in opposition to what the Church is.

Once you really understand what vatican ii and the novus ordo are, you will fully comprehend why Candace does not pass the Catholic litmus test.

And it is precisely this failure to pass the Catholic litmus test that constitutes the prima facie evidence that Candace is a shill - a very attractive shill, and a shill who has been engineered to attract .... well .... white Catholic males. She's a honeypot.

ISOC has a brand new youtube channel. In early December Gary Giuffre is coming on to discuss why the vatican ii church is Jєωιѕн. I'll post the vid here when it airs.
This is where you loose me…… she’s exposed the Jews in so many different ways that it’s hard for me to understand how they could let her go on and on exposing Freud and guys like the one that said “ we promote pornography because we hate Christians” I forget his name. I also realize most traditionalist do not like e Michael jones mostly because he doesn’t condemn Vatican 2 outright. I can understand that but I feel like calling Candace controlled opposition is like calling e Michael jones a cia agent. It’s not a lack of understanding doctrine as much as it is I lack concrete proof and I see a lot of reasons to support the opposite. The division going on in the church is mind blowing. I know a lot more than you would probably expect especially when it comes to Jєωιѕн subversives and the link between them and the other Kabbalah religions like masonry. The Kabbalah seems to be at the center of every serious false religion attacking us like in Theosephy or the house of Solomon associated esoteric religions like rosacusionism. I just can’t see where Candace would fit into that. I do believe people can actually change direction. And that’s what gives me my reservations. I would hate to be wrong about a confessing Catholic. This is one of the problems my generation faces. I know the deception is thick. Typically not trusting anyone is my default position but I would hate to be wrong and condemn someone who’s sticking their neck out. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: songbird on November 24, 2025, 01:22:22 PM
Candace is not in the Catholic Church.  She is in Masonry.  Same with Vance.  Anyone can walk in the new order and be taken in, literally.  She is prideful of what she knows.  She overlooks what she is dragging into her home.  she has no solution for the woes of the world.

I once read federal grants and I knew a lot of garbage in the New Order.  They have been restructured and all parishes are now Civil society organizations that answer to the United Nations.  That is not surprising but please do not refer to the New Order as catholic.  They follow the ways of Satan.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 01:22:40 PM
This is where you loose me…… she’s exposed the Jews in so many different ways that it’s hard for me to understand how they could let her go on ...

So, look into the notion of a "gatekeeper".  While certain levels of operatives will block any criticism of the Jews, once people see through and get past their "gate", they move into the next level.  So, then need to have someone else misleading them, in an attempt to prevent them from getting to the next level.  It's the inverse of the Masonic pyramid.

"Ah, I see that Alex Jones is constantly shilling to protect the Jews.  I see this Candace Owens here, and she's going after them."  So they get to Owens and the majority will be complacent that "ah, I've found this person who speaks truth" ... but then she subtly misleads them, or at the very least, they stop right there and go no further because they think they've found ultimate truth.

One misdirection I see at this level, since a TON of people got past the Jew-gate block after Gaza is ... subtly shift blame to Netanyahu, while exonerating Jews in general.  That way, if it gets too hot, they can impeach Bibi and even fake some big revolt of the Jєωιѕн people, and once Bibi takes the fall, they continue on with the operation with other actors.

So, another role of someone at this gate might be to discredit of "kookify" the truth.  Owens might go off the deepend, and thereby discredit everything she had stood for or pretended to stand for.  Lots of people think that the Macron assassination thing makes her look nuts.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 01:28:29 PM
ISOC has a brand new youtube channel. In early December Gary Giuffre is coming on to discuss why the vatican ii church is Jєωιѕн. I'll post the vid here when it airs.

Excellent.  I actually think that Stew Peters got him thinking along those lines by trying to get him to emphasize that angle, and had I been Mr. Giuffre, I would have emphasized that aspect to get more time with Stew, since we know that's 90% of his schtick, to go after Jews.

So, IMO, this is what Our Lady meant by the "errors of Russia".  Jewry set up Communism precisely to go after the Church.  Bella Dodd admitted to having placed over 1100 young men in seminaries, and there were many others doing the same thing.  By the time of the 1958 Conclave, there were many Commie agents among the Cardinals, some of them Jews, but other Goy cooperators (Masons) ... and that's how they pulled off Vatican II.  As I wrote on the other thread, they thought they had their man in Pius IX, but God "converted" him (at least from extreme liberalism) by the graces of the office and the protection of the Holy Ghost over the papacy.  So that's when they devised the Siri plan ... and it worked.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: IndultCat on November 24, 2025, 01:28:34 PM
100% deliberate controlled opposition.

1) Shilled for Trump during the entire 2024 campaign cycle.

2) THEN suddenly realized that Trump was in favor of the genocide in Gaza (despite his having made that entirely clear)

3) after Trump started filling his administration with Jews and their puppets, Owens issues an absurdly histrionic public "warning" that Trump's administration was being "infiltrated" ... LOL ... as if Trump was not doing it on purposes

4) during 2024, instead of investigating something REAL, like Trump's actual ties to Jews, to Epstein, etc. -- she creates a distraction and wastes everyone's time by investigating the true race of Kamala's grandmother

5) having come from Shapiro's organization, from which she had been allegedly bounced for suddenly becoming an "αnтι-ѕємιтє", she was clearly unleashed from there to go out as controlled op

6) comes out of nowhere to win some made-up "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year" award to give her street cred ... when there were far more worthy candidates with years of track record in the area

7) THEN, when again she should have been investigating Trump administration's ties to Epstein, to the Jews, etc. ... she puts all her energy into investigation yet another monumental question, the gender of Macron's concubine, as if 1) this affects anyone in the US, 2) 99% of France didn't already know all about it and it had not been thoroughly investigated already by the French (she came up with nothing new), 3) 80% of the French public wouldn't actually approve of the entire thing.  Seriously?  This all you got, Candace?  Let's say it's proven he's a man.  What happens?  Absolutely nothing.  She could be investigating cнιℓd тrαffιcking rings among government high officials, Trump's relationship with Epstein, Trump being an Israeli asset, etc. ... but she wastes time and creates distractions with total garbage

8) with her latest claim that Macron's government is trying to αssαssιnαtҽ her, she's completing her mission of making anyone who doesn't buy the mainstream narrative about Kirk to be a nutjob

9) she's suddenly become the "number one podcast in the world" (in terms of views per episode or something).  THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN UNLESS YOU ARE AN ASSET.  Other people who are much closer to the truth are shadow banned, hidden by search algorithms, etc.  If she were an actual threat to the establishment, nobody would have ever heard of her.  Same goes with ALL the other big names.  Those who actually are over the target (like Dustin Nemos) ... they're relegated to near-total-obscurity by their algorithms

There's almost zero doubt that she's a controlled asset.  Now, what her motivations are, whether she's just been bought off, is blackmailed, is threatened, or whether she's just a willing conspirator totally on board with the cause ... we can't know that.  We can know that she's a controlled asset.  There's no other explanation for her having covered up for Trump the entire 2024 campaign by creating stupid distractions, and then emerging all surprised that Trump supports the genocide, absurdly winning some "αnтι-ѕємιтє" of the year award, undoubtedly made up out of thin air just for her to win, likely by Shapiro and company, and then creating the additional distraction right during the peak of the Epstein uproar by focusing on Macron's male concubine, never actually doing thorough investigations of cнιℓd тrαffιcking, Trump's ties to Epstein, Trump's being an Israel asset, etc.  You can often tell who someone is by those things they do NOT investigate.  But, you can't accuse Owens of being an Israel shill cause muh "αnтι-ѕємιтє of the Year Award", and of course she was "kicked out" by Shapiro (100% fabricated to create her back-story), and she will occasionally make some comment about Gaza and whatnot (while never doing indepth investigations of the matter ... but instead worrying about Macron's concubine).  But, as with all of them, they will say enough so they can shake off the accusation of being an Israeli shill.

Same thing with Kirk.  Kirk, Alex Jones, and a couple of the others, started all making the exact same criticisms of Israel all at the same time.  Why?  Simple.  Israel was losing the PR battle so badly on account of Gaza that the shills absolutely lost all credibility and had become worthless as shills.  So they were all greenlighted to start criticizing Israel at the same time.  Alex Jones, right at the same time that Kirk was making his comments, was saying the exact same stuff, and even went so far as to blame Israel for 9/11.  But you will notice that all of them very subtly laid the blame on Netanyahu.  They'll throw Netanyahu under the bus to take the blame so as to exonerate Israel and Jews in general from guilty.  That's why they also allowed the recent protests in Israel, etc.  They have no problem throwing that guy under the bus just like the proverbial scapegoat that gets its name from the ceremony by the same people.  They'll lay all the sins of Israel and Jews on Bibi, and throw him off the cliff and/or under the bus, thereby wiping their hands of it.  That's always been their plan and their tactic.  But, they had to rehabilitate the absurdly-blatant pro-Israeli shills, since having lost all credibility, they were like salt that had lost its savor and had become useless.

That's also, BTW, why the alt right are pushing the "Kirk was killed by Israel narrative".  While the mainstream narrative is that some Leftist transgender type did it, which most will buy, (and explains the previous operations by transgenders) ... the alt right was allowed to blame Israel, all as part of the agenda to say, "no, these Israel shill operations, they're not really Israeli shill operations".  Charlie Kirk is not dead, and is likely playing checkers with Epstein as we speak in "Valhalla" (some tropical island) ... surrounded by young girls.  But the Israel PR operations was losing so badly (admitted by the ADL even) that they had to do something to re-establish its credibility.

Candace Owens is among those that are part of this agenda.

But, now she's taking it a step further by "kookifying" the "Israel killed Kirk" theory that she helped promote with the latest "Macron's trying to αssαssιnαtҽ me" absurdity.  Most people are responding that she has some mental problems.

These guys are very good at the psychologcal manipulation.  They're evil, but not stupid.

Do we think the Jews didn't realize that the Gaza operation would result in this backlash and blowback?  They absolutely did, so they set up the responses well ahead of time, playing actual 5D chess with the diabolical chessmaster in charge, the devil himself ... who's likely at the 10D level.  This was all pre-planned and wargamed out.

"OK, look, we can't genocide the people in Gaza without massive blowback.  Here's how we'll plan out the reaction to soften the blow and turn it around."

Next step that they're prepping is a fαℓѕє fℓαg in the US to be blamed on Muslims.  That's why they put Mamdami in.
Did you really come up with this all by yourself? :jester:

Why do all of these people live in your head rent-free?:facepalm:

Shouldn't you distance yourself from the nonsense of the secular outside world and focus more time and attention on being a better Tridentine Catholic?  
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 01:35:55 PM
Candace is not in the Catholic Church.  She is in Masonry.  Same with Vance.  Anyone can walk in the new order and be taken in, literally.  She is prideful of what she knows.  She overlooks what she is dragging into her home.  she has no solution for the woes of the world.

I once read federal grants and I knew a lot of garbage in the New Order.  They have been restructured and all parishes are now Civil society organizations that answer to the United Nations.  That is not surprising but please do not refer to the New Order as catholic.  They follow the ways of Satan.
Vance is in the Opus Dei it makes him a lot easier to identify. Again how much concrete evidence do you have about Candace being a mason? In this day and age hate is easy. Love is nearly gone.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Ladislaus on November 24, 2025, 01:36:47 PM
Did you really come up with this all by yourself? :jester:

Why do all of these people live in your head rent-free?:facepalm:

Shouldn't you distance yourself from the nonsense of the secular outside world and focus more time and attention on being a better Tridentine Catholic? 

So, yes, all of that comes simply from paying attention an spending a few minutes each day looking at headlines.  I think that I've actually watched about a total of 5-10 minutes of Owens speaking, and the rest comes from simple pattern recognition, and just becausey you're too intellectually challenged to piece it together, it doesn't mean the rest of us cannot.  If you simply read a few minutes of the headlines, over years, it's rather simple for some of us (who have the right paradigm) to "connect the dots".

Of all these players, I've never watched Charlie Kirk (other than the videos of his staged assassination), nor Shapiro, maybe 10 minutes total of Owens, half of that when Fuentes was showing clips, maybe 15-20 minutes total of Fuentes ... and then I paid attention to what was going on with the 2024 election, Trump, his appointments, and then who came out of the woodwork when and saying what.

Maybe you live in some hermitage where you have no clue about what's happening in the United States politically, but you may also realize that we should be paying attention to politics, at some level, since it's just a matter of time before they come after the Traditional Catholics.

Of course, we all know what you mean by "Tridentine Catholic", where you hold that half of the popes since then were illegitimate Anti-Popes, so you may wish to pay attention to becoming Catholic again, since you've gone off the deep end into abject heresy.  Not sure why the heretically depraved such as yourself have not been banned long ago.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 01:40:35 PM
Excellent.  I actually think that Stew Peters got him thinking along those lines by trying to get him to emphasize that angle, and had I been Mr. Giuffre, I would have emphasized that aspect to get more time with Stew, since we know that's 90% of his schtick, to go after Jews.

So, IMO, this is what Our Lady meant by the "errors of Russia".  Jewry set up Communism precisely to go after the Church.  Bella Dodd admitted to having placed over 1100 young men in seminaries, and there were many others doing the same thing.  By the time of the 1958 Conclave, there were many Commie agents among the Cardinals, some of them Jews, but other Goy cooperators (Masons) ... and that's how they pulled off Vatican II.  As I wrote on the other thread, they thought they had their man in Pius IX, but God "converted" him (at least from extreme liberalism) by the graces of the office and the protection of the Holy Ghost over the papacy.  So that's when they devised the Siri plan ... and it worked.
I understand Hegelian dialects but again it’s the concrete evidence I lack and it’s evidence to the contrary that I see. I can listen to a liar speak truth and then on some major issue they will be forced to show their hand. I have not seen that yet with Candace and I listen to her directly not people who talk about her. I lack any concrete evidence so far.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Boru on November 24, 2025, 02:05:58 PM
...................

I recommend - among others - The New Montinian Church by Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga; The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, by Rama Coomaraswamy; and The Problems With the Other Sacraments, by the same Coomaraswamy.

I also recommend MHT Seminary Courses youtube channel. Bp. Sanborn is a great teacher. I don't hold to the thesis, but so what? His demonstrations are excellent and indispensable for understanding what the novus ordo is, in opposition to what the Church is.

Once you really understand what vatican ii and the novus ordo are, you will fully comprehend why Candace does not pass the Catholic litmus test.



Roma Coomaraswarmy came from a Jєωιѕн occult back-ground. Out of nowhere he attached himself to the SSPX and began espousing sede-vacantism. Bp. Sanborn is one of his disciples. Once you understand that basic concept, you'll fully comprehend just who is being played.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 02:09:57 PM
Excellent.  I actually think that Stew Peters got him thinking along those lines by trying to get him to emphasize that angle, and had I been Mr. Giuffre, I would have emphasized that aspect to get more time with Stew, since we know that's 90% of his schtick, to go after Jews.

So, IMO, this is what Our Lady meant by the "errors of Russia".  Jewry set up Communism precisely to go after the Church.  Bella Dodd admitted to having placed over 1100 young men in seminaries, and there were many others doing the same thing.  By the time of the 1958 Conclave, there were many Commie agents among the Cardinals, some of them Jews, but other Goy cooperators (Masons) ... and that's how they pulled off Vatican II.  As I wrote on the other thread, they thought they had their man in Pius IX, but God "converted" him (at least from extreme liberalism) by the graces of the office and the protection of the Holy Ghost over the papacy.  So that's when they devised the Siri plan ... and it worked.

Bp. Sanborn was interviewed by Stephen Kokx the other day. It was a tidy little Q&A-style primer for sedevacantism. Kokx pitched all of the objections, and Bp. Sanborn swung the bat. The bishop said something that was a home run for me. I won't go into the context or the precise substance of his reply. Rather I will repeat merely the subject and predicate: "The traditional movement was derailed."

Not only would I agree with this, but the details and the ways in which it has been derailed would fill volumes.

One of the primary derailments is the abject failure of the traditionalist clergy/media to precisely define the novus ordo as a Jєωιѕн infiltration and hard military takeover of the worldwide Offices of the Church, starting with the Papacy. I suspect that these men kept quiet for fear of persecution and loss of their 501c3 status.

vatican ii is an act of war. No one says this. No one identifies the nature of the thing. No one identifies the combatants. Rather a perverse propaganda storm has been thrown up in its wake, to the effect either that vatican ii was the peaceful, harmonic, and organic act of the Roman Church, or that it is a mere problem "in the Church."

The warring jews have insisted - both in their conciliar circus and in so-called tradition - that the novus ordo and the Church be professed as being identical. What percentage of traditional Catholics are sedes? 10%? 12%? The vast majority of self-nominated traditionalists - starting with the SSPX - profess this identification, which is utter falsity, utter absurdity.

Worse still, the sedevacantists, who refuse to equate the novus ordo and the Church, nevertheless refuse to precisely qualify the novus ordo. Sedevacantist clergy and media seem to want to avoid naming the jews as operating and controlling the novus ordo, just as they operate and control all infiltrations and revolutions on earth. I refuse to use the term modernists, not because modernists do not exist; but because the term is mostly employed now as a euphemism so that one does not have to make the most correct and most precise nomination. 

The derailment of the traditional counterstrike has always been due to false definitions, false identifications, false explanations, and false predications being shoved down Catholics' throats.

Louis Verrecchio has begun to explicitly identity the novus ordo with the jews. I cannot think of another who has made similar public statements. Now Giuffre is stepping up. God bless him. This truth needs to "go viral." It is the sine qua non of the true defense of the Catholic Faith. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 02:19:03 PM
I understand Hegelian dialects but again it’s the concrete evidence I lack and it’s evidence to the contrary that I see. I can listen to a liar speak truth and then on some major issue they will be forced to show their hand. I have not seen that yet with Candace and I listen to her directly not people who talk about her. I lack any concrete evidence so far.

Things that make you go hmmmm, Volume 39845765698468367:

If Candace is a hound on the heels of ginormous hoaxes, lies, cօռspιʀαcιҽs, and deceptions, why did she join the novus ordo? Why doesn't she expose vatican ii? montini, roncalli, jpii, bergoglio, tucho? It is reported she goes to a Latin Mass. If she is so intelligent and penetrating, and if she got a clue not to go to the filthy novus ordo sacrilege, did she not receive the memo on vatican ii? Has she no interest in this horror come upon the whole earth? Is this not the biggest story since the "moon landing?"

What does she have in common with the daily wire cuck stable? Why, she's promoting the conciliar antichurch. Red flag, Michael. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Everlast22 on November 24, 2025, 02:20:30 PM

Worse still, the sedevacantists, who refuse to equate the novus ordo and the Church, nevertheless refuse to precisely qualify the novus ordo. Sedevacantist clergy and media seem to want to avoid naming the jews as operating and controlling the novus ordo, just as they operate and control all infiltrations and revolutions on earth. I refuse to use the term modernists, not because modernists do not exist; but because the term is mostly employed now as a euphemism so that one does not have to make the most correct and most precise nomination. 


It puts sedes, (or anyone naming Jews) on the target bullseye. I agree though, modernism comes from elightenment Kabbahlists, frankists jews.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: IndultCat on November 24, 2025, 02:41:44 PM
Of course, we all know what you mean by "Tridentine Catholic", where you hold that half of the popes since then were illegitimate Anti-Popes
I do not consider any popes after The Council of Trent to be Anti-Popes. The first Anti-Pope after The Council of Trent was John XXIII.

However, I do believe that Vatican I was an un-necessary and embarrassing failure which paved the way for Vatican II. Had any of the popes between 1870 and 1958 officially "concluded" Vatican I, then I would see things differently. Sadly, however, they did not and that is why Trent was the last "officially concluded and necessary Council."
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 03:24:57 PM
Things that make you go hmmmm, Volume 39845765698468367:

If Candace is a hound on the heels of ginormous hoaxes, lies, cօռspιʀαcιҽs, and deceptions, why did she join the novus ordo? Why doesn't she expose vatican ii? montini, roncalli, jpii, bergoglio, tucho? It is reported she goes to a Latin Mass. If she is so intelligent and penetrating, and if she got a clue not to go to the filthy novus ordo sacrilege, did she not receive the memo on vatican ii? Has she no interest in this horror come upon the whole earth? Is this not the biggest story since the "moon landing?"

What does she have in common with the daily wire cuck stable? Why, she's promoting the conciliar antichurch. Red flag, Michael.
This is an extremely complex question. She does attend the Latin mass in Nashville weekly. I would have attended the one here in Knoxville gladly if they did not just shut it down. From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one. So she does attend what’s left of the tlm until they take hers away too. To us who have come to the faith or came back to the faith the T.L.M is a gift from God despite the circuмstances around it. If the remaining Latin mass is not mass then………. Phew we’re in the worst circuмstances. Why would they bother shutting them down if it was not the last bastion of the faith?
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Justinian on November 24, 2025, 04:19:38 PM
This is an extremely complex question. She does attend the Latin mass in Nashville weekly. I would have attended the one here in Knoxville gladly if they did not just shut it down. From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one. So she does attend what’s left of the tlm until they take hers away too. To us who have come to the faith or came back to the faith the T.L.M is a gift from God despite the circuмstances around it. If the remaining Latin mass is not mass then………. Phew we’re in the worst circuмstances. Why would they bother shutting them down if it was not the last bastion of the faith?
Interesting. Have you got to know Candace and her husband? What do you think her motives are? I don’t doubt she attends the TLM but it seems so strange she’s publicising these death threats. If the deep state wanted her dead she’d be dead now, if she was really a danger she’d be banned from YouTube or at least censored more. Is it possible she’d exaggerating the danger she’s in to get attention, likes, views….??
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 04:37:32 PM
This is an extremely complex question. She does attend the Latin mass in Nashville weekly. I would have attended the one here in Knoxville gladly if they did not just shut it down. From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one. So she does attend what’s left of the tlm until they take hers away too. To us who have come to the faith or came back to the faith the T.L.M is a gift from God despite the circuмstances around it. If the remaining Latin mass is not mass then………. Phew we’re in the worst circuмstances. Why would they bother shutting them down if it was not the last bastion of the faith?

It is a complex question; and it takes many years to wade through everything. I began in the novus ordo, went to the indult, then the SSPX, and now I receive the Sacraments twice a month from a sedevacantist group. As long as you really love the truth and are willing to put the Lord before your own comfort, He will guide you. And most definitely, you are already receiving many graces.

There's something I don't understand. You said, "From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one." I presume you are speaking of yourself, and that you mean that you are now going to look for the novus ordo service said in Latin. Is that right?

Your question, "Why would they bother shutting [the indult Masses] down if it was not the last bastion of the faith," is an excellent one.

I am certain that the people who attend the indult Masses do have the Catholic Faith. They want to be Catholic. This makes them pariahs in the novus ordo. Such folk have been abused and manipulated by the novus ordo since the false council. Ratzinger really threw them a massive curve ball, and a mouthful of poison, with his Summorum Pontificuм. In order to have their special status they had to compromise the Faith. SP teaches, falsely, that there are two "rites" in the Church, ordinary and extraordinary. In order to get the extraordinary, they had to consent to the lie that the novus ordo sacrilege is the official rite of the Roman Church. They had to affirm a lie in order to get their Mass.

You've studied conspiracy enough to understand that getting the consent of the victim, getting him to compromise in some way, is a large part of how they obtain and preserve their power. You've studied the Faith enough to understand that even the tiniest compromise is a mortal sin, for which you will go to hell. The martyrs died rather than make even a minute compromise. 

Along the line, the indult Catholics swallowed many errors. We cannot judge their souls, but we can most certainly identify the errors. These errors, speaking objectively, are mortally fatal to the soul; but we hope that the sin is mitigated by the terrible confusion.

One reason, therefore, to allow the TLM in certain locations is to obtain the compromise and consent of the faithful. It is "TLM as long as you prop up the novus ordo."

Another reason to let them have it is sacrilege. If it is being simulated by invalidly ordained men, then only bread and wine are being adored and distributed. How many indult "priests" are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs? We had one in this diocese, and he was also in the military!

Another reason: Let us give them the TLM, with invalidly ordained priests. We get their sin of compromise, we get their submission to our illegitimate and false authority, and we deprive them of real sacramental grace.

Last reason for now: The hegelian dialectic. The enemy thrives on division. Indult Catholics are divided from novus ordoites, from SSPXers, and from sedevacantists.

Principles must precede action. This is what I meant when I conjectured that you may have launched before navigating the course. Attending an indult TLM violates many principles of both Reason and Faith. Staying inside the novus ordo is, objectively speaking, an act of mortal sin.

A thorough understanding of principles is the only map one can follow in making decisions.

I'm not trying to smash you into submission. You are a work in progress. Let God take His own time with you. But here are the principles I steer by:

1. The novus ordo is not the Roman Catholic Church.

2. The novus ordo hierarchy is a categorical imposture with zero ecclesiastical authority. It's authority is purely human and delegated to it by men who "consent to iniquity." [2 Thes]  As soon as the consent is withdrawn, the whole thing comes down in its own footprint.

3. novus ordo sacraments are invalid. Their priests and bishops are laymen.

Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 05:02:39 PM
Interesting. Have you got to know Candace and her husband? What do you think her motives are? I don’t doubt she attends the TLM but it seems so strange she’s publicising these death threats. If the deep state wanted her dead she’d be dead now, if she was really a danger she’d be banned from YouTube or at least censored more. Is it possible she’d exaggerating the danger she’s in to get attention, likes, views….??
YouTube has actually gotten a lot better. I remember the days when you could learn to build explosives and say whatever you want and those days are slowly coming back. I still have a lifetime ban from creating a channel but they let me watch 😆. I think her motives are part of the larger pushback that’s happening right now that is way way too big to stop. It’s bipartisan as far as polyticks goes and the Catholic faith because of the apologetics scene is BOOMING! The Protestants are not even relevant in the conversation any more. John chrystostostm  has as many people listening to him now as he did when he was alive probably more. I think Candace is part of this larger boom in information. I think the Holy Ghost is moving. The Jews are being exposed but the damage they did in their massive subversion of our culture is at the forefront of the conversation and there is nothing google can do to stop it anymore. Our prayers have hit heaven. We are unstoppable if we stand up. And I think that’s happening. Until she gives me a reason to think otherwise I have to give her the benefit of the doubt. I don’t want to judge her falsely. The specific information she is giving to a massive audience is beneficial to truth. And Truth ieven if spoken from a liar is truth. It’s up to us to determine that. So far what I’ve heard from listening to her show fairly regularly is waking people up. She’s not the best at it, she’s young, she’s sharp but like nick Fuentes she’s effective. There are things to be corrected but there are also golden nuggets to collect. I think our trajectory is a good one. I have not seen this many people interested in such serious problems in my lifetime. From questioning 9/11 to the jfk assassination to Charlie Kirk people are finally waking up to the fact this is a global conspiracy run by billionaire Jews, banker, occult societies, and military industrial complex’s, when she aligns with them on a single issue I will question her but I have not seen that happen since she has converted to the Catholic faith. 🤷‍♂️ I don’t take anyone’s word as gospel. We can’t give humans that much power. But when they speak the truth we should applaud them and when they speak a lie rebuke them. We have to be open to the fact people can and do change. Maybe im too optimistic but i have faith we can change things. We have gotten to used to being lied to and loosing. I won’t bother commenting on her husband because I don’t know much about him. Only there is a controversy they were married to fast and that is not substantial evidence to me
of anything. I do know however the smear campaign against her will be very strong and backed by billions. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 05:13:20 PM
It is a complex question; and it takes many years to wade through everything. I began in the novus ordo, went to the indult, then the SSPX, and now I receive the Sacraments twice a month from a sedevacantist group. As long as you really love the truth and are willing to put the Lord before your own comfort, He will guide you. And most definitely, you are already receiving many graces.

There's something I don't understand. You said, "From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one." I presume you are speaking of yourself, and that you mean that you are now going to look for the novus ordo service said in Latin. Is that right?

Your question, "Why would they bother shutting [the indult Masses] down if it was not the last bastion of the faith," is an excellent one.

I am certain that the people who attend the indult Masses do have the Catholic Faith. They want to be Catholic. This makes them pariahs in the novus ordo. Such folk have been abused and manipulated by the novus ordo since the false council. Ratzinger really threw them a massive curve ball, and a mouthful of poison, with his Summorum Pontificuм. In order to have their special status they had to compromise the Faith. SP teaches, falsely, that there are two "rites" in the Church, ordinary and extraordinary. In order to get the extraordinary, they had to consent to the lie that the novus ordo sacrilege is the official rite of the Roman Church. They had to affirm a lie in order to get their Mass.

You've studied conspiracy enough to understand that getting the consent of the victim, getting him to compromise in some way, is a large part of how they obtain and preserve their power. You've studied the Faith enough to understand that even the tiniest compromise is a mortal sin, for which you will go to hell. The martyrs died rather than make even a minute compromise. 

Along the line, the indult Catholics swallowed many errors. We cannot judge their souls, but we can most certainly identify the errors. These errors, speaking objectively, are mortally fatal to the soul; but we hope that the sin is mitigated by the terrible confusion.

One reason, therefore, to allow the TLM in certain locations is to obtain the compromise and consent of the faithful. It is "TLM as long as you prop up the novus ordo."

Another reason to let them have it is sacrilege. If it is being simulated by invalidly ordained men, then only bread and wine are being adored and distributed. How many indult "priests" are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs? We had one in this diocese, and he was also in the military!

Another reason: Let us give them the TLM, with invalidly ordained priests. We get their sin of compromise, we get their submission to our illegitimate and false authority, and we deprive them of real sacramental grace.

Last reason for now: The hegelian dialectic. The enemy thrives on division. Indult Catholics are divided from novus ordoites, from SSPXers, and from sedevacantists.

Principles must precede action. This is what I meant when I conjectured that you may have launched before navigating the course. Attending an indult TLM violates many principles of both Reason and Faith. Staying inside the novus ordo is, objectively speaking, an act of mortal sin.

A thorough understanding of principles is the only map one can follow in making decisions.

I'm not trying to smash you into submission. You are a work in progress. Let God take His own time with you. But here are the principles I steer by:

1. The novus ordo is not the Roman Catholic Church.

2. The novus ordo hierarchy is a categorical imposture with zero ecclesiastical authority. It's authority is purely human and delegated to it by men who "consent to iniquity." [2 Thes]  As soon as the consent is withdrawn, the whole thing comes down in its own footprint.

3. novus ordo sacraments are invalid. Their priests and bishops are laymen.
No nothing about me what they said in the letter to the Knoxville tlm was they could have the new mass in some form of reverent new mass 😵‍💫 from what I gathered it included some Latin and retains Gregorian chants but will be norvus ordos in structure. Me personally I’m going to the Byzantine mission right around the corner to scout it. Your absolutely right the priest himself at the tlm they just axed put out a letter to the congregation that basically told them if you do not like it we will take away your “ reverent mass as well. It’s crazy. I don’t want to abandon the church but I understand compromise is compromising. I think we are all being forced to compromise in different ways though.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 05:24:08 PM
This is an extremely complex question. She does attend the Latin mass in Nashville weekly. I would have attended the one here in Knoxville gladly if they did not just shut it down. From now on it will be a reverent Latin mass as opposed to the old one. So she does attend what’s left of the tlm until they take hers away too. To us who have come to the faith or came back to the faith the T.L.M is a gift from God despite the circuмstances around it. If the remaining Latin mass is not mass then………. Phew we’re in the worst circuмstances. Why would they bother shutting them down if it was not the last bastion of the faith?

This is very tangential, but slightly probative. 

Let's look at Candace.

From wiki: Owens pursued an undergraduate degree in journalism at the University of Rhode Island. She dropped out after her junior year, saying she had an issue with her student loan. After leaving college, she worked as an intern for Vogue magazine in New York. She took a job in 2012 as an administrative assistant for a private equity firm in Manhattan, later moving up to become its vice president of administration.

ALERT: College dropout lands a job at Vogue, in NYC, and then rapidly climbs up a financial entity ladder. NOT NORMAL.

Equity company: From google: An equity firm is an investment company that raises capital from investors to buy stakes in private companies with the goal of making them more valuable and selling them for a profit.

[If you haven't watched the TPUSA Grift video I posted, you might want to. TSUSA stinks like an equity company with a 501c3 tax exempt status.]

What's a journalism dropout doing at a private equity firm in Manhattan? Echoes of Vance/Thiel and Epstein.   

2015: Raving liberal banshee with her own marketing firm. Made a living out of disgracing trump. ATYPICAL CAREER CURVE.

2016-2017: Converts to "conservativism" and trumpism. SMELLS LIKE RAT.

2017: Picked up by CIA asset charlie kirk to run "communications" for tpusa. SMELLS LIKE GUBMENT.

2018: Becomes best buds with Kanye. WHO'S HANDLING WHO?

2018-2019: On trump's radar and on the radar of other politicos. ASSET DEBUT: GET HER A NAME.

2020: Hired by daily wire. PROPERLY HANDLED STABLE CREATURE.

March 2024: Fired by daily wire. MAN FIRED FROM CANNON ROUTINE. 

April 2024: Converts to novus ordoism. HONEYPOT DEPLOYED.

April 2024 - Present: RIDING THE CIRCUS PONY AROUND THE RING.

I recommend the wiki article. It's a nice sketch of a made woman. 

Candace has long been a member of the antichrist consortium. When she finally "awoke to God," she joined up with the same exact crowd she's been running with all along. She made a lateral move, or you might say she changed her skin.

What would happen to Candace if one day she decided to target the novus ordo? CANCELLED. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: TheRealMcCoy on November 24, 2025, 05:26:43 PM
This is very tangential, but slightly probative.

Let's look at Candace.

From wiki: Owens pursued an undergraduate degree in journalism at the University of Rhode Island. She dropped out after her junior year, saying she had an issue with her student loan. After leaving college, she worked as an intern for Vogue magazine in New York. She took a job in 2012 as an administrative assistant for a private equity firm in Manhattan, later moving up to become its vice president of administration.

ALERT: College dropout lands a job at Vogue, in NYC, and then rapidly climbs up a financial entity ladder. NOT NORMAL.

Equity company: From google: An equity firm is an investment company that raises capital from investors to buy stakes in private companies with the goal of making them more valuable and selling them for a profit.

[If you haven't watched the TPUSA Grift video I posted, you might want to. TSUSA stinks like an equity company with a 501c3 tax exempt status.]

What's a journalism dropout doing at a private equity firm in Manhattan? Echoes of Vance/Thiel and Epstein. 

2015: Raving liberal banshee with her own marketing firm. Made a living out of disgracing trump. ATYPICAL CAREER CURVE.

2016-2017: Converts to "conservativism" and trumpism. SMELLS LIKE RAT.

2017: Picked up by CIA asset charlie kirk to run "communications" for tpusa. SMELLS LIKE GUBMENT.

2018: Becomes best buds with Kanye. WHO'S HANDLING WHO?

2018-2019: On trump's radar and on the radar of other politicos. ASSET DEBUT: GET HER A NAME.

2020: Hired by daily wire. PROPERLY HANDLED STABLE CREATURE.

March 2024: Fired by daily wire. MAN FIRED FROM CANNON ROUTINE.

April 2024: Converts to novus ordoism. HONEYPOT DEPLOYED.

April 2024 - Present: RIDING THE CIRCUS PONY AROUND THE RING.

I recommend the wiki article. It's a nice sketch of a made woman.

Candace has long been a member of the antichrist consortium. When she finally "awoke to God," she joined up with the same exact crowd she's been running with all along. She made a lateral move, or you might say she changed her skin.

What would happen to Candace if one day she decided to target the novus ordo? CANCELLED.
Thank you for laying out the evidence that she is a plant.
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 05:46:35 PM
YouTube has actually gotten a lot better. I remember the days when you could learn to build explosives and say whatever you want and those days are slowly coming back. I still have a lifetime ban from creating a channel but they let me watch 😆. I think her motives are part of the larger pushback that’s happening right now that is way way too big to stop. It’s bipartisan as far as polyticks goes and the Catholic faith because of the apologetics scene is BOOMING! The Protestants are not even relevant in the conversation any more. John chrystostostm  has as many people listening to him now as he did when he was alive probably more. I think Candace is part of this larger boom in information. I think the Holy Ghost is moving. The Jews are being exposed but the damage they did in their massive subversion of our culture is at the forefront of the conversation and there is nothing google can do to stop it anymore. Our prayers have hit heaven. We are unstoppable if we stand up. And I think that’s happening. Until she gives me a reason to think otherwise I have to give her the benefit of the doubt. I don’t want to judge her falsely. The specific information she is giving to a massive audience is beneficial to truth. And Truth ieven if spoken from a liar is truth. It’s up to us to determine that. So far what I’ve heard from listening to her show fairly regularly is waking people up. She’s not the best at it, she’s young, she’s sharp but like nick Fuentes she’s effective. There are things to be corrected but there are also golden nuggets to collect. I think our trajectory is a good one. I have not seen this many people interested in such serious problems in my lifetime. From questioning 9/11 to the jfk assassination to Charlie Kirk people are finally waking up to the fact this is a global conspiracy run by billionaire Jews, banker, occult societies, and military industrial complex’s, when she aligns with them on a single issue I will question her but I have not seen that happen since she has converted to the Catholic faith. 🤷‍♂️ I don’t take anyone’s word as gospel. We can’t give humans that much power. But when they speak the truth we should applaud them and when they speak a lie rebuke them. We have to be open to the fact people can and do change. Maybe im too optimistic but i have faith we can change things. We have gotten to used to being lied to and loosing. I won’t bother commenting on her husband because I don’t know much about him. Only there is a controversy they were married to fast and that is not substantial evidence to me
of anything. I do know however the smear campaign against her will be very strong and backed by billions.

You think the awakening is a tsunami that they cannot stop. My hunch is that they are creating the tsunami and plan to stop it with extreme tyranny.

Remember, they control the weather and the airwaves and the military and the money ... remember that they are currently mass murdering the Palestinians and the Ukrainians. It's the second time they did this to Ukraine. They mass murdered the Chinese and the Vietnamese, etc. They mass murder Africans. They mass murdered the whole world with the jab. They have trafficked more humans than a hundred corn fields have kernels.

They get away with it all.

This so called awakening that you and so many others are applauding - it's a trap. It would not be permitted unless it served their own purposes.

Why does Candace get a youtube channel but you do not?

The Laurel Canyon book I posted goes a long way to reveal that every single person in the world with any kind of massive platform is one of them.

Why was Charlie Manson, as good a singer/songwriter as any other phony in the Canyon, overlooked and ignored by the music industry? I think it is because he lacked the blood pedigree. He was not "sent."
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 05:48:19 PM
This is very tangential, but slightly probative.

Let's look at Candace.

From wiki: Owens pursued an undergraduate degree in journalism at the University of Rhode Island. She dropped out after her junior year, saying she had an issue with her student loan. After leaving college, she worked as an intern for Vogue magazine in New York. She took a job in 2012 as an administrative assistant for a private equity firm in Manhattan, later moving up to become its vice president of administration.

ALERT: College dropout lands a job at Vogue, in NYC, and then rapidly climbs up a financial entity ladder. NOT NORMAL.

Equity company: From google: An equity firm is an investment company that raises capital from investors to buy stakes in private companies with the goal of making them more valuable and selling them for a profit.

[If you haven't watched the TPUSA Grift video I posted, you might want to. TSUSA stinks like an equity company with a 501c3 tax exempt status.]

What's a journalism dropout doing at a private equity firm in Manhattan? Echoes of Vance/Thiel and Epstein. 

2015: Raving liberal banshee with her own marketing firm. Made a living out of disgracing trump. ATYPICAL CAREER CURVE.

2016-2017: Converts to "conservativism" and trumpism. SMELLS LIKE RAT.

2017: Picked up by CIA asset charlie kirk to run "communications" for tpusa. SMELLS LIKE GUBMENT.

2018: Becomes best buds with Kanye. WHO'S HANDLING WHO?

2018-2019: On trump's radar and on the radar of other politicos. ASSET DEBUT: GET HER A NAME.

2020: Hired by daily wire. PROPERLY HANDLED STABLE CREATURE.

March 2024: Fired by daily wire. MAN FIRED FROM CANNON ROUTINE.

April 2024: Converts to novus ordoism. HONEYPOT DEPLOYED.

April 2024 - Present: RIDING THE CIRCUS PONY AROUND THE RING.

I recommend the wiki article. It's a nice sketch of a made woman.

Candace has long been a member of the antichrist consortium. When she finally "awoke to God," she joined up with the same exact crowd she's been running with all along. She made a lateral move, or you might say she changed her skin.

What would happen to Candace if one day she decided to target the novus ordo? CANCELLED.
Keep in mind everying leading up to her joing the tlm in Nashville she was an avid Zionist toeing the party line. I will not hold against her anything up to her conversion. I can’t condemn people for going to what they perceive is still the Catholic faith. If it’s entirely a deception to join even a tlm then it is doomsday and hell will be overloaded. People don’t stand a chance. I’m going to give it time. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 05:50:32 PM
Thank you for laying out the evidence that she is a plant.

And thank you for thinking straight! :cowboy:
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 05:53:20 PM
You think the awakening is a tsunami that they cannot stop. My hunch is that they are creating the tsunami and plan to stop it with extreme tyranny.

Remember, they control the weather and the airwaves and the military and the money ... remember that they are currently mass murdering the Palestinians and the Ukrainians. It's the second time they did this to Ukraine. They mass murdered the Chinese and the Vietnamese, etc. They mass murder Africans. They mass murdered the whole world with the jab. They have trafficked more humans than a hundred corn fields have kernels.

They get away with it all.

This so called awakening that you and so many others are applauding - it's a trap. It would not be permitted unless it served their own purposes.

Why does Candace get a youtube channel but you do not?

The Laurel Canyon book I posted goes a long way to reveal that every single person in the world with any kind of massive platform is one of them.

Why was Charlie Manson, as good a singer/songwriter as any other phony in the Canyon, overlooked and ignored by the music industry? I think it is because he lacked the blood pedigree. He was not "sent."
It may sound cliche’ but don’t forget God. If anything can stop it, they will push us into a global war. But to just give up is just not in my blood. 💪🏻 if we go down we go down swinging and if we go down, we go down martyrs for the truth. I’ve lived long enough. I believe the reason they don’t ban her is because of the striesdan effect. They made nick Fuentes a household name and it backfired 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 05:58:56 PM
Keep in mind everying leading up to her joing the tlm in Nashville she was an avid Zionist toeing the party line. I will not hold against her anything up to her conversion. I can’t condemn people for going to what they perceive is still the Catholic faith. If it’s entirely a deception to join even a tlm then it is doomsday and hell will be overloaded. People don’t stand a chance. I’m going to give it time.

There is abundant cause for hope. Serving God in this century is a heroic act. Being faithful to Him is the cause of all joy. 

If Candace is a big fat shill, nothing changes. Truth is truth. God is God. The fight is still the greatest of all fights. 

That she turns out to be shill, should cause no one any emotional pain or desolation. If it does cause pain or desolation, then there is something that needs to be worked on in the soul. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Simeon on November 24, 2025, 06:01:01 PM
It may sound cliche’ but don’t forget God. If anything can stop it, they will push us into a global war. But to just give up is just not in my blood. 💪🏻 if we go down we go down swinging and if we go down, we go down martyrs for the truth. I’ve lived long enough. I believe the reason they don’t ban her is because of the striesdan effect. They made nick Fuentes a household name and it backfired

Absolutely!

Who is giving up? Shedding shills is just polishing the armor and sharpening the sword.

We fight in God and with God - not in shills and with shills. 
Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Freind on November 24, 2025, 06:25:59 PM
This is very tangential, but slightly probative.

Let's look at Candace.

From wiki: Owens pursued an undergraduate degree in journalism at the University of Rhode Island. She dropped out after her junior year, saying she had an issue with her student loan. After leaving college, she worked as an intern for Vogue magazine in New York. She took a job in 2012 as an administrative assistant for a private equity firm in Manhattan, later moving up to become its vice president of administration.

ALERT: College dropout lands a job at Vogue, in NYC, and then rapidly climbs up a financial entity ladder. NOT NORMAL.

Equity company: From google: An equity firm is an investment company that raises capital from investors to buy stakes in private companies with the goal of making them more valuable and selling them for a profit.

[If you haven't watched the TPUSA Grift video I posted, you might want to. TSUSA stinks like an equity company with a 501c3 tax exempt status.]

What's a journalism dropout doing at a private equity firm in Manhattan? Echoes of Vance/Thiel and Epstein. 

2015: Raving liberal banshee with her own marketing firm. Made a living out of disgracing trump. ATYPICAL CAREER CURVE.

2016-2017: Converts to "conservativism" and trumpism. SMELLS LIKE RAT.

2017: Picked up by CIA asset charlie kirk to run "communications" for tpusa. SMELLS LIKE GUBMENT.

2018: Becomes best buds with Kanye. WHO'S HANDLING WHO?

2018-2019: On trump's radar and on the radar of other politicos. ASSET DEBUT: GET HER A NAME.

2020: Hired by daily wire. PROPERLY HANDLED STABLE CREATURE.

March 2024: Fired by daily wire. MAN FIRED FROM CANNON ROUTINE.

April 2024: Converts to novus ordoism. HONEYPOT DEPLOYED.

April 2024 - Present: RIDING THE CIRCUS PONY AROUND THE RING.

I recommend the wiki article. It's a nice sketch of a made woman.

Candace has long been a member of the antichrist consortium. When she finally "awoke to God," she joined up with the same exact crowd she's been running with all along. She made a lateral move, or you might say she changed her skin.

What would happen to Candace if one day she decided to target the novus ordo? CANCELLED.

You know about "rash judgments", right?
About impugning reputations, right? 





Title: Re: Candace Owens Opinions Please?
Post by: Michaelknoxville on November 24, 2025, 06:30:59 PM
There is abundant cause for hope. Serving God in this century is a heroic act. Being faithful to Him is the cause of all joy.

If Candace is a big fat shill, nothing changes. Truth is truth. God is God. The fight is still the greatest of all fights.

That she turns out to be shill, should cause no one any emotional pain or desolation. If it does cause pain or desolation, then there is something that needs to be worked on in the soul.
I learned all about detachment for the first time not so long ago. It was my first time ever hearing the word and it has quickly become one of my favorites ❤️ it could have saved me a lot of grief in my life just understanding the principle. Of course that applies to all the virtues that I never heard of till recently as well haha 😆 God help us!